Hunting Washington Forum

Big Game Hunting => Elk Hunting => Topic started by: Old Man Yager on May 16, 2013, 07:02:12 AM


Advertise Here
Title: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Old Man Yager on May 16, 2013, 07:02:12 AM
WTH?? Why is the Barbour Outfitting locked? Sabotaged?
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: SniperDanWA on May 16, 2013, 07:15:24 AM
I would put it this way, the mods saw it going downhill.   :twocents:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Old Man Yager on May 16, 2013, 07:19:39 AM
Dang it, that's the best entertainment I've had in the past few days!!! I'll shut up now so I don't get 86'd from the forum!!!
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: mrmoskillz on May 16, 2013, 07:35:53 AM
Yea there was unfinished business on that thread.  That guide was about to give a members Son a free hunt.  Oh well maybe he will send him a PM.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: h20hunter on May 16, 2013, 07:38:54 AM
Ahem cough cough DOUBT IT cough cough
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: jackmaster on May 16, 2013, 07:45:00 AM
i wanted  to know who his buddy was that is a coach for gk football....i wanted to ask whatever coach it was if this guy was full of it or not..... :dunno:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: jackelope on May 16, 2013, 07:48:54 AM
Yea there was unfinished business on that thread.  That guide was about to give a members Son a free hunt.  Oh well maybe he will send him a PM.

If he wants to give a hunt, he can start a new thread. I doubt that will happen, but thats what he can do.

i wanted  to know who his buddy was that is a coach for gk football....i wanted to ask whatever coach it was if this guy was full of it or not..... :dunno:
Send him a pm.

There's 600+ posts a day on here. We don't have time to babysit one thread. That's probably why it was locked. 
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: jackelope on May 16, 2013, 07:49:45 AM
Dang it, that's the best entertainment I've had in the past few days!!! I'll shut up now so I don't get 86'd from the forum!!!
It would take a lot more than this to get 86'd from the forum. Just sayin...

Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: pianoman9701 on May 16, 2013, 07:50:44 AM
Dang it, that's the best entertainment I've had in the past few days!!! I'll shut up now so I don't get 86'd from the forum!!!
It would take a lot more than this to get 86'd from the forum. Just sayin...

Yep. You really have to act like a huge jerk before that happens.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: b0bbyg on May 16, 2013, 08:24:16 AM
I also was a little saddened when I noticed it was locked, but understand why you would choose to do so.

That thread reminded me of NASCAR, 
Watching guys going in circles waiting for the crash   :chuckle:

Title: Graham Outfitter
Post by: iRem on May 16, 2013, 08:32:02 AM
I wanted to get more into how Billdo hooked up with this joker! Two pees in a pod....
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Bullkllr on May 16, 2013, 08:32:10 AM
There was really nowhere good that the thread was going.


I am looking into the hunt offer though.

I'll let everyone know what happens.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: turkeyfeather on May 16, 2013, 08:39:30 AM

That thread reminded me of NASCAR, 
Watching guys going in circles waiting for the crash   :chuckle:
That's a pretty good analogy
Title: Graham Outfitter
Post by: iRem on May 16, 2013, 08:43:10 AM
There was really nowhere good that the thread was going.


I am looking into the hunt offer though.

I'll let everyone know what happens.
The Free hunt this year and pay next year?
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: billdo5 on May 16, 2013, 08:55:30 AM
I wanted to get more into how Billdo hooked up with this joker! Two pees in a pod....
Like peas and carrots  :IBCOOL:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: sirmissalot on May 16, 2013, 08:58:47 AM
I'm starting to believe more and more he and billdo are related. Brothers? Cousins? The similarities are just too much...
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: billdo5 on May 16, 2013, 08:59:39 AM
Uncle actually
Title: Graham Outfitter
Post by: iRem on May 16, 2013, 09:08:37 AM
Uncle actually
No really, what's the relation between you guys?
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: billdo5 on May 16, 2013, 09:10:05 AM
I dont know the guy at all never even talked to him and he was messaging saying we should get together sometime and he is always looking for guides... lol i didnt do anything i just think he wants to know where i hunt....  :dunno:
Title: Graham Outfitter
Post by: iRem on May 16, 2013, 09:13:51 AM
If I were you I wouldn't get involved with this guy!
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: billdo5 on May 16, 2013, 09:14:36 AM
No $hit he just wants to see where i hunt and probably where i got the bull this year.. Because i told him it was in his neck of the woods...
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Broken Arrow on May 16, 2013, 09:14:42 AM
"call um and KILL UM" guide services!
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Bullkllr on May 16, 2013, 09:25:27 AM
There was really nowhere good that the thread was going.


I am looking into the hunt offer though.

I'll let everyone know what happens.
The Free hunt this year and pay next year?

Yes.
If the offer still stands, I am willing to take him up on it.
We'll see.
Title: Graham Outfitter
Post by: iRem on May 16, 2013, 09:35:45 AM
I live right down the street, I might have to go down and find out where he hunts and what properties he is hunting on. I know a few owners out there that have elk that travel through, but don't allow hunters on the property!
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: pianoman9701 on May 16, 2013, 09:40:31 AM
The other thread was locked because it was 400 posts of picking on a forum member for his grammar and mostly unfounded allegations about his guiding. Why is this starting all over again? Enough is enough.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: jackmaster on May 16, 2013, 10:12:27 AM
dang so when BILDO and mr barbour outfitters hook up that means there will be no elk left in graham, cause bildo kills all the elk in his spots and babour kills 200 every 5 years so that means bildo + barbour = 400 boone and crockett bulls every 3 1/2 years  :dunno:  :chuckle:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: billdo5 on May 16, 2013, 10:13:54 AM
Did u not read any of the previous comments?
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Band on May 16, 2013, 10:29:16 AM
I just have to chime in and be honest here.  I cringe when I (occasionally) see a post by a young person with poor English skills who is looking for someone to back up his decision to skip school in order to go on a hunting trip.  Yes, we all love to hunt; but education should never take a back seat to hunting, especially for people who are not "up to speed" with their age/grade level.

I guess the nicest thing to say is that I suspect "Monster Bulls" is an exceptional hunter due to his year-around dedication to the pursuit (including during school days/hours).  I hope he can find the time to enroll in school.  My suggestion would be to start at the beginning writing course that we took in elementary school.

Seriously, I pity what a person must encounter day to day when they lack such basic communication skills.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: mrmoskillz on May 16, 2013, 10:40:25 AM
The other thread was locked because it was 400 posts of picking on a forum member for his grammar and mostly unfounded allegations about his guiding. Why is this starting all over again? Enough is enough.

Here is my side of the story.  I see a fellow hunt-wa member asking for reviews on a guide.  He gets negative reviews that warn he might get burnt if he uses said guide.

Then the guide gets on and starts lying in his 1st few post imo (let a guy go and he hacked the website and miss spelled the words).

We all argue back and forth like family but when a outsider comes here with bs we all band together. (200 elk in 5 years is questionable imo)

I dont care if a guy can read or write but I do care if a fellow member gets ripped off.

The guide was trying to clear his name and we were listening and imo members were willing to give the guide a chance to do so.

There were members with valid unanswered questions that the guide might of liked to have the chance to answer when he got back from baiting.

I was one of the main ones poking fun and that was wrong.  I did think the guide was made up at 1st but then figured out he was for real.  He does have some nice pics of game and might be a hellofa hunter but now we may never know if he is a good guide or the worst that has lived bc the thread was locked...
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: jackelope on May 16, 2013, 10:40:38 AM
Yea there was unfinished business on that thread.  That guide was about to give a members Son a free hunt.  Oh well maybe he will send him a PM.

If he wants to give a hunt, he can start a new thread. I doubt that will happen, but thats what he can do.

i wanted  to know who his buddy was that is a coach for gk football....i wanted to ask whatever coach it was if this guy was full of it or not..... :dunno:
Send him a pm.

There's 600+ posts a day on here. We don't have time to babysit one thread. That's probably why it was locked.

Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: pianoman9701 on May 16, 2013, 10:42:44 AM
The other thread was locked because it was 400 posts of picking on a forum member for his grammar and mostly unfounded allegations about his guiding. Why is this starting all over again? Enough is enough.

Here is my side of the story.  I see a fellow hunt-wa member asking for reviews on a guide.  He gets negative reviews that warn he might get burnt if he uses said guide.

Then the guide gets on and starts lying in his 1st few post imo (let a guy go and he hacked the website and miss spelled the words).

We all argue back and forth like family but when a outsider comes here with bs we all band together. (200 elk in 5 years is questionable imo)

I dont care if a guy can read or write but I do care if a fellow member gets ripped off.

The guide was trying to clear his name and we were listening and imo members were willing to give the guide a chance to do so.

There were members with valid unanswered questions that the guide might of liked to have the chance to answer when he got back from baiting.

I was one of the main ones poking fun and that was wrong.  I did think the guide was made up at 1st but then figured out he was for real.  He does have some nice pics of game and might be a hellofa hunter but now we may never know if he is a good guide or the worst that has lived bc the thread was locked...

And, the information was provided and nothing new was being added.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: billdo5 on May 16, 2013, 10:43:30 AM
I dont see why it didnt get locked before he was a member... Then when someone tells him about it he becomes a member and then u lock it makes no sense
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: mrmoskillz on May 16, 2013, 10:45:26 AM
For the record I do respect pianoman and his opinion,  I just wanted to tell my side.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: jackelope on May 16, 2013, 10:48:05 AM
The other thread was locked because it was 400 posts of picking on a forum member for his grammar and mostly unfounded allegations about his guiding. Why is this starting all over again? Enough is enough.

Here is my side of the story.  I see a fellow hunt-wa member asking for reviews on a guide.  He gets negative reviews that warn he might get burnt if he uses said guide.

Then the guide gets on and starts lying in his 1st few post imo (let a guy go and he hacked the website and miss spelled the words).

We all argue back and forth like family but when a outsider comes here with bs we all band together. (200 elk in 5 years is questionable imo)

I dont care if a guy can read or write but I do care if a fellow member gets ripped off.

The guide was trying to clear his name and we were listening and imo members were willing to give the guide a chance to do so.

There were members with valid unanswered questions that the guide might of liked to have the chance to answer when he got back from baiting.

I was one of the main ones poking fun and that was wrong.  I did think the guide was made up at 1st but then figured out he was for real.  He does have some nice pics of game and might be a hellofa hunter but now we may never know if he is a good guide or the worst that has lived bc the thread was locked...

Just want to point out that it's clear to me that if one thread is locked, another one just starts up. The guy is a member and can still post. If he wants to post and clear up his name that has been run into the dirt here, then he can go for it.
If he doesn't want to post on here, I can't blame him. We all poked fun, which probably wasn't the best idea and could have run him off. I suspect that's likely not the case. My point is, just because the thread was locked does not mean the discussion is over. That's clearly evident by this thread.


Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: jackelope on May 16, 2013, 10:49:09 AM
I dont see why it didnt get locked before he was a member... Then when someone tells him about it he becomes a member and then u lock it makes no sense

It was locked before he was a member. Then we saw the guy sign up as a member so the thread was unlocked to allow him to have a say.
Once the thread went in the toilet, it was locked again.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: elk247 on May 16, 2013, 10:50:25 AM
There was really nowhere good that the thread was going.


I am looking into the hunt offer though.

I'll let everyone know what happens.
I'm looking forward to seeing the results of the offer. Both your son and Monsterbulls could benefit from it. I will reserve judgment until then. I assumed it was locked because he was soliciting business and was not a site sponsor? In any event, some good was accomplished in the previous thread. The guy has a chance to repair his image and business's reputation publicly. We will see.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Band on May 16, 2013, 10:52:17 AM
It all boils down to honesty.  Regardless of a person's English skills, honesty can help a person gain respect but dishonesty will result in "internet murder" every time. :twocents:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: mrmoskillz on May 16, 2013, 10:54:39 AM
It all boils down to honesty.  Regardless of a person's English skills, honesty can help a person gain respect but dishonesty will result in "internet murder" every time. :twocents:
:yeah:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: pianoman9701 on May 16, 2013, 10:57:19 AM
For the record I do respect pianoman and his opinion,  I just wanted to tell my side.

we're all good, Moz.  :tup:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: jackmaster on May 16, 2013, 12:02:25 PM
thats cause pianno man is gonna be the next pres and i am gonna get that dream job managing are prison system  :tup:  :chuckle:
Title: Graham Outfitter
Post by: iRem on May 16, 2013, 12:05:16 PM
Pianoman for President!
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: billdo5 on May 16, 2013, 12:06:08 PM
Billdo for president get it right  :chuckle: :IBCOOL:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: pianoman9701 on May 16, 2013, 12:07:52 PM
My fellow Americans,... :chuckle: I think me teens and twenties might prove to be a problem! :yike: :yike: :bdid:
Title: Graham Outfitter
Post by: iRem on May 16, 2013, 12:08:28 PM
Billdo for president get it right  :chuckle: :IBCOOL:
President of Barbour Outfitters maybe! Lol
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: turkeyfeather on May 16, 2013, 12:10:07 PM
My fellow Americans,... :chuckle: I think me teens and twenties might prove to be a problem! :yike: :yike: :bdid:
Well you told the truth, you are definitely out of the running now.  :chuckle:
Title: Graham Outfitter
Post by: iRem on May 16, 2013, 12:11:50 PM
My fellow Americans,... :chuckle: I think me teens and twenties might prove to be a problem! :yike: :yike: :bdid:
Well you told the truth, you are definitely out of the running now.  :chuckle:
Should we impeach him before he begins?!?!
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: turkeyfeather on May 16, 2013, 12:15:20 PM
Sorry pianoman, the tribe has spoken.  :ban:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: billdo5 on May 16, 2013, 12:17:39 PM
This thread is boring... we need to shake things up
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: gaddy on May 16, 2013, 12:20:24 PM
maybe you could go shake a bear ??
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: mrmoskillz on May 16, 2013, 12:21:12 PM
Billdo for president get it right  :chuckle: :IBCOOL:

You will have to settle for being Monica Lewinsky :yike:  lol you asked to :stirthepot:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: h20hunter on May 16, 2013, 12:23:29 PM
Wow....that took a turn of the unexpected.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: boneaddict on May 16, 2013, 12:24:02 PM
On that note, lets pull the plug or go stand in opposite corners of the house.   Enough already.    :beatdeadhorse:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: billdo5 on May 16, 2013, 12:29:51 PM
maybe you could go shake a bear ??

beer* learn to spell lol
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Buckmark on May 16, 2013, 12:41:08 PM
maybe you could go shake a bear ??

beer* learn to spell lol
I am pretty sure he meant "bear" and not beer....shake that bear....I'm not going any further with it..
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: mossback91 on May 16, 2013, 12:45:30 PM
maybe you could go shake a bear ??

beer* learn to spell lol
I am pretty sure he meant "bear" and not beer....shake that bear....I'm not going any further with it..
I'm sure bildo knows what he really meant!!! heck he prolly filmed it!
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: billdo5 on May 16, 2013, 12:45:48 PM
never heard that saying before.. before my time i guess
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Band on May 16, 2013, 12:47:43 PM
My fellow Americans,... :chuckle: I think me teens and twenties might prove to be a problem! :yike: :yike: :bdid:
Maybe, maybe not.  Did you inhale? ;)
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: pianoman9701 on May 16, 2013, 12:50:00 PM
I haven't yet exhaled.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: snowpack on May 16, 2013, 12:51:41 PM
You're probably over qualified for president... :yike:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: duckmen1 on May 16, 2013, 01:46:11 PM
Its funny how on the other thread i asked how much a cow hunt would cost and it took four times to get him to say 1500 and then they emailed me also saying 1650 for the same hunt. Kind of fishy. I would never do buisiness with them. Ill stay clear of that.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Netminder01 on May 16, 2013, 02:28:50 PM
My  :twocents:...

Let me first say, I didn't like to see the vultures swarming and given I am "the guy" SPUD initially solicited about Barbour and his services I remain very thankful for all the good guys who gave direct feedback based on personal interaction or provided a bit more critical hole-poking to the story Hillbilly was selling. 

The verdict was still pending and I for one felt the negative comments were slowing down with a few solutions being offered (i.e. free hunt for a Hunt-WA member, youth guide addition, etc).  Hillbilly didn't do himself any favors and the overall conduct of a few pushed the boundaries of where I feel forums should go but equally surprising is the arbitrary call to lock this thread. 

Yeah, it was "entertaining" but I've never seen a forum or thread get locked.  I have to imagine it's happened before but I've been on here for a few years, mostly as a passive observer but I'm on plenty of forums and in technology and social media for a living.  The absolute last thing I would expect from the great guys on this thread and those administer it would've been to censor it. 

If guys were stepping out of line they should be addressed. Pianoman (and a few others) attempted to calm the swarm down a few times as I recall - but if those offenders don't get back in line they should be dealt with appropriately and individually.  The rest of us benefit from the conversation and still interested in seeking the a greater understanding of the situation.  We should not be left to PMing Hillbilly privately since part of the concern is he's scamming people and I for one don't have the as much experience as many others here.

Should the actions of a few prevent the rest of this forum from understanding or hoping something will be brought to bear which settles it?

Again, just my  :twocents: but I'm really - really surprised the decision to lock the thread was made.

Net



 
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: fillthefreezer on May 16, 2013, 02:42:31 PM

Again, just my  :twocents: but I'm really - really surprised the decision to lock the thread was made.

Net
threads on here get locked all the time. just ask a question about native poaching or something and bam, 24hr later locked...
our mods dont have time to watch a thread thats blowing up like that and keep it clean
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: jackelope on May 16, 2013, 02:58:10 PM
My  :twocents:...

Let me first say, I didn't like to see the vultures swarming and given I am "the guy" SPUD initially solicited about Barbour and his services I remain very thankful for all the good guys who gave direct feedback based on personal interaction or provided a bit more critical hole-poking to the story Hillbilly was selling. 

The verdict was still pending and I for one felt the negative comments were slowing down with a few solutions being offered (i.e. free hunt for a Hunt-WA member, youth guide addition, etc).  Hillbilly didn't do himself any favors and the overall conduct of a few pushed the boundaries of where I feel forums should go but equally surprising is the arbitrary call to lock this thread. 

Should the actions of a few prevent the rest of this forum from understanding or hoping something will be brought to bear which settles it?

Again, just my  :twocents: but I'm really - really surprised the decision to lock the thread was made.

Net

So...when a thread is to the point where nothing good is going to come of it, we have to babysit it, the beating just continues, etc....it gets locked. We don't delete anymore so the record stays but locking is not uncommon....it is a lot less common than it used to be, but it is definitely not something that doesn't happen.

Quote
Yeah, it was "entertaining" but I've never seen a forum or thread get locked.  I have to imagine it's happened before but I've been on here for a few years, mostly as a passive observer but I'm on plenty of forums and in technology and social media for a living.  The absolute last thing I would expect from the great guys on this thread and those administer it would've been to censor it. 


No censoring. It's still there.  Obviously it was pointless to lock it, because someone just started this one.

Quote
If guys were stepping out of line they should be addressed. Pianoman (and a few others) attempted to calm the swarm down a few times as I recall - but if those offenders don't get back in line they should be dealt with appropriately and individually.  The rest of us benefit from the conversation and still interested in seeking the a greater understanding of the situation.  We should not be left to PMing Hillbilly privately since part of the concern is he's scamming people and I for one don't have the as much experience as many others here.


That's what I was saying in my last posts in this thread. 17 pages and 425 posts...We don't have time to babysit 1 gigantic  thread with nothing but a bunch of crap after the first few pages and address every post that needs to be addressed. It is against the rules to insult someone on here. That whole thread was people insulting that guy. How is that right?  I'm not going to sit and wait for every new post that comes up so I can nuke it because someone picked on the guy's spelling or grammar or whatever. It should have just stayed locked the 1st time around, then we probably wouldn't be having this discussion.


Us mods are all volunteers. We all have real lives and work and family and everything else that most adults have. I'd love to think that the forum, mostly comprised of adults, would not need constant monitoring and babysitting, but the simple fact of the matter is, it does. That is why I feel like giant, pointless threads on here that are going nowhere should get locked now and then.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: jackelope on May 16, 2013, 02:59:26 PM

Again, just my  :twocents: but I'm really - really surprised the decision to lock the thread was made.

Net
threads on here get locked all the time. just ask a question about native poaching or something and bam, 24hr later locked...
our mods dont have time to watch a thread thats blowing up like that and keep it clean

But in those 24 hours there will be 132 posts in said thread trashing native americans.
Not awesome, especially since it's happened 132 times in the past.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: pianoman9701 on May 16, 2013, 03:01:46 PM
The continued attacks on Monster bulls with almost no let-up for 16 pages was what did it, in my opinion. If you want to have a discussion and let a guy air his defense of a valid attack, that's one thing. When the whole group of people get personal on the guy for non-hunting related peripherals, then sometimes the bleeding needs to be stopped. I don't have a problem with confronting someone about bad references and asking them to show otherwise. However, about 80% of that thread was abusive and had to do with something over which the target of the abuse has little control. Maybe if the discussion is continued in this thread, the posters can respectfully deal with the hunting issue at hand and leave the personal attacks on his writing style out of it. Again, just my  :twocents:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Orion88 on May 16, 2013, 03:14:28 PM
I think that the Mods do a great job of allowing enough to be said, but when it goes downhill then it should be locked.  They are volunters and spend numerous hours keeping this site clean and useful for the members.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Jonathan_S on May 16, 2013, 03:14:55 PM
maybe you could go shake a bear ??

beer* learn to spell lol
I am pretty sure he meant "bear" and not beer....shake that bear....I'm not going any further with it..
I'm sure bildo knows what he really meant!!! heck he prolly filmed it!


 :chuckle:Bwhahahahahahahahaha! :chuckle:    :bdid:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: turkeyfeather on May 16, 2013, 03:18:43 PM
I gotta say that the last thread lasted longer than I thought it would. I think we all had some fun with the guy (even the mods). Personally I think the guy kinda brought it on himself. He definitely got harassed a bit but I never thought it was vicious. And let's not forget you guys (yes even the mods) have given ddjj1991 a bunch of "poop" for his writing as well.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: fillthefreezer on May 16, 2013, 03:30:19 PM

Again, just my  :twocents: but I'm really - really surprised the decision to lock the thread was made.

Net
threads on here get locked all the time. just ask a question about native poaching or something and bam, 24hr later locked...
our mods dont have time to watch a thread thats blowing up like that and keep it clean

But in those 24 hours there will be 132 posts in said thread trashing native americans.
Not awesome, especially since it's happened 132 times in the past.
exactly. i hope you didnt take this with any sort of tone other than matter of fact as it was intended
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Netminder01 on May 16, 2013, 03:43:59 PM
Thanks guys. 

I don't have the visibility to history to other threads requiring similar action so I'll defer; sounds like similar instances have occurred which required similar action.

As much as I can, I understand the labor of love that goes into any volunteer gig and can only imagine the increase in time spent on dealing with a thread which clearly got out of hand - I'm not sure anyone would disagree with it.  However, I do have a pretty good idea on the effort it takes to perform administrative chores on forums to the extent I can on Hunt-WA without having the visibility of knowing what tools you have at your disposal to administer this forum and members.  If it's a heavy burden of time because of manual effort I could easily see how it could become a time suck... multiplied by the hundreds/thousands of other threads needing management but it does not lessen my personal appreciation for what you guys are doing nor so many others on this thread.

I never saw an attack on native americans or any race and of course - that's atrocious but to me, that's where an individual is banned or held accountable for his/her posts, not killing the entire conversation.  We all signed up for a code of conduct and should be expected to follow it... no different than the work place.

Josh - I'm not sure I agree with nothing good coming from it.  Clearly, there was a swell of negative comments and absolutely flooding in which moved quickly to personal attacks when Shane fanned the flames with his writing style and boasting of records, # of kills or earned revenue which just didn't add up.  I don't condone it at all but I actually felt we were headed in the right direction (IMO). To be completely transparent, there was absolutely good that came out of this threaded discussion.  A few classy guys reached out to me privately to discuss possible hunts this coming year.  Had the thread not blown up - quite possibly, the visibility to members would've been reduced and I may not have had the same chance to connect with guys who seem to have the same passion and ethics as I do.  Of course, this is self-gratifying but even before the thread was locked, I made comments to co-workers as well as SPUD how cool it was for a a couple guys to reach out proactively. That demonstrates class in the midst of some unclassy comments.

Anyway, the good thing about you guys being admins and me being a member is we don't have to agree  :P.  I was simply sharing my perspective and surprise the thread was locked but having set social strategies and implemented social technologies for small to very large organizations I assure you none have deleted/locked a conversation... just individual users. This is why I was so surprised.

BTW - if you'd like to review any newer forum technologies I happen to know a guy.  wink wink.   :IBCOOL:

Thanks and appreciate all your comments and thoughts - even Hillbilly's. 
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: jackelope on May 16, 2013, 03:46:34 PM

Again, just my  :twocents: but I'm really - really surprised the decision to lock the thread was made.

Net
threads on here get locked all the time. just ask a question about native poaching or something and bam, 24hr later locked...
our mods dont have time to watch a thread thats blowing up like that and keep it clean

But in those 24 hours there will be 132 posts in said thread trashing native americans.
Not awesome, especially since it's happened 132 times in the past.
exactly. i hope you didnt take this with any sort of tone other than matter of fact as it was intended

No...we're on the same page.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Bob33 on May 16, 2013, 03:56:23 PM
Speaking for myself as a moderator, here is my perspective. This site is a source of both information and entertainment. We allow members quite a bit of latitude in what they post, but there are limits.

We’re mindful that web content is visible to visitors as well as members. Some may not hunt, and may not understand our culture very well. Members of this site are a small portion of the 3% of Washington’s population that hunts, but are possibly the face of all hunters to site visitors.

The recent tragic loss of Colockumelk brought out the good, generous, compassionate, and kind nature of so many on here. I would like to believe that visitors to this site, including his wife, saw that.

However, we need to occasionally intervene in threads that go sideways for a variety of issues. The thread about the Graham outfitter had received a point where the bad outweighed the good. Enough information had been posted that would allow members to make an informed choice about the use of his services. Continuous degrading of the outfitter’s business, justifiable or not, really didn’t provide much value and was reaching a point that wasn’t doing us as hunters any good.

Moderators constantly communicate behind the scenes, and rarely make decisions without consensus.

This is a great site. Let’s keep it that way.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: jackelope on May 16, 2013, 04:02:30 PM
.............Thanks and appreciate all your comments and thoughts - even Hillbilly's.

Chuck-
This forum is totally manual as far as I know. The "censor" function that censors swear words is automatic, but that's about it as far as I know. I am not a tech guy.  Dale has a guy hired for technical issues. He is set up as with "administrator" status so he can access everything that he needs. I don't know of any automated function.

As far as the nothing good coming from it part..I probably shouldn't have said nothing good...the 1st 2-3 pages were great. Perfect. Hunters helping hunters evade a possible huge issue. Just what this forum is here for. However, after it took a nose dive, that's when it should've ended. It ended a lot later than it should have if you ask me.

The longer you spend here, you'll find threads do get locked. I'd say it takes a lot now to get banned but we do ban. Dale has backed us off of banning people permanently. We might give out a 24 hour ban, a 3 day or 7 day but almost never do we perma-ban anymore. You have to be a pretty vile individual these days to get banned permanently...that or you've gotten the little bans multiple times.



Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Netminder01 on May 16, 2013, 04:13:29 PM
.............Thanks and appreciate all your comments and thoughts - even Hillbilly's.

Chuck-
This forum is totally manual as far as I know. The "censor" function that censors swear words is automatic, but that's about it as far as I know. I am not a tech guy.  Dale has a guy hired for technical issues. He is set up as with "administrator" status so he can access everything that he needs. I don't know of any automated function.

As far as the nothing good coming from it part..I probably shouldn't have said nothing good...the 1st 2-3 pages were great. Perfect. Hunters helping hunters evade a possible huge issue. Just what this forum is here for. However, after it took a nose dive, that's when it should've ended. It ended a lot later than it should have if you ask me.

The longer you spend here, you'll find threads do get locked. I'd say it takes a lot now to get banned but we do ban. Dale has backed us off of banning people permanently. We might give out a 24 hour ban, a 3 day or 7 day but almost never do we perma-ban anymore. You have to be a pretty vile individual these days to get banned permanently...that or you've gotten the little bans multiple times.

Thanks Josh!
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: boneaddict on May 16, 2013, 05:01:29 PM
THey have pretty much explained it.   I don't tend to lock things.   I tend to say that's enough and when some newbie decides to try the old man, they get a pair of cleats to the nuts and about 3 days to let the swelling go down.   Locking is also very effective so we can go about more useful things like running auctions, and helping people post pics and stuff like that.   There seems to always be a new personality with the same old personality of stirring the pot or derailing subjects.   Trust me they quickly outlive their welcome and are dealt with.  The meat of the thread has not and will not be removed. 
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Old Man Yager on May 16, 2013, 05:10:35 PM
I don't think this guy was "attacked", and besides, he was giving it right back to us. As a group, the hunters on this forum will call BS on anybody that says they have taken 200 elk in the past couple of years. We all have a hunting buddy or know a hunter that always tells us BS stories, and that's what MonsterBullSh*ter was doing. I'm just sayin!!!
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: jackelope on May 16, 2013, 05:19:33 PM
I don't think this guy was "attacked", and besides, he was giving it right back to us. As a group, the hunters on this forum will call BS on anybody that says they have taken 200 elk in the past couple of years. We all have a hunting buddy or know a hunter that always tells us BS stories, and that's what MonsterBullSh*ter was doing. I'm just sayin!!!

The insults were flying both ways maybe...but which way doesn't matter. The BS was called on this guy before he even joined the forum. Call it what you want. It's over and done.

From:

http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,4100.0.html (http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,4100.0.html)

Quote
You agree, through your use of this forum, that you will not post any material which is false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, slanderous, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, adult material, or ..........
[/b][/size]
You agreed to it when you signed up for the forum.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Dan-o on May 16, 2013, 05:47:20 PM
 :tup:

You mods rock - except you spend too much time explaining why you locked a thread that deserved locking.   

Now if I was a mod....   I'd probably have to ban myself, cause I'd tell them to pound sand for the incessant whining.     :dunno:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: jackelope on May 16, 2013, 05:52:52 PM
:tup:

You mods rock - except you spend too much time explaining why you locked a thread that deserved locking.   

Now if I was a mod....   I'd probably have to ban myself, cause I'd tell them to pound sand for the incessant whining.     :dunno:

I'm all done explaining this one.
We used to tell people to pound sand for whining, but the people whined about it so we quit. Instead we just listen to it now.  I don't get it.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Bob33 on May 16, 2013, 05:56:28 PM
:tup:

You mods rock - except you spend too much time explaining why you locked a thread that deserved locking.   

Now if I was a mod....   I'd probably have to ban myself, cause I'd tell them to pound sand for the incessant whining.     :dunno:
We are occasionally told to ban ourselves, but not quite in those exact words.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: turkeyfeather on May 16, 2013, 06:08:49 PM
Aren't we kinda  :beatdeadhorse: with this now. Let's let this one die already.  :twocents:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Cylvertip on May 16, 2013, 06:09:35 PM
Looking at the guys site, it is just the same animals in different pictures over and over- there are only 5 branched bulls ( the one is the funky photo shop suspect bull) on the page and the one water buff.  :dunno:

I could give a rip about grammar on here, it does detract from a web page promoting your services though. 

All the info just does not add up on this one.   :twocents:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: James E on May 16, 2013, 06:16:06 PM
I was going to post this on the other thread, but the subject is locked now. I have hunted with monster bulls and I know him well. He does have a lot of private land to hunt, that holds some nice bulls. He will work hard for you as well.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Netminder01 on May 16, 2013, 06:24:07 PM
Tangent + random thought... since I have all the big guys eyes right now.

Have you guys (mods/admin/owner) considered implementing a rating system of members and their content contribution by any community member? I'm sure you get plenty of 'report to moderator' feedback but members could rate the value of the content (pic, video, replies, insights, etc) contributed.  That way over time individuals who regularly contribute solid feedback, advice, insights, etc would eventually bubble up to combine with the overall # of posts.  If we're seeking quality it may reduce folks from just posting a pile of useless or inappropriate stuff. 

Maybe a combination of # of posts & community rating gives you X.  I really don't know what X would be yet that's what it's a random thought.  Maybe a special iconography or badge to go with your profile but it also gives credibility to those that know what they're talking about. Mods and admins gets X right away but everyone starts in the same place.  Hunt-WA members would also be able to give a negative rating of a fellow user too drive towards a heightened community status that maintains value and something others seek to achieve.

Maybe there's a widget, tool or a tiny bit of custom code to provide that functionality providing you guys liked the idea and it was flushed out a bit more. My hunch is the competitive nature of guys on this board might drive them to behave better and actually think through posting instead of some of the verbal vomit.

Whatcha think?

I gotta get back to work - big pitch tomorrow but before I do I feel a slight responsibility to post a little  humor.  If you guys haven't seen this, trust me - you don't have it that bad. Imagine having to moderate the interaction between the members and these guys on Hunt-WA. Whoa!  You might make Hillbilly a Mod!  :bash:

Epic Brand Meltdown
http://www.buzzfeed.com/ryanhatesthis/this-is-the-most-epic-brand-meltdown-on-facebook-ever (http://www.buzzfeed.com/ryanhatesthis/this-is-the-most-epic-brand-meltdown-on-facebook-ever)
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: turkeyfeather on May 16, 2013, 06:50:26 PM
I have never seen a forum do something like that. In my opinion that would be a terrible idea. You rate people based on whether you think their info is worthy. To subjective.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: elk247 on May 16, 2013, 07:02:17 PM
I think the idea is meant for the extremes. Extremely helpful, someone could show respect. Extremely disrespectful, harassing, thread derailers will be more obvious. Could be useful to the mods. :dunno:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: fillthefreezer on May 16, 2013, 07:09:48 PM
Tangent + random thought... since I have all the big guys eyes right now.

Have you guys (mods/admin/owner) considered implementing a rating system of members and their content contribution by any community member? I'm sure you get plenty of 'report to moderator' feedback but members could rate the value of the content (pic, video, replies, insights, etc) contributed.  That way over time individuals who regularly contribute solid feedback, advice, insights, etc would eventually bubble up to combine with the overall # of posts.  If we're seeking quality it may reduce folks from just posting a pile of useless or inappropriate stuff. 

Maybe a combination of # of posts & community rating gives you X.  I really don't know what X would be yet that's what it's a random thought.  Maybe a special iconography or badge to go with your profile but it also gives credibility to those that know what they're talking about. Mods and admins gets X right away but everyone starts in the same place.  Hunt-WA members would also be able to give a negative rating of a fellow user too drive towards a heightened community status that maintains value and something others seek to achieve.

Maybe there's a widget, tool or a tiny bit of custom code to provide that functionality providing you guys liked the idea and it was flushed out a bit more. My hunch is the competitive nature of guys on this board might drive them to behave better and actually think through posting instead of some of the verbal vomit.

Whatcha think?

I gotta get back to work - big pitch tomorrow but before I do I feel a slight responsibility to post a little  humor.  If you guys haven't seen this, trust me - you don't have it that bad. Imagine having to moderate the interaction between the members and these guys on Hunt-WA. Whoa!  You might make Hillbilly a Mod!  :bash:
Epic Brand Meltdown
http://www.buzzfeed.com/ryanhatesthis/this-is-the-most-epic-brand-meltdown-on-facebook-ever (http://www.buzzfeed.com/ryanhatesthis/this-is-the-most-epic-brand-meltdown-on-facebook-ever)
its a good idea but you hang around a bit and it becomes pretty obvious, some of the folks with lots of knowledge and some true trophies are very quiet here and its a shame as theres lot to be learned from them
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Netminder01 on May 16, 2013, 08:12:03 PM
Yeah, those sort of strategies are implemented in different ways all the time in social channels.  But hey, just an idea.

 :tup:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: turkeyfeather on May 16, 2013, 08:37:31 PM
Don't get me wrong net. I wasn't trying to bash you. I just don't think a rating system like that would help more than maybe hurt. There are a couple other sites I belong to that may have an idea. One other hunting site has an applaud/smite ticker, and a motorcycle site has a thanked feature.  :twocents:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: billdo5 on May 16, 2013, 08:49:07 PM
I was going to post this on the other thread, but the subject is locked now. I have hunted with monster bulls and I know him well. He does have a lot of private land to hunt, that holds some nice bulls. He will work hard for you as well.
im talking to him on the phone right now.... good guy lol
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Netminder01 on May 16, 2013, 09:22:53 PM
Don't get me wrong net. I wasn't trying to bash you. I just don't think a rating system like that would help more than maybe hurt. There are a couple other sites I belong to that may have an idea. One other hunting site has an applaud/smite ticker, and a motorcycle site has a thanked feature.  :twocents:

Oh no worries - I'm not that thin skinned - I didn't take it as bashing at all.

Yeah, I probably conveyed a specific execution instead of a broad inquiry on a few things but yeah - likes, thumbs up are different tactics to implement the overall idea.   I also don't know enough of the history and time you guys commit so consider foot inserted into mouth.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: turkeyfeather on May 16, 2013, 09:39:21 PM
Don't get me wrong net. I wasn't trying to bash you. I just don't think a rating system like that would help more than maybe hurt. There are a couple other sites I belong to that may have an idea. One other hunting site has an applaud/smite ticker, and a motorcycle site has a thanked feature.  :twocents:

Oh no worries - I'm not that thin skinned - I didn't take it as bashing at all.

Yeah, I probably conveyed a specific execution instead of a broad inquiry on a few things but yeah - likes, thumbs up are different tactics to implement the overall idea.   I also don't know enough of the history and time you guys commit so consider foot inserted into mouth.
Oh I've been known to stick my foot into my mouth on here a time or two. I sometimes type before I think.  :tup:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: billdo5 on May 16, 2013, 09:41:11 PM
 :chuckle: Dont we all Johnny Bravo :tup:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: monster bulls on May 16, 2013, 10:02:02 PM
thanks james e how ru and hows pops doing these guys are funny on here 1 or 2 of them are cool you how many elk  we got!

Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: elk247 on May 16, 2013, 10:12:14 PM
Don't get me wrong net. I wasn't trying to bash you. I just don't think a rating system like that would help more than maybe hurt. There are a couple other sites I belong to that may have an idea. One other hunting site has an applaud/smite ticker, and a motorcycle site has a thanked feature.  :twocents:

Oh no worries - I'm not that thin skinned - I didn't take it as bashing at all.

Yeah, I probably conveyed a specific execution instead of a broad inquiry on a few things but yeah - likes, thumbs up are different tactics to implement the overall idea.   I also don't know enough of the history and time you guys commit so consider foot inserted into mouth.
I thought it was a good idea. Take your foot out of your mouth. This is a great site but im sure suggestions, ideas, discussion will always be welcome.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Bullkllr on May 16, 2013, 10:46:08 PM
thanks james e how ru and hows pops doing these guys are funny on here 1 or 2 of them are cool you how many elk  we got!

Monster Bulls- Sent you a personal message here, and sent a message through your website.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: billdo5 on May 16, 2013, 11:09:10 PM
thanks james e how ru and hows pops doing these guys are funny on here 1 or 2 of them are cool you how many elk  we got!

Monster Bulls- Sent you a personal message here, and sent a message through your website.
Ur not special enough to get a phone call like me  :chuckle: :IBCOOL:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Spuddieselwwu on May 16, 2013, 11:59:57 PM
thanks james e how ru and hows pops doing these guys are funny on here 1 or 2 of them are cool you how many elk  we got!

Here we go, guys.  Should we just lock the thread now?
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Bullkllr on May 17, 2013, 07:03:05 AM
thanks james e how ru and hows pops doing these guys are funny on here 1 or 2 of them are cool you how many elk  we got!

Monster Bulls- Sent you a personal message here, and sent a message through your website.
Ur not special enough to get a phone call like me  :chuckle: :IBCOOL:

Special has more than one definition.


I guess I'm just old school enough to believe that people should say what they mean, mean what they say, then stand behind it.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: jackelope on May 17, 2013, 07:18:33 AM
thanks james e how ru and hows pops doing these guys are funny on here 1 or 2 of them are cool you how many elk  we got!

Here we go, guys.  Should we just lock the thread now?

Pretty soon. I thought one locked thread would provide enough of a hint. Apparently not.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Old Man Yager on May 17, 2013, 08:07:24 AM
If it gets locked again, I will promise not to start another thread.  :boxin:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: billdo5 on May 17, 2013, 08:26:32 AM
Monster Bulls there is only one thing i dont like about u and i have to say it... Grizzly man come on bro kodiak is where its at these days  :chuckle: :IBCOOL:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: monster bulls on May 17, 2013, 09:39:16 AM
lol bill seen lots of elk this morning about145 good morning
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Spuddieselwwu on May 17, 2013, 09:46:48 AM
I'm convinced Bildo in some way is the spawn of Monsterbulls.  Maybe a scenario like this:

Monsterbulls had too many guaranteed shots one night, met a lady and had a romantic rendezvous, never to hear from her again.   19 years goes by, Monsterbulls happens to sign onto hunting-washington to defend himself against numerous (albeit truthful) allegations of bad business practices only to find (and hire) his long lost son, Bildo5. 
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: jackelope on May 17, 2013, 09:50:39 AM
Can we just let it die already?
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Spuddieselwwu on May 17, 2013, 09:53:40 AM
Sorry Jackelope, I had to. It was too easy.  That's my last one, I promise.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: billdo5 on May 17, 2013, 11:04:48 AM
lol bill seen lots of elk this morning about145 good morning

I thought it was 245 damn I can't count... That's makes two monster  :chuckle:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: 6x6in6 on May 17, 2013, 11:06:51 AM
Can we just let it die already?

10 - 9 - 8 - 7......   :chuckle:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: duckmen1 on May 17, 2013, 11:18:12 AM
Do you carry a camera out on your scouting trips. You should be getting some awesome photos for show if you see that many.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: billdo5 on May 17, 2013, 11:27:07 AM
He doesnt want to show u his elk... u got to pay to see come on bro lol
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: duckmen1 on May 17, 2013, 11:31:49 AM
Others show pics of there scouting trips for fun on the sight and you dont see everyone paying them. :chuckle:
If its indeed true that would help out a lot about things on here. Good advertisement etc. but some who make millions cant afford a simple digital camera.
I think it would be a whole new game if he was to prove us wrong and making a new topic about his scouting season and show his experiences along the way.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: billdo5 on May 17, 2013, 11:33:10 AM
just watch the outdoor channel man... u will see in no time at all
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: duckmen1 on May 17, 2013, 11:33:56 AM
Whats the show called. :dunno:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: billdo5 on May 17, 2013, 11:35:57 AM
Go to the facebook and u will see
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Elkpiss on May 17, 2013, 11:36:49 AM
Whats the show called. :dunno:

I think "STAY HUNTIN"...  :dunno:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Broken Arrow on May 17, 2013, 12:02:33 PM
Looking back on the past few days. I actually send Monster Bulls an apology through pm.  I was one who was stirring the pot and poking fun. I did so as I truly believed this was all a joke. However, after seeing this through, I think this guy is not only seriously challenged and may have a disability, such as dyslexia (i work in this field so i have some knowledge) , I think he is really trying to clear his name. Regardless what i initially believed, based on reviews, I am willing to give this guy a chance to produce some positive outcomes. If it doesn't work out.....let the chips fall where they belong!. Until then....no more comments from me as everyone deserves a second chance.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: billdo5 on May 17, 2013, 12:04:07 PM
next saturday i will be out with him checkin it out i will give u a review how about that..
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: turkeyfeather on May 17, 2013, 12:10:07 PM
Looking back on the past few days. I actually send Monster Bulls an apology through pm.  I was one who was stirring the pot and poking fun. I did so as I truly believed this was all a joke. However, after seeing this through, I think this guy is not only seriously challenged and may have a disability, such as dyslexia (i work in this field so i have some knowledge) , I think he is really trying to clear his name. Regardless what i initially believed, based on reviews, I am willing to give this guy a chance to produce some positive outcomes. If it doesn't work out.....let the chips fall where they belong!. Until then....no more comments from me as everyone deserves a second chance.
I agree with you Arrow. That is why I have also not made any more comments on this for the last day or so. I didn't care for the cocky attitude but if he can back it up I will gladly eat my words. Having thought about it if I was getting blasted by a bunch of people I didn't know I'd probably come out swinging too.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: h20hunter on May 17, 2013, 12:16:42 PM
I've kept my mouth shutt....no all caps typing.......


I'd like to see some trail cam pics. Sounds like he has a lot and the forum has a section for it. Who doesn't like seeing pics of elk on cam?
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: billdo5 on May 17, 2013, 12:17:16 PM
I've kept my mouth shutt....no all caps typing.......


I'd like to see some trail cam pics. Sounds like he has a lot and the forum has a section for it. Who doesn't like seeing pics of elk on cam?
go the the facebook page theres pics on there from trail cameras...
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Broken Arrow on May 17, 2013, 12:30:06 PM
Some, or many times, I have my alligator mouth overrule my humming bird  ass.  Here is what i suggest, and I am ready to put my $$ speak for this. I still would like to see someone go on a free hunt with this guy, specifically a kid and his dad. If the hunt is what he says, quality, ethical, etc, then I would be willing to put forth $250 for the deposit for the following year, with the conditions being that it be provided to a soldier that has never killed an elk that is returning from a war zone. I'm pretty sure if his guide service produces what he says, this would be a great way to get back on track and I believe a few of us would also pony up for this cause.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: billdo5 on May 17, 2013, 12:40:47 PM
I will take the free hunt off your hands... lol
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Broken Arrow on May 17, 2013, 12:57:08 PM
Billdo,

I know your are kid, but i was thinking a kid who has never proclaimed to have called in numerous moster bulls, yet alone shot an elk
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: turkeyfeather on May 17, 2013, 01:00:29 PM
Some, or many times, I have my alligator mouth overrule my humming bird  ass.  Here is what i suggest, and I am ready to put my $$ speak for this. I still would like to see someone go on a free hunt with this guy, specifically a kid and his dad. If the hunt is what he says, quality, ethical, etc, then I would be willing to put forth $250 for the deposit for the following year, with the conditions being that it be provided to a soldier that has never killed an elk that is returning from a war zone. I'm pretty sure if his guide service produces what he says, this would be a great way to get back on track and I believe a few of us would also pony up for this cause.
I agree arrow. I would like to see him make good on his offer but without the catch. If he's truly that good he wouldn't need it cause guys would line up to go hunt with him. Otherwise the catch gives him an out if he doesn't come thru. I will also put up some money for a soldier or even better the kid of a fallen soldier to hunt.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: billdo5 on May 17, 2013, 01:01:56 PM
Billdo,

I know your are kid, but i was thinking a kid who has never proclaimed to have called in numerous moster bulls, yet alone shot an elk
I was joking... i will probably be hunting there anyway lol
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: billdo5 on May 17, 2013, 01:03:00 PM
but this year im just going to be helping out and calling.. going to stick to my own spots for the first year...
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Ccortez on May 17, 2013, 01:10:41 PM
Sounds like a waste of $$ to pay for a guided hunt in Washington  lol
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: billdo5 on May 17, 2013, 01:12:20 PM
looking at ur pic u need it  :chuckle:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Ccortez on May 17, 2013, 01:14:11 PM
Looking at your pic looks like you need a bigger bull before you can talk   :tup:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: billdo5 on May 17, 2013, 01:15:00 PM
rosie buddy.. didnt pay like u :) or u just got drawn.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Ccortez on May 17, 2013, 01:16:00 PM
Neither did I  :chuckle:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: billdo5 on May 17, 2013, 01:17:09 PM
 :chuckle:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Ccortez on May 17, 2013, 01:18:28 PM
And I don't need to get drawn to get a bull I do pretty good on my own every year
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: billdo5 on May 17, 2013, 01:19:25 PM
 :tup:
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: billdo5 on May 17, 2013, 01:22:05 PM
And I don't need to get drawn to get a bull I do pretty good on my own every year
lets see them buddy
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: Broken Arrow on May 17, 2013, 01:27:29 PM
I  said my piece...and I'm out. Anyone feel free to contact me if the this works out and we get a good review. Stick to my word on the retainer. I know were all members and have rules as to respecting each other, or you may get a 24 hour blank screen, however with that said....Billdo, i must just say if you ever go homeless, i have a place for you in a box  that holds wrenches.
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: billdo5 on May 17, 2013, 01:28:36 PM
thx ill take that as a nice gesture since u like me lol.. but cCortez is the one starting it oh well
Title: Re: Graham Outfitter
Post by: jackelope on May 17, 2013, 01:32:01 PM
This one's all done. Don't start another one.

 :nono:

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal