Hunting Washington Forum

Equipment & Gear => Guns and Ammo => Topic started by: splitshot on January 04, 2013, 06:52:18 PM


Advertise Here
Title: ultra or short?
Post by: splitshot on January 04, 2013, 06:52:18 PM
  the elk committee in moses lake are needing a gun for a board game at the annual banquet.  should we get a short mag or ultra mag in 7 or 300?  or does it really matter?  we want to of course sell out the board and also give the winner a nice prize.  thanks,  mike w
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: Bigtine96 on January 04, 2013, 06:56:00 PM
Your going to get a million different responses, I vote 300 but everyone on here has their own choice haha.
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: Bob33 on January 04, 2013, 06:58:39 PM
If you took a poll of 100 shooters I think it would go 51 for the 300, and 49 for the 7. Short is a little more popular than Ultra in a 300.
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: 762Armo on January 04, 2013, 07:00:32 PM
Ill take a 7 ultra.  :chuckle:
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: high country on January 04, 2013, 07:02:20 PM
The recoil difference favors the short. The velocity difference is negligible.
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: Biggerhammer on January 04, 2013, 07:02:53 PM
.300 WSM :tup: :tup:

Most people can handle 300 WSM recoil. .300 WSM DEAD or .300 Ultra REAL DEAD.
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: BullMagnet76 on January 04, 2013, 07:29:49 PM
300 ultra great knockdown power and ammo is reletively easy to find
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: GEARHEAD on January 04, 2013, 07:37:14 PM
300 WSM
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: Bob33 on January 04, 2013, 07:38:47 PM
.300 WSM :tup: :tup:

Most people can handle 300 WSM recoil. .300 WSM DEAD or .300 Ultra REAL DEAD.
I agree on both counts although I see the primary advantage of the Ultra as flatter trajectory more than increased energy/killing effectiveness.  :twocents:
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: Biggerhammer on January 04, 2013, 07:43:44 PM
.300 WSM :tup: :tup:

Most people can handle 300 WSM recoil. .300 WSM DEAD or .300 Ultra REAL DEAD.
I agree on both counts although I see the primary advantage of the Ultra as flatter trajectory more than increased energy/killing effectiveness.  :twocents:

I'm a super magnum junkie, I shoot stuff that would break most men. ;)
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: Rick on January 04, 2013, 07:45:50 PM
.300 WSM

It'll appeal to more people IMO.
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: RadSav on January 04, 2013, 07:47:11 PM
300 Short.  Why give away a gun most won't enjoy shooting?  That is if they can afford ammo for it!  I'd bet more interest would be created with the 300 short vs 7 or .30 Ultra.  That's the name of the game in this case, isn't it?
Title: ultra or short?
Post by: jackelope on January 04, 2013, 07:48:08 PM
The ultra mag will kill stuff more deader. I'd go that route.
Title: ultra or short?
Post by: jackelope on January 04, 2013, 07:48:42 PM
Although the 7wsm is ultra cool.
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: Wanttohuntmore on January 04, 2013, 07:50:01 PM
More will like the 300wsm.   But I wouldn't mind a 7 ultra!
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: yorketransport on January 04, 2013, 08:14:19 PM
Since you're dealing with elk hunters, I say 300 Ultra. It seems like the elk guys would prefer the 300 over the 7mm, and the Ultra over the WSM.

If this were somebody looking to put down their own money to buy the gun I would say 300 WSM. I don't think the Ultra offers enough of an advantage over the 300 WSM other than a slight trajectory differance. Even then only the long range guys would see the benefit of the Ultra.

Having said that, I have both. :chuckle: The WSM is a rifle and the Ultra mag is a pistol.  :tup:

Andrew
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: gadwall on January 04, 2013, 08:33:00 PM
Ill take a 7 ultra.  :chuckle:

 :yeah:

For popularity at a fundraiser, I would go with the 300 short mag
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: The100Road on January 04, 2013, 08:35:53 PM
Why a Short or a Ultra and not just the 300 win mag? Just curious.
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: longrangekiller on January 04, 2013, 08:39:33 PM
Even though I shoot and love my 300 rum I would have to say 300 wsm just because the recoil diffrence ...... it works out for everyone in the recoil area atleast and still has some thud behind it
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: splitshot on January 04, 2013, 08:47:24 PM
we all ready have a 300 win mag so we are going to something else.  i am leaning toward the rum in 300.  thanks for the help.  more stuff is welcomed.  the whole deal is to sell tickets and give the lucky winner a nice elk rifle that will last the rest of his/her life, and might be passed down to his or her heirs.  mike w,  by the way our rmef  banquet is feb. 2 in moses lake and if you want to go pm me and we can arrange it, thank you for watching.
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: Biggerhammer on January 04, 2013, 08:53:22 PM
we all ready have a 300 win mag so we are going to something else.  i am leaning toward the rum in 300.  thanks for the help.  more stuff is welcomed.  the whole deal is to sell tickets and give the lucky winner a nice elk rifle that will last the rest of his/her life, and might be passed down to his or her heirs.  mike w,  by the way our rmef  banquet is feb. 2 in moses lake and if you want to go pm me and we can arrange it, thank you for watching.

The .300 Ultra is a bruiser cartridge and 90 percent of your hunters can't handle the recoil of one. I can't even count the number of them I have seen return to shops shortly after being purchased. Consignment, traded back or sold back. If a pool of average hunters were involved I would think the 300 WSM would be more desirable.
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: splitshot on January 04, 2013, 09:04:05 PM
good point bigger.  maybe we could let the winner pick either a short or an ultra.  mike w
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: Bob33 on January 04, 2013, 09:08:45 PM
The .300 Ultra is a bruiser cartridge and 90 percent of your hunters can't handle the recoil of one. I can't even count the number of them I have seen return to shops shortly after being purchased. Consignment, traded back or sold back. If a pool of average hunters were involved I would think the 300 WSM would be more desirable.
That is very true, and I suspect if you ball and dummied 100 big game hunters you would find quite a few that flinch with a 300 magnum of any variety. Taking advantage of the RUM's additional power is not easy. The WSM can be more accurately shot by more hunters in my opinion.

But look at it this way: with a RUM you get the added benefit of using empty cartridge cases for coffee mugs.
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: yorketransport on January 04, 2013, 09:15:04 PM
But look at it this way: with a RUM you get the added benefit of using empty cartridge cases for coffee mugs.

 :yeah: :chuckle:
I wish I would have thought of that!

Andrew

Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: longrangekiller on January 04, 2013, 09:19:42 PM
But look at it this way: with a RUM you get the added benefit of using empty cartridge cases for coffee mugs.

 :yeah: :chuckle:
I wish I would have thought of that!

Andrew

Or u can sell em to me for half price  :tup:  :chuckle:
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: huntnphool on January 04, 2013, 09:22:35 PM
7
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: Biggerhammer on January 04, 2013, 10:46:10 PM
The .300 Ultra is a bruiser cartridge and 90 percent of your hunters can't handle the recoil of one. I can't even count the number of them I have seen return to shops shortly after being purchased. Consignment, traded back or sold back. If a pool of average hunters were involved I would think the 300 WSM would be more desirable.
That is very true, and I suspect if you ball and dummied 100 big game hunters you would find quite a few that flinch with a 300 magnum of any variety. Taking advantage of the RUM's additional power is not easy. The WSM can be more accurately shot by more hunters in my opinion.

But look at it this way: with a RUM you get the added benefit of using empty cartridge cases for coffee mugs.

Or shot glasses for that matter. ;)
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: high country on January 04, 2013, 11:10:25 PM
Hell, if you want horsepower, toss a 416 meteor in the mix. I would buy a 375 ultra.....if more guys knew the accuracy potential of the 375......it would be the new elk master.
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: JackOfAllTrades on January 04, 2013, 11:22:51 PM
300wsm.
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: mountainman on January 04, 2013, 11:27:32 PM
Hell, if you want horsepower, toss a 416 meteor in the mix.

 :tup: :)
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: carpsniperg2 on January 04, 2013, 11:41:11 PM
I tell anyone thinking about a big gun like the ultra to find someone and shoot them first. See what they feel like and how you shoot them. Most people out there have no need or reason to need a ultra or super mag.

The last friend that was talking having a big 30+ magnum came over and was talking options with me. I told him before you get crazy and drop 3-4k why don't you shoot a few of mine :chuckle: Let's just say he went to a 7mm mag instead.

Kinda wish I would have let him build it and then bought it from him when he found out he did not like it :chuckle: I try to be a better friend then that :chuckle:
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: hoyt2002 on January 05, 2013, 12:05:00 AM
300 Wsm if a kid or woman wins it will be a good gun. Mild recoil and can put elk down hard. it would be a good gun for anyone that wins. I have a buddy that shoots one he loves it. My wife has the 300 wm and i shoot the ultra. all do the same to the animals. but the ultra is a beast but its a hellofa good time shooting it.
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: Biggerhammer on January 05, 2013, 12:16:40 AM
Hell, if you want horsepower, toss a 416 meteor in the mix. I would buy a 375 ultra.....if more guys knew the accuracy potential of the 375......it would be the new elk master.

The .375 Ultra is the most accurate of the ultra mags I have shot, 3 of them have been spooky accurate. The first three rounds with hand loads I had used in the two prior .375 Ultra's . Shot .375 at 100 yards in the current one.
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: yorketransport on January 05, 2013, 05:56:19 AM
Hell, if you want horsepower, toss a 416 meteor in the mix. I would buy a 375 ultra.....if more guys knew the accuracy potential of the 375......it would be the new elk master.
Now it's getting interesting!
Serious elk calibers start at 338, and get better as you go up! :tup:

Andrew
Title: ultra or short?
Post by: elkinrutdrivemenuts on January 05, 2013, 07:06:02 AM
300 ultra mag hands down.  Give the short mag to the women and children. 
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: yorketransport on January 05, 2013, 09:16:46 AM
300 ultra mag hands down.  Give the short mag to the women and children. 

And give a 30-06 to all the guys who buy an Ultra mag and realize that they can't afford to shoot it, and that they can't handle it. Then they never shoot it enough to actually become proficient with it, and go cripple game animals at 600+ yards. :bash:

That's then down side to the Ultra, it takes a pretty serious commitment to learn to shoot them well.

Andrew
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: ICEMAN on January 05, 2013, 09:18:31 AM
300 ultra mag hands down.  Give the short mag to the women and children. 

Exactly! :chuckle:
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: mountainman on January 05, 2013, 09:19:31 AM
 
[/quote]
Now it's getting interesting!
Serious elk calibers start at 338, and get better as you go up! :tup:

 
[/quote]

 :tup:
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: ICEMAN on January 05, 2013, 09:19:58 AM
300 ultra mag hands down.  Give the short mag to the women and children. 

And give a 30-06 to all the guys who buy an Ultra mag and realize that they can't afford to shoot it, and that they can't handle it. Then they never shoot it enough to actually become proficient with it, and go cripple game animals at 600+ yards. :bash:

That's then down side to the Ultra, it takes a pretty serious commitment to learn to shoot them well.

Andrew

Here is a whole 'nother thread... 

Yorke, how many round should it take to become proficient? :chuckle:
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: yorketransport on January 05, 2013, 09:28:37 AM
300 ultra mag hands down.  Give the short mag to the women and children. 

And give a 30-06 to all the guys who buy an Ultra mag and realize that they can't afford to shoot it, and that they can't handle it. Then they never shoot it enough to actually become proficient with it, and go cripple game animals at 600+ yards. :bash:

That's then down side to the Ultra, it takes a pretty serious commitment to learn to shoot them well.

Andrew

Here is a whole 'nother thread... 

Yorke, how many round should it take to become proficient? :chuckle:

For me? 3 shots to zero the scope! :chuckle:

My rule when I teach people to shoot, is that they need to be able to hit my 8" steel gong 10 for 10 from a field position. Whatever range you can accomplish this at is what I consider their max range. If they can only do that at 50 yards, then they are proficient at 50 yards. If you can run that at 1000 yards, then that's your range.

It's just important to understand that the "proficiency range" changes from gun to gun. I don't care if they can shoot a perfect score with a 243 at 600 yards. That doesn't mean you can do it with the Ultra mag at that range!

Andrew
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: ICEMAN on January 05, 2013, 09:36:05 AM
Good threshold you posted. 

When I first purchased my 300rum, I sighted the gun in...then returned to the woods each weekend for quite some time. Proficiency in my case was a single first shot. Had to be withing 3" of center at 300 yards. My choice for me was that 300 yard max. Some days I would drive out, take out a target and the gun, one shot on my 300 yard range. In the snow or on a 100 degree day. One shot trip.

Obviously the gun is able to do much more, but when I can tip beer cans at 300 yards, for me, I consider this proficient.

Title: ultra or short?
Post by: elkinrutdrivemenuts on January 05, 2013, 10:25:52 AM
300 ultra mag hands down.  Give the short mag to the women and children. 

And give a 30-06 to all the guys who buy an Ultra mag and realize that they can't afford to shoot it, and that they can't handle it. Then they never shoot it enough to actually become proficient with it, and go cripple game animals at 600+ yards. :bash:

That's then down side to the Ultra, it takes a pretty serious commitment to learn to shoot them well.

Andrew

It's kind of a sick obsession we ultra mag owners have.  I got the 338 RUM and my shoulder is bruised after a session at the range, but I always come back for more and I am most confident with that rifle.  There is just something about the power I love! 

And reloading is a must with ultra mags!!! 
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: splitshot on January 05, 2013, 05:40:40 PM
  why is reloading a must for a rum?   i think i know but want to know for sure.  i do want to thank everyone who had input to this thread.  next year we will have a 338 rum on one of our board games.  mike w
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: yorketransport on January 05, 2013, 06:09:43 PM
  why is reloading a must for a rum?   i think i know but want to know for sure.  i do want to thank everyone who had input to this thread.  next year we will have a 338 rum on one of our board games.  mike w

It's purely a cost saving measure. 300 RUM ammo is $45-75 a box.

Andrew
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: MountainWalk on January 05, 2013, 06:11:59 PM
.300 or 7mm Ultra.
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: high country on January 05, 2013, 06:13:13 PM
.........and accuracy. What good is a 1500 yard killing machine that shoots 1.5moa with chitty bullets?
Title: ultra or short?
Post by: elkinrutdrivemenuts on January 05, 2013, 06:23:53 PM
  why is reloading a must for a rum?   i think i know but want to know for sure.  i do want to thank everyone who had input to this thread.  next year we will have a 338 rum on one of our board games.  mike w

Cost is the biggest part, and it's nice I play with difference bullets. 
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: haugenna on January 05, 2013, 06:47:45 PM
Elk?  338 Win Mag
Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: Curly on January 05, 2013, 06:53:39 PM
Elk?  338 Win Mag

 :yeah:

Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: atc250r18 on January 05, 2013, 10:32:34 PM
Short.....way better8)

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2

Title: Re: ultra or short?
Post by: Magnum_Willys on January 05, 2013, 10:41:32 PM
Neither - 325 wsm is a better elk cartridge and works fine for deer. 
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal