Free: Contests & Raffles.
Wait so you don’t even know what this about? You didn’t see the Supreme Court ruling on article xvi of the New Mexico State constitution? Got it. I’ll leave you to continue carry on yelling about stuff you don’t even bother to learn about.
Quote from: LDennis24 on March 20, 2025, 03:07:04 PMQuote from: Platensek-po on March 20, 2025, 02:57:12 PMQuote from: LDennis24 on March 20, 2025, 01:20:05 PMThis goes hand in hand with the UIA and the Wyoming corner crossing case. I said it on that thread and people didn't like it. But don't be surprised when every landowner in the state stops letting people access their land because of stuff like this! Stops letting people do what? Float down a river that they have property on? Can’t do that. Just like on the sound. As long as I am floating on the water and not touching the ground I’m not trespassing.Maybe you should read the article. It's non navigable water only accessible by crossing their land. THEIR LAND! It's called trespassing. Remember, reading comprehension! I didn't post anything about floating the river but that's not possible either.Have to cross a fence because they put a fence across the stream.
Quote from: Platensek-po on March 20, 2025, 02:57:12 PMQuote from: LDennis24 on March 20, 2025, 01:20:05 PMThis goes hand in hand with the UIA and the Wyoming corner crossing case. I said it on that thread and people didn't like it. But don't be surprised when every landowner in the state stops letting people access their land because of stuff like this! Stops letting people do what? Float down a river that they have property on? Can’t do that. Just like on the sound. As long as I am floating on the water and not touching the ground I’m not trespassing.Maybe you should read the article. It's non navigable water only accessible by crossing their land. THEIR LAND! It's called trespassing. Remember, reading comprehension! I didn't post anything about floating the river but that's not possible either.
Quote from: LDennis24 on March 20, 2025, 01:20:05 PMThis goes hand in hand with the UIA and the Wyoming corner crossing case. I said it on that thread and people didn't like it. But don't be surprised when every landowner in the state stops letting people access their land because of stuff like this! Stops letting people do what? Float down a river that they have property on? Can’t do that. Just like on the sound. As long as I am floating on the water and not touching the ground I’m not trespassing.
This goes hand in hand with the UIA and the Wyoming corner crossing case. I said it on that thread and people didn't like it. But don't be surprised when every landowner in the state stops letting people access their land because of stuff like this!
Quote from: Platensek-po on March 20, 2025, 06:45:33 PMWait so you don’t even know what this about? You didn’t see the Supreme Court ruling on article xvi of the New Mexico State constitution? Got it. I’ll leave you to continue carry on yelling about stuff you don’t even bother to learn about.Wait, so you went and looked it up and want to post now to make it sound like you knew what was up all along! 🤡 I saw it, it's another socialist program for hunters and anglers who don't support landowners rights. The ones who think it's ok to intrude on someone's private land they worked hard for because they can't just go somewhere else. It's totally socialist behavior. Prove me wrong.
Focus on the wrong part of my statement, that's your problem. Taking landowners rights away by allowing people to cross their property to get to public land or water is taking someones rights to give rights to another person. What is it called when you take from one person or group to provide for another group? I'll use that term instead. Please teach me! Wait wait wait... I found it! It's COMMUNISM!Your right, it's not Socialist
Quote from: LDennis24 on March 21, 2025, 02:02:40 PMFocus on the wrong part of my statement, that's your problem. Taking landowners rights away by allowing people to cross their property to get to public land or water is taking someones rights to give rights to another person. What is it called when you take from one person or group to provide for another group? I'll use that term instead. Please teach me! Wait wait wait... I found it! It's COMMUNISM!Your right, it's not SocialistPretty sure I already explained that you need to go back to grade school if you need to be taught these things. From the looks of it you seem to really hate America and its system of government. You call a Supreme Court ruling on a state constitution communism and socialism! ***text censored*** Good luck with that! You really seem to be winning people with your fallacious arguments and false equivalencies.
I can flip crap just as good as anyone else. Moving on...
Quote from: LDennis24 on March 21, 2025, 03:31:34 PM I can flip crap just as good as anyone else. Moving on...Keep up the fight LDennis24. This should be a great concern to anyone who owns property and values property rights. I’m all for access to public land but it should be done through a legal easement, not tromping through and over private property. I’d like to think our legislators could write and pass a bill allowing eminent domain or whatever to create public easements to isolated public lands at the most reasonable access point and the current landowner paid market value for their loss.
Cheering for laws to take away from landowners rights is lazy and dangerous.
QuoteCheering for laws to take away from landowners rights is lazy and dangerous. lol. You have no idea what I believe and advocate for. Land owner rights are right near the top
