collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: WDFW considers cutting responses to wild animals  (Read 1059 times)

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 6030
WDFW considers cutting responses to wild animals
« on: May 23, 2019, 11:41:05 AM »
WDFW considers cutting responses to wild animals

https://www.capitalpress.com/ag_sectors/livestock/wdfw-considers-cutting-responses-to-wild-animals/article_5cc83a50-7590-11e9-a5b9-bbf81fbe6a8f.html?fbclid=IwAR0bUxVj79ow6UyR6L-6yfFQquPmUBZ2f1j5NrDywd1l7ds-mc3evfMHr6Q


“People are frustrated,” he said. “I’m not advocating for this, but my district is on the verge of taking over that whole program themselves.”

Offline ctwiggs1

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 2869
Re: WDFW considers cutting responses to wild animals
« Reply #1 on: May 23, 2019, 12:57:48 PM »
Even better IMHO

Quote
Kretz said Monday he has sympathy for Fish and Wildlife’s budget problem, but said the department should make responding to threats to property and public safety a priority.

“Tell me what they’re doing that is more important than that,” he said.

Offline Fl0und3rz

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 31615
  • Location: E. WA
Re: WDFW considers cutting responses to wild animals
« Reply #2 on: May 23, 2019, 02:51:38 PM »
Great.  Just in time for the bears in the neighborhood to run amok.

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 9010

Online rainshadow1

  • RainShadow Game Calls & Custom Knives
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 2164
  • Location: Selah, WA - Sequim, WA
  • Custom Calls and Knives
    • http://www.facebook.com/pages/RainShadow-Game-Calls-Custom-Knives/133406026689512?ref=hl
    • RainShadow Game Calls & Custom Knives
Re: WDFW considers cutting responses to wild animals
« Reply #4 on: May 24, 2019, 11:39:41 AM »
COUNTY Animal Damage Control agents. If WDFW is going to drop responses due to the bureaucrats paying themselves more of our money, the counties could take it over, hire an ADC person, who could send written reports to WDFW about what they already DID, to take care of last week's problems.
- - Steve
View and Purchase/Order Custom Calls!
Cougar Hunters!!! Check out Calling Products and Call-In Stories!
View the Blade Gallery, & Purchase/Order a Custom Knife!
 www.rain-shadow.com

RainShadow Game Calls & Custom Knives on Facebook

Offline Bango skank

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2014
  • Posts: 2872
  • Location: colville
Re: WDFW considers cutting responses to wild animals
« Reply #5 on: May 24, 2019, 11:46:13 AM »
COUNTY Animal Damage Control agents. If WDFW is going to drop responses due to the bureaucrats paying themselves more of our money, the counties could take it over, hire an ADC person, who could send written reports to WDFW about what they already DID, to take care of last week's problems.

Stevens county has their guy ready to roll as soon as wdfw fails to act.  He and his dogs are ready.

Online Goshawk

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 259
  • Location: Lewis County
Re: WDFW considers cutting responses to wild animals
« Reply #6 on: May 30, 2019, 09:43:40 PM »
If a land owner has a bear or other game problem, then use the available hunting season to let a few hunters in to take care of the problem.  If you don't want to do that, then the WDFW needs to tell them to pound sand. That's what hunting as a wildlife management tool is all about. 

Offline Bango skank

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2014
  • Posts: 2872
  • Location: colville
Re: WDFW considers cutting responses to wild animals
« Reply #7 on: May 30, 2019, 09:51:09 PM »
If a land owner has a bear or other game problem, then use the available hunting season to let a few hunters in to take care of the problem.  If you don't want to do that, then the WDFW needs to tell them to pound sand. That's what hunting as a wildlife management tool is all about.

Yeah, a lion is killing your goats in july, just wait until september then let people hunt cougar on your property. Oh wait, thats a stupid non-solution.

Offline ctwiggs1

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 2869
Re: WDFW considers cutting responses to wild animals
« Reply #8 on: May 30, 2019, 10:01:36 PM »
That's what hunting as a wildlife management tool is all about.

Um, no.

Online Goshawk

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 259
  • Location: Lewis County
Re: WDFW considers cutting responses to wild animals
« Reply #9 on: May 31, 2019, 10:07:24 AM »
If a land owner has a bear or other game problem, then use the available hunting season to let a few hunters in to take care of the problem.  If you don't want to do that, then the WDFW needs to tell them to pound sand. That's what hunting as a wildlife management tool is all about.

Yeah, a lion is killing your goats in july, just wait until september then let people hunt cougar on your property. Oh wait, thats a stupid non-solution.

Not exactly.
That's where the Predation Hunter's list comes in.  It was used in the past for orchards and other crops when deer, elk, bear and even cougar were in need of immediate removal.  You had to be able to respond in a day with dogs or weapon to the place where it was occurring depending on the type of animal that needed removal.   No WDFW, Contracted Hunter or Dept of Ag Agents needed.

Offline Bango skank

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2014
  • Posts: 2872
  • Location: colville
Re: WDFW considers cutting responses to wild animals
« Reply #10 on: May 31, 2019, 10:09:28 AM »
If a land owner has a bear or other game problem, then use the available hunting season to let a few hunters in to take care of the problem.  If you don't want to do that, then the WDFW needs to tell them to pound sand. That's what hunting as a wildlife management tool is all about.

Yeah, a lion is killing your goats in july, just wait until september then let people hunt cougar on your property. Oh wait, thats a stupid non-solution.

Not exactly.
That's where the Predation Hunter's list comes in.  It was used in the past for orchards and other crops when deer, elk, bear and even cougar were in need of immediate removal.  You had to be able to respond in a day with dogs or weapon to the place where it was occurring depending on the type of animal that needed removal.   No WDFW, Contracted Hunter or Dept of Ag Agents needed.

Youre talking about a team of hounds showing up right off the bat.  The other dude sounded like he was talking about just letting any joe schmo recreational hunter hunt on your property whenever, or no help from wdfw.

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 20218
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: WDFW considers cutting responses to wild animals
« Reply #11 on: May 31, 2019, 10:25:16 AM »
If a land owner has a bear or other game problem, then use the available hunting season to let a few hunters in to take care of the problem.  If you don't want to do that, then the WDFW needs to tell them to pound sand. That's what hunting as a wildlife management tool is all about.

Yeah, a lion is killing your goats in july, just wait until september then let people hunt cougar on your property. Oh wait, thats a stupid non-solution.

Not exactly.
That's where the Predation Hunter's list comes in.  It was used in the past for orchards and other crops when deer, elk, bear and even cougar were in need of immediate removal.  You had to be able to respond in a day with dogs or weapon to the place where it was occurring depending on the type of animal that needed removal.   No WDFW, Contracted Hunter or Dept of Ag Agents needed.
I like where your heads at but there is a problem with it. The damage management for elk in the Skagit valley cannot discriminate between locals, retired folks etc and the general public. As such they have people show up from Olympia  one weekend, and the landowner has to complain to get the next person on the list to have the elk. There is a series of problems with allowing hunters to solve the problem. From what I've gathered this is a departmenal/state rule/law problem that encumbered a hunter based solution 2c.  Some one else may have more details about  the inner workings of the elk damage program up here, and that imput would be awesome.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Online Goshawk

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 259
  • Location: Lewis County
Re: WDFW considers cutting responses to wild animals
« Reply #12 on: June 06, 2019, 04:28:12 PM »
If a land owner has a bear or other game problem, then use the available hunting season to let a few hunters in to take care of the problem.  If you don't want to do that, then the WDFW needs to tell them to pound sand. That's what hunting as a wildlife management tool is all about.

Yeah, a lion is killing your goats in july, just wait until september then let people hunt cougar on your property. Oh wait, thats a stupid non-solution.

Agreed; You have the right to protect person and property 24/7/365.
My comment is more toward the timber lands than a goat farmer or fish hatchery.  Instead of charging the state $500 to remove a problem bear from a timberland, that company should only be compensated if they allow hunting.

Offline konradcountry

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: May 2016
  • Posts: 483
  • Location: SouthWest
Re: WDFW considers cutting responses to wild animals
« Reply #13 on: June 08, 2019, 07:59:01 AM »
Well part of the problem is that there are a lot of California North types that call over every single bear or cougar.

In Sequim they flood the Sheriff's office with reports of hunters......during hunting season.

Offline WAcoyotehunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 4138
  • Location: Pend Oreille County
Re: WDFW considers cutting responses to wild animals
« Reply #14 on: June 08, 2019, 08:58:00 AM »
COUNTY Animal Damage Control agents. If WDFW is going to drop responses due to the bureaucrats paying themselves more of our money, the counties could take it over, hire an ADC person, who could send written reports to WDFW about what they already DID, to take care of last week's problems.

Stevens county has their guy ready to roll as soon as wdfw fails to act.  He and his dogs are ready.
Wdfw has been pretty good about response.  They had a couple that were mishandled, but that seems to be the outliers.  They have taken a lot of cats from depredations in the last few years.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Question about elevations from a new bowhunter. by WapitiTalk1
[Today at 09:30:42 PM]


Oregon giant by Goshawk
[Today at 09:30:28 PM]


Lowrance Hook 7 by Crunchy
[Today at 09:27:27 PM]


Broadhead tuning by Crunchy
[Today at 09:24:28 PM]


2019 sheds: post them here! by Bango skank
[Today at 09:15:28 PM]


Sell: 11/111 trophy hunter xp 308 by Jasonb
[Today at 09:14:38 PM]


X-Bolt Hell's Canyon Long Range .300 win question by Timberstalker
[Today at 09:14:21 PM]


Weatherby vanguard 300 win Mag by Jasonb
[Today at 09:13:11 PM]


Educational call-in by WapitiTalk1
[Today at 09:13:10 PM]


2019, Pinks Reports by doyourtime89
[Today at 09:08:54 PM]


Caribou Hunt, the search begins again by AlaskaHunter18
[Today at 08:58:11 PM]


Bob Marshall guided hunt. by WAElkhunter89
[Today at 08:58:06 PM]


F4WM by Naches Sportsman
[Today at 08:57:41 PM]


Finally! by tgomez
[Today at 08:52:46 PM]


.280 Ackley improved vs .28 Nosler by yorketransport
[Today at 08:40:23 PM]


Best bait for deer and elk? by Mallardmasher
[Today at 08:40:21 PM]


WTS Springfield 67f with 2 barrels 12 guage $ 250 by wrchinook
[Today at 08:21:46 PM]


Colockum Muzzy Tag Selected!!! by elkrack
[Today at 08:18:03 PM]


Boot advise by jrebel
[Today at 07:39:30 PM]


#28 by huntandjeep
[Today at 07:37:05 PM]