collapse

Author Topic: Trump administration abruptly ends key law enforcement program at wildlife refug  (Read 883 times)

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 5783

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 43459
  • Location: Selah, Washington
That’s one perspective.   

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 8774
This is actually a good move that's been a long time coming. This does not end all uniformed LEOS on National Wildlife Refuges. What it does is remove law enforcement authority from USFWS employees who held a non-LE position but possessed law enforcement authority. Such as being a biologist but also strapping on the badge and gun during hunting season. It's kind of the equivalent of a reserve deputy/officer position with your local PD and SO.

Basically what this comes down to is the USFWS (this actually has nothing to do with Trump as it actually started after 9/11) is saying those who possess USFWS LE authority need to be fulltime officers and not part time officers.

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 43459
  • Location: Selah, Washington
 :yeah:   Thank you.   That article is very skewed.

Offline Igor

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2012
  • Posts: 485
  • Location: Monroe, WA
This is actually a good move that's been a long time coming. This does not end all uniformed LEOS on National Wildlife Refuges. What it does is remove law enforcement authority from USFWS employees who held a non-LE position but possessed law enforcement authority. Such as being a biologist but also strapping on the badge and gun during hunting season. It's kind of the equivalent of a reserve deputy/officer position with your local PD and SO.

Basically what this comes down to is the USFWS (this actually has nothing to do with Trump as it actually started after 9/11) is saying those who possess USFWS LE authority need to be fulltime officers and not part time officers.

Why is this a "good move" ?  As long as they are sworn officers, who cares if they are "fulltime" or "part time" officers ?
molṑn labé

Offline Sandberm

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2013
  • Posts: 1048
This is actually a good move that's been a long time coming. This does not end all uniformed LEOS on National Wildlife Refuges. What it does is remove law enforcement authority from USFWS employees who held a non-LE position but possessed law enforcement authority. Such as being a biologist but also strapping on the badge and gun during hunting season. It's kind of the equivalent of a reserve deputy/officer position with your local PD and SO.

Basically what this comes down to is the USFWS (this actually has nothing to do with Trump as it actually started after 9/11) is saying those who possess USFWS LE authority need to be fulltime officers and not part time officers.

Are you saying Law Enforcement should have never been a part of the job description for USFWS employees and it was wrong to place that added danger to their job?

Online CAMPMEAT

  • CAMPMEAT
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 13102
  • Location: ARIZONA, A PLACE WHERE I DON'T WANT YOU LIVING !!
  • I love my gun rights in Arizona..
The article says that they check for " bullets " used. I didn't know they used bullets in Cali for waterfowl hunting....
I couldn't care less about what anybody says..............

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 8774
This is actually a good move that's been a long time coming. This does not end all uniformed LEOS on National Wildlife Refuges. What it does is remove law enforcement authority from USFWS employees who held a non-LE position but possessed law enforcement authority. Such as being a biologist but also strapping on the badge and gun during hunting season. It's kind of the equivalent of a reserve deputy/officer position with your local PD and SO.

Basically what this comes down to is the USFWS (this actually has nothing to do with Trump as it actually started after 9/11) is saying those who possess USFWS LE authority need to be fulltime officers and not part time officers.
Why is this a "good move" ?  As long as they are sworn officers, who cares if they are "fulltime" or "part time" officers ?
How about standards and experience?

Do you think the guy who puts the badge and gun on for a total of one month out of the year is up to the same speed who does it every single day?

There's a reason why most LE agencies who do have a reserve program restrict their officers from patrolling alone, or even patrolling at all. It's also the reason why most LE agencies have gotten rid of reserve programs.

Law enforcement with changing regulations, policies, court decisions, etc is a full time job, not a part time one.

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 8774
This is actually a good move that's been a long time coming. This does not end all uniformed LEOS on National Wildlife Refuges. What it does is remove law enforcement authority from USFWS employees who held a non-LE position but possessed law enforcement authority. Such as being a biologist but also strapping on the badge and gun during hunting season. It's kind of the equivalent of a reserve deputy/officer position with your local PD and SO.

Basically what this comes down to is the USFWS (this actually has nothing to do with Trump as it actually started after 9/11) is saying those who possess USFWS LE authority need to be fulltime officers and not part time officers.
Are you saying Law Enforcement should have never been a part of the job description for USFWS employees and it was wrong to place that added danger to their job?
:o
Where in the world did you get that?

I am saying it's a full time job, not a part time one. USFWS is the only federal agency that lets people who are not in law enforcement positions (such as maintenance, biology, interpretation) strap on the gun and suddenly become a federal LEO.

Offline ribka

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 5277
  • Location: E side
  • That's what she said
[No FLETC TRAINING or quarterly quals?

If so that's crazy






quote author=bigtex link=topic=234164.msg3125017#msg3125017 date=1544117780]




This is actually a good move that's been a long time coming. This does not end all uniformed LEOS on National Wildlife Refuges. What it does is remove law enforcement authority from USFWS employees who held a non-LE position but possessed law enforcement authority. Such as being a biologist but also strapping on the badge and gun during hunting season. It's kind of the equivalent of a reserve deputy/officer position with your local PD and SO.

Basically what this comes down to is the USFWS (this actually has nothing to do with Trump as it actually started after 9/11) is saying those who possess USFWS LE authority need to be fulltime officers and not part time officers.
Are you saying Law Enforcement should have never been a part of the job description for USFWS employees and it was wrong to place that added danger to their job?
:o
Where in the world did you get that?

I am saying it's a full time job, not a part time one. USFWS is the only federal agency that lets people who are not in law enforcement positions (such as maintenance, biology, interpretation) strap on the gun and suddenly become a federal LEO.
[/quote]

Offline Humptulips

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 4605
  • Location: Humptulips
    • Washington State Trappers Association
  • Groups: WSTA, NTA, FTA, OTA, WWC, WFW, NRA
To put it in perspective it affects 51 employees nationwide and the article says these people won't be able to do anything if they see a lawbreaker. They can still act as witness.
Does not seem like that big of a deal either way to me.
Bruce Vandervort

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 8774
[No FLETC TRAINING or quarterly quals?

If so that's crazy
So here's some backstory on this:

Prior to the 9/11 era uniformed LE for USFWS was largely done by those who were considered to be "dual function" officers. Simply put, they were not full time LEOs. Come the late 90s USFWS started hiring more fulltime LEOs. After 9/11 the Department of the Interior conducted a report on all of their LE programs and for USFWS it suggested eliminating the "dual function" officers as it is not a professional way of doing business (what other agency relies heavily on part time LEOs???).

So after that report USFWS removed LE authority from hundreds of "dual function" officers and stated they will not issue LE authority to individuals who want to be "dual function" officers. It essentially meant the "dual function" program would end when the last commissioned employee retired. Well here it is in 2018 and there were still 50 or so "dual function" officers out there. One of the reasons they were still around is because they did not qualify for federal LE retirement which requires officers to retire at age 57. So a fulltime USFWS LEO is kicked out the door at 57 but a "dual function" LEO could still be working at age 80. So with all of this in mind the USFWS decided in September that by December 31, 2018 the remaining 50 or so "dual function" officers would have their credentials rescinded and the "dual function" program would cease to exist.

Realistically, this will only impact the Rocky Mountain and SE areas of the country as all other regions have already pushed their "dual function" officers out the door years ago.

Ribka-

As far as training goes yes they had to qualify twice a years on firearms (federal land management agencies require twice a year quals not quarterly). As far as FLETC goes yes they had to attend FLETC but most were hired in the late 80s or 90s when FLETC was several weeks long, not several months like it is today.

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 5783
:yeah:   Thank you.   That article is very skewed.

 :yeah: :tup:

 

* Recent Topics

Opening a can of worms.... by deerhunter_98520
[Today at 01:15:01 PM]


Winter Birding by Rufous
[Today at 01:12:05 PM]


HB 1046 Would Ban WDFW and Other Agencies from Using Dogs to Take Bear & Cougar by Bob33
[Today at 12:58:00 PM]


post-rut meh by elkboy
[Today at 12:39:15 PM]


A few rifles by Joe
[Today at 12:36:16 PM]


European mount by blindluck
[Today at 12:28:07 PM]


Team Bad Decision (Spring Release) by Houndhunter
[Today at 12:25:44 PM]


Puyallup river by Bullkllr
[Today at 12:22:54 PM]


Abandoned game cams by jtrammell
[Today at 11:35:55 AM]


Lost forgotten black back pack by lokidog
[Today at 11:33:33 AM]


FS - Propane Fireplace Hearth by lokidog
[Today at 11:31:58 AM]


Ice Fishing! by steelhead4life
[Today at 11:21:05 AM]


2018/2019 Fur Season by Carp Commander
[Today at 11:19:26 AM]


Wild Food (not exactly Wild Game) by pianoman9701
[Today at 11:19:10 AM]


Youth bow advice wanted by KFhunter
[Today at 11:02:23 AM]


Thermarest luxury L/W by fillthefreezer
[Today at 10:36:11 AM]


WTS 30/06 brass by mudflat mike
[Today at 10:34:38 AM]


5 Points......(mule deer or blacktails) by MADMAX
[Today at 10:27:06 AM]


34A Arizona Coues Late Rut Draw Hunt Coming up by jdmecomber
[Today at 10:24:49 AM]


WTS-Ruger M77 MK II Stainless/ Brown Laminate 30.06 by Dirtnap
[Today at 10:18:24 AM]