collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Cougar hunting proposal  (Read 8527 times)

Offline Brushcrawler

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2016
  • Posts: 494
  • Location: West side
Cougar hunting proposal
« on: May 19, 2022, 07:16:04 PM »
Everyone should comment on this:

https://wdfw.wa.gov/news/wdfw-invites-public-comment-rule-making-cougar-hunting-and-regulations

Because of the way the surveys are being run now, anyone from anywhere in the world can comment and WDFW can’t tell who is who. In order to keep up with the national and international anti-hunting groups we should be looking to RMEF, SCI, BHA, Meateater, Randy Newberg and  any other group that can help to recruit hunters everywhere to comment, so we don’t have a repeat of spring bear.
There is not enough wilderness left in the world, or in the hearts of men.

Offline trophyhunt

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 18677
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: Wa Wild Sheep Life Member
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #1 on: May 19, 2022, 07:25:09 PM »
Sorry if I’m being negative but if 100% of public comments were for spring bear, I believe the commission would have still voted it down. I truly believe this commision don’t give two chits what the public says, much less WDFW biologist.
“In common with”..... not so much!!

Offline Cougartail

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 3221
  • Location: Eastern Washington
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #2 on: May 19, 2022, 07:51:02 PM »
Sorry if I’m being negative but if 100% of public comments were for spring bear, I believe the commission would have still voted it down. I truly believe this commision don’t give two chits what the public says, much less WDFW biologist.

 :yeah: They know best because most of them sleep with teddy bears and watch Disney.
Did Trump hurt your feelings?

I only seem like a macho guy if you have low T and you listen to the Village  People

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 7662
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • If you know me,then you know I give zero #&$@$
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #3 on: May 19, 2022, 08:34:39 PM »
Sorry if I’m being negative but if 100% of public comments were for spring bear, I believe the commission would have still voted it down. I truly believe this commision don’t give two chits what the public says, much less WDFW biologist.

 :yeah: They know best because most of them sleep with teddy bears and watch Disney.
So true so true.
I don't see any harm in supporting more opportunity for hunters.
At the same time if this is "happening" in the Blues,
What's to say it isn't in the whole state.
Hehehehe :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle:
🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
I rather piss in the wind,then have piss down my back.

Offline Timberstalker

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 9163
  • Location: Tri-Cities
  • Just one more ridge
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #4 on: May 19, 2022, 08:40:18 PM »
Wow. Get the word out.
It’s very unlikely to kill one lion, let alone two, but this is a step in the right direction.
If you aint hunting, you aint livin'

Offline idaho guy

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2012
  • Posts: 2798
  • Location: hayden
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #5 on: May 19, 2022, 09:11:26 PM »
Commented

Offline ZaneHunts

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2021
  • Posts: 196
  • Location: Mason county
  • Groups: NWTF, NAFA, WFA, RMEF, HOWL
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #6 on: May 19, 2022, 09:21:00 PM »
Dare I say a slight glimmer of hope for the ol' WDFW.
Commented my support and starting my sharing spree

Offline PsoasHunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2014
  • Posts: 178
  • Location: Western Washington
  • Groups: RMEF
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #7 on: May 20, 2022, 12:03:29 AM »
Thanks for the link. Commented.

Offline NOCK NOCK

  • Timberdog Slabs
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2013
  • Posts: 6188
  • Location: E. Wenatchee
  • Timberdog Slab Designs
    • https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100063502962432
    • Timberdogslabs.com
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #8 on: May 20, 2022, 05:40:05 AM »
If I read that correct, will not change the overall quantity of cats killed per harvest "guidelines"......just allows some hunters to kill more than 1
Live edge Slab woods, Log Furniture, Beds, Dressers, Tables, Chairs, Custom signs, Décor, Cedar fencing w/artwork cutting. Supplies
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100063502962432

Offline Skyvalhunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 15706
  • Location: Sky valley/Methow
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #9 on: May 20, 2022, 05:40:45 AM »
Comment made, time to get this issue under control
The only man who never makes a mistake, is the man who never does anything!!
The further one goes into the wilderness, the greater the attraction of its lonely freedom.

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 7662
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • If you know me,then you know I give zero #&$@$
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #10 on: May 20, 2022, 06:35:05 AM »
If I read that correct, will not change the overall quantity of cats killed per harvest "guidelines"......just allows some hunters to kill more than 1
That may be true. But it will allow more cats killed in high depredations areas ,which should help ungulates.
I rather piss in the wind,then have piss down my back.

Offline Timberstalker

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 9163
  • Location: Tri-Cities
  • Just one more ridge
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #11 on: May 20, 2022, 06:43:43 AM »
If I read that correct, will not change the overall quantity of cats killed per harvest "guidelines"......just allows some hunters to kill more than 1

No, this will allow more cats to be killed because they don’t govern the number of cats killed before January 1.
In theory, all of us could kill 2 cats this year before January 1, whereas last year we could’ve only killed 1 cat each.
If you aint hunting, you aint livin'

Offline trophyhunt

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 18677
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: Wa Wild Sheep Life Member
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #12 on: May 20, 2022, 07:10:13 AM »
Honest question, if they took away limits completely on cougar, how many more cats would be killed? What is the percentage of hunters that have even seen one cat in the past 5 years, 10 years?? I’ve spent tons of hours glassing in the blues, sitting for hours watching hill sides, never saw a cat over there. I know we have a big cat problem, but allowing one more cate to be killed will save the elk and deer? Hell, I’d like to see one cat per 100 hunters get killed. I’ll comment, but it’s not even a band aid on a open wound that’s pumping blood. If The WDFW really want to help, they’d push for changing hounds and baiting laws.
“In common with”..... not so much!!

Offline trophyhunt

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 18677
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: Wa Wild Sheep Life Member
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #13 on: May 20, 2022, 07:27:53 AM »
Here is my comment…

Another comment about supporting hunting to a mostly anti hunting commission… this is exactly what it’s like talking to my 5 year old yorkie, I wonder if some of the commisioners turn their heads slightly when the read these comments?? You could take away limits completely and it wouldn’t put a dent in the cougar population, they just don’t get harvested enough by boot hunters. Only way to control cougar populations in critical areas, hounds. Ahh, now I just lost the anti hunting commisioners, heads just turned back straight and swiped away the comment….
“In common with”..... not so much!!

Offline Timberstalker

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 9163
  • Location: Tri-Cities
  • Just one more ridge
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #14 on: May 20, 2022, 07:43:45 AM »
Jerry:

I get your sentiments, but remember, we have to try and rebuild the predator control somehow!
I agree, we need hounds.  I agree, we need bait, but you and I both know, in this state we aren't going to get the whole buffet line at once. 

This change is positive and a step in the right direction.

 :twocents:
If you aint hunting, you aint livin'

Offline RB

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 2838
  • Location: Arlington, washington
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #15 on: May 20, 2022, 07:51:42 AM »
Jerry:

I get your sentiments, but remember, we have to try and rebuild the predator control somehow!
I agree, we need hounds.  I agree, we need bait, but you and I both know, in this state we aren't going to get the whole buffet line at once. 

This change is positive and a step in the right direction.

 :twocents:




 :yeah:
IAFF #3728

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 7662
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • If you know me,then you know I give zero #&$@$
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #16 on: May 20, 2022, 07:53:47 AM »
Honest question, if they took away limits completely on cougar, how many more cats would be killed? What is the percentage of hunters that have even seen one cat in the past 5 years, 10 years?? I’ve spent tons of hours glassing in the blues, sitting for hours watching hill sides, never saw a cat over there. I know we have a big cat problem, but allowing one more cate to be killed will save the elk and deer? Hell, I’d like to see one cat per 100 hunters get killed. I’ll comment, but it’s not even a band aid on a open wound that’s pumping blood. If The WDFW really want to help, they’d push for changing hounds and baiting laws.
Honestly they could take away quotas in SOME areas.
Look at NE WA .
And the meat eater episode the other day.
60+ removal a year.
That tells me more opportunity should go to hunters with longer seasons and less quotas.


Just wanted to add that these hounds men do a great job at safety removal ECT.
But an August opener,or two cat limit in problem areas for NE WA should also be going on for some areas.
« Last Edit: May 20, 2022, 08:03:02 AM by hunter399 »
I rather piss in the wind,then have piss down my back.

Offline RB

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 2838
  • Location: Arlington, washington
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #17 on: May 20, 2022, 07:54:03 AM »
Thanks for the link comment added more tags!

Here is what we are up against the lack of knowledge in this persons statement is mind boggling!


"Why don't you reduce human hunting of elk until the population bounces back? Killing off a part of the ecosystem doesn't make sense. Cougars can never do as much damage as advanced hunters who use technology. Please compare how many humans kill off elk vs cougars in the area".
IAFF #3728

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 12521
  • Location: Arlington
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #18 on: May 20, 2022, 08:56:07 AM »
Maybe WDFW should report how many elk are killed in the Blue Mountains from hunters and predators, I bet that person would be surprised to say the least.

Offline rainshadow1

  • RainShadow Game Calls & Custom Knives
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 3258
  • Location: Selah, WA - Sequim, WA
  • Custom Calls and Knives
    • http://www.facebook.com/pages/RainShadow-Game-Calls-Custom-Knives/133406026689512?ref=hl
    • RainShadow Game Calls & Custom Knives
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #19 on: May 20, 2022, 09:03:32 AM »
I agree, and participate in the frustration...

But we may as well comment when the door opens a crack for it. Think carefully and address the core issue. More people see what we say every time we're able to say it.  Do what you can where you can.

People following these appointed politicians are ENTHUSIASTICALLY IGNORANT!!!
- - Steve
View and Purchase/Order Custom Calls!
Cougar Hunters!!! Check out Calling Products and Call-In Stories!
View the Blade Gallery, & Purchase/Order a Custom Knife!
 www.rain-shadow.com

RainShadow Game Calls & Custom Knives on Facebook

Labrador Retrievers - https://rainshadowlabradors.com

Offline trophyhunt

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 18677
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: Wa Wild Sheep Life Member
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #20 on: May 20, 2022, 09:14:03 AM »
Jerry:

I get your sentiments, but remember, we have to try and rebuild the predator control somehow!
I agree, we need hounds.  I agree, we need bait, but you and I both know, in this state we aren't going to get the whole buffet line at once. 

This change is positive and a step in the right direction.

 :twocents:
I agree with ya, hell, im sure I’ve never disagreed w ya!  :chuckle:
“In common with”..... not so much!!

Offline Timberstalker

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 9163
  • Location: Tri-Cities
  • Just one more ridge
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #21 on: May 20, 2022, 09:59:31 AM »
All good man, let's hope WDFW sees the light.  I do know, if something isn't done in the Blues (ASAP), the deer/elk/moose are going to be gone.
If you aint hunting, you aint livin'

Offline Meow

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Nov 2020
  • Posts: 58
  • Location: Lakehood, WA
  • Groups: NRA, SAF
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #22 on: May 20, 2022, 10:35:26 AM »
Honest question, if they took away limits completely on cougar, how many more cats would be killed? What is the percentage of hunters that have even seen one cat in the past 5 years, 10 years?? I’ve spent tons of hours glassing in the blues, sitting for hours watching hill sides, never saw a cat over there. I know we have a big cat problem, but allowing one more cate to be killed will save the elk and deer? Hell, I’d like to see one cat per 100 hunters get killed. I’ll comment, but it’s not even a band aid on a open wound that’s pumping blood. If The WDFW really want to help, they’d push for changing hounds and baiting laws.
Honestly they could take away quotas in SOME areas.
Look at NE WA .
And the meat eater episode the other day.
60+ removal a year.
That tells me more opportunity should go to hunters with longer seasons and less quotas.


Just wanted to add that these hounds men do a great job at safety removal ECT.
But an August opener,or two cat limit in problem areas for NE WA should also be going on for some areas.
The cougar opener should be moved up to August 1st to match bears state wide, or at the very least in the SE and NE units. I bet that would get a lot more people out when access is easy pressure is relatively low, and there's not a lot else to hunt. Would be a shame to call in a cougar while bear hunting and have to let it go.

As trophyhunt stated, adjusting the limit alone doesn't seem like it will greatly increase the number of cats killed, as they're so elusive.

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4508
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #23 on: May 20, 2022, 10:43:45 AM »


Here is what we are up against the lack of knowledge in this persons statement is mind boggling!


"Why don't you reduce human hunting of elk until the population bounces back? Killing off a part of the ecosystem doesn't make sense. Cougars can never do as much damage as advanced hunters who use technology. Please compare how many humans kill off elk vs cougars in the area".


Obviously this person knows absolutely zero his/herself.  This person is what I call a repeater as they and many others are only capable of repeating rhetoric supplied by anti hunting groups.  This is all likely to go the route of spring bear anyway as the attack on hunters continues.

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 24823
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #24 on: May 20, 2022, 11:40:48 AM »
This is a throw away compromise IMO. This will do almost nothing to greatly reduce cougar numbers. Perhaps we should bust into the game management plan for blues elk and see if they are low enough drastic measures could be taken.
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline elksnout

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 1278
  • Location: Washougal, Wash
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #25 on: June 01, 2022, 10:05:28 PM »
Commented.

elksnout
Can't we all just get along?

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 7662
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • If you know me,then you know I give zero #&$@$
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #26 on: June 02, 2022, 04:57:42 AM »
Thanks for the link comment added more tags!

Here is what we are up against the lack of knowledge in this persons statement is mind boggling!


"Why don't you reduce human hunting of elk until the population bounces back? Killing off a part of the ecosystem doesn't make sense. Cougars can never do as much damage as advanced hunters who use technology. Please compare how many humans kill off elk vs cougars in the area".

It's pretty obvious that antlerless hunts should be put on hold. I don't think any hunters want to destroy an ecosystem.
At the same time ungulate and predators need management to equal the playing field in order to keep a equal balance between ungulate and predator and humans.

I'm no expert on the Blues elk herd.
Wolves are not being managed in Washington. I'm a firm believer that these cougar are trying to adapt to a new ecosystem. Cougar was top predator ,not any more.
A pecking order so to speak.
What happens when you kill A lot of coyote in area?
The next year they have bigger litters,and even more coyote appear.
This is just a thought......
Cougar are adapteing by breeding more,bigger litters.
Also if a cougar kills an Elk,eats,covers the kill.
Then other predators find that and eat it.
Will cause that cougar to kill another Elk.
Wolves and coyote will eat anything dead or alive.

The ecosystem is changing......
99% of hunters have some conservationists in them.
At the same time,we also don't want to lose hunting as recreation and food for the freezer.

There is supposed to be a predator/prey study coming out.
But I assume it will protect wolves at all cost. And will really do nothing to add insight to some of what I mentioned above.

The sad reality is....
More than likely if Elk numbers continue to drop in coming years. WDFW big plan will be to turn elk hunting there into permit draw hunting only.

Just some things to think about our current ecosystem

Wanted to add this....
You could kill every cougar in the state,and we would just become a wolf stronghold.
Until wolves and cougar are managed properly ,we will continue to see declines in ungulate herds.



« Last Edit: June 02, 2022, 05:05:42 AM by hunter399 »
I rather piss in the wind,then have piss down my back.

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 24823
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #27 on: June 02, 2022, 08:30:25 AM »
Thanks for the link comment added more tags!

Here is what we are up against the lack of knowledge in this persons statement is mind boggling!


"Why don't you reduce human hunting of elk until the population bounces back? Killing off a part of the ecosystem doesn't make sense. Cougars can never do as much damage as advanced hunters who use technology. Please compare how many humans kill off elk vs cougars in the area".

It's pretty obvious that antlerless hunts should be put on hold. I don't think any hunters want to destroy an ecosystem.
At the same time ungulate and predators need management to equal the playing field in order to keep a equal balance between ungulate and predator and humans.

I'm no expert on the Blues elk herd.
Wolves are not being managed in Washington. I'm a firm believer that these cougar are trying to adapt to a new ecosystem. Cougar was top predator ,not any more.
A pecking order so to speak.
What happens when you kill A lot of coyote in area?
The next year they have bigger litters,and even more coyote appear.
This is just a thought......
Cougar are adapteing by breeding more,bigger litters.
Also if a cougar kills an Elk,eats,covers the kill.
Then other predators find that and eat it.
Will cause that cougar to kill another Elk.
Wolves and coyote will eat anything dead or alive.

The ecosystem is changing......
99% of hunters have some conservationists in them.
At the same time,we also don't want to lose hunting as recreation and food for the freezer.

There is supposed to be a predator/prey study coming out.
But I assume it will protect wolves at all cost. And will really do nothing to add insight to some of what I mentioned above.

The sad reality is....
More than likely if Elk numbers continue to drop in coming years. WDFW big plan will be to turn elk hunting there into permit draw hunting only.

Just some things to think about our current ecosystem

Wanted to add this....
You could kill every cougar in the state,and we would just become a wolf stronghold.
Until wolves and cougar are managed properly ,we will continue to see declines in ungulate herds.

ID has a great long term predator prey study that addresses many of the things you talk about. The biggest take away is that 1 cats do more of the killing. this is because sight predators like wolves push them into ambush areas, and then wolves and bears steal more of the kills. In this state each species are managed independent of each other. This is how they hide the obvious cause and effect.
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4508
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #28 on: June 02, 2022, 09:43:21 AM »
Thanks for the link comment added more tags!

Here is what we are up against the lack of knowledge in this persons statement is mind boggling!


"Why don't you reduce human hunting of elk until the population bounces back? Killing off a part of the ecosystem doesn't make sense. Cougars can never do as much damage as advanced hunters who use technology. Please compare how many humans kill off elk vs cougars in the area".

It's pretty obvious that antlerless hunts should be put on hold. I don't think any hunters want to destroy an ecosystem.
At the same time ungulate and predators need management to equal the playing field in order to keep a equal balance between ungulate and predator and humans.

I'm no expert on the Blues elk herd.
Wolves are not being managed in Washington. I'm a firm believer that these cougar are trying to adapt to a new ecosystem. Cougar was top predator ,not any more.
A pecking order so to speak.
What happens when you kill A lot of coyote in area?
The next year they have bigger litters,and even more coyote appear.
This is just a thought......
Cougar are adapteing by breeding more,bigger litters.
Also if a cougar kills an Elk,eats,covers the kill.
Then other predators find that and eat it.
Will cause that cougar to kill another Elk.
Wolves and coyote will eat anything dead or alive.

The ecosystem is changing......
99% of hunters have some conservationists in them.
At the same time,we also don't want to lose hunting as recreation and food for the freezer.

There is supposed to be a predator/prey study coming out.
But I assume it will protect wolves at all cost. And will really do nothing to add insight to some of what I mentioned above.

The sad reality is....
More than likely if Elk numbers continue to drop in coming years. WDFW big plan will be to turn elk hunting there into permit draw hunting only.

Just some things to think about our current ecosystem

Wanted to add this....
You could kill every cougar in the state,and we would just become a wolf stronghold.
Until wolves and cougar are managed properly ,we will continue to see declines in ungulate herds.

I do not believe cougar are trying to adapt to a "new ecosystem".  Within the ecosystem, I believe biotic components, namely predator/prey animals, are trying to adjust to changes brought on by the addition of the wolf.

Please share your source of study information about coyotes, and cougar adapting to breed "more, bigger litters".

I think bringing back bait/hounds may as well be in outer space as there doesn't seem to be a possibility of a new vote on those measures let alone enough support to change the outcome in a state with an ever growing population that is either indifferent to or against hunting.

Even if quotas and seasons were drastically changed, WITH OUT hounds, not much will change.  Just because there could be more opportunity doesn't mean change is imminent.  Last year or 2 was covid, this next season the price of fuel will probably have a greater effect than covid. 

Bears, wolves, and cougars are all the problem, and they simply are not managed properly by wdfw because of their political nature.



Offline Pathfinder101

  • The Chosen YAR
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 11736
  • Location: Southeast WA
  • Semper Primus
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #29 on: June 02, 2022, 12:23:30 PM »
Honest question, if they took away limits completely on cougar, how many more cats would be killed? What is the percentage of hunters that have even seen one cat in the past 5 years, 10 years?? I’ve spent tons of hours glassing in the blues, sitting for hours watching hill sides, never saw a cat over there. I know we have a big cat problem, but allowing one more cate to be killed will save the elk and deer? Hell, I’d like to see one cat per 100 hunters get killed. I’ll comment, but it’s not even a band aid on a open wound that’s pumping blood. If The WDFW really want to help, they’d push for changing hounds and baiting laws.
Won't make a huge difference, but I do know a few retired guys that kill as many per year as they're allowed.  Calling, tracking... etc...  They spend significant time at it and get tags in as many states as they can get to.  Won't matter much, but every cat dead = 20-40 deer/elk calves that get to live....
Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes.  That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes.

Online mcrawfordaf

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2019
  • Posts: 523
  • Location: East Side
  • PF, RGS, INWWC, SBDA, NWTF
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #30 on: June 02, 2022, 12:41:09 PM »

Please share your source of study information about coyotes, and cougar adapting to breed "more, bigger litters".


Knowlton,1972:  Noted the death of alpha pairs in packs stimulates breeding among formerly behaviorally sterile pack members, promotes immigration of transient coyotes, and that litter size can be affected by population density; reporting average litter sizes of 4.3 at high coyote densities and 6.9 at low coyote densities(I)

Connolly and Longhurst, 1975/ Connolly, 1978:  Noted that in most situations, killing coyotes even at rates of up to 70% of their population merely stimulates reproduction and aggravates the problem.(II)

Bekoff, 1977:  Noted that in more coyote females breed when food is abundant and that during years when rodent populations are high, as many as 75% of yearling females may breed.(III)

New York State DEC, 1991:  Noted females will not breed if food is in short supply or their numbers are too high for the available food and space, liter sizes will be smaller with less abundant food sources, random hunting and trapping and year-round hunting will not reduce coyote populations, and if a breeding female is removed, a previous non-breeder may take her place.(VI)

Connolly, 1995:  Noted that upon review of the Connolly and Longhurst model of 1975,  those biological concepts seemed just as valid in 1995 and that new studies have tended to reaffirm those coyote population mechanics rather than prove them wrong.(V)

Fox and Papouchis, 2005: Noted the failure of extreme, indiscriminate killing of coyotes due to their adaptability within their diet, as well as reproductive and immigration response, and that resources would be better spent on long-term, humane coexistence methods.(VI)

Schadler, 2010:  Noted that pack disruption stimulates breeding among previously behaviorally sterile pack members and that coyote fertility varies based on food availability; improved nutrition releases hormonal signals that result in more egg production in females, causing an increase of population upon the next mating cycle following a temporary decrease in population.(VII)

Minnie, Gaylard, and Kerley, 2015:  Noted compensatory reproduction and immigration response in adaptive and indiscriminately killed predators such as the jackal and the coyote.(VIII)

Crabtree, 2015: Explained the scientific theory of compensatory reproductive response; further solidifying the growing acceptance of the predator reproductive response theory among scientists.(IX)

Kierepka, Kilgo and Rhodes, 2017:  Noted that coyotes recover from intensive trapping via reproduction and immigration, which likely make preventing compensation difficult.(X)


Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 7662
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • If you know me,then you know I give zero #&$@$
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #31 on: June 02, 2022, 02:55:07 PM »
Thanks for the link comment added more tags!

Here is what we are up against the lack of knowledge in this persons statement is mind boggling!


"Why don't you reduce human hunting of elk until the population bounces back? Killing off a part of the ecosystem doesn't make sense. Cougars can never do as much damage as advanced hunters who use technology. Please compare how many humans kill off elk vs cougars in the area".

It's pretty obvious that antlerless hunts should be put on hold. I don't think any hunters want to destroy an ecosystem.
At the same time ungulate and predators need management to equal the playing field in order to keep a equal balance between ungulate and predator and humans.

I'm no expert on the Blues elk herd.
Wolves are not being managed in Washington. I'm a firm believer that these cougar are trying to adapt to a new ecosystem. Cougar was top predator ,not any more.
A pecking order so to speak.
What happens when you kill A lot of coyote in area?
The next year they have bigger litters,and even more coyote appear.
This is just a thought......
Cougar are adapteing by breeding more,bigger litters.
Also if a cougar kills an Elk,eats,covers the kill.
Then other predators find that and eat it.
Will cause that cougar to kill another Elk.
Wolves and coyote will eat anything dead or alive.

The ecosystem is changing......
99% of hunters have some conservationists in them.
At the same time,we also don't want to lose hunting as recreation and food for the freezer.

There is supposed to be a predator/prey study coming out.
But I assume it will protect wolves at all cost. And will really do nothing to add insight to some of what I mentioned above.

The sad reality is....
More than likely if Elk numbers continue to drop in coming years. WDFW big plan will be to turn elk hunting there into permit draw hunting only.

Just some things to think about our current ecosystem

Wanted to add this....
You could kill every cougar in the state,and we would just become a wolf stronghold.
Until wolves and cougar are managed properly ,we will continue to see declines in ungulate herds.

I do not believe cougar are trying to adapt to a "new ecosystem".  Within the ecosystem, I believe biotic components, namely predator/prey animals, are trying to adjust to changes brought on by the addition of the wolf.

Please share your source of study information about coyotes, and cougar adapting to breed "more, bigger litters".

I think bringing back bait/hounds may as well be in outer space as there doesn't seem to be a possibility of a new vote on those measures let alone enough support to change the outcome in a state with an ever growing population that is either indifferent to or against hunting.

Even if quotas and seasons were drastically changed, WITH OUT hounds, not much will change.  Just because there could be more opportunity doesn't mean change is imminent.  Last year or 2 was covid, this next season the price of fuel will probably have a greater effect than covid. 

Bears, wolves, and cougars are all the problem, and they simply are not managed properly by wdfw because of their political nature.
I do agree with ya.
New ecosystem is probably not the right wording.
Current ecosystem adjusting to our new predator.
Wolves and cougar are in direct competition for food.
Before they where not.

You have to agree with that.

Cougar having bigger litter is just theory, No facts or research for that. Maybe not even bigger litter,maybe better survival rate or something . Wolves coming back and knocking them down the food chain or causing them to make more kills,might raise the survival rates for kittens.
 :dunno: :dunno: :dunno:
Just a theory.

I also agree with ya.
Managed properly means
Trapping for wolves
Hounds for cats.

Your right again!!!
We won't get management like hounds for cats.
For sure won't see any wolf management.

But I do think giving hunters more opportunity is better than nothing.
WDFW hands are tied with hounds or wolf management.
At least they are trying to give hunters more opportunity.


I rather piss in the wind,then have piss down my back.

Offline idaho guy

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2012
  • Posts: 2798
  • Location: hayden
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #32 on: June 03, 2022, 07:53:51 AM »

Please share your source of study information about coyotes, and cougar adapting to breed "more, bigger litters".


Knowlton,1972:  Noted the death of alpha pairs in packs stimulates breeding among formerly behaviorally sterile pack members, promotes immigration of transient coyotes, and that litter size can be affected by population density; reporting average litter sizes of 4.3 at high coyote densities and 6.9 at low coyote densities(I)

Connolly and Longhurst, 1975/ Connolly, 1978:  Noted that in most situations, killing coyotes even at rates of up to 70% of their population merely stimulates reproduction and aggravates the problem.(II)

Bekoff, 1977:  Noted that in more coyote females breed when food is abundant and that during years when rodent populations are high, as many as 75% of yearling females may breed.(III)

New York State DEC, 1991:  Noted females will not breed if food is in short supply or their numbers are too high for the available food and space, liter sizes will be smaller with less abundant food sources, random hunting and trapping and year-round hunting will not reduce coyote populations, and if a breeding female is removed, a previous non-breeder may take her place.(VI)

Connolly, 1995:  Noted that upon review of the Connolly and Longhurst model of 1975,  those biological concepts seemed just as valid in 1995 and that new studies have tended to reaffirm those coyote population mechanics rather than prove them wrong.(V)

Fox and Papouchis, 2005: Noted the failure of extreme, indiscriminate killing of coyotes due to their adaptability within their diet, as well as reproductive and immigration response, and that resources would be better spent on long-term, humane coexistence methods.(VI)

Schadler, 2010:  Noted that pack disruption stimulates breeding among previously behaviorally sterile pack members and that coyote fertility varies based on food availability; improved nutrition releases hormonal signals that result in more egg production in females, causing an increase of population upon the next mating cycle following a temporary decrease in population.(VII)

Minnie, Gaylard, and Kerley, 2015:  Noted compensatory reproduction and immigration response in adaptive and indiscriminately killed predators such as the jackal and the coyote.(VIII)

Crabtree, 2015: Explained the scientific theory of compensatory reproductive response; further solidifying the growing acceptance of the predator reproductive response theory among scientists.(IX)

Kierepka, Kilgo and Rhodes, 2017:  Noted that coyotes recover from intensive trapping via reproduction and immigration, which likely make preventing compensation difficult.(X)
     


Uggh :bash: no offense to you but I get sick every time I read one of these “science “ studies. It all started with Farley mowat who fell in love with wolves in the 70s.  Birth rates vary based on available prey. Killing coyotes, wolves and lions does NOT lead to a greater abundance of coyotes, wolves and lions that is such a circular ridiculous argument it would be funny if it wasn’t so dangerous. These studies are all done from the perspective of don’t hunt or trap predators in any way or form. I know it’s written by a biologist most of the time but that’s where this flawed logic started in the university system. You are living with the results of these studies right now in Washington. Is it working for you? This is exactly what these studies were designed to create . No or ineffective management of predators. The point of those “studies “ are you shouldn’t hunt or trap predators because it will just create more. Really? You are living the affects of these “studies “ right now. Does it work for your ungulates or hunting? These folks have college degrees but ask yourselves where did the pro predator anti hunting and anti gun philosophy start? This is not directed at you at all it’s just the stupidity of these studies in my mind. There is a hidden agenda and it’s not good for the future of hunting. I have personally witnessed a major reduction in coyotes through trapping certain ranches. I have seen lion population plummet from hound hunting (which I am not in favor of)but I have seen it in my hound hunting spots. Think about what they are actually saying-if we hunt or trap predators we will have MORE predators. What does everyone think the real goal is here?

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 7662
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • If you know me,then you know I give zero #&$@$
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #33 on: June 03, 2022, 08:27:27 AM »
There are so many factor of "why" so many predators.
The main take away is ,too many cats.
WDFW hands are tied on most management tools.
The only tool left in the tool box is.....
Hunter opportunity.
Which is fine by me.
I rather piss in the wind,then have piss down my back.

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4508
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #34 on: June 03, 2022, 09:25:02 AM »
The sharpest tool in the box is the one they are using now for removal.  The majority of the cats "removed", are NOT in areas hunters can hunt freely.  They are mostly on or near private property.

The very effective and professional hounds men wdfw and tri-county are using now for conflict removal could and should be used in the blue mountains to eliminate "X" number of cats in order to get a better grip on the problem.  Second tags and no quotas and open season on cats could also make a contribution, but for immediate results, the pros need to get in there and make a difference.  No amount of voting is going to resurrect public hound hunting but wdfw can certainly use them in the current manner being used in other areas without legal fallout.

 

Offline callturner

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2020
  • Posts: 648
  • Location: nine mile falls Washington
    • n/a
  • Groups: nra
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #35 on: June 03, 2022, 10:32:02 AM »
Probably the smartest idea next to completly opening hound hunting again! :chuckle:

Online mcrawfordaf

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2019
  • Posts: 523
  • Location: East Side
  • PF, RGS, INWWC, SBDA, NWTF
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #36 on: June 03, 2022, 10:33:32 AM »

Please share your source of study information about coyotes, and cougar adapting to breed "more, bigger litters".


Knowlton,1972:  Noted the death of alpha pairs in packs stimulates breeding among formerly behaviorally sterile pack members, promotes immigration of transient coyotes, and that litter size can be affected by population density; reporting average litter sizes of 4.3 at high coyote densities and 6.9 at low coyote densities(I)

Connolly and Longhurst, 1975/ Connolly, 1978:  Noted that in most situations, killing coyotes even at rates of up to 70% of their population merely stimulates reproduction and aggravates the problem.(II)

Bekoff, 1977:  Noted that in more coyote females breed when food is abundant and that during years when rodent populations are high, as many as 75% of yearling females may breed.(III)

New York State DEC, 1991:  Noted females will not breed if food is in short supply or their numbers are too high for the available food and space, liter sizes will be smaller with less abundant food sources, random hunting and trapping and year-round hunting will not reduce coyote populations, and if a breeding female is removed, a previous non-breeder may take her place.(VI)

Connolly, 1995:  Noted that upon review of the Connolly and Longhurst model of 1975,  those biological concepts seemed just as valid in 1995 and that new studies have tended to reaffirm those coyote population mechanics rather than prove them wrong.(V)

Fox and Papouchis, 2005: Noted the failure of extreme, indiscriminate killing of coyotes due to their adaptability within their diet, as well as reproductive and immigration response, and that resources would be better spent on long-term, humane coexistence methods.(VI)

Schadler, 2010:  Noted that pack disruption stimulates breeding among previously behaviorally sterile pack members and that coyote fertility varies based on food availability; improved nutrition releases hormonal signals that result in more egg production in females, causing an increase of population upon the next mating cycle following a temporary decrease in population.(VII)

Minnie, Gaylard, and Kerley, 2015:  Noted compensatory reproduction and immigration response in adaptive and indiscriminately killed predators such as the jackal and the coyote.(VIII)

Crabtree, 2015: Explained the scientific theory of compensatory reproductive response; further solidifying the growing acceptance of the predator reproductive response theory among scientists.(IX)

Kierepka, Kilgo and Rhodes, 2017:  Noted that coyotes recover from intensive trapping via reproduction and immigration, which likely make preventing compensation difficult.(X)
     


Uggh :bash: no offense to you but I get sick every time I read one of these “science “ studies. It all started with Farley mowat who fell in love with wolves in the 70s.  Birth rates vary based on available prey. Killing coyotes, wolves and lions does NOT lead to a greater abundance of coyotes, wolves and lions that is such a circular ridiculous argument it would be funny if it wasn’t so dangerous. These studies are all done from the perspective of don’t hunt or trap predators in any way or form. I know it’s written by a biologist most of the time but that’s where this flawed logic started in the university system. You are living with the results of these studies right now in Washington. Is it working for you? This is exactly what these studies were designed to create . No or ineffective management of predators. The point of those “studies “ are you shouldn’t hunt or trap predators because it will just create more. Really? You are living the affects of these “studies “ right now. Does it work for your ungulates or hunting? These folks have college degrees but ask yourselves where did the pro predator anti hunting and anti gun philosophy start? This is not directed at you at all it’s just the stupidity of these studies in my mind. There is a hidden agenda and it’s not good for the future of hunting. I have personally witnessed a major reduction in coyotes through trapping certain ranches. I have seen lion population plummet from hound hunting (which I am not in favor of)but I have seen it in my hound hunting spots. Think about what they are actually saying-if we hunt or trap predators we will have MORE predators. What does everyone think the real goal is here?


I'm very much pro-predator hunting. The ending of derby hunts for coyotes was incredibly disappointing for me, as my father and I were beginning to prepare for entering some together. I just wanted to provide some of the "studies" I've come across while debating antis. I did pest control for 4 years in PA and I know for a fact removing and killing predators helps reduce populations. These are mammals, I don't believe they have any way of recognizing or communicating that their pack size has increased or decreased in such a way that they can alter reproduction. Ants can do this, bees as well but I just don't see how mammals could.

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4508
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #37 on: June 03, 2022, 10:35:51 AM »

Please share your source of study information about coyotes, and cougar adapting to breed "more, bigger litters".


Knowlton,1972:  Noted the death of alpha pairs in packs stimulates breeding among formerly behaviorally sterile pack members, promotes immigration of transient coyotes, and that litter size can be affected by population density; reporting average litter sizes of 4.3 at high coyote densities and 6.9 at low coyote densities(I)

Connolly and Longhurst, 1975/ Connolly, 1978:  Noted that in most situations, killing coyotes even at rates of up to 70% of their population merely stimulates reproduction and aggravates the problem.(II)

Bekoff, 1977:  Noted that in more coyote females breed when food is abundant and that during years when rodent populations are high, as many as 75% of yearling females may breed.(III)

New York State DEC, 1991:  Noted females will not breed if food is in short supply or their numbers are too high for the available food and space, liter sizes will be smaller with less abundant food sources, random hunting and trapping and year-round hunting will not reduce coyote populations, and if a breeding female is removed, a previous non-breeder may take her place.(VI)

Connolly, 1995:  Noted that upon review of the Connolly and Longhurst model of 1975,  those biological concepts seemed just as valid in 1995 and that new studies have tended to reaffirm those coyote population mechanics rather than prove them wrong.(V)

Fox and Papouchis, 2005: Noted the failure of extreme, indiscriminate killing of coyotes due to their adaptability within their diet, as well as reproductive and immigration response, and that resources would be better spent on long-term, humane coexistence methods.(VI)

Schadler, 2010:  Noted that pack disruption stimulates breeding among previously behaviorally sterile pack members and that coyote fertility varies based on food availability; improved nutrition releases hormonal signals that result in more egg production in females, causing an increase of population upon the next mating cycle following a temporary decrease in population.(VII)

Minnie, Gaylard, and Kerley, 2015:  Noted compensatory reproduction and immigration response in adaptive and indiscriminately killed predators such as the jackal and the coyote.(VIII)

Crabtree, 2015: Explained the scientific theory of compensatory reproductive response; further solidifying the growing acceptance of the predator reproductive response theory among scientists.(IX)

Kierepka, Kilgo and Rhodes, 2017:  Noted that coyotes recover from intensive trapping via reproduction and immigration, which likely make preventing compensation difficult.(X)
     


Uggh :bash: no offense to you but I get sick every time I read one of these “science “ studies. It all started with Farley mowat who fell in love with wolves in the 70s.  Birth rates vary based on available prey. Killing coyotes, wolves and lions does NOT lead to a greater abundance of coyotes, wolves and lions that is such a circular ridiculous argument it would be funny if it wasn’t so dangerous. These studies are all done from the perspective of don’t hunt or trap predators in any way or form. I know it’s written by a biologist most of the time but that’s where this flawed logic started in the university system. You are living with the results of these studies right now in Washington. Is it working for you? This is exactly what these studies were designed to create . No or ineffective management of predators. The point of those “studies “ are you shouldn’t hunt or trap predators because it will just create more. Really? You are living the affects of these “studies “ right now. Does it work for your ungulates or hunting? These folks have college degrees but ask yourselves where did the pro predator anti hunting and anti gun philosophy start? This is not directed at you at all it’s just the stupidity of these studies in my mind. There is a hidden agenda and it’s not good for the future of hunting. I have personally witnessed a major reduction in coyotes through trapping certain ranches. I have seen lion population plummet from hound hunting (which I am not in favor of)but I have seen it in my hound hunting spots. Think about what they are actually saying-if we hunt or trap predators we will have MORE predators. What does everyone think the real goal is here?


Ya, talk about agenda driven studies......Ever notice who ever pays for a study always winds up with it supporting their ideals/agendas ?

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4508
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #38 on: June 03, 2022, 10:40:56 AM »
Last year I killed 12 coyotes here and this year Ive only seen one @ 600 yards that wasnt about to stop for a shot.  My neighbor has some sheep and goats that were a real draw for the dogs but not so much now.  I watch her fields as much now as I ever have and Ive not seen a single yote near her place.  The one I saw was 600 yards other side of me going away so 1000 yards from her critters.

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 7662
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • If you know me,then you know I give zero #&$@$
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #39 on: June 03, 2022, 11:16:13 AM »
The sharpest tool in the box is the one they are using now for removal.  The majority of the cats "removed", are NOT in areas hunters can hunt freely.  They are mostly on or near private property.

The very effective and professional hounds men wdfw and tri-county are using now for conflict removal could and should be used in the blue mountains to eliminate "X" number of cats in order to get a better grip on the problem.  Second tags and no quotas and open season on cats could also make a contribution, but for immediate results, the pros need to get in there and make a difference.  No amount of voting is going to resurrect public hound hunting but wdfw can certainly use them in the current manner being used in other areas without legal fallout.
That tool isn't in the box for elk management.
It's there for safety and cats that attack livestock.
You can't kill cats cause they are hunting deer and elk ,there primary food source.
I rather piss in the wind,then have piss down my back.

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4508
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #40 on: June 03, 2022, 11:37:17 AM »
That tool is certainly in the box for cat management and thats what it is once they decide to change cat harvest guidelines, unless you have talked to wdfw about it and you are quoting wdfw.

Offline Okanagan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 665
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #41 on: June 03, 2022, 12:12:22 PM »
Bit of a tangent here but several have mentioned increased reproduction of coyotes when some are killed.  OK.  That is virtually irrelevant to a rancher whose sheep or calves are being killed by coyotes today.  The coyote he kills today will not kill his calf (nor birthing cow) tonight. The coyote he kills as it chases sheep or stands at the rump of a birthing cow is the critical factor in coyote population.    Next year’s coyote reproduction rate is a different problem with a different timeline and different solution than the best one to deal with the coyote after a calf in my pasture right now.

Theories and studies are useful, especially if they lead to solutions, but a step out of the ivory tower into a springtime rancher’s boots would add some wisdom to facts and a better practical understanding of the problem. 


Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 7662
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • If you know me,then you know I give zero #&$@$
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #42 on: June 03, 2022, 01:04:52 PM »
That tool is certainly in the box for cat management and thats what it is once they decide to change cat harvest guidelines, unless you have talked to wdfw about it and you are quoting wdfw.
No I'm not quoting WDFW.
But here is a quote from WDFW...

Currently there are no management needs warranting this permit program. The department will update this site a necessary.

Here is a link .....read for yourself.

https://wdfw.wa.gov/hunting/special-hunts/cougar

At this time it's only safety removal.



I rather piss in the wind,then have piss down my back.

Offline idaho guy

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2012
  • Posts: 2798
  • Location: hayden
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #43 on: June 03, 2022, 01:23:48 PM »

Please share your source of study information about coyotes, and cougar adapting to breed "more, bigger litters".


Knowlton,1972:  Noted the death of alpha pairs in packs stimulates breeding among formerly behaviorally sterile pack members, promotes immigration of transient coyotes, and that litter size can be affected by population density; reporting average litter sizes of 4.3 at high coyote densities and 6.9 at low coyote densities(I)

Connolly and Longhurst, 1975/ Connolly, 1978:  Noted that in most situations, killing coyotes even at rates of up to 70% of their population merely stimulates reproduction and aggravates the problem.(II)

Bekoff, 1977:  Noted that in more coyote females breed when food is abundant and that during years when rodent populations are high, as many as 75% of yearling females may breed.(III)

New York State DEC, 1991:  Noted females will not breed if food is in short supply or their numbers are too high for the available food and space, liter sizes will be smaller with less abundant food sources, random hunting and trapping and year-round hunting will not reduce coyote populations, and if a breeding female is removed, a previous non-breeder may take her place.(VI)

Connolly, 1995:  Noted that upon review of the Connolly and Longhurst model of 1975,  those biological concepts seemed just as valid in 1995 and that new studies have tended to reaffirm those coyote population mechanics rather than prove them wrong.(V)

Fox and Papouchis, 2005: Noted the failure of extreme, indiscriminate killing of coyotes due to their adaptability within their diet, as well as reproductive and immigration response, and that resources would be better spent on long-term, humane coexistence methods.(VI)

Schadler, 2010:  Noted that pack disruption stimulates breeding among previously behaviorally sterile pack members and that coyote fertility varies based on food availability; improved nutrition releases hormonal signals that result in more egg production in females, causing an increase of population upon the next mating cycle following a temporary decrease in population.(VII)

Minnie, Gaylard, and Kerley, 2015:  Noted compensatory reproduction and immigration response in adaptive and indiscriminately killed predators such as the jackal and the coyote.(VIII)

Crabtree, 2015: Explained the scientific theory of compensatory reproductive response; further solidifying the growing acceptance of the predator reproductive response theory among scientists.(IX)

Kierepka, Kilgo and Rhodes, 2017:  Noted that coyotes recover from intensive trapping via reproduction and immigration, which likely make preventing compensation difficult.(X)
     


Uggh :bash: no offense to you but I get sick every time I read one of these “science “ studies. It all started with Farley mowat who fell in love with wolves in the 70s.  Birth rates vary based on available prey. Killing coyotes, wolves and lions does NOT lead to a greater abundance of coyotes, wolves and lions that is such a circular ridiculous argument it would be funny if it wasn’t so dangerous. These studies are all done from the perspective of don’t hunt or trap predators in any way or form. I know it’s written by a biologist most of the time but that’s where this flawed logic started in the university system. You are living with the results of these studies right now in Washington. Is it working for you? This is exactly what these studies were designed to create . No or ineffective management of predators. The point of those “studies “ are you shouldn’t hunt or trap predators because it will just create more. Really? You are living the affects of these “studies “ right now. Does it work for your ungulates or hunting? These folks have college degrees but ask yourselves where did the pro predator anti hunting and anti gun philosophy start? This is not directed at you at all it’s just the stupidity of these studies in my mind. There is a hidden agenda and it’s not good for the future of hunting. I have personally witnessed a major reduction in coyotes through trapping certain ranches. I have seen lion population plummet from hound hunting (which I am not in favor of)but I have seen it in my hound hunting spots. Think about what they are actually saying-if we hunt or trap predators we will have MORE predators. What does everyone think the real goal is here?

 

I'm very much pro-predator hunting. The ending  of derby hunts for coyotes was incredibly disappointing for me, as my father and I were beginning to prepare for entering some together. I just wanted to provide some of the "studies" I've come across while debating antis. I did pest control for 4 years in PA and I know for a fact removing and killing predators helps reduce populations. These are mammals, I don't believe they have any way of recognizing or communicating that their pack size has increased or decreased in such a way that they can alter reproduction. Ants can do this, bees as well but I just don't see how mammals could.
     


I assumed you were just posting study to respond to the other one asking for it . Like I said my post was not directed at you just ranting on the biased study concerning predators. They are basically saying removing predators creates more and it’s such bull crap I had too comment ha ha. It’s all good I figured we agreed


Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4508
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #44 on: June 03, 2022, 01:31:13 PM »
wdfw policy and practice subject to change at any second.   :twocents:

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 7662
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • If you know me,then you know I give zero #&$@$
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #45 on: June 03, 2022, 02:16:56 PM »
wdfw policy and practice subject to change at any second.   :twocents:

Maybe?...... :dunno:
The little fiasco with the spring hound hunting of bears through a permits a few years ago was bad publicity.
When these animal groups find out it gets smeared all over the news and such.
Since then pretty sure WDFW has kinda turned direction.
But hey that's just my opinion,could change tomorrow.
I really don't know. :dunno:

But some things I do know.
Is you can thank the timber company's for that.
Instead of allowing access,and promoting hunter oppertunitty .Spring hound bear hunts got the chopping
block. And now spring bear hunting for us hunters hit the chopping block.

BE VERY CAREFUL WHAT YOU ADVOCATE FOR.
@buckfvr

Opening a hound permit season in the Blues might achieve short term goals quickly,but may hurt or erase hunter oppertunitty to hunt cougar for everybody.

Something to think on.
« Last Edit: June 03, 2022, 02:59:25 PM by hunter399 »
I rather piss in the wind,then have piss down my back.

Offline elkh8me

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 567
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #46 on: August 07, 2022, 05:54:41 PM »
Everyone needs to vote!  Comments ain’t gonna get it done folks. After listening to the meeting for spring bear meeting, minds have already been made up.

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 24823
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Cougar hunting proposal
« Reply #47 on: August 07, 2022, 07:40:37 PM »
Everyone needs to vote!  Comments ain’t gonna get it done folks. After listening to the meeting for spring bear meeting, minds have already been made up.

FACT! we need a republican majority in the State Senate to make a difference. I know the primaries are over.... so many of us need to donate some cheddar to folks that are Republicans running in the senate. Obi Won Kenobi.... Republicans are our only hope!
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Average by lhrbull
[Today at 07:31:56 AM]


Let’s see your best Washington buck by Pathfinder101
[Today at 07:22:11 AM]


Walked a cougar down by Loup Loup
[Today at 07:16:30 AM]


CVA optima V2 LR tapped hole for front sight by Remdawg
[Today at 07:09:22 AM]


Bearpaw Season - Spring 2024 by duckmen1
[Today at 06:52:09 AM]


Which 12” boat trailer tires? by timberhunter
[Yesterday at 08:22:18 PM]


Lowest power 22 round? by JakeLand
[Yesterday at 08:06:13 PM]


1x scopes vs open sights by JakeLand
[Yesterday at 07:29:35 PM]


Long Beach Clamming Tides by Encore 280
[Yesterday at 05:16:00 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal