collapse

Advertisement


Poll

Is it time to push for a new system, draw, alternating year, etc?

No
Yes

Author Topic: Washington State Mule Deer Hunting Future (poll)  (Read 40030 times)

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32690
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Washington State Mule Deer Hunting Future (poll)
« Reply #60 on: October 11, 2017, 09:53:57 AM »
Good stuff guys, both ways. :tup:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline Boss .300 winmag

  • FLY NAVAL AVIATION
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+22)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 17764
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • How do you measure trying, you do, or you don’t.
Re: Washington State Mule Deer Hunting Future (poll)
« Reply #61 on: October 11, 2017, 10:14:43 AM »
Go to 4 point or better modern, 3 point or better archery, no doe tags for anyone. Start managing the predators.
"Just because I like granola, and I have stretched my arms around a few trees, doesn't mean I'm a tree hugger!
Hi I'm 8156, our leader is Bearpaw.
YOU CANNOT REASON WITH A TIGER WHEN YOUR HEAD IS IN ITS MOUTH! Winston Churchill

Keep Calm And Duc/Ski Doo On!

Offline trapp01

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 131
  • Location: North Bend
Re: Washington State Mule Deer Hunting Future (poll)
« Reply #62 on: October 11, 2017, 10:30:05 AM »
I voted no. I fear reducing opportunity to hunt (draw only) would reduce hunter recruitment, which is the future of the sport, also reducing revenue. Draw only for mule deer would only bolster buck to doe ratios. If you really would like to see herd numbers rise then slash antlerless hunts and increase predator harvest.

Offline lunchbox

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 35
  • Location: Eastern Washington
Re: Washington State Mule Deer Hunting Future (poll)
« Reply #63 on: October 11, 2017, 12:16:52 PM »
I've lived in Okanogan county for 39 years and it's the worst i've ever seen it for mule deer numbers. Even across the river in Douglas county it's bad real bad!!

Offline Smokepole

  • Kevin Miller
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 2315
  • Location: Upper Skyberian
Re: Washington State Mule Deer Hunting Future (poll)
« Reply #64 on: October 11, 2017, 12:58:26 PM »
Cut back on doe tags.  Hunt more predators.  Get rid of wolves entirely.  Reduce special hunt opportunities temporarily.  Kill the high buck hunt for a couple years.  Cut back the duration of archery seasons.  Open the general rifle season earlier, and reduce it to 7-9 days for mule deer.

Also increase fines for poaching and wildlife harassment.  Use high fines to curb mortality from domestic dogs. 

We need to do a lot of these things to protect the mule deer.  They aren't very adaptable.   :twocents:

Offline Bigshooter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 6366
  • Location: Lewis Co
  • High Wide And Heavy
Re: Washington State Mule Deer Hunting Future (poll)
« Reply #65 on: October 11, 2017, 01:17:02 PM »
I voted yes because something needs to be done.  But I don't see how reducing buck harvest grows herds.  In fact I've read tons of the opposite to be true, that to many bucks can hurt herd health.  The Gunnison Basin in CO is a prime example of that.  CO in general is a good example.
Welcome to liberal America, where the truth is condemned and facts are ignored so as not to "offend" anyone


"Borders, language, culture."

Offline Deerelk37

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Oct 2016
  • Posts: 63
  • Location: Auburn
Re: Washington State Mule Deer Hunting Future (poll)
« Reply #66 on: October 11, 2017, 02:40:08 PM »
Increase predator harvest. Perhaps by allowing bait again or offering second tags to those few who do harvest a predator. Manage the wolves with a regional quota (has anyone see the map of "packs"?)

 I am in favor of choosing east or west or reducing mule deer rifle to even one weekend through the following friday. Tbh I am in favor of anything the game dept will actually do...before it's too late. I haven't hunted mule deer since 2015-I can't ask to solve a problem, if I am part of it.

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32690
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Washington State Mule Deer Hunting Future (poll)
« Reply #67 on: October 11, 2017, 02:42:43 PM »
 I hope those of you proposing wolf hunts, don't want more wolves in this state than we have now. :twocents:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 24823
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Washington State Mule Deer Hunting Future (poll)
« Reply #68 on: October 11, 2017, 02:48:36 PM »
The Crux of this problem is evident in so many peoples posts. A huge component of this issue is not under sportmens control. Many are mistaken that we can effect some meaningful change by altering the small portion we can control. If only it were that easy.

Part of the issue  IMO is that many are willing to dedicate a huge amount of time to hunting Deer and Elk but that is not the case with predator hunting, with exception of a few hunters.
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline Deerelk37

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Oct 2016
  • Posts: 63
  • Location: Auburn
Re: Washington State Mule Deer Hunting Future (poll)
« Reply #69 on: October 11, 2017, 03:51:53 PM »
The Crux of this problem is evident in so many peoples posts. A huge component of this issue is not under sportmens control. Many are mistaken that we can effect some meaningful change by altering the small portion we can control. If only it were that easy.

Part of the issue  IMO is that many are willing to dedicate a huge amount of time to hunting Deer and Elk but that is not the case with predator hunting, with exception of a few hunters.

I have had the same thought lately. I plan on doing some coyote hunting this winter, I figure I need something to do and anything to help the deer and elk populations I am down for. I went out bear hunting for the first time this year but didn't see a bear. I would harvest one every year if I could. It was kind of a daunting task this year as I had no clue where to start. If anyone on here would be willing to take me out next year or give me some pointers I would graciously oblige.  :chuckle:

Offline DOUBLELUNG

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5836
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: Washington State Mule Deer Hunting Future (poll)
« Reply #70 on: October 11, 2017, 04:01:39 PM »
I voted no mainly because of the "hope and change" lack of specificity in the poll mentioned previously.  That doesn't mean I would not favor certain changes.  I do believe we can continue to hunt buck mule deer every year under 3-point or better, without negatively affecting herd size or herd health.  I would like to see multiseason deer permit hunting done away with for mule deer, with relatively small harvest opportunities with depressed herds we don't need one subgroup with greater opportunities.   

I would like to see herd management prioritized over the current emphasis on opportunity and resource allocation.  Currently, herd managers have their hands tied by efforts to equalize success between user groups, that means it is nearly impossible with mule deer specifically to have archers have enough success without allowing antlerless harvest.  Same goes for pressure for increased harvest opportunities for youth, senior, disabled, and enough antlerless and second deer permits areas to get hunters to buy the special permit applications ($$$).  All of those are fine when numbers are high, the problem is they don't go away when numbers are down.  Prioritize protecting the reproductive segment of the herds over equalizing success between user groups and providing doe harvest opportunities.

I would like to see all mule deer hunting, general and special permit, end before the rut.  Over time this will increase the quality of general hunt trophy opportunities; more important, it will allow deer to breed and not expend precious energy avoiding hunters right before going into winter.  Better condition deer after November means higher winter survival, heavier birth weights, and may allow better mate selection by does.  Bona fide agricultural damage can be addressed on a case by case basis administered by WDFW's damage control specialists. 

I would like to see all public land winter ranges closed to motorized access December through March.  Including snowmobiles.  It continues to amaze me that this state - including the USFS - allow running snow mobiles on crucial winter ranges.   

I would encourage more mule deer hunters to take up serious predator hunting - if you want predator control, that is the ONLY way it is going to happen given Washington's human population.  The government isn't going to do it. 

I would like to see the USFS have success in not diverting their resource management funding to firefighting.  Open canopied forest stands are both resilient to crown fires, and produce a LOT more nutritious forage than overstocked, closed canopy timber.  Log the diseased stands while the trees are still alive, manage the reprod/regen to NOT create another closed canopy stand.  Cool understory fires are great for mule deer - stand replacing, soil sterilizing hellfire is not. 

Full disclosure: I do not voluntarily limit myself, but am willing to share being limited with everyone.  In the meantime, I will continue to apply for whatever opportunities are available, and use them when I draw.
As long as we have the habitat, we can argue forever about who gets to kill what and when.  No habitat = no game.

Offline ian_padron

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 389
  • Location: Snohomish
Re: Washington State Mule Deer Hunting Future (poll)
« Reply #71 on: October 11, 2017, 04:17:11 PM »
Is this thread going to be forwarded to WDFW? Because it definitely should.

Sent from my LG-H872 using Tapatalk


Offline NoBark

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 565
Re: Washington State Mule Deer Hunting Future (poll)
« Reply #72 on: October 11, 2017, 05:05:06 PM »
I'd have to say that without taking other steps first, it's just wishful thinking.   If you can't limit predators by having a season and limit on how many predators we allow, if we can't do away with the multi-season deer tag that puts additional pressure on a declining resource, if we can't count on help in helping the deer herd from anyone BUT hunters ( and I believe this is the case ) I'm afraid it will be a simple case of hunters limiting themselves until there are virtually no deer left.

Offline Mr Mykiss

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 1832
Re: Washington State Mule Deer Hunting Future (poll)
« Reply #73 on: October 11, 2017, 09:02:39 PM »
WA mule deer hunting is a joke, anyone who knows anything knows that. Hell, even OR makes WA look bad!!
It is hard to follow one great vision in a world of darkness and of many changing shadows. Among these shadows men get lost.
-Black Elk

Offline jagermiester

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 868
  • Location: Burien
  • My family is my life
Re: Washington State Mule Deer Hunting Future (poll)
« Reply #74 on: October 11, 2017, 09:25:33 PM »
I voted no because I believe that the does need to be protected from predators. We all need to start hunting cats  ;)
Seriously though there is no coming back from such a drastic change as what is being proposed. Deer numbers fluctuate but we are the true conservationist. Support habitat change, lobby to bring back hound hunting. But take away hunting opportunities does not breed future hunters and without future hunters we are all screwed.
In one year 100 deer can turn into 150
year two 250
year three 400
Kill a cat :o
Lead em if they're running.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Bearpaw Season - Spring 2024 by Machias
[Today at 09:19:44 AM]


SB 5444 signed by Inslee on 03/26 Takes Effect on 06/06/24 by hughjorgan
[Today at 09:03:26 AM]


Walked a cougar down by 2MANY
[Today at 08:56:26 AM]


Springer 2024 Columbia River by WSU
[Today at 08:31:10 AM]


Average by lhrbull
[Today at 07:31:56 AM]


Let’s see your best Washington buck by Pathfinder101
[Today at 07:22:11 AM]


CVA optima V2 LR tapped hole for front sight by Remdawg
[Today at 07:09:22 AM]


Which 12” boat trailer tires? by timberhunter
[Yesterday at 08:22:18 PM]


Lowest power 22 round? by JakeLand
[Yesterday at 08:06:13 PM]


1x scopes vs open sights by JakeLand
[Yesterday at 07:29:35 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal