collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Should 209 primers be legal?  (Read 40621 times)

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21190
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Should 209 primers be legal?
« on: October 04, 2017, 04:01:32 PM »
WDFW WILDLIFE PROGRAM
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
600 Capitol Way North, Olympia, WA 98501-1091
wildthing@dfw.wa.gov

Dear Elk and Deer Hunters,

As part of the outreach to the hunting public for the upcoming 2018-2020 three-year hunting season package, the Fish and Wildlife Commission requested the department include a discussion of muzzleloader equipment.  Therefore, we are conducting a short survey at this time that is specific to whether 209 primers should be allowed as part of the ignition system for muzzleloader firearms during muzzleloader seasons.  Currently, 209 primers or any primer designed to be used in centerfire cartridges are not allowed for muzzleloader hunting in Washington state except for muzzleloaders used during modern firearm seasons. 

Please take 5 minutes out of your busy schedule to answer the four questions in the survey at the link provided below.  The department will consider all survey input received before October 31 at 5:00 p.m.

Link: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/N2JZMPG

Thank you for all that you do for wildlife in the state of Washington and thank you for your interest in hunting season development for the 2018-2020 seasons.

Respectfully,

Anis Aoude
Game Division manager
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline bowhunterforever

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 8540
  • Location: Lincoln, Co
Re: Should 209 primers be legal?
« Reply #1 on: October 04, 2017, 04:18:49 PM »
No
You sure you know how to skin griz pilgram

Offline Duckslayer89

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2014
  • Posts: 4081
  • Location: Cut Bank, Montana
Re: Should 209 primers be legal?
« Reply #2 on: October 04, 2017, 04:27:51 PM »
I just got on here to post this. I say hell ya and keep the open sights rule. Washington is so wet and rainy let us use the 209 primers.

Offline Mfowl

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2012
  • Posts: 4152
  • Location: westside
Re: Should 209 primers be legal?
« Reply #3 on: October 04, 2017, 04:29:38 PM »
No, you can use them during modern season already. Keep it a primitive weapon season.
Fish hard, hunt harder!

Online CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 6453
  • Location: Mukilteo
Re: Should 209 primers be legal?
« Reply #4 on: October 04, 2017, 04:34:09 PM »
Yes.  Scopes too.

Offline steeleywhopper

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 1602
  • Location: Snohomish co.
Re: Should 209 primers be legal?
« Reply #5 on: October 04, 2017, 04:38:46 PM »
Let us use 209,it’s just an ignition source it’s not turning a muzzy into a 7mm-08.
Politicians like Jay Inslee are the reason we have the 2nd Amendment

Offline cm2cb4

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Feb 2015
  • Posts: 25
  • Location: Port Orchard
  • Groups: NRA, RMEF, TU
Re: Should 209 primers be legal?
« Reply #6 on: October 04, 2017, 05:27:09 PM »
Just submitted the survey with a resounding yes. I wish I could have added a comment though. I think that 209 is fine as long as primitive / No 11 primer users get to hunt the last week of archery into the first week of October. Then 209 users get the first weekend of October up to modern rifle. After that, all can add scopes unless you have a medical reason for placing on a scope during muzzy season. Spreads the season out a bit and gives everyone a fair chance

Offline vandeman17

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 14119
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: Should 209 primers be legal?
« Reply #7 on: October 04, 2017, 05:36:04 PM »
Just submitted the survey with a resounding yes. I wish I could have added a comment though. I think that 209 is fine as long as primitive / No 11 primer users get to hunt the last week of archery into the first week of October. Then 209 users get the first weekend of October up to modern rifle. After that, all can add scopes unless you have a medical reason for placing on a scope during muzzy season. Spreads the season out a bit and gives everyone a fair chance

In a word, no.
" I have hunted almost every day of my life, the rest have been wasted"

Offline rackattack

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 648
  • Location: Battle Ground
Re: Should 209 primers be legal?
« Reply #8 on: October 04, 2017, 05:44:17 PM »
Wish I could have commented on my no answer.  I like it the way it is, if you want a modern ignition system then go modern firearm season.  My worry is then muzzleloading success goes up and I lose more days that I can hunt. :twocents:

Offline Mallardmasher

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2016
  • Posts: 394
  • Location: Port Orchard, Washington
  • IBEW LU 46
  • Groups: CCA WWA
Re: Should 209 primers be legal?
« Reply #9 on: October 04, 2017, 05:58:57 PM »
No
[/quote

Nor should compound bows, carbon arrows or expanding broad heads. Right
I said yes, people are wrapping their breaches with siran wrap. Taping their barrel, we live in a rain forest. Anything to make your shot more powerful, it is not going to increase your range.
USN 1985-94, IBEW Local 46 1994-Present
Matt

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14351
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: Should 209 primers be legal?
« Reply #10 on: October 04, 2017, 06:05:30 PM »
I had to put no.  Until WDFW determines if it is supposed to be a primitive season or muzzleloading season, I'll defer to primitive. If just a muzzleloading season then scopes/209/two barrels/etc would be fine, but I would need to see how they move seasons and adjust lengths first.
Let us use 209,it’s just an ignition source it’s not turning a muzzy into a 7mm-08.
maybe not that extreme, but it does add quite a bit to the muzzy.  The hottest #11 magnums or musket caps are really only good for about 110-120 gr of FFg or two pellets.  With the 209s you can go to 150+ gr or FFg or use three pellets.

Offline Duckslayer89

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2014
  • Posts: 4081
  • Location: Cut Bank, Montana
Re: Should 209 primers be legal?
« Reply #11 on: October 04, 2017, 06:12:13 PM »
I had to put no.  Until WDFW determines if it is supposed to be a primitive season or muzzleloading season, I'll defer to primitive. If just a muzzleloading season then scopes/209/two barrels/etc would be fine, but I would need to see how they move seasons and adjust lengths first.
Let us use 209,it’s just an ignition source it’s not turning a muzzy into a 7mm-08.
maybe not that extreme, but it does add quite a bit to the muzzy.  The hottest #11 magnums or musket caps are really only good for about 110-120 gr of FFg or two pellets.  With the 209s you can go to 150+ gr or FFg or use three pellets.

I don't think the extra 50 grains really gives the bullet all that much more power but could be wrong

Offline Whitenuckles

  • Transplanted Cajun
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 1228
  • Location: Sno valley
Re: Should 209 primers be legal?
« Reply #12 on: October 04, 2017, 06:14:46 PM »
I don't muzzy hunt often. But I voted yes. Anything to advance the hunters agenda and not the tree huggers is a win in my book. :twocents:
GEAUX TIGERS

Online CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 6453
  • Location: Mukilteo
Re: Should 209 primers be legal?
« Reply #13 on: October 04, 2017, 06:16:21 PM »
I had to put no.  Until WDFW determines if it is supposed to be a primitive season or muzzleloading season, I'll defer to primitive. If just a muzzleloading season then scopes/209/two barrels/etc would be fine, but I would need to see how they move seasons and adjust lengths first.
Let us use 209,it’s just an ignition source it’s not turning a muzzy into a 7mm-08.
maybe not that extreme, but it does add quite a bit to the muzzy.  The hottest #11 magnums or musket caps are really only good for about 110-120 gr of FFg or two pellets.  With the 209s you can go to 150+ gr or FFg or use three pellets.

That's not my experience.  I shoot 209s at the range over chrono and the FPS difference over musket caps is insignificant.  velocity peaks around 110g and actually decreases with more powder -209 or MCs no difference

Offline tbotts

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Hunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 128
Re: Should 209 primers be legal?
« Reply #14 on: October 04, 2017, 06:16:38 PM »
i voted yes.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Springer Fishing Opportunity 3/29 & 3/30 by Blacklab
[Today at 12:48:56 PM]


Long Beach Clamming Tides by dilleytech
[Today at 12:39:19 PM]


Let’s see your best Washington buck by abhold87
[Today at 12:03:27 PM]


Bearpaw Season - Spring 2024 by bearpaw
[Today at 11:45:41 AM]


Walked a cougar down by Rainier10
[Today at 11:17:49 AM]


SB 5444 signed by Inslee on 03/26 Takes Effect on 06/06/24 by hughjorgan
[Today at 09:03:26 AM]


Springer 2024 Columbia River by WSU
[Today at 08:31:10 AM]


Average by lhrbull
[Today at 07:31:56 AM]


CVA optima V2 LR tapped hole for front sight by Remdawg
[Today at 07:09:22 AM]


Which 12” boat trailer tires? by timberhunter
[Yesterday at 08:22:18 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal