Big Game Hunting > Wolves
Wolf control board seeks OK to keep operating
wolfbait:
Wolf control board seeks OK to keep operating
"Rey said that for the first time in the board’s history, it spent more on wolf control in fiscal year 2018 than it took in. Rey previously said in a budget hearing before another committee the board spent $765,000 last year, about $136,000 more than it took in.”
"Tanya Espinosa, a spokeswoman for the Agriculture Department, said in an email on Monday that in fiscal year 2018, Wildlife Services killed 83 wolves in Idaho. Of those, 73 involved livestock attacks and 10 were an effort to boost elk numbers in northern Idaho and requested by Fish and Game."
http://dnews.com/local/wolf-control-board-seeks-ok-to-keep-operating/article_f961b742-cff0-597b-8653-99d4f464ee20.html?fbclid=IwAR2CyzGwiQd2P5mVS-qCI5rHp2CH14w084OPwpz6IgojnVssdry0CERZFhY
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only. s: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Ridgeratt:
765,000 isn't that about what Washington spends on a consultant? :chuckle:
That seems like money well spent. :bash: :bash: :bash: :bash:
pianoman9701:
:yeah: Sad but true.
Magnum_Willys:
I hope the third livestock predation spells the end to the grouse flats pack. The Blues are a small area to support 3 "recognized" packs ( Tucannon, Touchet, Grouse Flats)
I've saw 5 animals up close in a pack in there last spring - not sure if that pack was one of these or a yet to be recognized one.
mtn muley madness:
Funny thing about wolves is everyone that didn't want them and are in some way, shape, or form affected by them are the ones funding the "program management" of them while everyone that thought wolves was such a great idea is held accountable for nothing at all and asked nothing of.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version