Big Game Hunting > Out Of State Hunting
Trail cams, is Nevada the first to take this position.
Woodchuck:
--- Quote from: 2MANY on July 30, 2019, 03:56:37 PM ---
--- Quote from: pianoman9701 on July 30, 2019, 03:35:51 PM ---Huh?
--- End quote ---
Exactly.
--- End quote ---
Well, now that we have settled this issue...
Ghost Hunter:
--- Quote from: pianoman9701 on July 30, 2019, 03:35:51 PM ---Huh?
--- End quote ---
Glad you got it too. :o :dunno:
bornhunter:
OK EVERYONE! MILLER TIME! FEEL THE LOVE! :chuckle:
2MANY:
Water them critters instead of relying on others.
Be part of the solution folks.
Plant fish!!!
Water deer!!!
Take pictures after the kill.
Make America great again!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
blackveltbowhunter:
I am not against the use of trailcams. But I understand the logic behind restrictions in some areas. Logic. The most overlooked study in schools these days. Seems to be right up there with common sense and bigfoot in the rarity you actually see it.
Just an observation. By their very nature trailcams are designed to monitor and "scout" without the user even being in the area. The majority of the other "technology advancements" mentioned in in this thread have not eliminated the need for an end user to be present. A long range rifle needs a shooter, high end optics, need an operator, gps, rangefinders, tech clothing, nice boots etc make it more comfortable, arguably more effective, but its requires a person be present. Trailcams CAN provide very important data that would often go unnoticed because the end user cannot constantly monitor X number of locations all the time. Trailcams can solve that.