Post by: livnlife on June 14, 2013, 09:06:31 PM
ation and with the option for a second tag in one day. So, are reservations exempt from WDFW rules/regulations for baiting and # of tags?
Post by: jackelope on June 14, 2013, 09:07:18 PM
Post by: JoeE on June 14, 2013, 09:08:57 PM
Yes
:yeah:
Post by: coachcw on June 14, 2013, 09:23:00 PM
Post by: rtspring on June 14, 2013, 09:24:25 PM
Post by: coachcw on June 14, 2013, 09:32:50 PM
Post by: xXLojackXx on June 16, 2013, 07:47:03 AM
Post by: Bob33 on June 16, 2013, 07:52:11 AM
Post by: dreamunelk on June 16, 2013, 08:28:23 AM
As for the bear baiting. Pretty much answered above. Separate nation not under state law. If their citizens voted to make it illegal it would be.
Post by: Elkaholic daWg on June 16, 2013, 08:28:52 AM
They are a separate nation. We can't tell Canada or Mexico how to regulate hunting either.
But we don't have THEM running all over our country doing whatever they like, killing our animals, taking goverment money, sending money back to.......................wait a minute.???? :chuckle: Okay, not Canada
It's total BS that they can bait and not the rest of "us". You should see what they do to the elk herds too.
Many of us have on the old Mountain Home ranch for one
Post by: buckcanyonlodge on June 16, 2013, 02:12:25 PM
They are a separate nation. We can't tell Canada or Mexico how to regulate hunting either.
Separate Nation?? I've never seen a tribal air force, army or navy. How does this nation protect itself? How does this "nation" employ it's people? Tribal nation dept. of highways, etc.?? Just asking..........
Post by: Blacktail Sniper on June 16, 2013, 02:15:48 PM
:beatdeadhorse:
Tagging to see what happens.
Post by: sled on June 16, 2013, 02:18:50 PM
Damn! Pretty Much Says It All. Good Point.They are a separate nation. We can't tell Canada or Mexico how to regulate hunting either.
Separate Nation?? I've never seen a tribal air force, army or navy. How does this nation protect itself? How does this "nation" employ it's people? Tribal nation dept. of highways, etc.?? Just asking..........
Post by: bearpaw on June 16, 2013, 02:27:54 PM
Post by: Blacktail Sniper on June 16, 2013, 02:47:46 PM
Post by: Curly on June 16, 2013, 03:47:31 PM
we need to be upset with the urban I-5 corridor for voting out baiting and hounds. :twocents:
How about just being upset with any of the mental midgets that voted out baiting and hunting with hounds (whether or not they live along the I-5 corridor? :dunno: (I'm sure there were plenty of people from Spokane and Tri Cities that voted for those initiatives as well). :twocents:
Post by: Button Nubbs on June 16, 2013, 03:49:53 PM
:yeah:we need to be upset with the urban I-5 corridor for voting out baiting and hounds. :twocents:
How about just being upset with any of the mental midgets that voted out baiting and hunting with hounds (whether or not they live along the I-5 corridor? :dunno: (I'm sure there were plenty of people from Spokane and Tri Cities that voted for those initiatives as well). :twocents:
I live 1 mile form the urban i-5 corridor and wouldn't vote for something like that. Lets be mad at the people who did vote for it, not just people on the wetside.. :rolleyes:
Post by: PlateauNDN on June 16, 2013, 04:14:46 PM
Post by: bearpaw on June 16, 2013, 04:54:35 PM
we need to be upset with the urban I-5 corridor for voting out baiting and hounds. :twocents:
How about just being upset with any of the mental midgets that voted out baiting and hunting with hounds (whether or not they live along the I-5 corridor? :dunno: (I'm sure there were plenty of people from Spokane and Tri Cities that voted for those initiatives as well). :twocents:
I agree, there were some on the eastside who voted for it too, I meant the vast hugger crowd, not the good folks on the west side. :sry:
But Bear that would be to difficult, why don't we just conrinue with the easy route and bash the Tribes. :bash:
I can't say that I will always agree with the tribes, but the tribes had nothing to do with the huggers and some hunters who voted out hounds and baiting.
Post by: Blacktail Sniper on June 16, 2013, 05:08:43 PM
http://www.sos.wa.gov/elections/results_report.aspx?e=17&c=&c2=&t=&t2=5&p=&p2=&y= (http://www.sos.wa.gov/elections/results_report.aspx?e=17&c=&c2=&t=&t2=5&p=&p2=&y=)
Looking through, by my count only 9 counties voted against it:
Columbia, Douglas, Ferry, Garfield, Lewis, Lincoln, Okanogan, Pend Oreille & Stevens.
Post by: bearpaw on June 16, 2013, 05:36:11 PM
If this link works, it shows the 1996 Initiative results with a link to the county breakdown.
http://www.sos.wa.gov/elections/results_report.aspx?e=17&c=&c2=&t=&t2=5&p=&p2=&y= (http://www.sos.wa.gov/elections/results_report.aspx?e=17&c=&c2=&t=&t2=5&p=&p2=&y=)
Looking through, by my count only 9 counties voted against it:
Columbia, Douglas, Ferry, Garfield, Lewis, Lincoln, Okanogan, Pend Oreille & Stevens.
Thanks for clarifying. Most of those counties are region 1 counties that opposed, with the exception of Douglas and Okanogan (I think Region 2) and Lewis the only county on the west side to vote against it. I would say the statistics do show that the westside counties and the counties with larger populations on the eastside almost unanimously passed it. Now that more counties have large cougar populations I think the vote would be much different today in some of the smaller westside and some eastside counties, but the masses in Pugetropolis, Spokane, and other cities would likely still pass it. :twocents:
Post by: bearpaw on June 16, 2013, 05:40:42 PM
Post by: carpsniperg2 on June 16, 2013, 05:49:20 PM
Post by: bearpaw on June 17, 2013, 06:32:37 PM
I really wish each county could vote on there own hunting laws. To much pull from king county to mess with all of the laws that have taken away baiting and hound hunting in our back yard. My dad has always said if they want them so bad and want to protect them. Lets load some up in the horse trailer and go deliver them :chuckle:
I would love to do that with a couple dozen wolves to downtown Seattle. :chuckle:
Post by: KopperBuck on June 17, 2013, 07:02:37 PM
I really wish each county could vote on there own hunting laws. To much pull from king county to mess with all of the laws that have taken away baiting and hound hunting in our back yard. My dad has always said if they want them so bad and want to protect them. Lets load some up in the horse trailer and go deliver them :chuckle:
We're trying to get that done down here.
These need to be local decisions!!!
Post by: dreamunelk on June 17, 2013, 07:21:10 PM
http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/state.php?fips=53&year=1996&f=0&off=60&elect=0 (http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/state.php?fips=53&year=1996&f=0&off=60&elect=0)
Post by: opdinkslayer on June 17, 2013, 08:56:37 PM
Post by: Curly on June 17, 2013, 09:11:52 PM
The real question is how the hell does a game management decision get on the ballot to be decided by uninformed people that wear their emotions on their sleeves? :dunno: :bash::yeah:
Game management by initiative measures is so completely stupid and insane. :bash: Just wait until wolves are delisted; once they are, you can bet there will be an initiative voted on to protect the wolves from any hunting seasons. >:(
Post by: BullCrazy24 on June 18, 2013, 12:14:22 PM
I really wish each county could vote on there own hunting laws. To much pull from king county to mess with all of the laws that have taken away baiting and hound hunting in our back yard. My dad has always said if they want them so bad and want to protect them. Lets load some up in the horse trailer and go deliver them :chuckle:
we can start with the big boar i saw a couple weeks ago on your family's land in R-C canyon feeding on a fresh deer kill.
Post by: jackmaster on June 18, 2013, 12:21:45 PM
Post by: BullCrazy24 on June 18, 2013, 12:28:51 PM