collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Skookumchuck continues decline  (Read 11510 times)

Offline Dman

  • Dmanmastertracker
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 1468
Skookumchuck continues decline
« on: September 05, 2007, 09:43:24 AM »
 I asked the question of WDFW about the decline in recent years of the Skoomumchuck unit blacktail. Not good news! No cause has yet been identified for the decline, but this year is expected to be the same as last as far as harvest. I'm wondering if many of the deer used to range down into the Weyerhaeuser land's sold in the Yelm and Mineral areas totaling several thousand acres for new housing. If that's the case, we'll never see the 'glory days' again.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 38900
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #1 on: September 05, 2007, 10:12:46 AM »
Maybe hair loss has had an affect?

Offline WDFW-SUX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5724
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #2 on: September 05, 2007, 10:24:30 AM »
I think poaching is more of an issue around mineral lots of hard up folks in that neck of the woods :dunno:
THE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUCKS MORE THAN EVER..........

Offline Dman

  • Dmanmastertracker
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 1468
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #3 on: September 05, 2007, 10:41:13 AM »
 Hair slip has not been significantly noticed, according to the bio. I think poaching can be an issue outside of Vail proper, but within the mainlines I think it's minimal to nil. My gut tells me it's both habitat loss and overharvest just prior to the habitat loss, as well as 3 dry summers in a row.

Offline billythekidrock

  • Varmint
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 13440
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #4 on: September 05, 2007, 06:35:23 PM »
I agree with the habitat loss and over harvest. The logging, though still ongoing, is less than what it used to be and the cuts are growing into stands of timber therefore less feed. Building is a huge issue in this area as well.




Offline 280ackley

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 1007
  • Location: SWW
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #5 on: September 05, 2007, 09:39:16 PM »
Are we talking population decline or harvest decline?
Life member: Washington Wild Sheep Foundation & NRA

Offline Dman

  • Dmanmastertracker
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 1468
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #6 on: September 05, 2007, 09:39:51 PM »
 This is my theory on the last couple dry summers I hunted the Skook (excluding this summer). Doe's that are fawning in late spring have lower fawn survival rates when water is scarce and it forces them and their offspring to travel greater distances through coyote country in search of water.

Offline Dman

  • Dmanmastertracker
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 1468
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #7 on: September 05, 2007, 09:41:06 PM »
Are we talking population decline or harvest decline?

 Both since 2004.

Offline 280ackley

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 1007
  • Location: SWW
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #8 on: September 05, 2007, 09:50:07 PM »
I agree with the summer theory.  As far as the habitat I don't see much of a change in the harvest of the Vail Tree Farm.  The mixed age of the timber seems to me to be fairly consistant.  Yes there are years that have a higher harvest then others, but it looks fairly even.  I think with a 2 point restriction (spikes can be taken by youth or antlerless permit) the Skook could be a premier blacktail unit.
Life member: Washington Wild Sheep Foundation & NRA

Offline Dman

  • Dmanmastertracker
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 1468
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #9 on: September 05, 2007, 09:53:00 PM »
 A two point rule would be great for the Skook, I don't shoot spike's anyways. If the trend continues another year or so, it may very well happen.

Offline Dman

  • Dmanmastertracker
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 1468
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #10 on: September 07, 2007, 02:56:56 PM »
 Here's an article from last season.

http://www.theolympian.com/103/story/47042.html

Offline Antlershed

  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 4748
  • Location: Olympia, WA
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #11 on: September 07, 2007, 05:55:54 PM »
I would alos be in favor of at least a 2-point min restriction on that unit. I used to live (when I lived with my parents) about 10 minutes from the valley, and about 15 minutes from the E-130 gate. The amount of deer being seen has been declining for a number of years. I wish Weyerhauser would burn their clearcuts up there instead of leaving them dead with no food in them.

Offline 257 Wby Mag

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (-1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 1974
  • Location: Chehalis
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #12 on: September 11, 2007, 09:41:41 PM »
2 point restriction would be the way to go,don't know if it will ever happen though. My property borders Vail, opening morning the headlights come over in a solid stream. what are they shootin'? Spikes. Let the geezers and youth kill spikes, everyone else forked horn or better.
Tod Riechert fan club.

Offline singleshot12

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 3445
  • Location: N.W. Washington
  • WWA,PF
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #13 on: September 12, 2007, 01:39:30 PM »
Some timber company's use herbicides that kill allot of foliage that the deer depend on for food.A 2-point min restriction would definitely be worth a try tho.
NATURE HAS A WAY

"All good things must come to an end"

SEARCHING FOR TRUTH, SEARCHING FOR PURITY, something that doesn't really exist anymore..

Offline Dman

  • Dmanmastertracker
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 1468
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #14 on: September 12, 2007, 04:21:00 PM »
 I saw a study on the use of herbicides done by DNR/ WDFW. Hancock came out as the worst, which I already knew from hiking the Snoqualmie, they definitely are using too heavy a mix from what I've seen with my own eyes (and smelled!). I've not noticed herbicede's at all in Vail, I think that they are so aggressive about planting/ burning the fresh cuts, that weeds don't really take hold as much. I know from being a WSDA licensed herbicides consultant for nearly ten years that many of the regulations have been relaxed too much in recent years. You don't want to know what is being sprayed around these days!!

Offline sagerat

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 668
  • Location: Blacktail Country
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #15 on: September 12, 2007, 07:35:56 PM »
I'd be all for the 2 point min. also. I wish they would do that in most of the blacktail range. How about 3 point min?

Offline 257 Wby Mag

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (-1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 1974
  • Location: Chehalis
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #16 on: September 13, 2007, 12:29:57 AM »
I didn't mention it cause I figured I would have got thrown under the bus. Anymore I don't shoot anything but 3 or 4 points, spikes and forks for geezers and youths, I'd go for that.
Tod Riechert fan club.

Offline PolarBear

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 10468
  • Location: Tatooine
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #17 on: September 13, 2007, 06:01:33 AM »
I'm the same way, I wont shoot a blackie unless it is 3pt or better.  I would also like to see the point restrictions raised to 2 or 3 pt in certain units.  Coming from someone who lives at the foot of Vail, I think a lot of the problem in the Shookumchuck is due to overharvest of immature bucks & does and the exploding number of predators.  I shoot anywhere from 20-40 coyotes a year in the Skook and am not even making a dent in the population.  I have seen fawn mortality rates rise dramatically over the past few years.  I have one of my pastures planted in several types of clover for the deer to munch on and we are only seeing 3-5 fawns a season instead of the 8-10 that we use to.  Also, check out the pics, and talk to Chauncey (Buzz) at the Vail check station and see how many 1 1/2 and 2 1/2 year old bucks and does are coming through and the condition that they are in.  It makes me sick to see what so called "hunters" are doing to these critters.  We saw one spike (less than 1 1/2" tall) that was shot 7 times with a .7mm mag, mostly in the ass and guts.   >:(  There was about 10 lbs of meat left on the poor little guy.  I have said for years to the guys at the the check atation that they need to put a 3 pt+ restriction on Vail, eliminate doe permits and make it a limited access draw area .  It has great potential to be a trophy machine again if just managed right.

Offline Dman

  • Dmanmastertracker
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 1468
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #18 on: September 13, 2007, 08:09:14 AM »
 I agree, I've harvested one nice 3x4 in Vail and passed on a 4" spike. I saw just last season a guy shoot at a spike nine times with a rest!?!

Offline singleshot12

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 3445
  • Location: N.W. Washington
  • WWA,PF
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #19 on: September 13, 2007, 08:17:45 AM »
The problem with not harvesting 2 points is there are alot of mature 2 points that will always be 2 points.If most of the 3's and 4's are taken guess which ones are left to do the breeding.That's how certain areas end up only producing mature 2 points.I think after a few decades this happens.
NATURE HAS A WAY

"All good things must come to an end"

SEARCHING FOR TRUTH, SEARCHING FOR PURITY, something that doesn't really exist anymore..

Offline 257 Wby Mag

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (-1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 1974
  • Location: Chehalis
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #20 on: September 13, 2007, 12:39:15 PM »
Right on Polarbear, I live on the south side of Vail on the North Fork. I make it a point to bait coyotes everey year, smoke 15-20 a year as well. I took a guy from work bowhunting in there the first Sunday of archery, 45 deer, only one buck, a spike. There were also VERY few fawns. Of course the longtails don't help either, the nieghber had 2 sitting in the edge of his yard last year, killed one. When I logged in Vail about 12 years ago it always amazed me how many spikes got smoked on the opener. Vail does have great potential to be a trophy area, sad to say we will never see it though. With the cost of feul,tags,etc, its a pretty lame excuse for these older hunters to kill spikes for the meat. Just my 2 cents
Tod Riechert fan club.

Offline Red Leg

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2007
  • Posts: 65
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #21 on: September 13, 2007, 05:09:10 PM »
Anyone know what the harvest statistics where last season for the
Shookumchuck, as well as other areas. How many spikes, 2pt, 3pt etc.? I only see the total harvest on the wdfw site.

Offline Dman

  • Dmanmastertracker
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 1468
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #22 on: September 14, 2007, 09:05:04 AM »
 They generally don't show the age class, though if you sift through articles of the "Olympian" online, you may find a Vail article on what was checked in at the check station last year. I hunted it and I did see a nice 4pt. shot on the hill next to me, but other than that all spikes and two points.

Offline bearmanric

  • RIP Colockumelk
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 4176
  • Location: Tenino Wa
  • Tenino Wa
    • Rick Robbins  rrcalls
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #23 on: September 23, 2007, 08:59:50 PM »
Lot's of doe tag's and lot's of cougar. i use to call alot around the dam. lot's of cougar 's there. Rick
RIP Colockumelk
Facebook rrcalls no website.

Offline 280ackley

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 1007
  • Location: SWW
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #24 on: October 27, 2007, 08:17:32 PM »
bearmanric you are right about the cougar's, I saw four there today.  Yes FOUR!!!  It looked like a female with three grown kittens.  They were almost as big as her. 

What is everyones experience with the season and deer population this year?  I have seen some nice bucks posted on this site, congrats to you.
« Last Edit: October 27, 2007, 08:42:37 PM by bearmartin »
Life member: Washington Wild Sheep Foundation & NRA

Offline cipryan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 99
  • Location: Merica
  • The Mighty Milk River
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #25 on: October 27, 2007, 09:16:43 PM »
I was also up near the dam and found a big kitty had ran everything out of there.

Need to harvest the doe numbers a little and raise the pt minimum.  I think that would help.  But with all the predators it would probably be a crapshoot to the does.
Tell me how many pieces of flair you want me to wear.

Offline LongTatLaw

  • Suckling Slayer!
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2007
  • Posts: 1784
  • Location: Olympia
  • My 2009 West WA - Shotgun kitty Kat
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #26 on: October 27, 2007, 10:15:02 PM »
I called in 2 different 2x2 bucks this morning in the fog. One looked like he would easily go over 200 pounds. They came in mad and lonely! So, there are at least 2 2x2 bucks in skookumchuck!

Not what I was looking for but neat to have them sneak in bristled up and looking for a fight!!

had some cows mewing and one bugle too!

so, the skook is still worth hunting to me! ;)

Offline billythekidrock

  • Varmint
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 13440
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #27 on: October 28, 2007, 08:57:42 AM »
Quote
Not what I was looking for but neat to have them sneak in bristled up and looking for a fight!!

What were ya looking for?




Offline Antlershed

  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 4748
  • Location: Olympia, WA
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #28 on: October 28, 2007, 11:11:59 AM »
had some cows mewing and one bugle too!
A cow bugled? jk  :chuckle:

I got my 2-point up at vail this year. Saw some spikes that barely made the legal requirements to be a buck cruising around in the back of trucks. Saw one spike on top of a Yukon at 9am and they were still driving aorund with it on top at 7pm. That was the day it was 65-70*. Why don't some people care for their game?

I would love to see it go to 2-point minimum, and wouldn't be heartbroken if they upped it to 3-point min.

Offline billythekidrock

  • Varmint
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 13440
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #29 on: October 28, 2007, 04:11:04 PM »
Quote
Saw one spike on top of a Yukon at 9am and they were still driving aorund with it on top at 7pm. That was the day it was 65-70*. Why don't some people care for their game?

Some people don't get it.




Offline actionshooter

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 5760
  • Location: Olympia/Okanogan
    • https://www.instagram.com/steve.bell.actionshooter/
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #30 on: October 28, 2007, 08:11:58 PM »
 I went up there this morning didn't see to many (6) but I did see a MONSTER at a jack fir edge. It was 598 according to the rangefinder, tried to move in for a shot and never saw him again.
 Typical day, everyone sits on a cut until about 8:30 then its a road hunting circle track   :bash:

Offline Mike450r

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 1213
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #31 on: October 29, 2007, 08:43:52 AM »
I would love to see it go to 2-point minimum, and wouldn't be heartbroken if they upped it to 3-point min.
[/quote]

The state has discussed this with Weyerhauser and thats as far as it will go.  Weyerhauser would be happy if there wasn't a single wild animal left on their property.  They want as many deer out of there as possible. 

The thing with Vail is a lot of those spikes aren't going to get much more than what they are, they have so many deer in there that breeding age spikes are contributing to the gene pool.  They age the spikes and they aren't yearlings in most cases.  They would do better to have a year of spike only do away with the "any" deer tag and call them antlerless tags.

Offline cipryan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 99
  • Location: Merica
  • The Mighty Milk River
Re: Skookumchuck continues decline
« Reply #32 on: October 29, 2007, 09:18:30 AM »
spikes breed in all areas.  one buck, dominant or not, breeds with 10-12 does max.  Spikes sneak in there and take what they can get and usuallly it turns out to be quite a lot.  This happens all the time in whitetail country.  Bring the doe numbers down and build a healthier buck to doe ratio and you will have bigger bucks.  They will become dominant and gigundous with the right conservation. 
Tell me how many pieces of flair you want me to wear.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal