Post by: HoofsandWings on June 26, 2013, 11:56:49 AM
Post by: bobcat on June 26, 2013, 12:13:30 PM
Post by: bobcat on June 26, 2013, 12:24:18 PM
Obviously due to the Weyerhaeuser closure.
Post by: KNOPHISH on June 26, 2013, 12:29:39 PM
Post by: BULLBLASTER on June 26, 2013, 12:36:04 PM
Post by: bobcat on June 26, 2013, 12:38:46 PM
Post by: BULLBLASTER on June 26, 2013, 12:44:23 PM
The 2nd deer tags shouldn't require you to apply only for the ones that match your first tag. That would solve the problem.that it would... one pile of second tags per area and season matches your tag choice...makes sense.
Post by: vandeman17 on June 26, 2013, 12:46:04 PM
Post by: Ridgerunner on June 26, 2013, 12:47:10 PM
Post by: bobcat on June 26, 2013, 12:51:27 PM
Post by: snowpack on June 26, 2013, 01:03:28 PM
That's just depressing, I remember when there were more goat tags than sheep & moose combined, now it hardly looks worth it.I don't see why they can't give out goat permits on the peninsula again. They have over 400 on the peninsula and the park says are non-native and wants to get rid of them. I've seen lots of those goats wandering around the wilderness areas next adjacent to it.
Post by: X-Force on June 26, 2013, 01:04:30 PM
That's just depressing, I remember when there were more goat tags than sheep & moose combined, now it hardly looks worth it.
2012 status and trend report
The
harvest guidelines are to limit harvest opportunity to
4% or less of the total population, only allow harvest in
goat populations meeting or exceeding 100 total
animals, and limit harvest of nannies (females) to 30%
or less.
If we only counted herds of 100 or more goats and exclude all three national parks there would still be 71 permits at a 4% harvest. As it is we have less than a 1% tag to population ratio... Idaho has roughly the same number of goats and 53 tags. I don't think we have gotten an adequate reason for the disparity.
If the population was 10k animals in the 1950's and 60's with 0 harvest how long would it take to get the population back up to historic levels?
Post by: trophyhunt on June 26, 2013, 01:09:49 PM
Wow! That was fast! That doesn't usually get put up for a couple months after the drawing.:yeah:why can't the drawing be that fast! I noticed the muzzy elk tag I put in for had double the applicants from last year?!? Wtf
Post by: WalleyeJason on June 26, 2013, 01:42:51 PM
I was just below Average I guess. :dunno:
Post by: Rooster1981 on June 26, 2013, 07:47:04 PM
In the quality deer hunt I was aiming for, someone got one of the four tags with only one point. Lucky hunter :tup:
Post by: WAcoueshunter on June 28, 2013, 11:04:47 AM
In the quality deer hunt I was aiming for, someone got one of the four tags with only one point. Lucky hunter :tup:
Where did you see that breakdown? I see the summary by hunt number, but can't find the breakdown by number of points for each hunt.
Post by: furbearer365 on June 30, 2013, 12:42:26 PM
Post by: cem3434 on June 30, 2013, 12:56:45 PM
1 guy/gal drew 4th choice sheep and 1 drew 4th choice goat :yike: How lucky to get selected and have you fourth choice still available
What goat tag did you draw?
Post by: Wea300mag on June 30, 2013, 01:03:28 PM
In the quality deer hunt I was aiming for, someone got one of the four tags with only one point. Lucky hunter :tup:
Where did you see that breakdown? I see the summary by hunt number, but can't find the breakdown by number of points for each hunt.
Above the Overall results table there is a box to select each species to get more details.
http://wdfw.wa.gov/hunting/permits/results/ (http://wdfw.wa.gov/hunting/permits/results/)
Post by: Rooster1981 on July 01, 2013, 12:33:59 PM
In the quality deer hunt I was aiming for, someone got one of the four tags with only one point. Lucky hunter :tup:
Where did you see that breakdown? I see the summary by hunt number, but can't find the breakdown by number of points for each hunt.
Here is the link. If you fallow the categories you will see the point total and then Apps. The point total is the # of points for the draw. Check it out
http://wdfw.wa.gov/hunting/permits/results/points/2013category_points_qualitydeer.pdf (http://wdfw.wa.gov/hunting/permits/results/points/2013category_points_qualitydeer.pdf)
Post by: bugs n bones on July 01, 2013, 06:12:23 PM
That's just depressing, I remember when there were more goat tags than sheep & moose combined, now it hardly looks worth it.I agree funny thing is I'm seeing more goats now in the 460 than I've ever seen
2012 status and trend report
The
harvest guidelines are to limit harvest opportunity to
4% or less of the total population, only allow harvest in
goat populations meeting or exceeding 100 total
animals, and limit harvest of nannies (females) to 30%
or less.
If we only counted herds of 100 or more goats and exclude all three national parks there would still be 71 permits at a 4% harvest. As it is we have less than a 1% tag to population ratio... Idaho has roughly the same number of goats and 53 tags. I don't think we have gotten an adequate reason for the disparity.
If the population was 10k animals in the 1950's and 60's with 0 harvest how long would it take to get the population back up to historic levels?
Post by: WDFW Hates ME!!! on July 01, 2013, 06:35:10 PM