Free: Contests & Raffles.
Saw this in the news this weekend. I’m confused about it, though- doesn’t the law require a person be 21 to have a hand gun?
Quote from: follow maggie on April 03, 2023, 09:26:54 AMSaw this in the news this weekend. I’m confused about it, though- doesn’t the law require a person be 21 to have a hand gun?There’s nothing to be confused about. The constitution is clear as day. Gun control laws are going to start falling like dominoes.Based on a careful review of the record, the court finds that defendants have failed to identify analogous regulations that show a historical tradition in America of depriving 18- to 20-year-olds the right to publicly carry a handgun for self-defense,” Menendez wroteThe left is going to have a heck of a time defending gun control schemes when applying BRUENS historical history test to any of their laws.The pendulum is going to make a hard swing back to the 2nd amendment supporters side. Everyone just needs to have patience and let our system work.
Quote from: hughjorgan on April 03, 2023, 09:41:10 AMQuote from: follow maggie on April 03, 2023, 09:26:54 AMSaw this in the news this weekend. I’m confused about it, though- doesn’t the law require a person be 21 to have a hand gun?There’s nothing to be confused about. The constitution is clear as day. Gun control laws are going to start falling like dominoes.Based on a careful review of the record, the court finds that defendants have failed to identify analogous regulations that show a historical tradition in America of depriving 18- to 20-year-olds the right to publicly carry a handgun for self-defense,” Menendez wroteThe left is going to have a heck of a time defending gun control schemes when applying BRUENS historical history test to any of their laws.The pendulum is going to make a hard swing back to the 2nd amendment supporters side. Everyone just needs to have patience and let our system work.I agree with you in principle, but if it were that cut-and-dried, the leftist clowns would not be passing as much anti-2A legislation as they constantly are. It's a never ending battle.................
Quote from: hughjorgan on April 03, 2023, 09:41:10 AMQuote from: follow maggie on April 03, 2023, 09:26:54 AMSaw this in the news this weekend. I’m confused about it, though- doesn’t the law require a person be 21 to have a hand gun?There’s nothing to be confused about. The constitution is clear as day. Gun control laws are going to start falling like dominoes.Based on a careful review of the record, the court finds that defendants have failed to identify analogous regulations that show a historical tradition in America of depriving 18- to 20-year-olds the right to publicly carry a handgun for self-defense,” Menendez wroteThe left is going to have a heck of a time defending gun control schemes when applying BRUENS historical history test to any of their laws.The pendulum is going to make a hard swing back to the 2nd amendment supporters side. Everyone just needs to have patience and let our system work.You are correct unless the dems and some of the RINO's succeed in continuing to win elections and are able to change the makeup of the supreme court (as they have publicly said they want to do) which will result in much different interpretations of the 2nd Amendment.
Quote from: bearpaw on April 03, 2023, 09:54:43 AMQuote from: hughjorgan on April 03, 2023, 09:41:10 AMQuote from: follow maggie on April 03, 2023, 09:26:54 AMSaw this in the news this weekend. I’m confused about it, though- doesn’t the law require a person be 21 to have a hand gun?There’s nothing to be confused about. The constitution is clear as day. Gun control laws are going to start falling like dominoes.Based on a careful review of the record, the court finds that defendants have failed to identify analogous regulations that show a historical tradition in America of depriving 18- to 20-year-olds the right to publicly carry a handgun for self-defense,” Menendez wroteThe left is going to have a heck of a time defending gun control schemes when applying BRUENS historical history test to any of their laws.The pendulum is going to make a hard swing back to the 2nd amendment supporters side. Everyone just needs to have patience and let our system work.You are correct unless the dems and some of the RINO's succeed in continuing to win elections and are able to change the makeup of the supreme court (as they have publicly said they want to do) which will result in much different interpretations of the 2nd Amendment. And that is why they keep passing laws. They want to bankrupt 2 A groups and know they will get a few years out of any law they pass. And maybe the court will change in another election cycle.Expect them to change the court, stack it, or try to repeal the 2A.It boggles my mind on how many people are ok with this. The fight will not be over in anyone’s reading this lifetime.
That is very much a possibility that the make up of the Supreme Court will change. They would have to over turn a lot of case law supporting the 2nd amendment.
Keeps getting better! Vote the D's out of office and we will return to some form of normalcy!!https://www.foxnews.com/politics/desantis-signature-tips-us-majority-constitutional-carry-nation-new-florida-gun-rights-law