collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Over shooting?⁹  (Read 1912 times)

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 7303
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Over shooting?⁹
« Reply #15 on: November 20, 2023, 04:58:28 PM »
Well, I know they're a problem but even on the large tracts of private property  vaugen and Dashiell properties, I'm seeing the same thing.  Way too many dry does and and way fewer bucks than in the past. Mule deer ratios seem to be holding pretty steady.  Don't get me wrong, I know the lion population is way out of control around us, but these long seasons  of shooting any whitetail  buck are compounding the problem.

Mule deer ratios are NOT holding steady where I am...and that's only 6 miles to the north of you. There are only 7 does in the local herd that used to be 25 does.      3 fawns and NO bucks in the present herd. One traveling buck finally showed up (2 point) to breed the 7 does. I had one 3 point whitetail buck that disappeared the day before opening day and only 3 does. WAY down in numbers. I say limit the tags or close the season here to give the herds a breather..and open up predator kills. I have never seen so many hunters as I have seen this year. Even had 3 guys in orange set up 20 feet from my mail box.  looking toward my house. Had two encounters with house shooters in the early hunt.
I don't live on your side of mountain.
My side mule deer numbers are down.
I agree a lot of hunters this year.

Offline Lapua07

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2017
  • Posts: 148
  • Location: Colville
  • Groups: RMEF, MD, NBA WRAW
Re: Over shooting?⁹
« Reply #16 on: November 20, 2023, 05:15:21 PM »
Same on this side of the hump. Not many whitetail to look at even less with head gear. 40+ whitetail yesterday and 3 bucks. Fortunate enough to not hunt much public ground for whiteys. Buck to doe ratio is out of whack on both mule deer and whitetail. I fully agree on the over hunting for the actual population.  I'm pretty firm on the 4 point min for whitetail. Wish they implement it for mule deer as well. All honesty wish they'd go to draw only and 4 point min on muleys in the tri-county area. Best thing that's happened since the 4 point min was eliminating the any elk. .  But that's another conversation.

Offline jrebel

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+20)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 10549
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: Over shooting?⁹
« Reply #17 on: November 20, 2023, 05:23:45 PM »
Statewide.....hunters # are down. 

2013 statewide deer hunters.....123,928     Success 27.2%
2022 statewide deer hunters......94,143      Success 23.0%

Hunter numbers are down down 25%


District 1 #'s

2013 deer hunters......18,396     Success 26.7%
2022 deer hunters......14,166     Success 22.3%

Hunter numbers are down 23%

Assuming these numbers are correct, which I have to believe they are close......hunters numbers are down by a significant number.  Success is also down, which cold be contributed to a multitude of factors.  I tend to believe it is the increase in predator numbers.  I am not naive to believe that other factors don't influence deer populations....very clearly bad winters, blue tongue, poachers, APR's, likely have some influence.  BUTTTTT.....predator numbers are through the roof.  I see plenty of bucks all over District 1...well my trail cams see them.  I just don't believe the hunting pressure (day's afield) has that big of an impact.  Most hunters spend 4-10 days afield, regardless of how long the season is.  Of that...it is mostly on the weekends. 


Offline baldopepper

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 1996
Re: Over shooting?⁹
« Reply #18 on: November 20, 2023, 05:23:56 PM »
Well, I know they're a problem but even on the large tracts of private property  vaugen and Dashiell properties, I'm seeing the same thing.  Way too many dry does and and way fewer bucks than in the past. Mule deer ratios seem to be holding pretty steady.  Don't get me wrong, I know the lion population is way out of control around us, but these long seasons  of shooting any whitetail  buck are compounding the problem.

Mule deer ratios are NOT holding steady where I am...and that's only 6 miles to the north of you. There are only 7 does in the local herd that used to be 25 does.      3 fawns and NO bucks in the present herd. One traveling buck finally showed up (2 point) to breed the 7 does. I had one 3 point whitetail buck that disappeared the day before opening day and only 3 does. WAY down in numbers. I say limit the tags or close the season here to give the herds a breather..and open up predator kills. I have never seen so many hunters as I have seen this year. Even had 3 guys in orange set up 20 feet from my mail box.  looking toward my house. Had two encounters with house shooters in the early hunt.
[/quote
I'd honestly say there are at best 1/3 the deer around us there were 20 years ago.  Our little herd of mules is pretty much isolated as my 20 acres and the approximate 200 acres around  me are private. We go down to the 1310 line but dont really have any boat hunters coming around anymore. Lot of irritating type hunters this year, they sit on hwy 25 with guns out the window scoping all the deer in the open field in front of the house. I agree, they need to either shut that area down for a while or put a strict apr on it.  I'd like to see a bounty on lions, maybe encourage more to hunt em. I said the ratios are holding steady, not the overall numbers.
« Last Edit: November 20, 2023, 05:31:02 PM by baldopepper »

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 7303
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Over shooting?⁹
« Reply #19 on: November 20, 2023, 05:44:41 PM »
Statewide.....hunters # are down. 

2013 statewide deer hunters.....123,928     Success 27.2%
2022 statewide deer hunters......94,143      Success 23.0%

Hunter numbers are down down 25%


District 1 #'s

2013 deer hunters......18,396     Success 26.7%
2022 deer hunters......14,166     Success 22.3%

Hunter numbers are down 23%

Assuming these numbers are correct, which I have to believe they are close......hunters numbers are down by a significant number.  Success is also down, which cold be contributed to a multitude of factors.  I tend to believe it is the increase in predator numbers.  I am not naive to believe that other factors don't influence deer populations....very clearly bad winters, blue tongue, poachers, APR's, likely have some influence.  BUTTTTT.....predator numbers are through the roof.  I see plenty of bucks all over District 1...well my trail cams see them.  I just don't believe the hunting pressure (day's afield) has that big of an impact.  Most hunters spend 4-10 days afield, regardless of how long the season is.  Of that...it is mostly on the weekends.
That 2013 success number is from a 4pt min year.
Those are all 4pt mature WT, except probably a 100 mule deer.
Vs the 2022 success number is from an any buck year crop of dink bucks. With surplus being a few smart ones that made through.

If you can imagine that in 2013 .....3pt and smaller was WT was left on the landscape as surplus,breeder,just general more deer.

Think we do get a few more hunters than the numbers.
Just cause the way the reporting is.
Weekend here or a weekend there. If you report it,then it goes into how many days,and more questions.
Most people just want to report and be done,not 20 questions about it.
I do think the success rate is probably spot on
Tag soup guys are gonna pick a GMU,x number of day, done reporting. Not go into every hunting trip. Just a theory.
I would use the hunters numbers for a minimum. Alot of guys move around GMU during season,no reason to report it. If not successful.
I'm also saying it not far off, probably 5 percent more on both 2013 and 2022.

The difference in those years is onx map,hunters just basically following the deer numbers. Everyone wants to hunt where there are deer Vs hunting some crappy public land spot that not even a doe lives there during the season.

So I agree numbers wise, less hunters over the years.
But we are all bunched together in the better spots.which makes it seem like there is more .

Those are my theory.
« Last Edit: November 20, 2023, 06:04:24 PM by hunter399 »

Offline jrebel

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+20)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 10549
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: Over shooting?⁹
« Reply #20 on: November 20, 2023, 06:14:06 PM »
Statewide.....hunters # are down. 

2013 statewide deer hunters.....123,928     Success 27.2%
2022 statewide deer hunters......94,143      Success 23.0%

Hunter numbers are down down 25%


District 1 #'s

2013 deer hunters......18,396     Success 26.7%
2022 deer hunters......14,166     Success 22.3%

Hunter numbers are down 23%

Assuming these numbers are correct, which I have to believe they are close......hunters numbers are down by a significant number.  Success is also down, which cold be contributed to a multitude of factors.  I tend to believe it is the increase in predator numbers.  I am not naive to believe that other factors don't influence deer populations....very clearly bad winters, blue tongue, poachers, APR's, likely have some influence.  BUTTTTT.....predator numbers are through the roof.  I see plenty of bucks all over District 1...well my trail cams see them.  I just don't believe the hunting pressure (day's afield) has that big of an impact.  Most hunters spend 4-10 days afield, regardless of how long the season is.  Of that...it is mostly on the weekends.
That 2013 success number is from a 4pt min year.
Those are all 4pt mature WT, except probably a 100 mule deer.
Vs the 2022 success number is from an any buck year crop of dink bucks. With surplus being a few smart ones that made through.

If you can imagine that in 2013 .....3pt and smaller was WT was left on the landscape as surplus,breeder,just general more deer.

Think we do get a few more hunters than the numbers.
Just cause the way the reporting is.
Weekend here or a weekend there. If you report it,then it goes into how many days,and more questions.
Most people just want to report and be done,not 20 questions about it.
I do think the success rate is probably spot on
Tag soup guys are gonna pick a GMU,x number of day, done reporting. Not go into every hunting trip. Just a theory.
I would use the hunters numbers for a minimum. Alot of guys move around GMU during season,no reason to report it. If not successful.
I'm also saying it not far off, probably 5 percent more on both 2013 and 2022.

The difference in those years is onx map,hunters just basically following the deer numbers. Everyone wants to hunt where there are deer Vs hunting some crappy public land spot that not even a doe lives there during the season.

So I agree numbers wise less hunters over the years.
But we are all bunched together in the better spots.which makes it seem like there is more .

Those are my theory.

I get exactly what you are saying.....and the numbers are what they are.  We can only work with what is provided, but he overall hunter numbers are down.  I don't even disagree that pressure on our herds could be a problem....I just argue that the majority of the pressure if from predators. 

A 20 day archery season does not mean that every archery hunter is going to spend 20 days afield.  If you shortened the season, you would get he same number of "days afield" as you do with a 20 day season, just in a more concentrated time period.  Most hunters take "X" numbers of days off and don't hunt the entire season.  Predators on the other hand...apply pressure 365 days a year 24 hours a day. 

If you want to see moor deer...does and bucks alike....start killing predators.  We have made a concerted effort to kill bear in our normal areas.  We (3 of us) managed to kill 4 bears this year on one of our hunting areas.  This has to have a positive impact long turn.  We also managed one coyote.  I hope to spend some time looking for cougars and trapping bobcats this winter.  Point being....kill a predator, don't shorten a season.  APR's....well, I would have to think more about this.  I'm inherently am against, but could be persuaded....especially if they didn't apply to youth or 65/and over. 

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 7303
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Over shooting?⁹
« Reply #21 on: November 20, 2023, 06:23:04 PM »
Statewide.....hunters # are down. 

2013 statewide deer hunters.....123,928     Success 27.2%
2022 statewide deer hunters......94,143      Success 23.0%

Hunter numbers are down down 25%


District 1 #'s

2013 deer hunters......18,396     Success 26.7%
2022 deer hunters......14,166     Success 22.3%

Hunter numbers are down 23%

Assuming these numbers are correct, which I have to believe they are close......hunters numbers are down by a significant number.  Success is also down, which cold be contributed to a multitude of factors.  I tend to believe it is the increase in predator numbers.  I am not naive to believe that other factors don't influence deer populations....very clearly bad winters, blue tongue, poachers, APR's, likely have some influence.  BUTTTTT.....predator numbers are through the roof.  I see plenty of bucks all over District 1...well my trail cams see them.  I just don't believe the hunting pressure (day's afield) has that big of an impact.  Most hunters spend 4-10 days afield, regardless of how long the season is.  Of that...it is mostly on the weekends.
That 2013 success number is from a 4pt min year.
Those are all 4pt mature WT, except probably a 100 mule deer.
Vs the 2022 success number is from an any buck year crop of dink bucks. With surplus being a few smart ones that made through.

If you can imagine that in 2013 .....3pt and smaller was WT was left on the landscape as surplus,breeder,just general more deer.

Think we do get a few more hunters than the numbers.
Just cause the way the reporting is.
Weekend here or a weekend there. If you report it,then it goes into how many days,and more questions.
Most people just want to report and be done,not 20 questions about it.
I do think the success rate is probably spot on
Tag soup guys are gonna pick a GMU,x number of day, done reporting. Not go into every hunting trip. Just a theory.
I would use the hunters numbers for a minimum. Alot of guys move around GMU during season,no reason to report it. If not successful.
I'm also saying it not far off, probably 5 percent more on both 2013 and 2022.

The difference in those years is onx map,hunters just basically following the deer numbers. Everyone wants to hunt where there are deer Vs hunting some crappy public land spot that not even a doe lives there during the season.

So I agree numbers wise less hunters over the years.
But we are all bunched together in the better spots.which makes it seem like there is more .

Those are my theory.

I get exactly what you are saying.....and the numbers are what they are.  We can only work with what is provided, but he overall hunter numbers are down.  I don't even disagree that pressure on our herds could be a problem....I just argue that the majority of the pressure if from predators. 

A 20 day archery season does not mean that every archery hunter is going to spend 20 days afield.  If you shortened the season, you would get he same number of "days afield" as you do with a 20 day season, just in a more concentrated time period.  Most hunters take "X" numbers of days off and don't hunt the entire season.  Predators on the other hand...apply pressure 365 days a year 24 hours a day. 

If you want to see moor deer...does and bucks alike....start killing predators.  We have made a concerted effort to kill bear in our normal areas.  We (3 of us) managed to kill 4 bears this year on one of our hunting areas.  This has to have a positive impact long turn.  We also managed one coyote.  I hope to spend some time looking for cougars and trapping bobcats this winter.  Point being....kill a predator, don't shorten a season.  APR's....well, I would have to think more about this.  I'm inherently am against, but could be persuaded....especially if they didn't apply to youth or 65/and over. 
I agree with ya..
Maybe keep posting those cougar pics.
People that want to hunt predators have to realize we have them
I know I'll keep trying,I'm not very good at it
When it's hot,there in your lap,when there not which is most the time ,it sucks.
I was also thinking about my trapping licence,I have the class part done,I just have to buy the license. I only have one cage.
But I might give it a try

Offline bigmacc

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 4271
  • Location: the woods
Re: Over shooting?⁹
« Reply #22 on: November 20, 2023, 06:24:16 PM »
Statewide.....hunters # are down. 

2013 statewide deer hunters.....123,928     Success 27.2%
2022 statewide deer hunters......94,143      Success 23.0%

Hunter numbers are down down 25%


District 1 #'s

2013 deer hunters......18,396     Success 26.7%
2022 deer hunters......14,166     Success 22.3%

Hunter numbers are down 23%

Assuming these numbers are correct, which I have to believe they are close......hunters numbers are down by a significant number.  Success is also down, which cold be contributed to a multitude of factors.  I tend to believe it is the increase in predator numbers.  I am not naive to believe that other factors don't influence deer populations....very clearly bad winters, blue tongue, poachers, APR's, likely have some influence.  BUTTTTT.....predator numbers are through the roof.  I see plenty of bucks all over District 1...well my trail cams see them.  I just don't believe the hunting pressure (day's afield) has that big of an impact.  Most hunters spend 4-10 days afield, regardless of how long the season is.  Of that...it is mostly on the weekends.
That 2013 success number is from a 4pt min year.
Those are all 4pt mature WT, except probably a 100 mule deer.
Vs the 2022 success number is from an any buck year crop of dink bucks. With surplus being a few smart ones that made through.

If you can imagine that in 2013 .....3pt and smaller was WT was left on the landscape as surplus,breeder,just general more deer.

Think we do get a few more hunters than the numbers.
Just cause the way the reporting is.
Weekend here or a weekend there. If you report it,then it goes into how many days,and more questions.
Most people just want to report and be done,not 20 questions about it.
I do think the success rate is probably spot on
Tag soup guys are gonna pick a GMU,x number of day, done reporting. Not go into every hunting trip. Just a theory.
I would use the hunters numbers for a minimum. Alot of guys move around GMU during season,no reason to report it. If not successful.
I'm also saying it not far off, probably 5 percent more on both 2013 and 2022.

The difference in those years is onx map,hunters just basically following the deer numbers. Everyone wants to hunt where there are deer Vs hunting some crappy public land spot that not even a doe lives there during the season.

So I agree numbers wise less hunters over the years.
But we are all bunched together in the better spots.which makes it seem like there is more .

Those are my theory.

I get exactly what you are saying.....and the numbers are what they are.  We can only work with what is provided, but he overall hunter numbers are down.  I don't even disagree that pressure on our herds could be a problem....I just argue that the majority of the pressure if from predators. 

A 20 day archery season does not mean that every archery hunter is going to spend 20 days afield.  If you shortened the season, you would get he same number of "days afield" as you do with a 20 day season, just in a more concentrated time period.  Most hunters take "X" numbers of days off and don't hunt the entire season.  Predators on the other hand...apply pressure 365 days a year 24 hours a day. 

If you want to see moor deer...does and bucks alike....start killing predators.  We have made a concerted effort to kill bear in our normal areas.  We (3 of us) managed to kill 4 bears this year on one of our hunting areas.  This has to have a positive impact long turn.  We also managed one coyote.  I hope to spend some time looking for cougars and trapping bobcats this winter.  Point being....kill a predator, don't shorten a season.  APR's....well, I would have to think more about this.  I'm inherently am against, but could be persuaded....especially if they didn't apply to youth or 65/and over.
👍some are figuring it out.

Offline baldopepper

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 1996
Re: Over shooting?⁹
« Reply #23 on: November 20, 2023, 06:27:21 PM »
Obviously statewide:hunter numbers are down, but definitely not in our area.  For one thing the amount of people moving to the area, or at least building a seasonal place, is growing rapidly.  While some don't hunt, many are there because of the hunting and, of course, the proximity to the lake.  Many I run into admit they used to hunt the Westside, but say they don't like the crowds or lack of deer.  Also the Spokane area is growing rapidly and from there it's pretty easy day hunt.
Some like it because there's more area to ride their side by sides and quads (I think that's the real reason some come is to just ride around on em)  Whatever the reason, I know there are a lot more hunters around here than there used to be.  While success rates arent great, with more hunters it's logical they're overall killing more deer and the late hunt draws a lot if last chance hunters taking any legal deer they see.

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 7303
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Over shooting?⁹
« Reply #24 on: November 20, 2023, 06:32:22 PM »
Obviously statewide:hunter numbers are down, but definitely not in our area.  For one thing the amount of people moving to the area, or at least building a seasonal place, is growing rapidly.  While some don't hunt, many are there because of the hunting and, of course, the proximity to the lake.  Many I run into admit they used to hunt the Westside, but say they don't like the crowds or lack of deer.  Also the Spokane area is growing rapidly and from there it's pretty easy day hunt.
Some like it because there's more area to ride their side by sides and quads (I think that's the real reason some come is to just ride around on em)  Whatever the reason, I know there are a lot more hunters around here than there used to be.  While success rates arent great, with more hunters it's logical they're overall killing more deer and the late hunt draws a lot if last chance hunters taking any legal deer they see. No
Well I know the mountain,you know which mountain.
Is a ATV ,SxS ,park all year long ,I mean all year long.
Snowmobile park in the winter.
It never gets a break. It's every weekend. From the time the snow melts ,still going now till the snow gets deep.
That place is always busy,year round.
It's the type of spot anymore,you can't even use the bathroom without someone watching you.

Offline jrebel

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+20)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 10549
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: Over shooting?⁹
« Reply #25 on: November 20, 2023, 06:42:00 PM »
Obviously statewide:hunter numbers are down, but definitely not in our area.  For one thing the amount of people moving to the area, or at least building a seasonal place, is growing rapidly.  While some don't hunt, many are there because of the hunting and, of course, the proximity to the lake.  Many I run into admit they used to hunt the Westside, but say they don't like the crowds or lack of deer.  Also the Spokane area is growing rapidly and from there it's pretty easy day hunt.
Some like it because there's more area to ride their side by sides and quads (I think that's the real reason some come is to just ride around on em)  Whatever the reason, I know there are a lot more hunters around here than there used to be.  While success rates arent great, with more hunters it's logical they're overall killing more deer and the late hunt draws a lot if last chance hunters taking any legal deer they see.

I'm definitely not trying to pester you.....but the above number show that hunters in the district 1 (NE corner) is down 22.3%.  In 121 using the same dates, it is down 6%.....So anecdotally in the finite spots you are looking, it may be more....but overall the numbers say it is decreased.  This would imply the hunting pressure is also down.   

2022....unit 121    4,089 deer hunters
2013....unit 121    4,346 deer hunters

That's a 6% decrease. 


At the end of the day.....I'm not willing to surrender any time to our WDFW / Commission.  If they are surrendered they will never come back.  Kill a predator and push the state, commission, feds, anyone that will listen....that predators have to be controlled if we want ungulates. 


Offline baldopepper

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 1996
Re: Over shooting?⁹
« Reply #26 on: November 20, 2023, 06:56:10 PM »
Heck you're  not pestering me, just an interesting discussion. I don't know where they get their numbers, all I can go by is what I see.  To old to spend all day in the field, so usually drop the kids off where they want to hunt and then cruise around until time to pick em up. Cover fair amount of country  and often stop and talk to hunters when I see em.  Shot enough deer in my life so I really don't care if I ever shoot another one or not.  Often forget to take my gun lol. Might add that I used to often see a warden out and about, but haven't in at least 3 or 4 years now.

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 7303
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Over shooting?⁹
« Reply #27 on: November 20, 2023, 08:01:24 PM »
I was out a bit during season ,all public land.
It was absolutely crazy in some spots,while other spots where vacant. So it definitely depends where your at on any given day.
Ya hunter numbers are down in every GMU.
But some spots are hot spots. Somebody seen a gamecam pic.
Or someone took a cell pic of a big buck in a Field. Or whatever ,that spot turns into hammered dog 💩.

Honestly I blame it on social media.
So many run cams,or just see something on the hoof.
Word of mouth through the cellular computer is strong.

A 200 acre stateland spot ,got 8 pickups there you better believe someone seen something. I can almost drive around look at the amount of hunters in any given spot and say yup there is a big boy somewhere.
« Last Edit: November 20, 2023, 08:07:15 PM by hunter399 »

Offline buckcanyonlodge

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 2300
  • Location: Gifford, Lake Roosevelt, Wa.
    • Buck Canyon Lodge
Re: Over shooting?⁹
« Reply #28 on: November 21, 2023, 05:00:31 AM »
Of those 4089 hunters at least half of them hunted the 1310 line in front of my house...which is only 100 yds wide. :chuckle: :chuckle:
Thanks for all for your past support...We officially pulled the plug and have retired from the Biz. Still dabble a little in real estate.
Call Westergard Real Estate  for your REAL ESTATE needs in the Tri-County area. Hunting/Recreational or retirement properties. Tri County Area 509-722-3949

Offline NOCK NOCK

  • Timberdog Slabs
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2013
  • Posts: 6066
  • Location: E. Wenatchee
  • Timberdog Slab Designs
    • https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100063502962432
    • Timberdogslabs.com
Re: Over shooting?⁹
« Reply #29 on: November 21, 2023, 05:16:11 AM »
Curious about this.

Above numbers to me show that less hunters are killing more deer (by percentage)
Live edge Slab woods, Log Furniture, Beds, Dressers, Tables, Chairs, Custom signs, Décor, Cedar fencing w/artwork cutting. Supplies
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100063502962432

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Saskatchewan guided deer hunts?? by huntnphool
[Today at 10:20:08 PM]


2023/2024 Cams by greenhead_killer
[Today at 10:05:00 PM]


2023 Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange "GO" by wadu1
[Today at 10:02:29 PM]


2023 Eastern WA Pics portfolio by highcountry_hunter
[Today at 10:00:22 PM]


Idaho White Tail Thread 2023 by highside74
[Today at 09:45:46 PM]


Puppies for Christmas by LongBomb
[Today at 08:56:20 PM]


FS-Nikon Buckmasters II Rifle Scope 1" Tube 3-9x40mm BDC Reticle by MADMAX
[Today at 08:31:57 PM]


Goose Decoys FS by 270Flat
[Today at 08:22:55 PM]


Musket caps for sale by Dan-o
[Today at 08:20:33 PM]


WTS: Varmint calibers 17 HMR ammo, 204/224/243 bullets by JDHasty
[Today at 08:19:59 PM]


new dog crate for sale. by Dan-o
[Today at 08:15:08 PM]


N-Vision HALO-XRF Thermal Scope by Hoythunter
[Today at 07:35:42 PM]


Press and Dies FS by Cowboy15
[Today at 07:33:47 PM]


Big Bear Poop by TeacherMan
[Today at 07:24:28 PM]


WTT .308 Win ammo by Emptyhanded
[Today at 07:19:53 PM]


Savage Lady Hunter 6.5 Creedmoor by Sundance
[Today at 07:11:49 PM]


SELL: Browning Hells Canyon Speed 308 $900 w/ ammo by OltHunter
[Today at 06:10:43 PM]


People on Cams by Ridgeratt
[Today at 05:58:00 PM]


A little moose help by jackelope
[Today at 05:57:00 PM]


3rd Annual Winter Workshop by Norman89
[Today at 05:44:18 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2023, SimplePortal