collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Stimson/ Colville NF Proposed Land Swap  (Read 3307 times)

Offline Buckhunter24

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 1735
  • Location: Eatonville
Re: Stimson/ Colville NF Proposed Land Swap
« Reply #15 on: March 19, 2021, 12:38:43 PM »
The Colville has successfully collaborated on a lot of stewardship projects in the last decade and built a lot of trust that good forestry is taking place. Would I like to see it at a faster pace and larger treatment level? Yes. But good projects are taking place in the Colville NF.

Online hunter399

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 3966
  • Location: In your hunting spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Stimson/ Colville NF Proposed Land Swap
« Reply #16 on: March 19, 2021, 01:28:08 PM »
The Colville has successfully collaborated on a lot of stewardship projects in the last decade and built a lot of trust that good forestry is taking place. Would I like to see it at a faster pace and larger treatment level? Yes. But good projects are taking place in the Colville NF.
Totally agree
There has been Alot more harvests going on in the colville national forest through steward ship harvest sales.
Most of those logs have went to a few mills in the area.
And has kept wood product manufacturer strong in our area.
Two birds in the Bush is always better than one in the hand-that way you can always go to the Bush and hunt another day .conservation=Better hunting.
Wrote by hunter399

Offline KFhunter

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 28938
  • Location: NE Corner
  • My posts do not reflect an official opinion of HW
Re: Stimson/ Colville NF Proposed Land Swap
« Reply #17 on: March 19, 2021, 01:37:28 PM »
The Colville has successfully collaborated on a lot of stewardship projects in the last decade and built a lot of trust that good forestry is taking place. Would I like to see it at a faster pace and larger treatment level? Yes. But good projects are taking place in the Colville NF.
Vaagans had a pretty good partnershio going , is that dissolved?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk


Online hunter399

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 3966
  • Location: In your hunting spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Stimson/ Colville NF Proposed Land Swap
« Reply #18 on: March 19, 2021, 01:43:41 PM »
The Colville has successfully collaborated on a lot of stewardship projects in the last decade and built a lot of trust that good forestry is taking place. Would I like to see it at a faster pace and larger treatment level? Yes. But good projects are taking place in the Colville NF.
Vaagans had a pretty good partnershio going , is that dissolved?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Yes they was awarded the stewardship contracts.
I don't have a clue now ,I'm not in the circle of trust anymore. :chuckle: :chuckle:
Two birds in the Bush is always better than one in the hand-that way you can always go to the Bush and hunt another day .conservation=Better hunting.
Wrote by hunter399

Offline Buckhunter24

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 1735
  • Location: Eatonville
Re: Stimson/ Colville NF Proposed Land Swap
« Reply #19 on: March 19, 2021, 01:47:59 PM »
I've got no real insight. My understanding from what I've read on the usfs site is every project is open for any bidder to bid on, and each project area is a separate bid.

Online hunter399

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 3966
  • Location: In your hunting spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Stimson/ Colville NF Proposed Land Swap
« Reply #20 on: March 19, 2021, 01:59:45 PM »
I've got no real insight. My understanding from what I've read on the usfs site is every project is open for any bidder to bid on, and each project area is a separate bid.
I guess the contracts I'm talking about was a few years ago.
All contracts are like that . Anybody can bid ECT,ECT.
But vaagans can take a pretty small log.
It kinda depends on the stand of timber.
Who can make the most of what's there.
Does that make sense at all ?
Two birds in the Bush is always better than one in the hand-that way you can always go to the Bush and hunt another day .conservation=Better hunting.
Wrote by hunter399

Offline Buckhunter24

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 1735
  • Location: Eatonville
Re: Stimson/ Colville NF Proposed Land Swap
« Reply #21 on: March 19, 2021, 02:01:28 PM »
 :tup:

Online hunter399

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 3966
  • Location: In your hunting spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Stimson/ Colville NF Proposed Land Swap
« Reply #22 on: March 19, 2021, 02:05:21 PM »
No mill wants to run small block.
Except vaagans they love it I guess.
Make a 2x4 out of nothing I guess.
 :chuckle: :chuckle: :dunno: :chuckle: :chuckle:

We used to make fun of the brothers said.
Them vaagan brothers must be named bow and wayn.
Cause of the way the straping would hit you in the face.
When you break the straps on there lumber.
With that said ,I don't think it was ever that bad,but it was always funny.
Two birds in the Bush is always better than one in the hand-that way you can always go to the Bush and hunt another day .conservation=Better hunting.
Wrote by hunter399

Offline Alan K

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 2755
  • Location: Lewis County, WA
  • University of Idaho Alumni
Re: Stimson/ Colville NF Proposed Land Swap
« Reply #23 on: March 19, 2021, 02:11:55 PM »
The stewardship sales are a workaround so that dollars stay on the forest. That's the good part of them. Its ridiculous that our government can't figure out a way to just handle the accounting internally and allow dollars from regular timber sales to go back into the lands they were generated on...

The bad part, is they make very little money, and the selection process of who gets the job is done behind closed doors and doesn't necessarily go to the bidder that returns the highest value.  In many cases it does not. Room for some good old boys club corruption there?  Stewardship contracts are faaaar from efficient. They rope in a lot of odd ball projects that a logger or lumber mill rarely deals with. For example pre-commercial thinning. Is it good they get some thinning done? Of course! But when the bidder puts $300/acre on that project because of the headache and subcontracting etc. outside of their regular business, when the USFS could have contracted the same work directly for $200/acre it doesn't make much sense...

Traditional, COMPETITIVE timber sales, with the USFS handling the special projects themselves would be better for everyone involved AND stretch the same dollars farther!


Online hunter399

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 3966
  • Location: In your hunting spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Stimson/ Colville NF Proposed Land Swap
« Reply #24 on: March 19, 2021, 02:16:45 PM »
The stewardship sales are a workaround so that dollars stay on the forest. That's the good part of them. Its ridiculous that our government can't figure out a way to just handle the accounting internally and allow dollars from regular timber sales to go back into the lands they were generated on...

The bad part, is they make very little money, and the selection process of who gets the job is done behind closed doors and doesn't necessarily go to the bidder that returns the highest value.  In many cases it does not. Room for some good old boys club corruption there?  Stewardship contracts are faaaar from efficient. They rope in a lot of odd ball projects that a logger or lumber mill rarely deals with. For example pre-commercial thinning. Is it good they get some thinning done? Of course! But when the bidder puts $300/acre on that project because of the headache and subcontracting etc. outside of their regular business, when the USFS could have contracted the same work directly for $200/acre it doesn't make much sense...

Traditional, COMPETITIVE timber sales, with the USFS handling the special projects themselves would be better for everyone involved AND stretch the same dollars farther!
I don't mind the mill hiring tree thinners,it's better than the forest service hiring migrants to due the work.
Does giveing local workers 300 AC make sense.
Sure it's better to do the work for cheap.But it's even better to pay more and keep that money in our community.
Two birds in the Bush is always better than one in the hand-that way you can always go to the Bush and hunt another day .conservation=Better hunting.
Wrote by hunter399

Online hunter399

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 3966
  • Location: In your hunting spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Stimson/ Colville NF Proposed Land Swap
« Reply #25 on: March 19, 2021, 02:27:03 PM »
Alan K
I do agree there is some good ol boy clubs.
Seen it myself ,you can put a certain name on a contract as a Forman,or project leader. And I bet money in some cases those contracts will go to those people.
But at the end of the day you got to ask yourself. WHY
More than likely someone noticed there work ethics or there ability to finish contracts start to finish.
Two birds in the Bush is always better than one in the hand-that way you can always go to the Bush and hunt another day .conservation=Better hunting.
Wrote by hunter399

Offline cougforester

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2016
  • Posts: 983
  • Location: Spokane
  • Groups: DU, RMEF
Re: Stimson/ Colville NF Proposed Land Swap
« Reply #26 on: September 27, 2021, 03:40:16 PM »
This is back.

Appears comment period is opening up soon.

Edit: Guess my link won't post. Whoops.

It appears comments will be open for October.
« Last Edit: September 27, 2021, 05:03:45 PM by cougforester »

Offline Boss .300 winmag

  • FLY NAVAL AVIATION
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+17)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 15942
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • How do you measure trying, you do, or you donít.
"Just because I like granola, and I have stretched my arms around a few trees, doesn't mean I'm a tree hugger!
Hi I'm 8156, our leader is Bearpaw.
YOU CANNOT REASON WITH A TIGER WHEN YOUR HEAD IS IN ITS MOUTH! Winston Churchill

Keep Calm And Duc/Ski Doo On!

Offline highcountry_hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 147
  • Location: Kettle Falls
Re: Stimson/ Colville NF Proposed Land Swap
« Reply #28 on: September 27, 2021, 07:37:46 PM »
As a logger and sportsmen I have a different opinion than the previous comments

Proís-
-Sportsmen and recreationalists receive double the amount of public land
-The public land received has been properly managed by a reputable timber company
-Since the land received has been managed for timber it will be much better hunting than USFS managed land. If youíve never been on USFS land in NE Washington, think dog hair thick lodgepole pine
-The 30k acres of USFS land that Stimson will receive will be properly managed in the immediate future which is desperately needed due to decades of neglect from the USFS caused by caving to pressure from out of state, extreme environmental groups who still try to stop logging on federal lands, even after witnessing the devastating effects of wildfire on unmanaged lands.

Cons(?)
-Wilderness lite; limited access to public lands IE no road access. To that I say, there are enough public lands in Washington that have road systems running through them. If you want to go into a roadless area you have 2 options. 1 buy a good pair of boots and get into shape. 2 buy a horse.

Just my 2Ę

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Is this why we lost our spring bear season? by hunter399
[Today at 01:02:48 AM]


WDFW 2022 cover pic contest... by hunter399
[Today at 01:00:29 AM]


blacktail tactics book by PolarBear
[Today at 12:27:51 AM]


WTT H1000 for H4350 by Kauaiian
[Today at 12:18:34 AM]


Please criticize my duck hunt! by shootem
[Today at 12:14:06 AM]


Another wolf v coyote v dog by X-Force
[Yesterday at 10:50:07 PM]


Have I ever mentioned by kellama2001
[Yesterday at 10:41:41 PM]


Sometimes they come your direction by kellama2001
[Yesterday at 10:35:34 PM]


WTB 2 Savage 24s by Shoofly09
[Yesterday at 10:29:18 PM]


Purty One by kellama2001
[Yesterday at 10:28:41 PM]


A decent beast by kellama2001
[Yesterday at 10:27:28 PM]


New to turkey hunting by brokentrail
[Yesterday at 10:06:23 PM]


Confusing dog command? by huntnfmly
[Yesterday at 09:16:45 PM]


Best moveable vacuum sealer by 7mmfan
[Yesterday at 09:02:33 PM]


Garmin Inreach Explorer plus by chukar58
[Yesterday at 09:01:34 PM]


Contact List Regarding Spring Bear by Torrent50
[Yesterday at 08:31:02 PM]


Legal buck in my Property... by Lady Grouse hunter
[Yesterday at 07:56:37 PM]


How to protect your fishing spot by elkrack
[Yesterday at 07:49:06 PM]


WTS WW2 M1 Garand! All Springfield Parts by swanderek
[Yesterday at 07:40:26 PM]


Defensive Edge Canyon Rifle 338 Edge by elkrack
[Yesterday at 07:30:22 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2021, SimplePortal