Free: Contests & Raffles.
We do not express an opinion on the accompanying consolidated financial statement of the Department.Because of the significance of the matter described in the Basis for Disclaimer of Opinion section of our report,we have not been able to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to provide a basis for an audit opinion onthe consolidated financial statement.
Quote from: Bucks2Ducks on March 13, 2025, 03:54:19 PMQuote from: chukardogs on March 13, 2025, 09:38:54 AM C'mon people, there absolutely no way that the best businessman that's ever ran a business would do anything to hurt the common folk. It's ridiculous to believe that he'd hand over the reins of the federal government to a South African emigrant that may not have the best interest of the citizens of this country, in mind. He wouldn't give massive tax breaks to multi-billionaires and make cuts to assistance programs that the working citizens of this country have been paying into for years. It's unfathomable that he would cut programs that harm our veterans and fellow citizens that have put there lives on the line for this country. The citizens of this great country need to relax, live their lives with eye's closed, and "believe" that the president has their backs and will do everything in his power to make America great again.So who should be auditing the government? I would choose the most successful businessman in the Country, which is what Trump did. And what he ran on the whole time, and won in a landslide victory. The Kind of good to remember he won, but had less than 50% of the popular vote. Not exactly a landslide when you consider that more than half the population voted against him.
Quote from: chukardogs on March 13, 2025, 09:38:54 AM C'mon people, there absolutely no way that the best businessman that's ever ran a business would do anything to hurt the common folk. It's ridiculous to believe that he'd hand over the reins of the federal government to a South African emigrant that may not have the best interest of the citizens of this country, in mind. He wouldn't give massive tax breaks to multi-billionaires and make cuts to assistance programs that the working citizens of this country have been paying into for years. It's unfathomable that he would cut programs that harm our veterans and fellow citizens that have put there lives on the line for this country. The citizens of this great country need to relax, live their lives with eye's closed, and "believe" that the president has their backs and will do everything in his power to make America great again.So who should be auditing the government? I would choose the most successful businessman in the Country, which is what Trump did. And what he ran on the whole time, and won in a landslide victory. The
C'mon people, there absolutely no way that the best businessman that's ever ran a business would do anything to hurt the common folk. It's ridiculous to believe that he'd hand over the reins of the federal government to a South African emigrant that may not have the best interest of the citizens of this country, in mind. He wouldn't give massive tax breaks to multi-billionaires and make cuts to assistance programs that the working citizens of this country have been paying into for years. It's unfathomable that he would cut programs that harm our veterans and fellow citizens that have put there lives on the line for this country. The citizens of this great country need to relax, live their lives with eye's closed, and "believe" that the president has their backs and will do everything in his power to make America great again.
Well now that you've asked, I would have to assume it shouldn't be a non-elected South African emigrant, the non-elected being the important point. That individual has no business digging around in our government. Think about only the conflict of interest issues that arise. Our president owes this emigrant his freedom in the tune of 290 million dollars worth. Next, depending on your definition of a successful businessman, our president is so far removed from the most successful businessman he's not even on the first page. Actually, go spend some time looking up the number of companies your man has started and then bankrupted, usually leaving someone else holding the bag.
Trump didn't win the popular vote, he got less than 50%.The notion that because Elon isn't elected he shouldn't be around is likewise a head scratcher. Only congress and the president are elected. Cabinet members aren't, chairman of joint chiefs isn't, FBI director isn't, CIA director isn't, FED president isn't, nobody making any of those decisions are elected. The reverse argument would be that the only option is to send a couple 80+ year old senators into the Department of Education to look around and they couldn't bring any staff because those staff aren't elected.
I'm wrong, I misspoke, meant majority. He did get more votes this time.
Quote from: Stein on March 13, 2025, 06:32:08 PMQuote from: Bucks2Ducks on March 13, 2025, 03:54:19 PMSo who should be auditing the government? I would choose the most successful businessman in the Country, which is what Trump did. And what he ran on the whole time, and won in a landslide victory. The US dollar is at the edge of collapse, interest on our debt is more than the Defense budget... there is some serious issues that need to be fixed immediately. The problem is there should be an annual audit, not one every 30 years I would chose an auditor (or rather large team or probably even a couple independent teams in the case of auditing the USG), it's what they do and who every other entity requiring auditing uses. Musk and his techs have no idea how to perform an audit and nothing they are doing even vaguely resembles an audit. They may be cutting programs and staff which may or may not be a good idea, but they aren't doing an audit.Good old fashioned auditor teams got us into this predicament; I don't see them getting us out of it.Professionals built the Titanic. Amateurs built Noah's ark.
Quote from: Bucks2Ducks on March 13, 2025, 03:54:19 PMSo who should be auditing the government? I would choose the most successful businessman in the Country, which is what Trump did. And what he ran on the whole time, and won in a landslide victory. The US dollar is at the edge of collapse, interest on our debt is more than the Defense budget... there is some serious issues that need to be fixed immediately. The problem is there should be an annual audit, not one every 30 years I would chose an auditor (or rather large team or probably even a couple independent teams in the case of auditing the USG), it's what they do and who every other entity requiring auditing uses. Musk and his techs have no idea how to perform an audit and nothing they are doing even vaguely resembles an audit. They may be cutting programs and staff which may or may not be a good idea, but they aren't doing an audit.
So who should be auditing the government? I would choose the most successful businessman in the Country, which is what Trump did. And what he ran on the whole time, and won in a landslide victory. The US dollar is at the edge of collapse, interest on our debt is more than the Defense budget... there is some serious issues that need to be fixed immediately. The problem is there should be an annual audit, not one every 30 years
Quote from: Dan-o on March 13, 2025, 07:49:17 PMQuote from: Stein on March 13, 2025, 06:32:08 PMQuote from: Bucks2Ducks on March 13, 2025, 03:54:19 PMSo who should be auditing the government? I would choose the most successful businessman in the Country, which is what Trump did. And what he ran on the whole time, and won in a landslide victory. The US dollar is at the edge of collapse, interest on our debt is more than the Defense budget... there is some serious issues that need to be fixed immediately. The problem is there should be an annual audit, not one every 30 years I would chose an auditor (or rather large team or probably even a couple independent teams in the case of auditing the USG), it's what they do and who every other entity requiring auditing uses. Musk and his techs have no idea how to perform an audit and nothing they are doing even vaguely resembles an audit. They may be cutting programs and staff which may or may not be a good idea, but they aren't doing an audit.Good old fashioned auditor teams got us into this predicament; I don't see them getting us out of it.Professionals built the Titanic. Amateurs built Noah's ark.Apples and Fairy Tales.