collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case  (Read 1071 times)

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187

Offline follow maggie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3058
  • Location: Fargo
  • Just me, just being a nomad
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2024, 09:53:15 AM »
Hopefully it spreads.

Offline BA Mongor

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 292
  • Location: Washington Coast
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2024, 04:13:10 PM »
Finally.
I agree, and hope it goes nation wide to STOP their arrogance in thinking they can go wherever they want, when they want!
 

Offline yogru

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2019
  • Posts: 81
  • Location: Everett
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2024, 04:20:54 PM »
The landowners were awarded nominal damages of $1 for the violations. 
 :twocents:

Offline CarbonHunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2014
  • Posts: 629
  • Location: Carbonado
  • Groups: RMEF, WSB
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2024, 06:30:22 PM »
Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

Has anyone seen the WDFW doing this on private property without permission or a warrant?

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10350
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2024, 09:25:15 AM »


Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

If I remember correctly, they received a report of on-going hunting violations on the property.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk


 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Commissioner of Public Lands 2024 by spin05
[Today at 01:08:04 AM]


Brewster by Caseyd
[Yesterday at 11:54:07 PM]


Name that animal! by addicted1
[Yesterday at 11:31:56 PM]


Grizz attacks huckleberry picker by elkslayer069
[Yesterday at 10:07:04 PM]


Huckleberry early bull moose by Bonnie
[Yesterday at 09:30:26 PM]


East Okanogan Quality by Birdguy
[Yesterday at 08:19:53 PM]


2024 Mountain View Rifle Quality Bull by andersonjk4
[Yesterday at 08:18:59 PM]


Friday's Commission vote on WOlves and Cougar by dwils233
[Yesterday at 07:17:14 PM]


Experience with 35 Whelen ? by zwickeyman
[Yesterday at 06:07:01 PM]


Area 11 Opener Next Week? by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 04:55:09 PM]


Any bull moose moved from Spokane north to Spokane west by mountainman
[Yesterday at 03:20:40 PM]


Electronic Torque wrenches by Rob
[Yesterday at 02:44:51 PM]


Any local taxidermists? by livin4fishin
[Yesterday at 02:44:13 PM]


Blinds Tip & Tricks by ghosthunter
[Yesterday at 01:04:19 PM]


Wall Tents Tips and Tricks by ghosthunter
[Yesterday at 12:33:09 PM]


Hiding by hunter399
[Yesterday at 11:32:51 AM]


Hunter399/2024 pics by hunter399
[Yesterday at 11:11:40 AM]


Best place to buy high end optics? by Nate Ortloff
[Yesterday at 10:36:31 AM]


2024 WSTA ANNUAL SUMMER RENDEZVOUS SCHEDULE by Frank The Tank
[Yesterday at 09:38:29 AM]


Got my 2023 archery Speed Goat back from Taxidermist by Bob33
[Yesterday at 08:31:21 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal