Post by: Bob33 on December 10, 2012, 09:34:56 PM
8 hours ago • Associated Press
Home Home //News News //State and Regional State and Regional //MontanaNews MontanaNews Montana shuts down wolf harvest near Yellowstone
Montana wildlife commissioners closed down the state's gray wolf season in some areas north of Yellowstone National Park on Monday, in response to a spate of recent shootings of animals that had been collared for scientific research.
The move shuts down hunting and trapping in areas to the east and west of the town of Gardiner, just days before trapping season was set to begin.
But wildlife commissioners did not yield to pressure from wildlife advocates to create a permanent and more extensive buffer around the park.
Fish, Wildlife and Parks Commission chairman Bob Ream said commissioners were addressing only "the particular and unique situation" of collared wolves being shot.
"It seems to be kind of a compromise," Ream said. "Is it political? Yeah, wolves are political."
Hunting and trapping supporters pushed to keep the areas open. Representatives of the Department of Fish, Parks and Wildlife also said no changes were needed because the overall wolf population was not at any risk.
The closures were approved on a 4-to-1 vote. Commissioner Dan Vermillion of Livingston cast the lone dissenting vote.
He said there was no evidence the harvest was damaging the species long-term viability.
Park officials say at least seven Yellowstone wolves —including five wearing tracking collars — were shot in recent weeks by hunters in Montana, Idaho and Wyoming.
Also shot were four collared wolves originally from the park but now living outside it. Three more shot in the vicinity of the park had unknown origins and were not wearing collars, park officials said.
Saturday marks the opening day of Montana's first wolf trapping season since the animals lost federal protections last year.
Wildlife advocates had warned trapping could take even more of Yellowstone's wolves than hunting. They've said only a permanent buffer zone would adequately protect a species that serves as a major draw for Yellowstone's 3 million visitors annually.
Still, Marc Cooke with the group Wolves of the Rockies said Monday's closure of some areas was a positive step.
"I admire the commissioners' courage to step up to the plate and do the right thing," he said.
A Yellowstone scientist said this week that the park's overall population remained strong despite the recent shootings.
Wolf hunting has been underway in Montana since Sept. 1, with at least 89 killed to date. Wildlife officials said Monday that the statewide harvest was down 18 percent through Nov. 25 versus the same period last year.
State officials lifted quotas on wolves across most of Montana this spring in hopes of decreasing a predator population blamed for livestock attacks and driving down elk numbers in some areas.
Hunting and trapping are prohibited inside park boundaries, but wolves range freely across that line.
Shooting a collared wolf is legal if done within a state's hunting regulations.
Radio collars on wolves are used to track the animals' movement, often for research. They also are used outside the park to track down and kill the predators following livestock attacks.
That function — using collars not just to study wolves but to manage their numbers — was a key factor behind Monday's decision, said Shane Colton, a wildlife commissioner from Billings.
"That is an area where we feel we are at significant risk of losing more collared wolves," Colton said of the areas closed to further wolf killing. "Whether hunters are targeting collared wolves or not, I don't know. But if we're going to continue to use collared wolves, steps have to be taken to stop that."
Post by: Bean Counter on December 10, 2012, 09:50:11 PM
:mor:
Post by: ICEMAN on December 11, 2012, 09:39:57 AM
Was the shutdown a result of the volume of wolves harvested, or the result of the volume of wolves harvested which just happened to be wearing collars?
Is there a fear that hunters have begun to electronically track wolves themselves for erradication?
Post by: JLS on December 11, 2012, 09:50:04 AM
It was the overall number of collared wolves being shot.
Post by: ICEMAN on December 11, 2012, 09:54:36 AM
Post by: JLS on December 11, 2012, 09:58:08 AM
This does not make sense to me then. They should have two quotas for the area then IMHO....one for collared and another for non-collared. To shut everything down just because they are losing collared wolves seems unfair.
You are correct. Or prohibit the shooting of collared wolves period, they are usually the wolves that have names and a bajillion photos on the internet.
Post by: BOWHUNTER45 on December 11, 2012, 10:34:03 AM
Post by: Humptulips on December 11, 2012, 10:57:08 AM
Iceman,
It was the overall number of collared wolves being shot.
I don't think so. It was the overall number of angry e-mails they received from wolf lovers. :bash:
Post by: Northway on December 11, 2012, 11:03:26 AM
The hunts have flown under the radar to a much larger extent nationally than a lot of the NGO's had hoped for, IMO. Drilling wolves that are well known inside the park by large numbers of visitors presents an opportunity to elevate the wolf issue to the national level. That's what it's really been about for large NGO's since delisting - national attention that could effect changes at the federal level.
Some of those Yellowstone wolves are going to be "harvested" regardless of a buffer zone, but it's when large numbers of them go down that the issue becomes elevated.
The worst thing that could happen for the big NGO's and the most shameless of wolf haters is for hunting/trapping seasons to settle into a pattern of norlmacy that is only broken by occasional control actions in areas where management goals are not being achieved, IMO.