collapse

Author Topic: Wolf Prints in the snow  (Read 2033 times)

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+22)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 38251
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: WSB RMGA NRA RMEF BHA
Wolf Prints in the snow
« Reply #30 on: December 05, 2018, 08:24:03 PM »
They are either coyotes or house pets unless the state says there are wolves there which they seldom do.
So if I am in a area the state says there are no wolves that make any canine in that area fair game. It is what it is.
Just because you think you seen a wolf or a wolf track doesn't mean you really seen a wolf or a wolf track.the state will tell you other wise. So I listen to what these liars say and take appropriate actions.

Sooooooo......If a moose is standing in the middle of downtown Seattle, is it still a moose, or is it a deer because WDFW says there are no moose in downtown Seattle? Based on this logic, youíre ok shooting said mystery moose/deer creature in deer season because itís not a moose?
:fire.:

" In today's instant gratification society, more and more pressure revolves around success and the measurement of one's prowess as a hunter by inches on a score chart or field photos produced on social media. Don't fall into the trap. Hunting is-and always will be- about the hunt, the adventure, the views, and time spent with close friends and family. " Ryan Hatfield

My posts, opinions and statements do not represent those of this forum

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 5783
Re: Wolf Prints in the snow
« Reply #31 on: December 06, 2018, 09:51:17 AM »
If WDFW say there are no wolves in an area then the public must take their word for it, after all WDFW are soooooooo honest....


WDFW is literally creating the hate of wolves! If they would take care of problem animals and show equal consideration for our other wildlife, many people would be far more receptive to having a reasonable wolf population.  :twocents:

 :yeah:


I think most people by now have their own idea on what needs to be done. WDF&Wolves etc. have shown they have no plans of trying to control their wolves, or manage ungulate herds to promote hunting.

Folks are and will take care of wolf problems on their own, WDFW has no appetite in confirming wolves until they are forced to do so, dragging delisting out until wolves have had the opportunity to expand and do as much damage as possible. Wolves will never be controlled in WA, the public will be responsible for defending their communities, animals etc..


Offline cavemann

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2014
  • Posts: 420
  • Location: Washington
Re: Wolf Prints in the snow
« Reply #32 on: December 06, 2018, 10:25:57 AM »
They are either coyotes or house pets unless the state says there are wolves there which they seldom do.
So if I am in a area the state says there are no wolves that make any canine in that area fair game. It is what it is.
Just because you think you seen a wolf or a wolf track doesn't mean you really seen a wolf or a wolf track.the state will tell you other wise. So I listen to what these liars say and take appropriate actions.

Sooooooo......If a moose is standing in the middle of downtown Seattle, is it still a moose, or is it a deer because WDFW says there are no moose in downtown Seattle? Based on this logic, youíre ok shooting said mystery moose/deer creature in deer season because itís not a moose?

jackelope..  While I understand where you are coming I also understand the frustration from those saying "no wolves, must be a coyote."  In other states precedence has been set based off of assumed knowledge it is reasonable an animal could be mistaken that is not there based off of what wild life management assertions are.  If they say they are not there, we reasonably would assume they are not there..  Not trying to argue your point, but agree that WDFW's failure to not identify kills and confirm wolves in an area where they certainly are could make for an interesting defense..

https://www.news-leader.com/story/news/2017/11/13/missouri-girl-14-thought-she-shooting-deer-when-she-pulled-trigger/858472001/
« Last Edit: December 06, 2018, 10:55:38 AM by cavemann »

Offline Taco280AI

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2013
  • Posts: 1270
  • Location: FL350
Re: Wolf Prints in the snow
« Reply #33 on: December 06, 2018, 10:45:35 AM »
Coyotes. Shoot them.

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+22)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 38251
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: WSB RMGA NRA RMEF BHA
Re: Wolf Prints in the snow
« Reply #34 on: December 06, 2018, 11:13:17 AM »
They are either coyotes or house pets unless the state says there are wolves there which they seldom do.
So if I am in a area the state says there are no wolves that make any canine in that area fair game. It is what it is.
Just because you think you seen a wolf or a wolf track doesn't mean you really seen a wolf or a wolf track.the state will tell you other wise. So I listen to what these liars say and take appropriate actions.

Sooooooo......If a moose is standing in the middle of downtown Seattle, is it still a moose, or is it a deer because WDFW says there are no moose in downtown Seattle? Based on this logic, you’re ok shooting said mystery moose/deer creature in deer season because it’s not a moose?

jackelope..  While I understand where you are coming I also understand the frustration from those saying "no wolves, must be a coyote."  In other states precedence has been set based off of assumed knowledge it is reasonable an animal could be mistaken that is not there based off of what wild life management assertions are.  If they say they are not there, we reasonably would assume they are not there..  Not trying to argue your point, but agree that WDFW's failure to not identify kills and confirm wolves in an area where they certainly are could make for an interesting defense..

https://www.news-leader.com/story/news/2017/11/13/missouri-girl-14-thought-she-shooting-deer-when-she-pulled-trigger/858472001/

With all due respect, when they can't "confirm" wolves presence, does that mean the same thing as them saying there are no wolves? Or does it simply mean they can't confirm the presence of wolves in an area? I guarantee you, especially with all the crap they take from both sides of the aisle, WDFW is not going to say one way or the other, that an animal is a wolf without being able to scientifically verify or confirm it was in fact a wolf. Doesn't seem like rocket science to me.
:fire.:

" In today's instant gratification society, more and more pressure revolves around success and the measurement of one's prowess as a hunter by inches on a score chart or field photos produced on social media. Don't fall into the trap. Hunting is-and always will be- about the hunt, the adventure, the views, and time spent with close friends and family. " Ryan Hatfield

My posts, opinions and statements do not represent those of this forum

Offline cavemann

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2014
  • Posts: 420
  • Location: Washington
Re: Wolf Prints in the snow
« Reply #35 on: December 06, 2018, 11:26:13 AM »
agreed Jackelope, I guess I was just also trying to give a little credence to both sides..  If it is taken at face value there have been live stock kills and kill sites that could have been proven that were still not confirmed by WDFW and their livelihood is what is being taken (livestock)..  I can see the frustration.

Offline KopperBuck

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 1573
  • Location: GRV
Re: Wolf Prints in the snow
« Reply #36 on: December 06, 2018, 11:44:42 AM »
They are either coyotes or house pets unless the state says there are wolves there which they seldom do.
So if I am in a area the state says there are no wolves that make any canine in that area fair game. It is what it is.
Just because you think you seen a wolf or a wolf track doesn't mean you really seen a wolf or a wolf track.the state will tell you other wise. So I listen to what these liars say and take appropriate actions.

Sooooooo......If a moose is standing in the middle of downtown Seattle, is it still a moose, or is it a deer because WDFW says there are no moose in downtown Seattle? Based on this logic, youíre ok shooting said mystery moose/deer creature in deer season because itís not a moose?

jackelope..  While I understand where you are coming I also understand the frustration from those saying "no wolves, must be a coyote."  In other states precedence has been set based off of assumed knowledge it is reasonable an animal could be mistaken that is not there based off of what wild life management assertions are.  If they say they are not there, we reasonably would assume they are not there..  Not trying to argue your point, but agree that WDFW's failure to not identify kills and confirm wolves in an area where they certainly are could make for an interesting defense..

https://www.news-leader.com/story/news/2017/11/13/missouri-girl-14-thought-she-shooting-deer-when-she-pulled-trigger/858472001/

With all due respect, when they can't "confirm" wolves presence, does that mean the same thing as them saying there are no wolves? Or does it simply mean they can't confirm the presence of wolves in an area? I guarantee you, especially with all the crap they take from both sides of the aisle, WDFW is not going to say one way or the other, that an animal is a wolf without being able to scientifically verify or confirm it was in fact a wolf. Doesn't seem like rocket science to me.

That's the problem... they should be objective and not influenced by crap from both sides.

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 5783
Re: Wolf Prints in the snow
« Reply #37 on: December 06, 2018, 12:26:26 PM »
 Instead of being honest with the people of WA, WDFW refuse to confirm known wolf packs/wolves, this has been proven many times and is still happening today. They would rather say their are no wolves as opposed to confirming wolves for delisting.

A few years back a friend of mine was hunting coyotes in the Perrygin lake country, he came across a canyon that was littered with dead deer and wolf tracks. He contacted WDFW they told him there were no wolves in that area, so he said he would hunting that area aggressively, they told him not to shoot the big coyotes.

Omak Flats was having wolf problems in 2010-2011, WDFW claimed it was coyotes, which was a total lie and they knew no one believed them. I could give example after example of WDFW lying to the public over wolf sightings/problems.

As far as WDFW being influenced, look at WDFW predator management policies and who they have partnered up with, it isn't in favor of hunting, hunters or livestock producers.







Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+22)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 38251
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: WSB RMGA NRA RMEF BHA
Re: Wolf Prints in the snow
« Reply #38 on: December 06, 2018, 12:56:21 PM »
They are either coyotes or house pets unless the state says there are wolves there which they seldom do.
So if I am in a area the state says there are no wolves that make any canine in that area fair game. It is what it is.
Just because you think you seen a wolf or a wolf track doesn't mean you really seen a wolf or a wolf track.the state will tell you other wise. So I listen to what these liars say and take appropriate actions.

Sooooooo......If a moose is standing in the middle of downtown Seattle, is it still a moose, or is it a deer because WDFW says there are no moose in downtown Seattle? Based on this logic, you’re ok shooting said mystery moose/deer creature in deer season because it’s not a moose?

jackelope..  While I understand where you are coming I also understand the frustration from those saying "no wolves, must be a coyote."  In other states precedence has been set based off of assumed knowledge it is reasonable an animal could be mistaken that is not there based off of what wild life management assertions are.  If they say they are not there, we reasonably would assume they are not there..  Not trying to argue your point, but agree that WDFW's failure to not identify kills and confirm wolves in an area where they certainly are could make for an interesting defense..

https://www.news-leader.com/story/news/2017/11/13/missouri-girl-14-thought-she-shooting-deer-when-she-pulled-trigger/858472001/

With all due respect, when they can't "confirm" wolves presence, does that mean the same thing as them saying there are no wolves? Or does it simply mean they can't confirm the presence of wolves in an area? I guarantee you, especially with all the crap they take from both sides of the aisle, WDFW is not going to say one way or the other, that an animal is a wolf without being able to scientifically verify or confirm it was in fact a wolf. Doesn't seem like rocket science to me.

That's the problem... they should be objective and not influenced by crap from both sides.

Rather than objective, I think they're just covering their hind quarters.
:fire.:

" In today's instant gratification society, more and more pressure revolves around success and the measurement of one's prowess as a hunter by inches on a score chart or field photos produced on social media. Don't fall into the trap. Hunting is-and always will be- about the hunt, the adventure, the views, and time spent with close friends and family. " Ryan Hatfield

My posts, opinions and statements do not represent those of this forum

Offline KopperBuck

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 1573
  • Location: GRV
Re: Wolf Prints in the snow
« Reply #39 on: December 06, 2018, 02:55:32 PM »
 :tup: I know how it works. That's why I left government work.

 

* Recent Topics

HB 1046 Would Ban WDFW and Other Agencies from Using Dogs to Take Bear & Cougar by Special T
[Today at 01:17:17 PM]


3nails trapping 2018-19 by 3nails
[Today at 01:16:30 PM]


Opening a can of worms.... by deerhunter_98520
[Today at 01:15:01 PM]


Winter Birding by Rufous
[Today at 01:12:05 PM]


post-rut meh by elkboy
[Today at 12:39:15 PM]


A few rifles by Joe
[Today at 12:36:16 PM]


European mount by blindluck
[Today at 12:28:07 PM]


Team Bad Decision (Spring Release) by Houndhunter
[Today at 12:25:44 PM]


Puyallup river by Bullkllr
[Today at 12:22:54 PM]


Abandoned game cams by jtrammell
[Today at 11:35:55 AM]


Lost forgotten black back pack by lokidog
[Today at 11:33:33 AM]


FS - Propane Fireplace Hearth by lokidog
[Today at 11:31:58 AM]


Ice Fishing! by steelhead4life
[Today at 11:21:05 AM]


2018/2019 Fur Season by Carp Commander
[Today at 11:19:26 AM]


Wild Food (not exactly Wild Game) by pianoman9701
[Today at 11:19:10 AM]


Youth bow advice wanted by KFhunter
[Today at 11:02:23 AM]


Thermarest luxury L/W by fillthefreezer
[Today at 10:36:11 AM]


WTS 30/06 brass by mudflat mike
[Today at 10:34:38 AM]


5 Points......(mule deer or blacktails) by MADMAX
[Today at 10:27:06 AM]


34A Arizona Coues Late Rut Draw Hunt Coming up by jdmecomber
[Today at 10:24:49 AM]