collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: JUDGE RULES FOR WDFW IN 2ND WOLF REMOVAL LAWSUIT  (Read 1225 times)

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 33374
  • Location: Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
JUDGE RULES FOR WDFW IN 2ND WOLF REMOVAL LAWSUIT
« on: January 14, 2020, 10:26:18 AM »
a small win for eastern WA residents and ranchers...


KING COUNTY JUDGE RULES FOR WDFW IN 2ND WOLF REMOVAL LAWSUIT
http://nwsportsmanmag.com/king-county-judge-rules-for-wdfw-in-2nd-wolf-removal-lawsuit/
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw) for spring bear, fall bear, buffalo, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered.

Offline Cougartail

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 1583
  • Location: Eastern Washington
Re: JUDGE RULES FOR WDFW IN 2ND WOLF REMOVAL LAWSUIT
« Reply #1 on: January 14, 2020, 10:40:44 AM »
a small win for eastern WA residents and ranchers...


KING COUNTY JUDGE RULES FOR WDFW IN 2ND WOLF REMOVAL LAWSUIT
http://nwsportsmanmag.com/king-county-judge-rules-for-wdfw-in-2nd-wolf-removal-lawsuit/

The last paragraph in the article is priceless. Use more non-lethal tactics? Maybe we should send the wolves to counseling and PC food identification classes.. :o
When you align yourself with people who beat up grandma's with strollers your opinions are from that of a psychopath. Jaded and worthless..

Offline Humptulips

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 5639
  • Location: Humptulips
    • Washington State Trappers Association
  • Groups: WSTA, NTA, FTA, OTA, WWC, WFW, NRA
Re: JUDGE RULES FOR WDFW IN 2ND WOLF REMOVAL LAWSUIT
« Reply #2 on: January 14, 2020, 11:10:40 AM »
The article said there was a third issue left unresolved. Anyone know what that is about?
Bruce Vandervort

Offline HUNTINCOUPLE

  • Lost Somewhere on the Praire of Klickitat Co. Chasing The Elusive BENCHLEG DEERS.
  • Non-Hunting & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 7519
  • Location: Lyle WA, 98635
  • Yep, my avatar is from my front porch.
Re: JUDGE RULES FOR WDFW IN 2ND WOLF REMOVAL LAWSUIT
« Reply #3 on: January 14, 2020, 11:16:16 AM »
 :tup:
Slap some bacon on a biscut and lets go, were burrnin daylight!

Most peoples health is a decision not a condition?

Kill your television!  ICEMAN SAID TO!

Life Member of Hunting  Washington  Forum.

Time in the woods is more important than timing the moon.

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 33374
  • Location: Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: JUDGE RULES FOR WDFW IN 2ND WOLF REMOVAL LAWSUIT
« Reply #4 on: January 14, 2020, 11:17:25 AM »
The article said there was a third issue left unresolved. Anyone know what that is about?

I was wondering the same thing?
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw) for spring bear, fall bear, buffalo, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered.

Offline TheStovePipeKid

  • They call me MISTER KID!
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 567
  • Location: Lakebay, Wa
  • I. Kill. Turkey.
    • TheStovePipeKid
  • Groups: NWTF Annual Member, NRA Extended Pay Lifetime Member
Re: JUDGE RULES FOR WDFW IN 2ND WOLF REMOVAL LAWSUIT
« Reply #5 on: January 14, 2020, 03:00:46 PM »
I still don't understand how someone from out of state can file a lawsuit in Washington to stop the legal removal of wolves in an area where no federal protections exist by the state agency charged with managing the wildlife. Never mind that they were following the "Wolf plan".
I laugh in the face of Danger. Ha ha ha Danger Face!

Offline getreal711

  • 1ST Sergeant
  • Non-Hunting & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2013
  • Posts: 141
  • Location: snohomish
Re: JUDGE RULES FOR WDFW IN 2ND WOLF REMOVAL LAWSUIT
« Reply #6 on: January 14, 2020, 03:12:20 PM »
the 3rd issue is how to get rid of Inslee.  :chuckle:
29 yrs Army as an instructor with weapons and transportation. Now play time at my own expense.

Offline zwickeyman

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2014
  • Posts: 814
  • Location: North Bend
Re: JUDGE RULES FOR WDFW IN 2ND WOLF REMOVAL LAWSUIT
« Reply #7 on: January 14, 2020, 06:04:02 PM »
the 3rd issue is how to get rid of Inslee.  :chuckle:

 :yeah:

Offline ribka

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 5624
  • Location: E side
  • That's what she said
Re: JUDGE RULES FOR WDFW IN 2ND WOLF REMOVAL LAWSUIT
« Reply #8 on: January 14, 2020, 07:25:03 PM »
I still don't understand how someone from out of state can file a lawsuit in Washington to stop the legal removal of wolves in an area where no federal protections exist by the state agency charged with managing the wildlife. Never mind that they were following the "Wolf plan".

Thats what they've done in Wisconsin, Minnesota and Michigan. Conservation NW was involved in the lawsuits

Offline SuperX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 309
Re: JUDGE RULES FOR WDFW IN 2ND WOLF REMOVAL LAWSUIT
« Reply #9 on: January 15, 2020, 08:46:59 AM »
we should make a law regarding repayment of costs for these types of 'activist suits" when they don't win, and make it a requirement that any suit has to be filed by an affected party who would be personally responsible for the repayment of court and legal fees.


Offline Jpmiller

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2016
  • Posts: 2710
  • Location: Wilkeson
Re: JUDGE RULES FOR WDFW IN 2ND WOLF REMOVAL LAWSUIT
« Reply #10 on: January 15, 2020, 09:16:28 AM »
we should make a law regarding repayment of costs for these types of 'activist suits" when they don't win, and make it a requirement that any suit has to be filed by an affected party who would be personally responsible for the repayment of court and legal fees.

I say not only make them pay legal Costa make them front the legal fees in an escrow account, big check up front would deter folks looking just to bog down the process.

Offline CGDucksandDeer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2014
  • Posts: 82
  • Groups: cgducksanddeer
Re: JUDGE RULES FOR WDFW IN 2ND WOLF REMOVAL LAWSUIT
« Reply #11 on: January 15, 2020, 12:05:18 PM »
The article said there was a third issue left unresolved. Anyone know what that is about?

I was wondering the same thing?

The 3rd, still unresolved, issue in both the King and Thurston county wolf cases is an Administrative Procedures Act argument by the various plaintiffs (Center for Biological Diversity [Arizona], Kettle Range Conservation Group [Ferry County], Center for a Humane Economy [Maryland],) that WDFW's implementation of the Protocol for Wolf-Livestock Conflict is inconsistent, or in legalese, arbitrary and capricious.

Given the state's win on the State Environmental Policy Act arguments, precedent from implementation of protocols by other state bodies and boards, and WDFWs effort to document when, how and why they are implementing the Protocol to resolve wolf-livestock conflicts in recent years, including through lethal removal, they are on pretty strong legal footing.

Ribka, your blind attempts to pin everything and anything on Conservation NW are moronic.

CNW has filed amicus (Friend of the Court) briefs (http://bit.ly/35UFMOi) defending WDFW in these cases, and has released numerous statements defending the Protocol, supporting lethal removal when appropriate, and calling BS on the endless litigation (copied below). We are in no way behind these lawsuits, we're pushing back on them. The facts of that are perfectly clear and publicly available.


"We support Washington's Wolf-Livestock Interaction Protocol, which flows from the 2011 Wolf Recovery and Management Plan and was developed in accordance with that plan through careful collaboration by biologists, conflict specialists, community leaders and the Wolf Advisory Group.

Lawsuits and polarization haven’t worked out well for wolves elsewhere, so we see little upside in spreading those tactics to Washington, where wolf recovery is going relatively well overall. Instead of polarization, our focus is on collaboration and long-term coexistence."
https://www.conservationnw.org/news-updates/statement-on-togo/


“While this group spends money on lawyers and undermines Washington’s collaborative wolf policy process, Conservation Northwest funds range riders and on-the-ground field staff working to protect both wolves and livestock. Balanced coexistence, not courtroom wrangling, is the best path for long-term wolf recovery. We firmly believe that sitting down with other wildlife stakeholders to create common-ground policies and win-win solutions is far more effective than divisive lawsuits.”
http://nwsportsmanmag.com/cbd-wolf-lawsuit-a-giant-step-backward-for-social-tolerance-hunter/

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Are these elk on onx maps? by Buckhunter82
[Today at 12:15:15 AM]


Grouse hunters better get informed by Limhangerslayer
[Yesterday at 10:32:47 PM]


Hancock ? by SGTDuffman
[Yesterday at 10:31:35 PM]


What is the biggest pile of scat youve seen. by bornhunter
[Yesterday at 10:03:04 PM]


Bugling success! by bornhunter
[Yesterday at 09:51:03 PM]


Nooksack Draw!!!! by jae
[Yesterday at 09:50:18 PM]


Be Careful In The Backcountry by LDennis24
[Yesterday at 09:50:08 PM]


Blood trail by jae
[Yesterday at 09:47:01 PM]


High hunt 2020 by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 09:42:54 PM]


Hawk hunting squirrel by Goshawk
[Yesterday at 09:39:11 PM]


3 Mexican wolf pups cross-fostered into an Arizona pack by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 09:35:57 PM]


People on Cams by Goshawk
[Yesterday at 09:35:09 PM]


One less Pend Oreille county deer killer in the woods. by Wanttohuntmore
[Yesterday at 09:15:13 PM]


FS: Eberlestock Blue Widow Pack by ryanfam
[Yesterday at 09:12:09 PM]


Officially out of wall space by CaNINE
[Yesterday at 09:05:12 PM]


Hunting clarification by Naches Sportsman
[Yesterday at 08:57:11 PM]


Archery hunt area around Snohomish, King, or Pierce County help by Tr33ofLif3
[Yesterday at 08:44:29 PM]


NW Chapter Washington Waterfowl Association by Special T
[Yesterday at 08:35:26 PM]


2020 Deer post em here by BLDtraLR
[Yesterday at 08:24:58 PM]


17 Mach 2 by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 07:43:38 PM]