collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: RL23 and range reports  (Read 1659 times)

Offline Taco280AI

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2013
  • Posts: 2011
  • Location: FL350
RL23 and range reports
« on: September 30, 2020, 10:38:55 AM »
145LRX
3067 vs 3097 fps
Both sub half inch @ 100 and will shoot at 300 next for groups.

Now this is what I'll use for Idaho deer and elk. Temps could range from 20 degrees in the morning up to 70 degrees mid day. Which would you choose to take with the info given? Temp sensitivity might be an issue, might not. I've read RL is more temp sensitive, but have seen a test that showed it barely changed at all from 8 degrees to 80. Different cartridge and bullet however.

What say you?

« Last Edit: October 07, 2020, 08:29:30 PM by Taco280AI »

Online Jason

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3354
  • Location: Camas
Re: H4831 vs RL23
« Reply #1 on: September 30, 2020, 11:07:00 AM »
I would use the H4831 just because it's way more stable in the temp range as you mentioned.

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 8020
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: H4831 vs RL23
« Reply #2 on: September 30, 2020, 01:13:27 PM »
30fps isn't enough speed to spit at and H4831 is bomb proof.  Ive burned 50lb or more of the stuff so it gets my vote every time
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline hogslayer

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 798
  • Location: Snoqualmie-Belfair
  • Groups: Bloody decks
Re: H4831 vs RL23
« Reply #3 on: September 30, 2020, 01:27:32 PM »
RL23 and 16 is the only “stable” RL powders.  I use 23 and really like it.  But it’s almost same exact burn rate as 4831SC.  Both are a great option.  Tweak your seating depth to bring it together a little more.

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 30492
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: H4831 vs RL23
« Reply #4 on: September 30, 2020, 01:39:18 PM »
RL23 and 16 is the only “stable” RL powders.  I use 23 and really like it.  But it’s almost same exact burn rate as 4831SC.  Both are a great option.  Tweak your seating depth to bring it together a little more.

 I’ve not had issues in the extreme cold of Montana with 4831SC. :twocents:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline huntandjeep

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 2533
  • Location: West Valley , Yakima
Re: H4831 vs RL23
« Reply #5 on: September 30, 2020, 01:58:57 PM »
Another vote for the 4831 . I have never noticed a difference from here to Montana
Anyone that thinks a Glock is better than a 1911 paints his toenails.
Yakima Valley Mountaineers

Offline jasnt

  • Predator hunter
  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 6094
  • Location: deer park
  • Out shooting
  • Groups: WSTA
Re: H4831 vs RL23
« Reply #6 on: September 30, 2020, 04:15:18 PM »
4831
243Round ct. 158
338 lapua rc 239


The commission shall attempt to maximize the public recreational game fishing and hunting opportunities of all citizens, including juvenile, disabled, and senior citizens.
https://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=77.04.012

Offline b23

  • Non-Hunting & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 2577
  • Location: Spokane Wa.
Re: H4831 vs RL23
« Reply #7 on: September 30, 2020, 05:16:26 PM »
Conventional wisdom would suggest H4831 as being the overwhelming choice.  BUT, in Alliant's defense RL16, RL23 and even to a large degree RL26 are nothing like their older powders with regard to temperature stability.  I think either would be a good choice but if you have any concern go with H4831.


Offline hunterofelk

  • Non-Hunting & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 854
Re: H4831 vs RL23
« Reply #8 on: October 01, 2020, 07:07:13 AM »
Are these velocitys from chronogragh or reloading manuel?

Offline Taco280AI

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2013
  • Posts: 2011
  • Location: FL350
Re: H4831 vs RL23
« Reply #9 on: October 01, 2020, 07:23:28 AM »
MagnetoSpeed Sporter. I had great accuracy with IMR4350, but it's sloooooooow compared to the book. Different lots, different chronos.

Offline Taco280AI

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2013
  • Posts: 2011
  • Location: FL350
Re: H4831 vs RL23
« Reply #10 on: October 01, 2020, 07:29:11 PM »
Well RL23 it is. Tried to shoot a "group" @ 200 with H4831, but didn't work out so went straight to RL23.



With a seating depth of 3.31" and 3.33" (3.30 wasn't as good), I grouped about 1.16" and 1.18" from a bipod with a rear bag. The two shots touching were .22" and .25". For reference those are 2" dots. Ground was hard pack dirt and very uneven, with a fine layer of practically dust. Did have some flyers with other groups, but think it was a combo of me and the ground, with a lack of consistent bipod footing. On the right target the first shot was in the orange. Don't know if I need to work on seating depth more, or find a better shooting surface, or just get better behind the trigger - or all three. Or bedding.

Of the three I chrono'd they ran 3097, 3092, 3092.
« Last Edit: October 01, 2020, 10:08:26 PM by Taco280AI »

Offline hogslayer

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 798
  • Location: Snoqualmie-Belfair
  • Groups: Bloody decks
Re: H4831 vs RL23
« Reply #11 on: October 05, 2020, 10:03:59 PM »
I froze some RL23 last weekend and tested it against 70 degrees.  There was zero FPS change.  Did this test a few weeks ago with RL26 and there was 30 FPS in 40 degrees.

Offline Magnum_Willys

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 4609
Re: H4831 vs RL23
« Reply #12 on: October 05, 2020, 10:22:24 PM »
2 shots together and flier everytime  I would want to shoot 5 shot groups to see whats happening.  Suspect rifle can do better if you can find culprit - stock clearance not enough, seating depth, bedding, screws tight.  ?

Same group equally spaced I would be happy  but You might be just one change from a real tack driver.   Kind of stuff that makes us wear out barrels looking for the answer.  Hehe. 

Offline Taco280AI

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2013
  • Posts: 2011
  • Location: FL350
Re: H4831 vs RL23
« Reply #13 on: October 06, 2020, 07:52:51 AM »
I froze some RL23 last weekend and tested it against 70 degrees.  There was zero FPS change. 

That's good to know  :tup:

Picked up three more pounds, same lot, in Naches a few days ago.

Offline Taco280AI

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2013
  • Posts: 2011
  • Location: FL350
Re: H4831 vs RL23
« Reply #14 on: October 07, 2020, 10:32:11 AM »
Took the stock off and tightened it back down. Fired one shot through the chrono to start, 3096fps. After four rounds on three different days it's 3097, 3092, 3092, 3096.

Little breezy out and didn't feel great about the shots so didn't want to look at the target until I was right in front of it (as opposed to being disappointed while walking up to it still). Got there and was like, that's not too bad... was expecting worse. Top to bottom is a little over 1.4" @ 200 yards and if you get rid of that bottom shot everything else is sub 1". Time to fine tune, set zero, shoot a few groups farther out, and have it ready to hunt.

« Last Edit: October 07, 2020, 02:01:55 PM by Taco280AI »

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Galliformes of the world by Birdguy
[Today at 08:20:06 PM]


Powder for primers by bugs n bones
[Today at 08:17:58 PM]


WTT/ Rl26 for cci200 by big wood
[Today at 08:12:27 PM]


Finding hoof rot dead elk shed hunting by bbarnes
[Today at 07:31:33 PM]


For sale 2014 Harley Ultra limited by MADMAX
[Today at 07:28:19 PM]


Wts wtt brand new in box razor Gen ll 4x27x56 riflescope by bambam3960
[Today at 07:05:33 PM]


Trade/Co-op reloading stuff by Teepee96
[Today at 07:02:09 PM]


Buffalo Bore 9mm outdoorsman by jdb
[Today at 06:54:27 PM]


WTS/WTT: Springfield XDS .45 by Boze84
[Today at 06:50:04 PM]


Montana results??? by gasman
[Today at 06:48:46 PM]


Let’s see your throwback pictures by Buck Rub Jr
[Today at 05:49:06 PM]


2021 sheds.... Post them here. by Buckhunter24
[Today at 05:45:14 PM]


Optics Planet Sucks by Ridgeratt
[Today at 05:36:39 PM]


2021-22 Big Game Regs by TVHunts
[Today at 05:13:15 PM]


2021 49 Degrees North Springers by cougforester
[Today at 05:08:52 PM]


Dems want to make silencers illegal... by BULLBLASTER
[Today at 05:04:26 PM]


Guess the species and win a free book by ucwarden
[Today at 05:03:10 PM]


what is your turkey gun setup? by salish
[Today at 05:02:40 PM]


FS:5.56 x-tac lap by Bandocknr
[Today at 04:39:52 PM]


300 Blackout (AAC BLK) by b23
[Today at 04:35:16 PM]