collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Reloading--Manual vs Convention (copper bullets)  (Read 236 times)

Online JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 12518
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Reloading--Manual vs Convention (copper bullets)
« on: September 22, 2020, 07:54:45 PM »
When reloading copper bullets in the past, when there wasn't any load data available I would use a little thumb rule.  That was to take the bullet weight and add 15%, then use the closest lead bullet that did have that powder.  So for a 150 gr copper, would look for a 170-ish grain lead which usually ended up being the 165-168 grains.  This was to account for the extra volume of copper (compressed load).  Anyone ever hear of this?
So I got a new manual because I couldn't find anything with a new powder to try (IMR 4451 Enduron).  I noticed the manual doesn't make any mention of differences for the length of the bullets.  It has all the bullets grouped by weight:  A 150 gr GMX (copper) is listed with say a 150 gr interlock SP (copper jacketed lead core).  Even listed as having the same COL, even though side by side the GMX is longer.  The maximum charge listed would be the same, yet the copper sits further into the case.  Just kind of made me wonder.  Is the former advice for using data for the 15% heavier lead bullets just not needed (never was)?  Just burned up more powder during load development by starting even lower than what is now a 'starting point'?

Offline Platensek-po

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2018
  • Posts: 312
  • Location: olympia, wa
Re: Reloading--Manual vs Convention (copper bullets)
« Reply #1 on: September 22, 2020, 07:57:43 PM »
Interesting. Would like to hear about this and bump this up
“Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary.”

If you are not willing to die for freedom then take the word out of your vocabulary.

Offline Jolten

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2013
  • Posts: 789
  • Location: Yakima, WA
Re: Reloading--Manual vs Convention (copper bullets)
« Reply #2 on: September 22, 2020, 08:11:01 PM »
I believe the COAL is max Sammi spec always. And the powder being the same due to needing just as much force to move an equal amount of weight down the barrel?
The best equipment in the world is useless to the idiot who doesn't understand it.

Online JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 12518
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: Reloading--Manual vs Convention (copper bullets)
« Reply #3 on: September 22, 2020, 08:24:29 PM »
If I look at the exact same bullet (ex the 180 gr interlock SP) and the same powder RL-17, both listed to be loaded to the cannelure--same depth/same weight bullet, but one goes in the .30-06 and the other goes into a .308, the 06 starts at 47.0 grs and the .308 is at 47.1 grs before the highlighted dangerous territory load is (max recommended).  Then the consideration is from case capacity/pressure.  But the manual says you can load a copper max load the same charge as a lead core for the given weight/powder, but you have a different case capacity.

The manual I'm looking at is the Hornady 10th edition.

Offline yorketransport

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 3292
  • Location: Yelm
  • I'm sorry, it's my fault I'll try harder next time
    • https://www.facebook.com/scapegoatenterprises/
    • Scapegoat Enterprises
Re: Reloading--Manual vs Convention (copper bullets)
« Reply #4 on: September 22, 2020, 08:44:38 PM »
It has just as much to do with bearing surface as it does bullet make up and weight. Newer monometal bullets have a much shorter bearing surface than the older designs (like the original Barnes bullet), so sometimes the same data can be used for the same weights in lead core and solid copper. When you get into the copper bullets with very short bearing surfaces like the Cutting Edge, Flatline, Badlands, and Hamemers, you'll actually get to a point where your charge weights will be higher with the monometals than they are with a similar weight lead core bullet. A lot of the solid coppers are using different alloys than they used to, so that changes things as well.
Scapegoat Enterprises Custom Shirts and Decals

Offline hogslayer

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 789
  • Location: Snoqualmie-Belfair
  • Groups: Bloody decks
Re: Reloading--Manual vs Convention (copper bullets)
« Reply #5 on: September 22, 2020, 08:57:29 PM »
I have been playing with Hammer Hunter bullets in 338 NMI.  I am becoming a fan. This was my three shot zero for hunting today. 24” barrel H1000 2980 FPS.   Copper doesn’t swell like lead does.  Same charge for 250 Berger (shortest bearing surface of all time) was 3050.

Online JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 12518
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: Reloading--Manual vs Convention (copper bullets)
« Reply #6 on: September 22, 2020, 09:04:57 PM »
Okay, that sounds like a good explanation.  The bullet description does say that the new gilding for the metal is friction reduction as well as mentions bearing surface changes.  The old monos that I am used to are Barnes TSX and TTSX, where I used to do the quick volume compensation.  My assumption was based off initial pressure.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Fins or Fur by cat daddy
[Today at 06:05:02 PM]


Optics for sale by Open-sights
[Today at 05:58:02 PM]


From a two stroke to a four stroke by Blacklab
[Today at 05:56:03 PM]


Corn field question by Mfowl
[Today at 05:55:59 PM]


Beretta Silver Pigeon by SeaRun1
[Today at 05:52:57 PM]


Trade/Co-op reloading stuff by paguy
[Today at 05:51:15 PM]


Calamari Anyone??? by Jake Dogfish
[Today at 05:46:17 PM]


Skagit Island Unit changes coming.. get your comments in. by ck
[Today at 05:44:48 PM]


Ritzville Buck Tag 2021 by LDennis24
[Today at 05:43:28 PM]


WTB: H1000 and/or RK 26 by Crunchy
[Today at 05:29:00 PM]


Forks Fishing by Commando
[Today at 04:54:34 PM]


WTS 2000 Dodge Ram 2500 4x4 by Rem14
[Today at 04:53:57 PM]


Kuiu Pro 6000 pack by Jayfire83
[Today at 04:20:43 PM]


An old warrior is down by Ironhead
[Today at 04:06:59 PM]


Idaho non resident tag quotas for 2021 by fishngamereaper
[Today at 04:05:54 PM]


Do backcountry elk hunts exist in Western Washington? by TRD1911
[Today at 03:16:26 PM]


500 S&W Revolver by whtbck
[Today at 03:03:25 PM]


WTS Folding Stock for Mini 14/30 by callturner
[Today at 02:59:51 PM]


2020 HuntWA Christmas Gift Exchange by wadu1
[Today at 02:46:35 PM]


where are all the primers? by buckfvr
[Today at 02:43:08 PM]