Spring Bear Pelt Submission

[h20hunter]

So.......because of the hide requirements you both  (?) are saying you won't report the kill as required?

[KFhunter]

They need to clarify, because all I intend to bring em is a nut sack.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

[h20hunter]

Coin Purse and a swizzle stick!

[Fl0und3rz]

[pickardjw]

If it gives the wdfw ammo against the anti's I guess I'm okay with it. Just wish there was clarification on how much is required to be submitted. I'll be bringing a pelt with no paws or head for sure.

Good point regarding the NE brown bear overlap units too.

[trophyhunt]

So.......because of the hide requirements you both  (?) are saying you won't report the kill as required?

I'll have to make up my mind at the time I guess, I did say I might just bring out a piece with evidence of sex though. 

[Fl0und3rz]

Misdemeanor if you do it wrong without adequate guidance?  I cannot fault a guy for having reservations.



If WDFW is concerned about it, they should provide as clear guidance as possible.  It's not rocket science.

[brokentrail]

IMO, the way I read it is pelt = skin, not a portion thereof, with evidence of sex attached.  I, myself, don't need any further clarification.
 I will bring out the pelt, defined as the way I interpreted it, as it is the law, regardless if I agree with it or not.

[Special T]

Perhaps they are stalling because spring bear is under litigation.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

[hunter399]

Just give me the tag - no problem dragging it.
Problem solved.

[Fl0und3rz]

IMO, the way I read it is pelt = skin, not a portion thereof, with evidence of sex attached.  I, myself, don't need any further clarification.
 I will bring out the pelt, defined as the way I interpreted it, as it is the law, regardless if I agree with it or not.

Thanks for proving the point.  It is not up to your interpretation.

[millerwheeler]

IMO, the way I read it is pelt = skin, not a portion thereof, with evidence of sex attached.  I, myself, don't need any further clarification.
 I will bring out the pelt, defined as the way I interpreted it, as it is the law, regardless if I agree with it or not.

Thanks for proving the point.  It is not up to your interpretation.

Can’t imagine why  the pics of hide with the piece of hide attached would
Need to be whole , and the tooth part is easy just odd and I do hope they clarify it

[brokentrail]

IMO, the way I read it is pelt = skin, not a portion thereof, with evidence of sex attached.  I, myself, don't need any further clarification.
 I will bring out the pelt, defined as the way I interpreted it, as it is the law, regardless if I agree with it or not.

Thanks for proving the point.  It is not up to your interpretation.

Actually, unless/until it is clarified and exact, it currently is up to my interpretation, just like yours is up to your interpretation.  I'll do what I think the law is telling me to do, you can do the same... I won't complain about it not being clarified/exact, or how I won't comply,  and others can feel free to do so.  I could care less tbh.

[Stein]

IMO, the way I read it is pelt = skin, not a portion thereof, with evidence of sex attached.  I, myself, don't need any further clarification.
 I will bring out the pelt, defined as the way I interpreted it, as it is the law, regardless if I agree with it or not.

Thanks for proving the point.  It is not up to your interpretation.

So, hunters need to bring in the entire pelt including the head and paws?

[Fl0und3rz]

IMO, the way I read it is pelt = skin, not a portion thereof, with evidence of sex attached.  I, myself, don't need any further clarification.
 I will bring out the pelt, defined as the way I interpreted it, as it is the law, regardless if I agree with it or not.

Thanks for proving the point.  It is not up to your interpretation.

Actually, unless/until it is clarified and exact, it currently is up to my interpretation, just like yours is up to your interpretation.  I'll do what I think the law is telling me to do, you can do the same... I won't complain about it not being clarified/exact, or how I won't comply,  and others can feel free to do so.  I could care less tbh.

And you proved the point, again.