collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Oregonians to Vote on Gun Control Measure Opponent Calls ‘Strictest’ in the Nati  (Read 397 times)


Online pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 38517
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • NRA Life, MH, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • Apply for a loan
We'll see how this law passes the Constitutional smell test. I doubt it could. The restrictions just to obtain a firearm will preclude many from being able to do so. Cost, accessibility, privacy under the 4th Amendment.

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated..."

I would find passing it unbelievable if not for the voting bloc of Multnomah County.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 31701
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
We'll see how this law passes the Constitutional smell test. I doubt it could. The restrictions just to obtain a firearm will preclude many from being able to do so. Cost, accessibility, privacy under the 4th Amendment.

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated..."

I would find passing it unbelievable if not for the voting bloc of Multnomah County.

 True, but even those in Multnomah are seeing the increased need for personal protection these days.
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Online pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 38517
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • NRA Life, MH, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • Apply for a loan
We'll see how this law passes the Constitutional smell test. I doubt it could. The restrictions just to obtain a firearm will preclude many from being able to do so. Cost, accessibility, privacy under the 4th Amendment.

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated..."

I would find passing it unbelievable if not for the voting bloc of Multnomah County.

 True, but even those in Multnomah are seeing the increased need for personal protection these days.

The general population doesn't understand the Constitution or their rights. Guns are bad, government is good. Big Brother will keep us safer than someone with a damn gun.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman

Offline Angry Perch

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 6606
  • Location: Sammamish/ Sequim
What a circle jerk.

“In order to obtain the permit, an applicant would have to show up with a firearm to demonstrate the ability to load, fire, unload, and store the firearm,” Williamson, an Oregon trial attorney specializing in firearms law, told The Epoch Times. “But you can’t get a firearm without the permit. And under Oregon’s highly restrictive gun storage laws, no one can legally loan a firearm to another. That creates an impassable barrier.”

 


* Advertisement

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2022, SimplePortal