collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Trail cams, is Nevada the first to take this position.  (Read 15290 times)

Offline dscubame

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 3603
  • Location: Spokane WA
  • 2013 Idaho Elk Hunt
Trail cams, is Nevada the first to take this position.
« on: July 25, 2019, 12:20:14 PM »
And it starts....
It's a TIKKA thing..., you may not understand.

Eyes in the Woods.   ' '

Offline HillHound

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2019
  • Posts: 1727
  • Location: Central Washington
  • Groups: NRA, RMEF
Re: Trail cams, is Nevada the first to take this position.
« Reply #1 on: July 25, 2019, 12:25:58 PM »
Wow so because some guys have the time and effort to put in to scout it is now an unfair advantage? I suppose they better outlaw high-end optics also because that gives me an unfair advantage over the guy who can only afford the cheapo 3 x 9. And they better outlaw the high-quality lightweight rain gear that gives those guys a upper hand on all the guys you can only afford the old flannel and jeans.

Offline h20hunter

  • Trade Count: (+16)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 20730
  • Location: Lake Stevens
Re: Trail cams, is Nevada the first to take this position.
« Reply #2 on: July 25, 2019, 12:27:32 PM »
I don't think so... i believe a few other states have a no use period.

Offline vandeman17

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 14653
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: Trail cams, is Nevada the first to take this position.
« Reply #3 on: July 25, 2019, 01:43:07 PM »
Montana was similar up until a year or two ago when they changed it. You used to not be able to have cameras out during any "open hunting season"
" I have hunted almost every day of my life, the rest have been wasted"

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21904
  • Groups: SCI, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Trail cams, is Nevada the first to take this position.
« Reply #4 on: July 25, 2019, 01:52:00 PM »
They're not the first. Nevada has a similar law and I suspect other states do as well.

Nevada:

Trail Cameras

With certain exemptions, it is illegal to place, maintain or use a trail camera on public land from August 1 – December 31 of each year. July 1 through December 31 if the camera is capable of transmitting.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline Doublelunger

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 1194
  • Location: Pacific NW
Re: Trail cams, is Nevada the first to take this position.
« Reply #5 on: July 25, 2019, 02:19:24 PM »
Wow so because some guys have the time and effort to put in to scout it is now an unfair advantage? I suppose they better outlaw high-end optics also because that gives me an unfair advantage over the guy who can only afford the cheapo 3 x 9. And they better outlaw the high-quality lightweight rain gear that gives those guys a upper hand on all the guys you can only afford the old flannel and jeans.

My understanding was that the main purpose of the law was to protect the well being of the animals.  Water sources are limited and every water hole and spring had a dozen cameras on them being checked regularly and it was putting a lot of stress on the critters. :dunno:

Offline vandeman17

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 14653
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: Trail cams, is Nevada the first to take this position.
« Reply #6 on: July 25, 2019, 02:33:25 PM »
Wow so because some guys have the time and effort to put in to scout it is now an unfair advantage? I suppose they better outlaw high-end optics also because that gives me an unfair advantage over the guy who can only afford the cheapo 3 x 9. And they better outlaw the high-quality lightweight rain gear that gives those guys a upper hand on all the guys you can only afford the old flannel and jeans.

My understanding was that the main purpose of the law was to protect the well being of the animals.  Water sources are limited and every water hole and spring had a dozen cameras on them being checked regularly and it was putting a lot of stress on the critters. :dunno:

Yes, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico and parts of Utah have this issue. I have seen pictures of water holes or guzzlers with like 20 cameras up on anything they can find or pack in to get a camera up.
" I have hunted almost every day of my life, the rest have been wasted"

Offline trophyhunt

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 20139
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: Wa Wild Sheep Life Member
Re: Trail cams, is Nevada the first to take this position.
« Reply #7 on: July 25, 2019, 02:52:18 PM »
Seems like a stupid law
“In common with”..... not so much!!

Offline MtnMuley

  • Site Sponsor
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 8689
  • Location: NCW
Re: Trail cams, is Nevada the first to take this position.
« Reply #8 on: July 25, 2019, 03:01:12 PM »
They're not the first. Nevada has a similar law and I suspect other states do as well.

Nevada:

Trail Cameras

With certain exemptions, it is illegal to place, maintain or use a trail camera on public land from August 1 – December 31 of each year. July 1 through December 31 if the camera is capable of transmitting.

That's confusing.    Nevada is what this topic is all about. :dunno:

Offline BULLBLASTER

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 8099
Re: Trail cams, is Nevada the first to take this position.
« Reply #9 on: July 25, 2019, 03:02:05 PM »
Wow so because some guys have the time and effort to put in to scout it is now an unfair advantage? I suppose they better outlaw high-end optics also because that gives me an unfair advantage over the guy who can only afford the cheapo 3 x 9. And they better outlaw the high-quality lightweight rain gear that gives those guys a upper hand on all the guys you can only afford the old flannel and jeans.

My understanding was that the main purpose of the law was to protect the well being of the animals.  Water sources are limited and every water hole and spring had a dozen cameras on them being checked regularly and it was putting a lot of stress on the critters. :dunno:

Yes, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico and parts of Utah have this issue. I have seen pictures of water holes or guzzlers with like 20 cameras up on anything they can find or pack in to get a camera up.
Fish and game should have a camera there and charge people to download the pictures from it.  :chuckle:

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21904
  • Groups: SCI, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Trail cams, is Nevada the first to take this position.
« Reply #10 on: July 25, 2019, 03:08:56 PM »
They're not the first. Nevada has a similar law and I suspect other states do as well.

Nevada:

Trail Cameras

With certain exemptions, it is illegal to place, maintain or use a trail camera on public land from August 1 – December 31 of each year. July 1 through December 31 if the camera is capable of transmitting.

That's confusing.    Nevada is what this topic is all about. :dunno:
LOL. My mistake. Sorry about that.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline huntnnw

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9717
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Trail cams, is Nevada the first to take this position.
« Reply #11 on: July 29, 2019, 10:20:40 PM »
Wow so because some guys have the time and effort to put in to scout it is now an unfair advantage? I suppose they better outlaw high-end optics also because that gives me an unfair advantage over the guy who can only afford the cheapo 3 x 9. And they better outlaw the high-quality lightweight rain gear that gives those guys a upper hand on all the guys you can only afford the old flannel and jeans.

My understanding was that the main purpose of the law was to protect the well being of the animals.  Water sources are limited and every water hole and spring had a dozen cameras on them being checked regularly and it was putting a lot of stress on the critters. :dunno:

Yes, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico and parts of Utah have this issue. I have seen pictures of water holes or guzzlers with like 20 cameras up on anything they can find or pack in to get a camera up.
Fish and game should have a camera there and charge people to download the pictures from it.  :chuckle:

hey now! dont be giving WDFW any ideas  :chuckle:

Offline bear

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 1733
Re: Trail cams, is Nevada the first to take this position.
« Reply #12 on: July 30, 2019, 05:56:07 AM »
I like it. Hate hiking and seeing cameras.
Liberals have a mental disorder

Offline dvolmer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 1580
  • Location: Eastern Washington, West Richland
Re: Trail cams, is Nevada the first to take this position.
« Reply #13 on: July 30, 2019, 05:57:24 AM »
I know I will get some flack, but I think all trail cameras should be outlawed.  If you want to scout, then get out there and scout. 
Zonk Volmer

Offline huntnnw

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9717
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Trail cams, is Nevada the first to take this position.
« Reply #14 on: July 30, 2019, 06:02:16 AM »
I know I will get some flack, but I think all trail cameras should be outlawed.  If you want to scout, then get out there and scout.

outlawed for what reasons?

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal