collapse

Advertisement


Poll

Are you in favor of this bill?

Yes
No

Author Topic: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements  (Read 7857 times)

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 24823
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #15 on: January 19, 2019, 11:35:41 AM »
Women are the only real growing group in hunting. At one of the Washington Waterfowl Association meetings the number of 8% female growth vs static in men was presented by A WDFW employee.  ANYTHING that helps promote the sport even as minor as this is a win. lots of other states have made this change.
« Last Edit: January 20, 2019, 02:31:55 PM by Special T »
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline Fl0und3rz

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 51553
  • Location: E. WA
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #16 on: January 20, 2019, 02:08:39 PM »
:yeah:

Offline trophyhunt

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 18678
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: Wa Wild Sheep Life Member
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #17 on: January 20, 2019, 02:21:17 PM »
7 no votes, curious why no? 
“In common with”..... not so much!!

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 12521
  • Location: Arlington
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #18 on: January 20, 2019, 03:15:38 PM »
I voted no for two reasons:

1.  I would like to see the rules kept with WDFW as opposed to actual legislation in order to remain nimble and be able to more easily address things like future changes to things like orange camo, what seasons, etc.  If it goes this way, every change will require new legislation.

2.  I see no need for pink.  I like to keep things simple and traditional unless there is a reason to change.  My daughter wears orange and doesn't think this is necessary and wouldn't keep her from hunting or make her hunt more.  As a parent, I like the fact that we both understand clearly orange means serious safety stuff, not fashion.  I would prefer to not combine the two.

Offline trophyhunt

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 18678
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: Wa Wild Sheep Life Member
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #19 on: January 20, 2019, 03:19:56 PM »
Solid reasons.  :tup:
“In common with”..... not so much!!

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21190
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #20 on: January 20, 2019, 03:54:26 PM »
Stereotyping of female hunters?

"Jean Bergerson, past president of Minnesota-based Women Hunting & Fishing in All Seasons, echoed the support for safety, but also the unease with the color potentially being seen as an attractant to women and girls.

“I don’t care what color it is as long as it’s safe,” Bergerson said. “But I guess what disturbs me a little is there should be far more reasons for women to go outdoors and explore hunting and shooting than because you can wear pink. It kind of implies women are so shallow that all they want is pink.”
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline dreamunelk

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 2049
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #21 on: January 20, 2019, 04:37:35 PM »
This is something that is better done under WAC.  Much easier to change if needed. 

Offline Oh Mah

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 6614
  • Location: region 3 Montana
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #22 on: January 20, 2019, 06:26:02 PM »
I voted no for two reasons:

1.  I would like to see the rules kept with WDFW as opposed to actual legislation in order to remain nimble and be able to more easily address things like future changes to things like orange camo, what seasons, etc.  If it goes this way, every change will require new legislation.

2.  I see no need for pink.  I like to keep things simple and traditional unless there is a reason to change.  My daughter wears orange and doesn't think this is necessary and wouldn't keep her from hunting or make her hunt more.  As a parent, I like the fact that we both understand clearly orange means serious safety stuff, not fashion.  I would prefer to not combine thetwo.





https://www.localnews8.com/news/politics/wyoming-to-allow-hunters-to-wear-fluorescent-pink-attire/716467391
I agree with this  :yeah: takes the safety part out of any NO reasoning.There have been a few times in the woods where it looked like hunter orange and was not.Nothing in the woods can be confused with pink.Now onto the important question,,,,,,They say that deer and elk can't see the orange,Can they see the pink?Marketing wise if they can sell more product because women want pink then so what.This is spreading across the country and i like that they are considering the women on this.

As to the making women look shallow,that sounds a little like CNN trying to make everything Trump says or does look feminist.  :twocents:
"Boss of the woods"
(this is in reference to the biggie not me).

Offline WSU

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 5381
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #23 on: January 20, 2019, 07:31:25 PM »
Should add a hunter orange requirement for all afield during big game modern firearm, hunting or not.

No, the government shouldn't be telling random people how to dress.

Not random.  People using the regulated lands.

Nothing more American than making a legal dress code for the general population. Keep up the anti-government fight!

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1299
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #24 on: January 21, 2019, 08:57:41 AM »
Why is this needed if it is already required to wear orange.  Many neon colored clothes that are bright work just as well as orange, but they aren't legal.  We have some great bright pink, Seahawk's green and yellow clothes that stick out like a strobe light but they can't be used.  I voted no because it is already a rule by someone, no need for a double rule which just confuses things.

Offline Oh Mah

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 6614
  • Location: region 3 Montana
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #25 on: January 21, 2019, 01:12:37 PM »
1) there not pushing it as a need.

2)not a new rule just an allowed article(more rights)

3)not confusing at all(if someone can't figure this one out they should just continue with orange)

                                               :twocents:

 The more people on our side(hunters) in any hunting issue is better for all.
"Boss of the woods"
(this is in reference to the biggie not me).

Offline Gopher

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 140
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #26 on: January 25, 2019, 06:29:25 PM »
Seems to me they should be working more on what exactly "hunter orange" "hunter pink" is.  I see guys out there with orange that might have been "hunter orange" years ago but has now been washed, sun faded or dirt covered and is now just plain old orange.

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 7662
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • If you know me,then you know I give zero #&$@$
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #27 on: January 25, 2019, 06:48:38 PM »
I have no problem with it.The deer can see that Hunter Orange and I don't care what ya say it's true .I might just wear pink to change it up a bit.
I rather piss in the wind,then have piss down my back.

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14351
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #28 on: January 25, 2019, 06:53:27 PM »
Instead of a pumpkin patch, you'll have a ? patch.  Hmmm....what's something that is pink?

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21190
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #29 on: January 25, 2019, 07:03:41 PM »
Instead of a pumpkin patch, you'll have a ? patch.  Hmmm....what's something that is pink?
:yike:
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Springer 2024 Columbia River by Blacklab
[Today at 02:35:54 PM]


Springer Fishing Opportunity 3/29 & 3/30 by Blacklab
[Today at 12:48:56 PM]


Long Beach Clamming Tides by dilleytech
[Today at 12:39:19 PM]


Let’s see your best Washington buck by abhold87
[Today at 12:03:27 PM]


Bearpaw Season - Spring 2024 by bearpaw
[Today at 11:45:41 AM]


Walked a cougar down by Rainier10
[Today at 11:17:49 AM]


SB 5444 signed by Inslee on 03/26 Takes Effect on 06/06/24 by hughjorgan
[Today at 09:03:26 AM]


Average by lhrbull
[Today at 07:31:56 AM]


CVA optima V2 LR tapped hole for front sight by Remdawg
[Today at 07:09:22 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal