collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags  (Read 2184 times)

Offline jdmecomber

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 115
  • Location: Washington
I picked up my 2011 Regulations I had saved and just checked some quick data against the 2019 Regulations

Deer

2011 Entiat 25 tags now 15

2011 Grayback 40 tags now 20 tags

2011 Windriver  40 tags  now 20 tags

2011 West Kitckitat 40 tags now 15

Elk

2011 peaches ridge 81 tags now  10

2011 goose prairie 70 tags now 7

2011  observatory 89 tags now 20

2011 bethel. 25 tags now 6

2011 rim rock 85 tags. now 21



Offline Birdguy

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 3203
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #1 on: February 15, 2020, 08:35:37 PM »
We all know it, but it sucks to see it in black and white! Imagine what it was in 2000.... :'(

For real fun check out license prices you those did not get cut by 50% or greater.

Offline bornhunter

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2018
  • Posts: 1321
  • Location: Lewis County
  • Groups: NRA, RMEF,
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #2 on: February 15, 2020, 09:19:32 PM »
What caused such a reduction in such a short period of time? We all know the causes but which of them caused it to occur so fast?

Offline fishngamereaper

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 3200
  • Location: kitsap
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #3 on: February 15, 2020, 09:27:16 PM »
Heck I remember the any bull any buck general tag year's.

Offline Magnum_Willys

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 3915
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #4 on: February 15, 2020, 11:04:45 PM »
What caused such a reduction in such a short period of time? We all know the causes but which of them caused it to occur so fast?

Perfect storm - outlaw hunting cougar & bear with dogs, outlaw leghold traps, bring in wolves, tribes ramp up their take, global warming, more technology - gps/rangefinders/etc. ,  disease, fire,  mismanagement.   Pick any or all the above.

Offline dvolmer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 804
  • Location: Eastern Washington, West Richland
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #5 on: February 16, 2020, 12:20:25 AM »
If you have the chance, please compare the blue mountain quality bull elk tags too.  Would like to see that.
Zonk Volmer

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 29362
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #6 on: February 16, 2020, 01:10:21 AM »
 IMO Entiat tags should never have gone past 10 to begin with, Id prefer 5 at the very most....same with all quality mule deer tags. My dream is 1 per unit. :twocents:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline kentrek

  • Non-Hunting & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 3115
  • Location: west coast
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #7 on: February 16, 2020, 07:21:05 AM »
IMO Entiat tags should never have gone past 10 to begin with, Id prefer 5 at the very most....same with all quality mule deer tags. My dream is 1 per unit. :twocents:

1 tag draw odds are not my dream....but I'm sure youl get your wish eventually if auction tags keep selling like they did last night...

WA is alil behind  :chuckle:

Offline fishngamereaper

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 3200
  • Location: kitsap
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #8 on: February 16, 2020, 07:34:06 AM »
IMO Entiat tags should never have gone past 10 to begin with, Id prefer 5 at the very most....same with all quality mule deer tags. My dream is 1 per unit. :twocents:

Then what do you do with general season ..

Mule deer probably should be draw only hunts anyway but once you go there you'll never go back. Not in this state.

Offline millerwheeler

  • Non-Hunting & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2014
  • Posts: 471
  • Location: Spanaway
  • Get out and put some miles on those boots
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #9 on: February 16, 2020, 07:52:37 AM »
What caused such a reduction in such a short period of time? We all know the causes but which of them caused it to occur so fast?

Perfect storm - outlaw hunting cougar & bear with dogs, outlaw leghold traps, bring in wolves, tribes ramp up their take, global warming, more technology - gps/rangefinders/etc. ,  disease, fire,  mismanagement.   Pick any or all the above.


 ALL ACCURATE BUT GLOBAL.WARMING ISNT REAL.COME.ON :IBCOOL:

Offline Dan-o

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 11335
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #10 on: February 16, 2020, 07:55:07 AM »
IMO Entiat tags should never have gone past 10 to begin with, Id prefer 5 at the very most....same with all quality mule deer tags. My dream is 1 per unit. :twocents:

Really?

Most of us casswould never erw a quality tag. 
There are still some really nice bucks taken each year. 
Member:   Yakstrakgutp (or whatever we are)
I love the BFRO!!!
I wonder how many people will touch their nose to their screen trying to read this...

Offline KFhunter

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 22183
  • Location: NE Corner
  • My posts do not reflect an official opinion of HW
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #11 on: February 16, 2020, 08:09:35 AM »
reducing opportunity will make you all better hunters, and it'll be just that much more rewarding when you do take that trophy animal! 


/sarcasm

Offline fishngamereaper

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 3200
  • Location: kitsap
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #12 on: February 16, 2020, 08:51:43 AM »
I think we all dream of having a whole gmu to ourselves. :chuckle:

Offline buglebrush

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 1500
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #13 on: February 16, 2020, 09:11:14 AM »
The trend will only Worsen.  WA is hopeless.  Every employee of WDFW, especially Biologists, should be ashamed of what they've allowed to happen by protecting predators at the cost of all other wildlife.  If predators don't get aggressive management there won't be any game left for two legged hunters. 

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 29362
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #14 on: February 16, 2020, 10:41:04 AM »
IMO Entiat tags should never have gone past 10 to begin with, Id prefer 5 at the very most....same with all quality mule deer tags. My dream is 1 per unit. :twocents:

Then what do you do with general season ..

Mule deer probably should be draw only hunts anyway but once you go there you'll never go back. Not in this state.

 Do away with the quality late hunts and move the general season end to the last Sunday of Oct.
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 18945
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #15 on: February 16, 2020, 11:04:36 AM »
We all know it, but it sucks to see it in black and white! Imagine what it was in 2000.... :'(

For real fun check out license prices you those did not get cut by 50% or greater.
Interesting question. Here are the numbers.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline Onewhohikes

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2020
  • Posts: 267
  • Location: Monroe
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #16 on: February 16, 2020, 11:16:13 AM »
New to the site, been trolling for some time. Would the hunters support a decrease in the deer and elk permits more than what is currently proposed?

Offline Bango skank

  • Non-Hunting & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2014
  • Posts: 4903
  • Location: colville
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #17 on: February 16, 2020, 11:21:31 AM »
New to the site, been trolling for some time. Would the hunters support a decrease in the deer and elk permits more than what is currently proposed?

Hunters have taken the cut again and again and again.  If we keep supporting it, it will never stop, they wont address the predator issue.  Weve given up enough, time to focus on the problem.  More predator control is needed, not less hunting opportunity.  I say we shouldnt have to give another inch until proper predator management goes along with it.

Offline snake

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2015
  • Posts: 433
  • Location: Washington
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #18 on: February 16, 2020, 11:25:56 AM »
New to the site, been trolling for some time. Would the hunters support a decrease in the deer and elk permits more than what is currently proposed?

Hunters have taken the cut again and again and again.  If we keep supporting it, it will never stop, they wont address the predator issue.  Weve given up enough, time to focus on the problem.  More predator control is needed, not less hunting opportunity.  I say we shouldnt have to give another inch until proper predator management goes along with it.
Absolutely right.  Its amazing that so many hunters are basically begging for the state to take away more opportunity when there are so many other options.

Offline fishngamereaper

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 3200
  • Location: kitsap
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #19 on: February 16, 2020, 11:27:01 AM »
Oh crips...I agree with Bango on something for once.

Offline Bango skank

  • Non-Hunting & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2014
  • Posts: 4903
  • Location: colville
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #20 on: February 16, 2020, 11:28:48 AM »
Oh crips...I agree with Bango on something for once.

Even a broken clock is right twice a day  :dunno:

Offline Onewhohikes

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2020
  • Posts: 267
  • Location: Monroe
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #21 on: February 16, 2020, 11:32:52 AM »
New to the site, been trolling for some time. Would the hunters support a decrease in the deer and elk permits more than what is currently proposed?

Hunters have taken the cut again and again and again.  If we keep supporting it, it will never stop, they wont address the predator issue.  Weve given up enough, time to focus on the problem.  More predator control is needed, not less hunting opportunity.  I say we shouldnt have to give another inch until proper predator management goes along with it.
So do you support an increase in permits or remain the same where a quality permit isn't really quality?

Offline Bango skank

  • Non-Hunting & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2014
  • Posts: 4903
  • Location: colville
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #22 on: February 16, 2020, 11:34:58 AM »
New to the site, been trolling for some time. Would the hunters support a decrease in the deer and elk permits more than what is currently proposed?

Hunters have taken the cut again and again and again.  If we keep supporting it, it will never stop, they wont address the predator issue.  Weve given up enough, time to focus on the problem.  More predator control is needed, not less hunting opportunity.  I say we shouldnt have to give another inch until proper predator management goes along with it.
So do you support an increase in permits or remain the same where a quality permit isn't really quality?

No matter how many cuts WE take, the herds will not improve until predators are dealt with properly.  So reduce opportunity all you want, but without predator management it still wont be quality, and it will continue getting worse.  Continuing to cut hunter opportunity year after year is not the answer, it wont fix things.

Offline jrebel

  • Non-Hunting & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 7498
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #23 on: February 16, 2020, 11:37:02 AM »
One of the real problems with hunters in general.....My :twocents: :twocents:......is the "trophy hunting."  This state continues to cut in an attempt to produce "quality" not quantity.  The hunters that are very loud and in your face are quite often "Trophy" hunters that are looking for the elusive 200" mule deer.  I drew a quality late archery tag last year and saw 150 deer a day without trying.  We saw plenty of quality bucks (not 200 inchers....but quality).  To say the tags need to be cut even more is simply crazy.  Increase opportunity with bear and cougar.  Allow dogs and bait.  Do it for 3 year and see what happens to our ungulate population.  If it works and we see and increase in numbers then continue.  If we don't see an increase then take it back to where it was.  If you want to be a trophy hunter.....get our and hunt harder because this state carries plenty of big bucks.  I think Bone's calendar proves that.   :tup:

Offline Bango skank

  • Non-Hunting & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2014
  • Posts: 4903
  • Location: colville
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #24 on: February 16, 2020, 11:40:09 AM »
One of the real problems with hunters in general.....My :twocents: :twocents:......is the "trophy hunting."  This state continues to cut in an attempt to produce "quality" not quantity.  The hunters that are very loud and in your face are quite often "Trophy" hunters that are looking for the elusive 200" mule deer.  I drew a quality late archery tag last year and saw 150 deer a day without trying.  We saw plenty of quality bucks (not 200 inchers....but quality).  To say the tags need to be cut even more is simply crazy.  Increase opportunity with bear and cougar.  Allow dogs and bait.  Do it for 3 year and see what happens to our ungulate population.  If it works and we see and increase in numbers then continue.  If we don't see an increase then take it back to where it was.  If you want to be a trophy hunter.....get our and hunt harder because this state carries plenty of big bucks.  I think Bone's calendar proves that.   :tup:

So the trophy hunters that let lots of bucks walk are the problem huh?  Interesting take on it.

Offline jrebel

  • Non-Hunting & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 7498
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #25 on: February 16, 2020, 11:47:20 AM »
One of the real problems with hunters in general.....My :twocents: :twocents:......is the "trophy hunting."  This state continues to cut in an attempt to produce "quality" not quantity.  The hunters that are very loud and in your face are quite often "Trophy" hunters that are looking for the elusive 200" mule deer.  I drew a quality late archery tag last year and saw 150 deer a day without trying.  We saw plenty of quality bucks (not 200 inchers....but quality).  To say the tags need to be cut even more is simply crazy.  Increase opportunity with bear and cougar.  Allow dogs and bait.  Do it for 3 year and see what happens to our ungulate population.  If it works and we see and increase in numbers then continue.  If we don't see an increase then take it back to where it was.  If you want to be a trophy hunter.....get our and hunt harder because this state carries plenty of big bucks.  I think Bone's calendar proves that.   :tup:


 
So the trophy hunters that let lots of bucks walk are the problem huh?  Interesting take on it.

No....the trophy hunters are typically the hunters that want further restrictions and less tags.  Some hunters have lost their way in my opinion and are simply horn hunters.  To produce bigger horns they will cut off their nose to spite their face.  I know quite a few that that petition the state / wdfw for less quality access and draw only units for mule deer because they want "quality".  These same hunters give their meat away becuase they don't like to eat it. 

I am vehemently oposed to this type of hunter and ideology that hunting has turned in to.  I too will have passed up bucks in search of a more mature animal, but I don't promote less opportunity for the masses because I have a dream of killing a boon and crocket buck. 

Offline BigCutty3

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2013
  • Posts: 53
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #26 on: February 16, 2020, 12:00:42 PM »
It boils down to too much pressure on the resource.  Whether from predators, non-tribal seasons, tribal seasons, loss of habitat, poaching, etc.  We are living off the memories and it isn't going to get any better.  Non-tribal hunters have taken the biggest reductions in opportunity for "quality" animals, but every other factor keeps hammering away at what we give up.  You can say the same thing about Deer and Elk, as you can about Salmon, Steelhead, and shellfish.  The predator and allocation issues are very similar.  Too many people and not enough resource to go around.

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 3183
  • Location: PREDATOR PIT UNIT 121
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #27 on: February 16, 2020, 12:01:26 PM »
Those of us who pass young bucks to get to mature bucks are mostly considered "trophy" hunters.  Dirty word, "trophy" where it applies to hunters, especially to the (my guess) 99% of those who cant pass anything with an antler.  In my opinion, it is the "cant pass anything" crowd that does by far the most damage.

The small percentage of true trophy hunters cant possibly have much voice unless they are within the system somewhere that gives them access to inportant ears.  I too despise those who give their meat away (because they and their family dont like it) and feel as though they shouldnt even be allowed to hunt.

Much is wrong, but I truly believe its from a management deficiency along with agendas not in line with wdfws mission statement.  They can write it without following it as they are now and have been for years.

Offline Stein

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 6511
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #28 on: February 16, 2020, 12:07:44 PM »
Don't worry, just keep buying licenses and permits.  Trust that the state's recovery plan will work.

We can bitch all we want, but if you keep sending your money to Olympia, nothing will change.  If their revenue goes up every year the message they get is that they are doing the right thing.

Offline Bango skank

  • Non-Hunting & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2014
  • Posts: 4903
  • Location: colville
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #29 on: February 16, 2020, 12:43:13 PM »
It boils down to too much pressure on the resource.  Whether from predators, non-tribal seasons, tribal seasons, loss of habitat, poaching, etc.  We are living off the memories and it isn't going to get any better.  Non-tribal hunters have taken the biggest reductions in opportunity for "quality" animals, but every other factor keeps hammering away at what we give up.  You can say the same thing about Deer and Elk, as you can about Salmon, Steelhead, and shellfish.  The predator and allocation issues are very similar.  Too many people and not enough resource to go around.

Yeah, but the people / resource ratio would be way way better if we got our predators in check.  It would do a LOT more to improve our herds than further reduction of permits.

Offline KFhunter

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 22183
  • Location: NE Corner
  • My posts do not reflect an official opinion of HW
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #30 on: February 16, 2020, 12:56:04 PM »
One of the real problems with hunters in general.....My :twocents: :twocents:......is the "trophy hunting."  This state continues to cut in an attempt to produce "quality" not quantity.  The hunters that are very loud and in your face are quite often "Trophy" hunters that are looking for the elusive 200" mule deer.  I drew a quality late archery tag last year and saw 150 deer a day without trying.  We saw plenty of quality bucks (not 200 inchers....but quality).  To say the tags need to be cut even more is simply crazy.  Increase opportunity with bear and cougar.  Allow dogs and bait.  Do it for 3 year and see what happens to our ungulate population.  If it works and we see and increase in numbers then continue.  If we don't see an increase then take it back to where it was.  If you want to be a trophy hunter.....get our and hunt harder because this state carries plenty of big bucks.  I think Bone's calendar proves that.   :tup:

So the trophy hunters that let lots of bucks walk are the problem huh?  Interesting take on it.

I've always said focus on quantity, the quality will take care of itself   :twocents:

Offline OutHouse

  • Non-Hunting & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2015
  • Posts: 1212
  • Location: Cowiche WA
  • Department of Foliage, Lifetime Member
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #31 on: February 16, 2020, 12:56:56 PM »
One of the real problems with hunters in general.....My :twocents: :twocents:......is the "trophy hunting."  This state continues to cut in an attempt to produce "quality" not quantity.  The hunters that are very loud and in your face are quite often "Trophy" hunters that are looking for the elusive 200" mule deer.  I drew a quality late archery tag last year and saw 150 deer a day without trying.  We saw plenty of quality bucks (not 200 inchers....but quality).  To say the tags need to be cut even more is simply crazy.  Increase opportunity with bear and cougar.  Allow dogs and bait.  Do it for 3 year and see what happens to our ungulate population.  If it works and we see and increase in numbers then continue.  If we don't see an increase then take it back to where it was.  If you want to be a trophy hunter.....get our and hunt harder because this state carries plenty of big bucks.  I think Bone's calendar proves that.   :tup:

Completely agree but also see the side that those who kill any buck contribute to the issue. I don't care about the quality tags anymore for similar reasons. Not saying this is true across the board, but most quality bucks I have seen taken you ask the hunter what he did with the meat and hear something like "I experiment with it a little but give most of it away". I never understood this. Is it because an older quality buck tastes bad? It is because it was only ever about the antlers to begin with? Its shameful.

And I have nothing against trophy hunting. I certainly wouldn't pass on a trophy animal.  But for me at the end of the day its about the meat.

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 3183
  • Location: PREDATOR PIT UNIT 121
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #32 on: February 16, 2020, 01:00:48 PM »
I enjoy the hunt even when I dont kill anything, so I am against lost opportunity to hunt.  I dont mind hunting my way through some unproductive years so long as I know they are putting forth legitimate effort for improvement.

For those who dont enjoy spending time in the woods without killing something, I understand your willingness to cut YOUR opportunity down, but dont bargain mine away.  Its bad out there, but not bad enough to quit.  Great opportunity for bear, and coyote hunting is always fun........those two animals right there will hone your woods skills.

For sure the good ol days are gone, so up your game and get after it.  More now than ever before, lack of effort makes a camping trip out of your hunt. 

Offline Bango skank

  • Non-Hunting & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2014
  • Posts: 4903
  • Location: colville
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #33 on: February 16, 2020, 01:20:28 PM »
108,729 deer hunters in 2018
57,452 elk hunters in 2018
21,068 bear hunters in 2018
Didnt find number of cougar licenses sold

So only 1 out of 5 deer hunters bought a bear license.  And many of those dont even go bear hunting, they buy the tag just incase, same with people who buy cougar tags.  So a small fraction of deer and elk hunters actually hunt predators.  I say if you wont put any effort into addressing the predator problem, you shouldnt be advocating for reducing deer and elk opportunity.  If every deer and elk hunter spent just a couple weekends here and there hunting predators outside of deer and elk seasons it would go a long way.

If youre bothered by our lack of deer and elk, get out there and do something about it instead of asking the state to take away more hunting opportunity.

As hunters we are the ones who manage predators, yet a lot of us arent doing it.  Even if we got hounds, wolf hunting, leg holds, everything, every tool available, it wont do. Damn bit of good if people wont even get out there and try.  Fall bear is 3.5 months long.  Cougar is 4-8 months long.  Coyote is year round.  We should all be able to make a little time, nobody is that busy.
« Last Edit: February 16, 2020, 02:51:30 PM by Bango skank »

Offline full choke

  • Non-Hunting & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 1178
  • Location: Maple Valley
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #34 on: February 16, 2020, 01:40:41 PM »
108,729 deer hunters in 2018
57,452 elk hunters in 2018
21,068 bear hunters in 2018
Didnt find number of cougar licenses sold

So only 1 out of 5 deer hunters bought a bear license.  And many of those dont even go bear hunting, they buy the tag just incase, same with people who buy cougar tags.  So a small fraction of deer and elk hunters actually hunt predators.  I say if you wont put any effort into addressing the predator problem, you shouldnt be advocating for reducing deer and elk opportunity.  If every deer and elk hunter spent just a couple weekends here and there hunting predators outside of deer and elk seasons it would go a long way.

If youre bothered by our lack of deer and elk, get out there and do something about it instead of asking the state to take away more hunting opportunity.

You are 100% correct.

Offline Jingles

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 2147
  • Location: 98862
  • Life is short so enjoy it to the MAX
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #35 on: February 16, 2020, 02:33:39 PM »
I think I can say that there are some, maybe not as many as there should be, but there are some that if the opportunity presented itself would do some serious incidental predator control. For me as long as it isn't wearing a collar it is a Coyote............. If it is to big to carry out nature will clean it up.
HMC/USN/RET
1969 -1990

Offline Onewhohikes

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2020
  • Posts: 267
  • Location: Monroe
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #36 on: February 16, 2020, 04:14:09 PM »
108,729 deer hunters in 2018
57,452 elk hunters in 2018
21,068 bear hunters in 2018
Didnt find number of cougar licenses sold
Was the number of bear hunters you quoted the bear tags sold or the number of hunters that filled out the WDFW survey saying they hunted bear?
« Last Edit: February 16, 2020, 04:22:32 PM by Onewhohikes »

Offline jstone

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 3440
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #37 on: February 16, 2020, 04:18:53 PM »
How many bears killed

Offline Bango skank

  • Non-Hunting & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2014
  • Posts: 4903
  • Location: colville
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #38 on: February 16, 2020, 04:23:09 PM »
How many bears killed

1,483 bears
6,559 elk
27,846 deer

Those are 2018 numbers.  Hopefully a good jump in bear harvest for 2019 with our new regs.  Harvest results should be out in a couple months i believe.
« Last Edit: February 16, 2020, 04:30:27 PM by Bango skank »

Offline buglebrush

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 1500
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #39 on: February 16, 2020, 04:44:10 PM »
Agree that we really need to collectively up our game on predator hunting.  Washington makes it tougher by requiring people to harvest bear meat, and no OTC spring bear. 

I spent a long day post-holing my way into wolf country yesterday.  Couldn't believe I forgot my snowshoes!  Didn't get into any, but found some tracks from earlier in the week.  I'll be back!

Offline Onewhohikes

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2020
  • Posts: 267
  • Location: Monroe
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #40 on: February 16, 2020, 04:58:56 PM »
Statistics show Cougars are more of an issue than bears to the ungulates population. We should be more concerned with them

Offline Bango skank

  • Non-Hunting & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2014
  • Posts: 4903
  • Location: colville
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #41 on: February 16, 2020, 05:08:01 PM »
Statistics show Cougars are more of an issue than bears to the ungulates population. We should be more concerned with them
  bears are huge predators of fawns and calves, and there are 10 times as many bears as there are cougars.  Plus theyre easier to hunt, season opens a month before cougar, and you can kill 2.  Im not saying dont hunt cougar, im saying that guys can realistically get out and kill 2 bears a year, and make an impact.  The lion thing is harder.  Bear hunting is the easiest way for a guy to help out our herds.  So get out and whack a bear or two in august, then of course try to get a cougar if possible when its open.  But if guys get serious about bear hunting and we get our numbers up we will be saving thousands more fawns and calves each year.  And if we want to see our permit numbers go back up, we need to do whatever we can to protect all those fawns and calves.
« Last Edit: February 16, 2020, 05:28:43 PM by Bango skank »

Offline hunter399

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 2497
  • Location: In your hunting spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Hunting Regulations 2011-2019 show drastic decline in Quality tags
« Reply #42 on: February 16, 2020, 08:43:23 PM »
New to the site, been trolling for some time. Would the hunters support a decrease in the deer and elk permits more than what is currently proposed?

Hunters have taken the cut again and again and again.  If we keep supporting it, it will never stop, they wont address the predator issue.  Weve given up enough, time to focus on the problem.  More predator control is needed, not less hunting opportunity.  I say we shouldnt have to give another inch until proper predator management goes along with it.
So do you support an increase in permits or remain the same where a quality permit isn't really quality?

No matter how many cuts WE take, the herds will not improve until predators are dealt with properly.  So reduce opportunity all you want, but without predator management it still wont be quality, and it will continue getting worse.  Continuing to cut hunter opportunity year after year is not the answer, it wont fix things.

I can tell that your starting to figure out that WDFW is not gonna deal with predator problem .Hunters are gonna hunt what they wanna hunt.Hunters are not gonna fix the predator problem.Most hunters go home right after deer season and don't return till fall .And you know this man.But in the meantime while we fight for better predator seasons and management,you can't deal deer and elk a $h$t sandwich.

On topic
We should just be happy the permits are even still available.I'm not that guy that's gonna get mad about WDFW reducing opportunity for conservation.Along as some opportunity still exists.
Two birds in the Bush is always better than one in the hand-that way you can always go to the Bush and hunt another day .conservation=Better hunting.
Wrote by hunter399

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Best cell trail camera by idaho guy
[Today at 05:35:31 AM]


Emergency, Emergency , Help by fishngamereaper
[Today at 05:34:27 AM]


Machias' 2020 Idaho Bear season by idaho guy
[Today at 05:32:39 AM]


WTB Binoculars by HntnFsh
[Today at 05:29:39 AM]


Kettle Falls Sturgeon by PA BEN
[Today at 05:20:41 AM]


Target shooting on wdfw lands rule changes by jasnt
[Today at 05:11:52 AM]


preserving traps by JakeLand
[Today at 04:50:43 AM]


Cougar in the Backyard? by adamR
[Today at 04:41:46 AM]


Weekend scouting results by nwalpineguide
[Today at 02:46:13 AM]


Huckleberry 2020 by cougforester
[Today at 12:16:19 AM]


Work boots by EmeraldBullet
[Today at 12:14:35 AM]


WDFW passes on culling Wedge wolf pack by huntnphool
[Yesterday at 11:52:12 PM]


free pellet gun by BD1
[Yesterday at 10:59:46 PM]


Sammamish, cliff notes for dummies please by AL WORRELLS KID
[Yesterday at 10:51:26 PM]


Report Wolf Sightings Here - Hunting-Washington Wolf Count 158+ by Utah
[Yesterday at 10:45:51 PM]


Spring is here, let the wolf depredations begin. Again. by KFhunter
[Yesterday at 10:45:23 PM]


New gray wolf pack discovered near valley, WDFW reports by Utah
[Yesterday at 10:39:45 PM]


RIP Newtron by BD1
[Yesterday at 10:10:49 PM]


What hunter orange vest is best? by opdinkslayer
[Yesterday at 09:49:21 PM]


Incubator possibly too dry and birds are stuck in egg by Birdguy
[Yesterday at 09:36:37 PM]