Free: Contests & Raffles.
a small win for eastern WA residents and ranchers...KING COUNTY JUDGE RULES FOR WDFW IN 2ND WOLF REMOVAL LAWSUIThttp://nwsportsmanmag.com/king-county-judge-rules-for-wdfw-in-2nd-wolf-removal-lawsuit/
The article said there was a third issue left unresolved. Anyone know what that is about?
the 3rd issue is how to get rid of Inslee.
I still don't understand how someone from out of state can file a lawsuit in Washington to stop the legal removal of wolves in an area where no federal protections exist by the state agency charged with managing the wildlife. Never mind that they were following the "Wolf plan".
we should make a law regarding repayment of costs for these types of 'activist suits" when they don't win, and make it a requirement that any suit has to be filed by an affected party who would be personally responsible for the repayment of court and legal fees.
Quote from: Humptulips on January 14, 2020, 11:10:40 AMThe article said there was a third issue left unresolved. Anyone know what that is about?I was wondering the same thing?