Hunting Washington Forum

Community => Advocacy, Agencies, Access => Topic started by: bobcat on January 29, 2013, 12:07:54 PM


Advertise Here
Title: Bark Beetle is not the reason for wildfires
Post by: bobcat on January 29, 2013, 12:07:54 PM
Interesting article in the Seattle Times:

http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2020208531_barkbeetlexml.html (http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2020208531_barkbeetlexml.html)
Title: Re: Bark Beetle is not the reason for wildfires
Post by: Bob33 on January 29, 2013, 12:39:37 PM
That is interesting. I would like to see the long term data on "drought" for these areas.
Title: Re: Bark Beetle is not the reason for wildfires
Post by: X-Force on January 29, 2013, 01:13:03 PM
Interesting but they seem to want their cake and eat it too. They say that beetles dont cause wild fires to spread and that they could actually help prevent their spread because of the lack of canopy from dead trees. They also say that the droughts are causing the beetle populations to increase, while fire prevalence continues to increase.
If the drought is causing the beetle population to thrive wouldnt it also stem the increased threat of fire from the drought?

It does make sense that the fire load would decrease once the trees are void of needles.

The other thing this article didnt address is that once the trees die their roots no longer hold the soils in place... So more erosion could occur and may be more damaging then putting in roads thinning the trees and replanting...
Title: Re: Bark Beetle is not the reason for wildfires
Post by: BOWHUNTER45 on January 29, 2013, 01:23:58 PM
 :yike: here is another bad subject for me to put my nose into  :dunno: :bash: :bash: as you drive over Hwy 20 from Sedro Woolley to Winthrop you have Hundreds of acres of trees dying from the dang bettles ...So the state and all their greenies choose to leave them there to rot .. Why not cut them down and plant New Healthy ones  :dunno: Dah !! Then you have these idiots who can not face the truth knowing the bettles killed the trees and there for they have died and there for they have caused fires ... I am lost as usual !!  :yeah:
Title: Re: Bark Beetle is not the reason for wildfires
Post by: logger on January 29, 2013, 03:39:46 PM
I agree that it's not the reason for fires, I believe though that it's the reason they burn so hot. Every briefing I went to while on a fire they harped and harped about the beetle killed timber. As usaul the forest service will study it to death with little to no action on gettin in there and doing something about it. The  forest service has become the biggest group of leaf lickers there is,apparently studies pay big money and doing what is best for the resource is secondary.
Title: Re: Bark Beetle is not the reason for wildfires
Post by: Humptulips on February 01, 2013, 11:14:28 PM
 :yeah:

No one wants to make a decision so they study it to death.
Title: Re: Bark Beetle is not the reason for wildfires
Post by: dreamingbig on April 13, 2013, 09:26:38 AM
 :bash: who said they were the reason?  What they do is provide a lot more fuel to burn so that the fires are bigger and hotter once started.
Title: Re: Bark Beetle is not the reason for wildfires
Post by: motg9_6 on April 13, 2013, 09:43:15 AM
 :yeah:
Title: Re: Bark Beetle is not the reason for wildfires
Post by: BOWHUNTER45 on April 13, 2013, 01:23:04 PM
 :dunno: What a joke ... the dang beetles kill the trees and then the trees become dried out because they are now dead ...what makes the fire burn hotter ? Birrr dirrr !!!! and yes the beetle is the main cause of the fires because they killed the trees in the 1st place ....why I never went to college is beyond me  :chuckle: :chuckle:
Title: Re: Bark Beetle is not the reason for wildfires
Post by: Wazukie on April 13, 2013, 01:28:06 PM
I din't kno dat a beetle could start a fire  :dunno:
Title: Re: Bark Beetle is not the reason for wildfires
Post by: Curly on April 13, 2013, 01:53:34 PM
 :lol4:
Title: Re: Bark Beetle is not the reason for wildfires
Post by: MadHatter on April 14, 2013, 06:06:02 PM
The moral of the story in this article is to push the climate change agenda... Four times in the story mention it, as if pounding saying the same thing over and over makes it more true... :bash:
Title: Re: Bark Beetle is not the reason for wildfires
Post by: JLS on April 15, 2013, 10:41:19 AM
The moral of the story in this article is to push the climate change agenda... Four times in the story mention it, as if pounding saying the same thing over and over makes it more true... :bash:

If you don't believe climate change is real you should.  One doesn't have to be an Al Gore groupie to see the effects of climate change in subalpine and montane environments across the Rocky Mountains and Pacific NW.
Title: Re: Bark Beetle is not the reason for wildfires
Post by: motg9_6 on April 16, 2013, 05:27:39 AM
i believe in climate change, happens four time a year, spring, summer, fall, winter. Climate change is something that is used as poltical propaganda more than anyhting. do you think the earth has always been the same temperature??? hense the ice age, sever droughts etc. the earth goes through cycles get used to it. it happened before there were car humans and all these bad things that we "created".
  just my :twocents:
Title: Re: Bark Beetle is not the reason for wildfires
Post by: Skyvalhunter on April 16, 2013, 05:34:29 AM
They can't say that a dead dry tree killed by a beetle hit by lightning isn't more likely to start a fire more than one still green or alive. They can twist the data any way they like to pacify their climate change agenda.
Title: Re: Re: Bark Beetle is not the reason for wildfires
Post by: MadHatter on April 21, 2013, 05:31:47 PM
The moral of the story in this article is to push the climate change agenda... Four times in the story mention it, as if pounding saying the same thing over and over makes it more true... :bash:

If you don't believe climate change is real you should.  One doesn't have to be an Al Gore groupie to see the effects of climate change in subalpine and montane environments across the Rocky Mountains and Pacific NW.

Climates do change... But as far as a political agenda, there is no such phenomenon... The earth will regulate and change its climate as it has done for eons, the fact that we are so pompous to think we are the ones solely causing it is nieve at best.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2

Title: Re: Bark Beetle is not the reason for wildfires
Post by: Boss .300 winmag on April 21, 2013, 05:46:12 PM
The moral of the story in this article is to push the climate change agenda... Four times in the story mention it, as if pounding saying the same thing over and over makes it more true... :bash:

If you don't believe climate change is real you should.  One doesn't have to be an Al Gore groupie to see the effects of climate change in subalpine and montane environments across the Rocky Mountains and Pacific NW.

JLS what proof/ data do you have?

Hopefully it's not all from AL GORES internets!  :yike:
Title: Re: Bark Beetle is not the reason for wildfires
Post by: bobcat on April 21, 2013, 06:29:47 PM
I don't think there's any reason to doubt that the climate is changing. I'm not sure why people dispute it. The only debate is whether it's man caused or natural.
Title: Re: Bark Beetle is not the reason for wildfires
Post by: Heredoggydoggy on April 21, 2013, 06:48:35 PM
The increase in the numbers of Bark Beetles is another benefit of the "Only You Can Prevent Forest Fires" BS.  Periodic Forest Fires kept the Beetles in check, burned along the ground, and promoted new healthy growth.  The Indians knew that a hundred years ago, but the white man, in his infinite wisdom, knew better.
Title: Re: Bark Beetle is not the reason for wildfires
Post by: MadHatter on April 21, 2013, 07:26:49 PM
The increase in the numbers of Bark Beetles is another benefit of the "Only You Can Prevent Forest Fires" BS.  Periodic Forest Fires kept the Beetles in check, burned along the ground, and promoted new healthy growth.  The Indians knew that a hundred years ago, but the white man, in his infinite wisdom, knew better.

I think this is one of our biggest threats anymore... No longer do fires burn out the forest.  The forest ecosystem is evolved to rely on fire, and we just put them out now and don't let them clean out the forest.  Its frustrating to see 1000 acres in the middle of NOWHERE catch and watch the government spend millions to put it out... My grandfather used to talk of how open the woods used to be, and how you could see 100+ yards even amongst the trees... Now, without a machete you cannot get 10' in most forests because of the undergrowth.  As much as it causes me great pain to say it, CA is starting to get it right... They let more fires burn now, and are even telling people that live in high fire danger areas to make defensible space, its not CALFIRE's job to protect you home if you choose to live in the middle of nowhere.  I have personally seen defensible space work... Guy had about 50-100yds around his house cleared of debris and shrubs... His house survived a pretty bad fire.  You could literally see where the fire parted and went around his house, burning the available fuels. 
Title: Re: Bark Beetle is not the reason for wildfires
Post by: Heredoggydoggy on April 21, 2013, 07:34:00 PM
Last year, just as the wildfires were getting started, my buddy and I were Grouse hunting along the Mission Ridge Trail, and I was astounded at all the dead fallen wood under the live trees.  I haven't been back up there since, but if the fires reached there, there's not a living thing left!
Title: Re: Bark Beetle is not the reason for wildfires
Post by: Northway on April 24, 2013, 05:50:40 PM
The moral of the story in this article is to push the climate change agenda... Four times in the story mention it, as if pounding saying the same thing over and over makes it more true... :bash:

If you don't believe climate change is real you should.  One doesn't have to be an Al Gore groupie to see the effects of climate change in subalpine and montane environments across the Rocky Mountains and Pacific NW.

I do believe that "climate change" is real, but it seems like a pointless argument. In my opinion we are pot-committed and there's no going back. Without drastic technological advances, pollution will continue to increase globally regardless of what americans do locally to combat it. 
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal