collapse

Advertisement


Poll

Survey taken?

I took the survey in support
108 (71.1%)
I took the survey against changes
2 (1.3%)
I sent emails
19 (12.5%)
Ive done nothing because im lazy and/or dont care
23 (15.1%)

Total Members Voted: 133

Author Topic: STATEWIDE bear reg proposal 🤞  (Read 27594 times)

Online hunter399

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 3061
  • Location: In your hunting spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: STATEWIDE bear reg proposal 🤞
« Reply #315 on: April 11, 2020, 12:22:06 PM »
Although the two bear tags is a great hunter opportunity/predator management.Im still on the fence about it.
One question though if your raising fall harvest for x amount of years how do you expect to get OTC spring bear hunt.
Two birds in the Bush is always better than one in the hand-that way you can always go to the Bush and hunt another day .conservation=Better hunting.
Wrote by hunter399

Offline Bango skank

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2014
  • Posts: 5876
  • Location: colville
Re: STATEWIDE bear reg proposal 🤞
« Reply #316 on: April 11, 2020, 12:28:44 PM »
Although the two bear tags is a great hunter opportunity/predator management.Im still on the fence about it.
One question though if your raising fall harvest for x amount of years how do you expect to get OTC spring bear hunt.

For one thing, the spring bear is not an additional bear, it does not increase the bag limit.

For another, wdfw says they do not have an estimate for the bear population, instead they rely on hunter harvest statistics as a surrogate for population estimate.  So by wdfws methods, the more bears killed, the higher they assume the population to be

Offline Bango skank

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2014
  • Posts: 5876
  • Location: colville
Re: STATEWIDE bear reg proposal 🤞
« Reply #317 on: April 11, 2020, 02:23:16 PM »
Even considering much of the state already had a 2 bear limit and august 1st or august 15th openers, still the total statewide fall harvest increased by almost 50% from 2018 to 2019.  :tup:  that extra 685 bears reported killed last fall will help out the deer elk and moose.   

Offline Jpmiller

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2016
  • Posts: 2788
  • Location: Wilkeson
Re: STATEWIDE bear reg proposal 🤞
« Reply #318 on: April 11, 2020, 06:25:43 PM »
Most of the folks I talked to last year had no idea about the reg change because it wasn't in the paper copy they picked up in spring. I'd bet alot more pressure gets put on them this fall too.

Offline dmoua

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2014
  • Posts: 420
Re: STATEWIDE bear reg proposal 🤞
« Reply #319 on: April 12, 2020, 12:21:11 AM »
Most of the folks I talked to last year had no idea about the reg change because it wasn't in the paper copy they picked up in spring. I'd bet alot more pressure gets put on them this fall too.

This. There were a lot of people that questioned us last season.
Instagram @dmoua_wa

Youtube channel DMOUA OUTDOORS
https://www.youtube.com/user/YeXuSsOlDiEr

Online hunter399

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 3061
  • Location: In your hunting spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: STATEWIDE bear reg proposal 🤞
« Reply #320 on: April 12, 2020, 02:11:58 AM »
Although the two bear tags is a great hunter opportunity/predator management.Im still on the fence about it.
One question though if your raising fall harvest for x amount of years how do you expect to get OTC spring bear hunt.

For one thing, the spring bear is not an additional bear, it does not increase the bag limit.

For another, wdfw says they do not have an estimate for the bear population, instead they rely on hunter harvest statistics as a surrogate for population estimate.  So by wdfws methods, the more bears killed, the higher they assume the population to be
I'm fully aware of how bear population is estimated.So when or if there is a decline in harvest we will lose opportunity.
As you know WDFW has a pretty good record for allowing over harvest ,then taking opportunity away. I've been emailing a few people at WDFW over spring permit numbers ect.It didn't sound as if permits numbers or any kind of spring bear season was gonna change.
But knowing how WDFW is you can see my concern.
Two birds in the Bush is always better than one in the hand-that way you can always go to the Bush and hunt another day .conservation=Better hunting.
Wrote by hunter399

Offline HillHound

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2019
  • Posts: 767
  • Location: Central Washington
  • Groups: NRA, RMEF
Re: STATEWIDE bear reg proposal 🤞
« Reply #321 on: April 12, 2020, 06:29:39 AM »
 If people will get out and put the effort In success rate should not go down. Most people just donít even go out there hunting And only shoot them incidentally. All you have to do is get out there and try. My brother Was never much into it because he would never see bears. I kept shooting bears in August when there werenít nearly as many people out and I finally got him over this year and he did get a shot off at one. Unfortunately he just nicked it. He went home and I killed a different one a couple days later then the one he had missed his chance on the week after that. He is now hooked and will be back August 1st.

Offline Bango skank

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2014
  • Posts: 5876
  • Location: colville
Re: STATEWIDE bear reg proposal 🤞
« Reply #322 on: April 12, 2020, 06:58:54 AM »
Although the two bear tags is a great hunter opportunity/predator management.Im still on the fence about it.
One question though if your raising fall harvest for x amount of years how do you expect to get OTC spring bear hunt.

For one thing, the spring bear is not an additional bear, it does not increase the bag limit.

For another, wdfw says they do not have an estimate for the bear population, instead they rely on hunter harvest statistics as a surrogate for population estimate.  So by wdfws methods, the more bears killed, the higher they assume the population to be
I'm fully aware of how bear population is estimated.So when or if there is a decline in harvest we will lose opportunity.
As you know WDFW has a pretty good record for allowing over harvest ,then taking opportunity away. I've been emailing a few people at WDFW over spring permit numbers ect.It didn't sound as if permits numbers or any kind of spring bear season was gonna change.
But knowing how WDFW is you can see my concern.

Yeah, i see your concern, it goes in a pattern like this.

We need more predator control!

Oh no, they gave us more predator control, this is bad because if we kill more predators theyll take away our increased predator control!

Serious dude, just stop. 

Whats the point of having opportunity if youre afraid to yse it for fear of it being taken away?

Everybody should make sure not to kill predators so we can have good seasons?

You make no sense, you just look for things to complain about.  I think you enjoy being a massive pessimist naysayer.
« Last Edit: April 12, 2020, 07:13:25 AM by Bango skank »

Offline buglebrush

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 1539
Re: STATEWIDE bear reg proposal 🤞
« Reply #323 on: April 12, 2020, 08:38:22 AM »
Any increase in predator harvest in Washington is a very very good thing.  Bears kill a lot of caves.  A LOT!  I wish they would also make the harvesting of meat optional like Idaho.  I personally take meat, but the ultimate goal of predator hunting is to reduce the numbers.  This especially applies in Washington due to the wolf and lion situation. 

Online hunter399

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 3061
  • Location: In your hunting spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: STATEWIDE bear reg proposal 🤞
« Reply #324 on: April 12, 2020, 12:14:24 PM »
Although the two bear tags is a great hunter opportunity/predator management.Im still on the fence about it.
One question though if your raising fall harvest for x amount of years how do you expect to get OTC spring bear hunt.

For one thing, the spring bear is not an additional bear, it does not increase the bag limit.

For another, wdfw says they do not have an estimate for the bear population, instead they rely on hunter harvest statistics as a surrogate for population estimate.  So by wdfws methods, the more bears killed, the higher they assume the population to be
I'm fully aware of how bear population is estimated.So when or if there is a decline in harvest we will lose opportunity.
As you know WDFW has a pretty good record for allowing over harvest ,then taking opportunity away. I've been emailing a few people at WDFW over spring permit numbers ect.It didn't sound as if permits numbers or any kind of spring bear season was gonna change.
But knowing how WDFW is you can see my concern.

Yeah, i see your concern, it goes in a pattern like this.

We need more predator control!

Oh no, they gave us more predator control, this is bad because if we kill more predators theyll take away our increased predator control!

Serious dude, just stop. 

Whats the point of having opportunity if youre afraid to yse it for fear of it being taken away?

Everybody should make sure not to kill predators so we can have good seasons?

You make no sense, you just look for things to complain about.  I think you enjoy being a massive pessimist naysayer.
:hello:
Two birds in the Bush is always better than one in the hand-that way you can always go to the Bush and hunt another day .conservation=Better hunting.
Wrote by hunter399

Offline Bango skank

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2014
  • Posts: 5876
  • Location: colville
Re: STATEWIDE bear reg proposal 🤞
« Reply #325 on: April 13, 2020, 02:45:34 PM »
Just got this info.  Thats a hell of a big jump in 2nd bear tags sold.  Those additional 609 2nd bear tags sold brought in about $15,000 for wdfw, which im sure they will spend wisely  :chuckle:
« Last Edit: April 13, 2020, 07:05:44 PM by Bango skank »

Offline jasnt

  • Predator hunter
  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 6094
  • Location: deer park
  • Out shooting
  • Groups: WSTA
Re: STATEWIDE bear reg proposal 🤞
« Reply #326 on: April 13, 2020, 07:42:19 PM »
Hope they keep it for life
243Round ct. 158
338 lapua rc 239


The commission shall attempt to maximize the public recreational game fishing and hunting opportunities of all citizens, including juvenile, disabled, and senior citizens.
https://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=77.04.012

Offline Bango skank

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2014
  • Posts: 5876
  • Location: colville
Re: STATEWIDE bear reg proposal 🤞
« Reply #327 on: April 13, 2020, 07:43:41 PM »
Hope they keep it for life

Have you ever known wdfw to give up a revenue source once they get it?

Offline cougforester

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2016
  • Posts: 939
  • Location: Spokane
  • Groups: DU, RMEF
Re: STATEWIDE bear reg proposal 🤞
« Reply #328 on: April 13, 2020, 07:44:37 PM »
Just got this info.  Thats a hell of a big jump in 2nd bear tags sold.  Those additional 609 2nd bear tags sold brought in about $15,000 for wdfw, which im sure they will spend wisely  :chuckle:

That's good news. I was one of them, didn't get to fill the second one this year. Lookin forward to two notched bear tags this fall though!

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Chainsaws chainsaws chainsaws by WRENCHMAN
[Yesterday at 11:40:49 PM]


Multi season draw results by carpsniperg2
[Yesterday at 11:18:50 PM]


Small vs. Large Munsterlander by munsterlander
[Yesterday at 10:55:01 PM]


F/S Black Gold Ascent Verdict Assault. 5-pin Custom built With Blind man's light by BLDtraLR
[Yesterday at 10:30:06 PM]


JOBS: Looking for work/Looking to hire by JTB
[Yesterday at 10:04:58 PM]


2021 Turkeys!!! Let see those birds. by Mulie87
[Yesterday at 09:53:25 PM]


SWFA rifle scope (price drop) by craigapphunt
[Yesterday at 09:41:29 PM]


WTS bullets by swanderek
[Yesterday at 09:38:51 PM]


Trade/Co-op reloading stuff by hunter399
[Yesterday at 09:38:05 PM]


Wts wtt brand new in box razor Gen ll 4x27x56 riflescope by wrchinook
[Yesterday at 09:05:35 PM]


Finding hoof rot dead elk shed hunting by High Climber
[Yesterday at 08:50:26 PM]


Alaska North Slope ( Please comment) by fishngamereaper
[Yesterday at 08:33:36 PM]


Swakane by scoutdog346
[Yesterday at 08:31:27 PM]


Galliformes of the world by Birdguy
[Yesterday at 08:20:06 PM]


Powder for primers by bugs n bones
[Yesterday at 08:17:58 PM]


WTT/ Rl26 for cci200 by big wood
[Yesterday at 08:12:27 PM]


For sale 2014 Harley Ultra limited by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 07:28:19 PM]


Buffalo Bore 9mm outdoorsman by jdb
[Yesterday at 06:54:27 PM]


Montana results??? by gasman
[Yesterday at 06:48:46 PM]


Letís see your throwback pictures by Buck Rub Jr
[Yesterday at 05:49:06 PM]