Free: Contests & Raffles.
I was employed several years ago by a fairly large, international company with offices literally around the world.. With profits down two years in a row, a decision was made to cut costs by closing some offices and letting people go. They offered what they called an early retirement offer to nearly every employee. 6 months pay and 6 months health insurance coverage. Problem was that every good employee who knew they could easily find employment (mostly with competitors) were the ones who took the offer. (Myself included) That was not enough so.they laid off another large group starting with the newest employees and worked their way up to reach their goal This left them with a management group who should have been selectively let go for poor preformance. Additionally the younger ones who made the cut were concerned about future cut backs and most of the better ones started immediately looking elsewhere..Company never really recovered, sold off some divisions and is now a shadow of its old self. Their record has made it difficult to recruit top people. Hope we're not seeing that same type thing in our government.
Hopefully the National forest is still open for fun this summer and fall. Also hopefully it doesn’t all burn to the ground.
Quote from: Buckhunter24 on February 14, 2025, 07:10:15 PMQuote from: addicted1 on February 14, 2025, 06:57:18 PMQuote from: MADMAX on February 14, 2025, 05:45:41 PMQuote from: CarbonHunter on February 14, 2025, 05:29:00 PMI saw earlier today that the US Forest Service seams to be the hardest hit with today’s terminations. Honestly we were finally starting to see some actual management of our forests since Clinton stopped logging and I think these across the board actions will set forest management back even further.Give it some timeI believe Trump will be directing his team to start doing some realignments, restructuring and new hiringFat chance, most areas have lost a significant portion of their workforce that had the boots on the ground. To think this will get turned around anytime soon beyond laughable. The terminations will continue through next week, for an agency that was already lean. Oh well what’s a few more people to add to Washington homeless population.Ramp up the cut then we can look at bringing back some employees.That's not realistic. That's like having a doctor tell the surgeon to just start pulling out organs and well see how it goes during the post-surgery recovery.Targeted cuts might have been productive AFTER auditing and understanding the impact. Broad base decimation doesn't actually protect the financial and resource interests of our country. That's why you don't just have some random person come in and fire your IT staff to save money... System dependency and vitality.Musk did the same process at Twitter. Market cap went from 44b to 9b. It doesn't make operational sense or business sense
Quote from: addicted1 on February 14, 2025, 06:57:18 PMQuote from: MADMAX on February 14, 2025, 05:45:41 PMQuote from: CarbonHunter on February 14, 2025, 05:29:00 PMI saw earlier today that the US Forest Service seams to be the hardest hit with today’s terminations. Honestly we were finally starting to see some actual management of our forests since Clinton stopped logging and I think these across the board actions will set forest management back even further.Give it some timeI believe Trump will be directing his team to start doing some realignments, restructuring and new hiringFat chance, most areas have lost a significant portion of their workforce that had the boots on the ground. To think this will get turned around anytime soon beyond laughable. The terminations will continue through next week, for an agency that was already lean. Oh well what’s a few more people to add to Washington homeless population.Ramp up the cut then we can look at bringing back some employees.
Quote from: MADMAX on February 14, 2025, 05:45:41 PMQuote from: CarbonHunter on February 14, 2025, 05:29:00 PMI saw earlier today that the US Forest Service seams to be the hardest hit with today’s terminations. Honestly we were finally starting to see some actual management of our forests since Clinton stopped logging and I think these across the board actions will set forest management back even further.Give it some timeI believe Trump will be directing his team to start doing some realignments, restructuring and new hiringFat chance, most areas have lost a significant portion of their workforce that had the boots on the ground. To think this will get turned around anytime soon beyond laughable. The terminations will continue through next week, for an agency that was already lean. Oh well what’s a few more people to add to Washington homeless population.
Quote from: CarbonHunter on February 14, 2025, 05:29:00 PMI saw earlier today that the US Forest Service seams to be the hardest hit with today’s terminations. Honestly we were finally starting to see some actual management of our forests since Clinton stopped logging and I think these across the board actions will set forest management back even further.Give it some timeI believe Trump will be directing his team to start doing some realignments, restructuring and new hiring
I saw earlier today that the US Forest Service seams to be the hardest hit with today’s terminations. Honestly we were finally starting to see some actual management of our forests since Clinton stopped logging and I think these across the board actions will set forest management back even further.
Quote from: dwils233 on February 14, 2025, 09:36:32 PMQuote from: Buckhunter24 on February 14, 2025, 07:10:15 PMQuote from: addicted1 on February 14, 2025, 06:57:18 PMQuote from: MADMAX on February 14, 2025, 05:45:41 PMQuote from: CarbonHunter on February 14, 2025, 05:29:00 PMI saw earlier today that the US Forest Service seams to be the hardest hit with today’s terminations. Honestly we were finally starting to see some actual management of our forests since Clinton stopped logging and I think these across the board actions will set forest management back even further.Give it some timeI believe Trump will be directing his team to start doing some realignments, restructuring and new hiringFat chance, most areas have lost a significant portion of their workforce that had the boots on the ground. To think this will get turned around anytime soon beyond laughable. The terminations will continue through next week, for an agency that was already lean. Oh well what’s a few more people to add to Washington homeless population.Ramp up the cut then we can look at bringing back some employees.That's not realistic. That's like having a doctor tell the surgeon to just start pulling out organs and well see how it goes during the post-surgery recovery.Targeted cuts might have been productive AFTER auditing and understanding the impact. Broad base decimation doesn't actually protect the financial and resource interests of our country. That's why you don't just have some random person come in and fire your IT staff to save money... System dependency and vitality.Musk did the same process at Twitter. Market cap went from 44b to 9b. It doesn't make operational sense or business senseNo doubt it seems bass ackwards. I would have much rather seen the red tape reduced. Its easy to feel frustrated with the majority of the FS districts production. There are a handful of districts that have been headed in a good direction, I sure hope they can maintain it.
Quote from: EnglishSetter on February 15, 2025, 09:45:22 PMSome real TDS around here. No wonder WA is CA Lite.~3% of the employees took the "early retirement". There's 2.5MM civil Fed employees.This topic has shifted from the original posters intent. So this wasn’t actually inference to resigned. This was for terminated employees. I will not respond to this thread, cause it has gone off the tracks. But, you are correct not many resigned as they shouldn’t have.
Some real TDS around here. No wonder WA is CA Lite.~3% of the employees took the "early retirement". There's 2.5MM civil Fed employees.
In the mid 90s, Boeing offered the one and only Silver Parachute (only management get the Golden Parachute) to reduce head count. I do not remember the complete specifics, but basically anyone withing five years of retirement to take the option to retire and get a multitude of retirement benefits. 242 people on the "blacK" program I was working at the time. Everyone left started panicking. How are we going to replace all those senior people Well after everything settled down, 16 were replaced. 16 of the 242 were critical enough to be replaced, and most of those were through upgrades not new hires. No deliveries were impacted by schedule or quality.I am not saying this is the answer, because each situation is different. I am saying that hardly ever is the damage done by consolidation situations, anywhere near as bad as people make it out to be.
That data has all forms of government - federal, state and local. They are shooting for a 200-300,00 reduction directly and probably double that overall if you account for private company involvement.The thing I notice is that the cuts are very focused, so it isn't like every department will trim their bottom 10%. They haven't touched anything defense/security related and that's 70% of federal employees. So, if you cut 10% overall from only 30% of the pot you get a really big number.Which leads me to the question of what will happen when we realize we actually needed some of those people? Will friendly corporations be ready and willing to quickly fix it through contracts? Is this going to just be a big outsourcing project?