Hunting Washington Forum

Equipment & Gear => Archery Gear => Topic started by: MattySuto on August 13, 2013, 04:31:41 PM


Advertise Here
Title: Clarification
Post by: MattySuto on August 13, 2013, 04:31:41 PM
Well I'm back off my 3 day suspension only to come back to say thanks for everyone thoughts and views on my last thread "is it Legal" never meant to offend anyone I was very mad atone of the replies..... Sorry to the Admin for putting my last reply on the board I could have handled it in a different matter... ... But I received my Clarification from Olympia.... And will not delete this email...
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: 92xj on August 13, 2013, 04:37:17 PM
Wow, That should shut up a lot of people.

Personally I still wouldnt do it, but that response you got sure is a lot more power to deal with questions in the future than anyone of those people in the other thread have going against it. 

Goodluck with whatever you choose to do. 
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: 724wd on August 13, 2013, 04:47:00 PM
WOW!  that's very surprising!   :o 
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: MattySuto on August 13, 2013, 04:49:08 PM
Thanks..... Ill still even ask a Gamie out there ill have this proof... And if something were to come up ... I have this to save me in any situation.... Cause I mean don't the gamies work for Olympia????  I would think they are all some what on the same page?!?
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: MattySuto on August 13, 2013, 04:52:00 PM
There's more the email.... Some one forwarded it up to someone else saying "can you answer this question" thank you... And then this lady answered my question.....
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: go4steelhd on August 13, 2013, 04:52:22 PM
Thanks for posting this.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: gasman on August 13, 2013, 04:57:27 PM
Did not read your thread that probably got out of hand but reading the regs and knowing the question, I would have said the same thing about your question.

Why was there even a debt over it? a camera is not adding in harvesting any game  :dunno:
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: bobcat on August 13, 2013, 05:00:53 PM
There's a rule that says no electronics can be attached to a bow. That's what the previous discussion was about.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: MattySuto on August 13, 2013, 05:03:42 PM
Yea it's a long thread but I have what I need if I choose to use it ...
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: MattySuto on August 13, 2013, 05:07:42 PM
I have a few emails to me but I'm not sure if this would work for you all.... :sry:
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: gasman on August 13, 2013, 05:11:06 PM
There's a rule that says no electronics can be attached to a bow. That's what the previous discussion was about.

You are correct but that rule was geared toward electronic devises that can aid in the harvest of animals, not items to take video.


With out starting the debt over, its interpretation of the rules and there meaning. We all know that...

I with you Matty  :tup:
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: buckfvr on August 13, 2013, 05:12:55 PM
Game Laws page 76 column 3 Archery regulations

1. b.   It is unlawful to have any electrical equipment or electric device(s) except for illuminated nocks, attatched to the bow or arrow while hunting.

Cant remember the original post, but this is also in the laws for what its worth or even applicable.............

flat out NO electrical devices, I see no exceptions......cant read in exceptions where there are none.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: MattySuto on August 13, 2013, 05:18:10 PM
I'm not trying to start a debate over ... I just wanted to apologize to the admin an show what clarification I received from OLY... 
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: turkeyfeather on August 13, 2013, 05:21:32 PM
I'm still gonna go with what the enforcement officer for this area told me and that was no. I think it's safer to put the camera on my head and not have to worry about it at all. One side says one thing, and the other says something different. I'll wait till they are all on the same page and the regs ok it. I'm not going to leave it up to one person's interpretation. I had a buddy call the office for clarification on something and the gamie didn't agree with the person. It turned into a huge fiasco and took several days to resolve. To much at stake.  :twocents:
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: MattySuto on August 13, 2013, 05:28:53 PM
 :yeah: like I said I may or may not push my luck that's why will keep asking OLY and maybe get that all on the same page
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: jackelope on August 13, 2013, 05:31:37 PM
I suspect a warden may chime in here with an opinion on the matter.
 :dunno:


My gut says that lady is wrong. We've had people literally busted for posting video that they took with a bow  mounted camera.  The thread is still around.

http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,33898.msg404557.html#msg404557 (http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,33898.msg404557.html#msg404557)
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: bobcat on August 13, 2013, 05:48:36 PM
If the opinion from Olympia is wrong, I still don't see why any game warden would choose to use the no electronics rule to write someone up for having a camera on their bow. I just don't see it happening. What purpose would it serve? A camera on a bow is not hurting anything.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: jackelope on August 13, 2013, 05:51:45 PM
I would not disagree with that.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: turkeyfeather on August 13, 2013, 05:56:06 PM
If the opinion from Olympia is wrong, I still don't see why any game warden would choose to use the no electronics rule to write someone up for having a camera on their bow. I just don't see it happening. What purpose would it serve? A camera on a bow is not hurting anything.
Your probably right, however do you wanna take that chance that he or she isn't having a bad day and decides to follow the law. Not me.  :bdid:
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: h20hunter on August 13, 2013, 05:56:58 PM
Agree with most points already made, however, a warden in a bad mood can cite you per the current laws. Not worth it.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: h20hunter on August 13, 2013, 06:00:54 PM
Matty....anyway you can talk with the gamie in your area? Kind of a heads up that you are not using anything to aid the hunt...only film it? That could smooth tbe way and really take care of any what ifs.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: MattySuto on August 13, 2013, 06:02:07 PM
That's why they all need to get on the same page.... If Olympia says you can do it and you have a written proof....doesn't the game warden work for Olympia??? So what's he supposed to do if his boss says its ok?? ... I will try to contact the Gamie and see what his take is...
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: Bob33 on August 13, 2013, 06:05:31 PM
If the opinion from Olympia is wrong, I still don't see why any game warden would choose to use the no electronics rule to write someone up for having a camera on their bow. I just don't see it happening. What purpose would it serve? A camera on a bow is not hurting anything.
That appears to be a valid "get out of jail free" card, but I think she is wrong. She is referencing a WAC that has no bearing on this issue. I believe most enforcement officers and judges would not agree with her conclusion.

WAC 232-12-054 is the applicable WAC, and I would ask to get a written reply on that one specifically.

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac/default.aspx?cite=232-12-054 (http://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac/default.aspx?cite=232-12-054)

..and welcome back.  :tup:
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: buckfvr on August 13, 2013, 06:11:13 PM
I suspect a warden may chime in here with an opinion on the matter.
 :dunno:


My gut says that lady is wrong. We've had people literally busted for posting video that they took with a bow  mounted camera.  The thread is still around.

http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,33898.msg404557.html#msg404557 (http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,33898.msg404557.html#msg404557)
  I dont think this will get an opinion......unanimous no more like it.

Look at my post Bobcat...........its so black and white it hurts.......no gray area, not a hint.  The archery regulations sums it up clear as a bell......you will get a ticket, dont waste your breath explaining to the warden, he will just tell you to save it for the judge.............you loose.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: Bob33 on August 13, 2013, 06:13:21 PM
By the logic of that reply, illuminated nocks would have already been legal. Fiber optic sights would be legal. Rangefinders would be legal as none of them project a beam onto the target.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: Rainier10 on August 13, 2013, 06:15:38 PM
If the opinion from Olympia is wrong, I still don't see why any game warden would choose to use the no electronics rule to write someone up for having a camera on their bow. I just don't see it happening. What purpose would it serve? A camera on a bow is not hurting anything.
That appears to be a valid "get out of jail free" card, but I think she is wrong. She is referencing a WAC that has no bearing on this issue. I believe most enforcement officers and judges would not agree with her conclusion.

WAC 232-12-054 is the applicable WAC, and I would ask to get a written reply on that one specifically.

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac/default.aspx?cite=232-12-054 (http://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac/default.aspx?cite=232-12-054)

..and welcome back.  :tup:
I think this WAC overides the one she referenced in her email.  Nice find Bob.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: turkeyfeather on August 13, 2013, 06:16:40 PM
After a bit more investigating I am not even sure she's the right person to be asking. A rules coordinator/criminal liason doesn't seem to be the person to be able to advise on the rules and certainly is not the person in charge of enforcing them.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: MattySuto on August 13, 2013, 06:18:38 PM
Thanks for the welcome back.... I have a few emails ill keep an if i see a Gamie ill ask .... But don't the Gamies work for OLY?
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: turkeyfeather on August 13, 2013, 06:19:53 PM
Yep, but they don't work for her.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: bobcat on August 13, 2013, 06:23:16 PM
I suspect a warden may chime in here with an opinion on the matter.
 :dunno:


My gut says that lady is wrong. We've had people literally busted for posting video that they took with a bow  mounted camera.  The thread is still around.

http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,33898.msg404557.html#msg404557 (http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,33898.msg404557.html#msg404557)
  I dont think this will get an opinion......unanimous no more like it.

Look at my post Bobcat...........its so black and white it hurts.......no gray area, not a hint.  The archery regulations sums it up clear as a bell......you will get a ticket, dont waste your breath explaining to the warden, he will just tell you to save it for the judge.............you loose.

I understand, and agree, but still- the intent of the law couldn't have been to outlaw a camera on a bow. It makes no sense. And, being that game wardens are humans too, I trust that they wouldn't write a ticket for this.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: buckfvr on August 13, 2013, 06:23:45 PM
Thanks for the welcome back.... I have a few emails ill keep an if i see a Gamie ill ask .... But don't the Gamies work for OLY?

Always defer to who writes the tickies.................... :tup:

bobcat........I couldnt possibly feel any more positive they would write the ticket muy pronto..........black and white.............
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: bobcat on August 13, 2013, 06:28:46 PM
Buckfvr,  how can you be so sure? Did you or someone you know get a ticket for this?
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: Bob33 on August 13, 2013, 06:29:42 PM
"I understand, and agree, but still- the intent of the law couldn't have been to outlaw a camera on a bow. It makes no sense. "

Just remember: Al Capone was convicted of tax evasion, not murder. ;)
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: MattySuto on August 13, 2013, 06:36:38 PM
I'm going to continue emailing them... I emailed the enforcement personnel and that supervisor forwarded my email to the person that responded to me.... I will continue to get as many emails as I can an from different people from OLY...
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: buckfvr on August 13, 2013, 06:40:41 PM
Buckfvr,  how can you be so sure? Did you or someone you know get a ticket for this?

They write tickets by the book, not by interpretation, theirs or yours.  Ive been told by wardens before who were friends of many seasons.....they write em like they see "em, and its the judges job to sort them out.  Thats all..........
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: turkeyfeather on August 13, 2013, 06:49:12 PM
 I would actually question they were doing their job if they didn't write the ticket. They are not in a position really to decide which laws they do and don't wanna enforce. Very slippery slope and I think we have all seen before what can happen if you let them make judgement calls.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: Blacktail Sniper on August 13, 2013, 06:53:15 PM
They write tickets by the book, not by interpretation, theirs or yours.  Ive been told by wardens before who were friends of many seasons.....they write em like they see "em, and its the judges job to sort them out.  Thats all..........
[/quote]


That I do believe is very true.  I think the logic is "If I caught you this time, how many times did you get away with it?," mainly because there are few and they are spread out so thin. 

My personal experience is after hunting in Cowlitz Co/St Helen's Tree Farm from 1976 to 2010, I was only contacted and checked 3 times while out hunting and never while fishing.  So it would kinda make sense they would lean towards this way of thinking.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: Blacktail Sniper on August 13, 2013, 07:00:16 PM
I would actually question they were doing their job if they didn't write the ticket. They are not in a position really to decide which laws they do and don't wanna enforce. Very slippery slope and I think we have all seen before what can happen if you let them make judgement calls.

I think where the confusion or maybe resistance comes from is in comparison to non-wildlife law enforcement and their use of discretion, as in say, an officer opting for giving a warning for speeding vs just writing a ticket every time.  Haven't really heard of WDFW giving warnings or breaks, just writing violations, or so it seems.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: buckfvr on August 13, 2013, 07:03:31 PM
The unofficial word from more than one source is 100% cite.................
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: billythekidrock on August 13, 2013, 07:04:43 PM
I suspect a warden may chime in here with an opinion on the matter.
 :dunno:


My gut says that lady is wrong. We've had people literally busted for posting video that they took with a bow  mounted camera.  The thread is still around.

http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,33898.msg404557.html#msg404557 (http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,33898.msg404557.html#msg404557)

I agree. This would not be the first time she gave wrong info.

We are also not seeing the whole email chain and it is possible that what we are being shown is out of context.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: turkeyfeather on August 13, 2013, 07:06:29 PM
I would actually question they were doing their job if they didn't write the ticket. They are not in a position really to decide which laws they do and don't wanna enforce. Very slippery slope and I think we have all seen before what can happen if you let them make judgement calls.

I think where the confusion or maybe resistance comes from is in comparison to non-wildlife law enforcement and their use of discretion, as in say, an officer opting for giving a warning for speeding vs just writing a ticket every time.  Haven't really heard of WDFW giving warnings or breaks, just writing violations, or so it seems.
Absolutely agree. I dont believe gamies are as leanient as a regular pd officer.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: Jellymon on August 14, 2013, 12:35:09 AM
You got that email from the same people in Olympia that couldn't figure out if my cougar was a male or not, and everything was attached to the hide! I think I will play it safe and follow the regs in the book.

Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: Curly on August 17, 2013, 08:20:06 AM
I suspect a warden may chime in here with an opinion on the matter.
 :dunno:


My gut says that lady is wrong. We've had people literally busted for posting video that they took with a bow  mounted camera.  The thread is still around.

http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,33898.msg404557.html#msg404557 (http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,33898.msg404557.html#msg404557)

I agree. This would not be the first time she gave wrong info.

We are also not seeing the whole email chain and it is possible that what we are being shown is out of context.

I was just going to point that out too.  She has given bad info before.

It is definitely not legal to have a camera on your bow.  Now, I could maybe see where a particular warden might think it is a dumb law and not cite for it if that is their personal belief, but I would bet that 99% of the time you'd be cited.

Like someone else pointed out, they would have added an exception for cameras when they added the exception for lighted nocks.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: Curly on August 17, 2013, 09:39:21 AM
By the logic of that reply, illuminated nocks would have already been legal. Fiber optic sights would be legal. Rangefinders would be legal as none of them project a beam onto the target.

Exactly!  Try placing a Rangefinder on your bow and see how that goes over with a warden.  It falls under the same category as a camera.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: pianoman9701 on August 17, 2013, 11:26:35 AM
Thanks for posting this.

 :yeah: x2
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: huntnphool on August 17, 2013, 11:33:32 AM
If the opinion from Olympia is wrong, I still don't see why any game warden would choose to use the no electronics rule to write someone up for having a camera on their bow. I just don't see it happening. What purpose would it serve? A camera on a bow is not hurting anything.
A lot of cameras have view finders that can be used in aiding the hunter.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: 3nails on August 17, 2013, 11:37:39 AM
 Tagging. Curious how this turns out.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: huntnphool on August 17, 2013, 11:41:24 AM
The unofficial word from more than one source is 100% cite.................
:yeah:
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: Special T on August 17, 2013, 02:50:19 PM
IMO its not  worth doing... MAYBE if you filmed in in your own county so you don't have to travel far to defend yourself. I would guess that a warden would cite you and a judge would let you off. Figure the cost of the video a couple of days off work to show up in court.  I'm guessing the infraction is a misdemeanor and that means you have to show up at LEAST 2x unless you plead guilty and pay the fine at the first one.  Remember that if you are cited YOU LOSE even if you win in court.  :twocents:  I think it would be a great way to video tape your hunt tho.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: JJD on August 18, 2013, 12:09:16 AM
They would take your gear as evidence.  Even if you win, you may have a tough time getting said gear back.
As others have stated, it would not be worth the battle.

I live in a county that has one game officer, If I really wanted to film my hunt from my bow, I'd talk to him first and get his interp.
If'n ya don't wanna get poop on your shoe, don't step in it.

INFO; range finders do project a beam, ya just cant see it.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: MattySuto on August 19, 2013, 05:49:06 PM
Well who ever stated that she has giving bum gouge was absolutely correct.... She emailed me today apologizing for being wrong ... SO I WOULD an WILL  NOT USE IT... :sry: :bash: :bash: :bash: :bash: :bash: :bdid:
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: Bob33 on August 19, 2013, 06:28:39 PM
Well who ever stated that she has giving bum gouge was absolutely correct
I think that was everyone but the legal representative from WDFW. :chuckle:

Glad to hear she made the correction. (I wonder what her Hunt WA member name is?)
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: turkeyfeather on August 19, 2013, 06:31:10 PM
That's a good lesson for you and all new members. Listen to the huntwa brotherhood. We know more than WDFW?  :chuckle:
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: Curly on August 19, 2013, 07:37:40 PM
Glad to hear she made the correction. (I wonder what her Hunt WA member name is?)

 :chuckle:

Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: billythekidrock on August 19, 2013, 08:22:39 PM
Well who ever stated that she has giving bum gouge was absolutely correct.... She emailed me today apologizing for being wrong ... SO I WOULD an WILL  NOT USE IT... :sry: :bash: :bash: :bash: :bash: :bash: :bdid:

At least she apologized this time.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: huntnphool on August 19, 2013, 08:31:28 PM
Well who ever stated that she has giving bum gouge was absolutely correct.... She emailed me today apologizing for being wrong ... SO I WOULD an WILL  NOT USE IT... :sry: :bash: :bash: :bash: :bash: :bash: :bdid:

At least she apologized this time.
Although it would have made for a fun thread when you got cited and your gear confiscated. :chuckle:
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: dscubame on August 19, 2013, 08:39:31 PM
That's a good lesson for you and all new members. Listen to the huntwa brotherhood. We know more than WDFW?  :chuckle:

True that.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: MattySuto on August 19, 2013, 09:20:27 PM
Well who ever stated that she has giving bum gouge was absolutely correct.... She emailed me today apologizing for being wrong ... SO I WOULD an WILL  NOT USE IT... :sry: :bash: :bash: :bash: :bash: :bash: :bdid:

At least she apologized this time.
Although it would have made for a fun thread when you got cited and your gear confiscated. :chuckle:

i can get cited on private land??  :yike: Just kidding... At least I have something for when I go back to NY and hunt
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: Machias on August 20, 2013, 06:22:52 AM
It's amazing to me how much bad information you get from the Dept and it's not just WDFW, I've gotten wrong information from IDFG as well.  Really is shocking sometimes.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: pianoman9701 on August 21, 2013, 07:34:10 AM
It's amazing to me how much bad information you get from the Dept and it's not just WDFW, I've gotten wrong information from IDFG as well.  Really is shocking sometimes.

Some feel that the IDFG was in cahoots with USFWS with covering up the real numbers of wolves and the true impact they were having on ungulate populations. I hope it's gotten better.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: Special T on August 21, 2013, 07:43:58 AM
This is a PERFECT example of  why they do not  put stuff in writing! If they just tell you, YOU have no recourse if they are wrong. IF THEY put it in writing they are legally bound by it. If find it so discouraging that we have to be legal experts on all matters in this ever changing always growing set of rules.  Perhaps if they had a few more hunters and fishermen they would take more than a passing interest in the BS they push on us.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: Curly on August 21, 2013, 07:51:11 AM
And why is it so hard to recruit new hunters into the sport?  It's because of all the rules.  It is hard enough for us guys that have been hunting in this state for decades to keep track of all the rules.  I imagine a new guy would have his head spinning trying to sort out all the legalities regarding hunting in this state.  Just an observation........
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: MattySuto on August 21, 2013, 12:55:31 PM
And why is it so hard to recruit new hunters into the sport?  It's because of all the rules.  It is hard enough for us guys that have been hunting in this state for decades to keep track of all the rules.  I imagine a new guy would have his head spinning trying to sort out all the legalities regarding hunting in this state.  Just an observation........

4th year hunting... and i was first BLOWN away at rules and regs.  I hunted in NY, you can use retractable broadheads as long as the dont form a barb or a hook, and you cant have anything Mechanical on your bow.. I.E.  you can't have a machine pull it back for you.  Thats it... you can use lumioks, cameras, lights for you fiber optics to see your pins... i came out here ( cause this is where i was stationed)  and was like well this stinks...  :( ... but hopefully they make changes... they did for the luminocks out here, now if we can get em to changes the electrical equipment and mechanical broad heads, it may take a while but i think there will be changes in the years to come.

 
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: Machias on August 21, 2013, 05:15:50 PM
And why is it so hard to recruit new hunters into the sport?  It's because of all the rules.  It is hard enough for us guys that have been hunting in this state for decades to keep track of all the rules.  I imagine a new guy would have his head spinning trying to sort out all the legalities regarding hunting in this state.  Just an observation........

4th year hunting... and i was first BLOWN away at rules and regs.  I hunted in NY, you can use retractable broadheads as long as the dont form a barb or a hook, and you cant have anything Mechanical on your bow.. I.E.  you can't have a machine pull it back for you.  Thats it... you can use lumioks, cameras, lights for you fiber optics to see your pins... i came out here ( cause this is where i was stationed)  and was like well this stinks...  :( ... but hopefully they make changes... they did for the luminocks out here, now if we can get em to changes the electrical equipment and mechanical broad heads, it may take a while but i think there will be changes in the years to come.

Here's hoping (respectfully) that you are wrong.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: Curly on August 21, 2013, 05:19:54 PM
And why is it so hard to recruit new hunters into the sport?  It's because of all the rules.  It is hard enough for us guys that have been hunting in this state for decades to keep track of all the rules.  I imagine a new guy would have his head spinning trying to sort out all the legalities regarding hunting in this state.  Just an observation........

4th year hunting... and i was first BLOWN away at rules and regs.  I hunted in NY, you can use retractable broadheads as long as the dont form a barb or a hook, and you cant have anything Mechanical on your bow.. I.E.  you can't have a machine pull it back for you.  Thats it... you can use lumioks, cameras, lights for you fiber optics to see your pins... i came out here ( cause this is where i was stationed)  and was like well this stinks...  :( ... but hopefully they make changes... they did for the luminocks out here, now if we can get em to changes the electrical equipment and mechanical broad heads, it may take a while but i think there will be changes in the years to come.

Here's hoping (respectfully) that you are wrong.

 :yeah:

Mechanical broadheads and cameras on bows is not what I was thinking about when I was mentioning all the rules.  :twocents:
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: Bob33 on August 21, 2013, 05:25:35 PM
And why is it so hard to recruit new hunters into the sport?  It's because of all the rules.  It is hard enough for us guys that have been hunting in this state for decades to keep track of all the rules.  I imagine a new guy would have his head spinning trying to sort out all the legalities regarding hunting in this state.  Just an observation........
The regulation on using electrical equipment on bows was clear to me. :dunno:
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: turkeyfeather on August 21, 2013, 05:28:34 PM
And why is it so hard to recruit new hunters into the sport?  It's because of all the rules.  It is hard enough for us guys that have been hunting in this state for decades to keep track of all the rules.  I imagine a new guy would have his head spinning trying to sort out all the legalities regarding hunting in this state.  Just an observation........
The regulation on using electrical equipment on bows was clear to me. :dunno:
:yeah:
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: Curly on August 21, 2013, 05:48:28 PM
And why is it so hard to recruit new hunters into the sport?  It's because of all the rules.  It is hard enough for us guys that have been hunting in this state for decades to keep track of all the rules.  I imagine a new guy would have his head spinning trying to sort out all the legalities regarding hunting in this state.  Just an observation........
The regulation on using electrical equipment on bows was clear to me. :dunno:

Very clear.  I never had a doubt that placing a camera on a bow was anything but illegal.

But, you have to admit that there are a lot of rules that a newbie has to wade thru to be able to go hunting.  i.e. - evidence of sex, when hunter orange is required, possession limits on ducks, how far off the road do you have to be to shoot, can you shoot off the hood of your truck,  etc.  The same questions come up every year. 
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: mholzngel on August 21, 2013, 05:52:28 PM
if you are gonna put a mount a camra on the bow like myself be sure to print out that response and glue it in your hunting lic/tag holder!! :tup: :tup:
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: MattySuto on August 22, 2013, 08:24:05 AM
And why is it so hard to recruit new hunters into the sport?  It's because of all the rules.  It is hard enough for us guys that have been hunting in this state for decades to keep track of all the rules.  I imagine a new guy would have his head spinning trying to sort out all the legalities regarding hunting in this state.  Just an observation........

4th year hunting... and i was first BLOWN away at rules and regs.  I hunted in NY, you can use retractable broadheads as long as the dont form a barb or a hook, and you cant have anything Mechanical on your bow.. I.E.  you can't have a machine pull it back for you.  Thats it... you can use lumioks, cameras, lights for you fiber optics to see your pins... i came out here ( cause this is where i was stationed)  and was like well this stinks...  :( ... but hopefully they make changes... they did for the luminocks out here, now if we can get em to changes the electrical equipment and mechanical broad heads, it may take a while but i think there will be changes in the years to come.

Here's hoping (respectfully) that you are wrong.

Wrong on what? ?
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: turkeyfeather on August 22, 2013, 08:33:02 AM
I believe he is referring to mechanical broadheads and electronics on bows. Many (me included) don't like them or think they are a good idea.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: MattySuto on August 22, 2013, 08:33:29 AM
And why is it so hard to recruit new hunters into the sport?  It's because of all the rules.  It is hard enough for us guys that have been hunting in this state for decades to keep track of all the rules.  I imagine a new guy would have his head spinning trying to sort out all the legalities regarding hunting in this state.  Just an observation........
The regulation on using electrical equipment on bows was clear to me. :dunno:
:yeah:
Everything was clear to me as well,  i like to stir the pot... dont mean to offend anyone... 
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: MattySuto on August 22, 2013, 08:34:19 AM
I believe he is referring to mechanical broadheads and electronics on bows. Many (me included) don't like them or think they are a good idea.
:dunno: good luck hunting everyone ...
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: turkeyfeather on August 22, 2013, 08:41:28 AM
And why is it so hard to recruit new hunters into the sport?  It's because of all the rules.  It is hard enough for us guys that have been hunting in this state for decades to keep track of all the rules.  I imagine a new guy would have his head spinning trying to sort out all the legalities regarding hunting in this state.  Just an observation........
The regulation on using electrical equipment on bows was clear to me. :dunno:
:yeah:
Everything was clear to me as well,  i like to stir the pot... dont mean to offend anyone...
We gathered that.   :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: Machias on August 22, 2013, 09:28:39 AM
I believe he is referring to mechanical broadheads and electronics on bows. Many (me included) don't like them or think they are a good idea.
:dunno: good luck hunting everyone ...

I didn't take it as stirring the pot, you are not alone in hoping for changes, I'm just not one of them.  Certainly did not offend me at all.  Good luck this fall.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: MattySuto on August 22, 2013, 12:00:44 PM
I believe he is referring to mechanical broadheads and electronics on bows. Many (me included) don't like them or think they are a good idea.
:dunno: good luck hunting everyone ...

I didn't take it as stirring the pot, you are not alone in hoping for changes, I'm just not one of them.  Certainly did not offend me at all.  Good luck this fall.

I gotcha... i understand that some people do not want change... the mechanical broad heads is really the only one change i cross my fingers for ever year since i started hunting out here.. but i guess ill keep them crossed..... 
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: Jonathan_S on August 22, 2013, 12:40:29 PM
I would be curious to know the real percentage of bowhunters who want to legalize mechanical broadheads.

I, for one, am against them for big game.  I don't use electronic nocks and don't plan to in the future.  I wouldn't use any of the mechanical broadheads either.  It adds one more variable to the game and I don't like that.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: pianoman9701 on August 22, 2013, 12:52:06 PM
 :tup: for mechanicals and down for luminocks. Mechanicals are far different from where they started. Every bit as effective as fixed, IMO.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: turkeyfeather on August 22, 2013, 01:05:09 PM
I am just the opposite. I was vigilant in emailing WDFW and the commission to get lighted nocks approved, but I am not a fan of mechanicals. Not that they haven't improved or that if you want to use them you shouldn't I just don't agree with them.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: BULLBLASTER on August 22, 2013, 02:26:56 PM
I'd sure like to send a rage through some critters!
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: steeleywhopper on August 22, 2013, 02:34:11 PM
I need something else to buy, I say bring the mechanicals!
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: MattySuto on August 22, 2013, 02:44:18 PM
Mechanicals are awesome.... they make even a poor shot very very lethal....and they just make a wicked hole on impact that just destroys the animal.... I'd love to put a rage in the cage as well..... Makes recovering the animal way easier with that blood trail....but Im very happy to have luminoks this year...WDFW is taking baby steps I believe for the better ....
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: Jonathan_S on August 22, 2013, 02:50:31 PM
Mechanicals are awesome.... they make even a poor shot very very lethal....and they just make a wicked hole on impact that just destroys the animal....

I guess there's the rub.  I appreciate lethality but I appreciate accuracy more.

I've never been a fan of wicked holes or destroying the animal.

I'm not trying to pick apart your talking points, I just feel differently.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: Bob33 on August 22, 2013, 03:01:38 PM
Mechanicals are awesome.... they make even a poor shot very very lethal...
If true that means archery harvest increases, which means archery opportunity decreases.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: Jonathan_S on August 22, 2013, 03:11:53 PM
 :yeah:  :yeah:
That's the whole reason I got into archery was the season length
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: MattySuto on August 22, 2013, 03:14:22 PM
Mechanicals are awesome.... they make even a poor shot very very lethal...
If true that means archery harvest increases, which means archery opportunity decreases.

All harvest decrease every year no matter what season or which animal you hunt.... Most if not all hunters aren't shooting "Just Shooter" so to speak they aren't managing the population .... If its brow down... If its legal they shoot it... Unless your hunting some outfitter land and on a guided hunt your gonna kill something if an when you have the opportunity especailly if its down to crunch time
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: Jellymon on August 22, 2013, 03:16:28 PM
I will never use expandables. An expandable may or may not kill faster with a gutshot, but I know what I want to be shooting if I hit ribs or shoulder.  :tup:
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: Jellymon on August 22, 2013, 03:18:54 PM
Mechanicals are awesome.... they make even a poor shot very very lethal...
If true that means archery harvest increases, which means archery opportunity decreases.

All harvest decrease every year no matter what season or which animal you hunt.... Most if not all hunters aren't shooting "Just Shooter" so to speak they aren't managing the population .... If its brow down... If its legal they shoot it... Unless your hunting some outfitter land and on a guided hunt your gonna kill something if an when you have the opportunity especailly if its down to crunch time

He's talking about wdfw shortening archery season because on increased harvest numbers.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: MattySuto on August 22, 2013, 03:20:13 PM
Mechanicals are awesome.... they make even a poor shot very very lethal....and they just make a wicked hole on impact that just destroys the animal....

I guess there's the rub.  I appreciate lethality but I appreciate accuracy more.

I've never been a fan of wicked holes or destroying the animal.

I'm not trying to pick apart your talking points, I just feel differently.

I agree about accuracy 100%  but we all know what buck fever is or even a gust of wind will effect even the best shot in the world...
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: Bob33 on August 22, 2013, 03:21:13 PM
Mechanicals are awesome.... they make even a poor shot very very lethal...
If true that means archery harvest increases, which means archery opportunity decreases.

All harvest decrease every year no matter what season or which animal you hunt.... Most if not all hunters aren't shooting "Just Shooter" so to speak they aren't managing the population .... If its brow down... If its legal they shoot it... Unless your hunting some outfitter land and on a guided hunt your gonna kill something if an when you have the opportunity especailly if its down to crunch time
Season lengths and opportunity are very definitely managed to distribute harvest across all "user groups" - modern firearm, muzzleloader, and archery to name three prominent ones. If one user group experiences an increase in harvest that is not determined to be an aberation, it is likely to result in shortened seasons and other harvest restrictions in future years.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: MattySuto on August 22, 2013, 03:22:01 PM
Mechanicals are awesome.... they make even a poor shot very very lethal...
If true that means archery harvest increases, which means archery opportunity decreases.

All harvest decrease every year no matter what season or which animal you hunt.... Most if not all hunters aren't shooting "Just Shooter" so to speak they aren't managing the population .... If its brow down... If its legal they shoot it... Unless your hunting some outfitter land and on a guided hunt your gonna kill something if an when you have the opportunity especailly if its down to crunch time

He's talking about wdfw shortening archery season because on increased harvest numbers.

I see now what he means but I hunt whidbey there's Deer everywhere.... It will make you hunt harder if the season were to shorten...
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: turkeyfeather on August 22, 2013, 03:23:22 PM
Mechanicals are awesome.... they make even a poor shot very very lethal...
If true that means archery harvest increases, which means archery opportunity decreases.
I think a bad shot with a fixed blade is just as lethal as a bad shot with a mechanical. Maybe even more so. So I really don't think that would affect seasons.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: Jellymon on August 22, 2013, 03:27:14 PM
Mechanicals are awesome.... they make even a poor shot very very lethal...
If true that means archery harvest increases, which means archery opportunity decreases.

All harvest decrease every year no matter what season or which animal you hunt.... Most if not all hunters aren't shooting "Just Shooter" so to speak they aren't managing the population .... If its brow down... If its legal they shoot it... Unless your hunting some outfitter land and on a guided hunt your gonna kill something if an when you have the opportunity especailly if its down to crunch time

He's talking about wdfw shortening archery season because on increased harvest numbers.

I see now what he means but I hunt whidbey there's Deer everywhere.... It will make you hunt harder if the season were to shorten...

Carefull what you wish for.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: MattySuto on August 22, 2013, 03:29:36 PM
Mechanicals are awesome.... they make even a poor shot very very lethal...
If true that means archery harvest increases, which means archery opportunity decreases.
I think a bad shot with a fixed blade is just as lethal as a bad shot with a mechanical. Maybe even more so. So I really don't think that would affect seasons.

In the end As long as the animal dies it dont matter...I just like mechanicals
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: MattySuto on August 22, 2013, 03:31:14 PM
Mechanicals are awesome.... they make even a poor shot very very lethal...
If true that means archery harvest increases, which means archery opportunity decreases.

All harvest decrease every year no matter what season or which animal you hunt.... Most if not all hunters aren't shooting "Just Shooter" so to speak they aren't managing the population .... If its brow down... If its legal they shoot it... Unless your hunting some outfitter land and on a guided hunt your gonna kill something if an when you have the opportunity especailly if its down to crunch time

He's talking about wdfw shortening archery season because on increased harvest numbers.

I see now what he means but I hunt whidbey there's Deer everywhere.... It will make you hunt harder if the season were to shorten...

Carefull what you wish for.
I don't wish anything.... Like I stated before I have only hunted WA for 4 years ... I love the long season I hunt in NY archery is only 2 weeks
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: Jonathan_S on August 22, 2013, 03:33:03 PM
I see now what he means but I hunt whidbey there's Deer everywhere.... It will make you hunt harder if the season were to shorten...

What a silly thing to say.  We're talking about the entire state of Washington not just the San Juans.

Secondly, it's not about "hunting hard" necessarily, it's about having a wide window of opportunity which most people appreciate.
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: MattySuto on August 22, 2013, 03:41:33 PM
I see now what he means but I hunt whidbey there's Deer everywhere.... It will make you hunt harder if the season were to shorten...

What a silly thing to say.  We're talking about the entire state of Washington not just the San Juans.

Secondly, it's not about "hunting hard" necessarily, it's about having a wide window of opportunity which most people appreciate.

I apologize for being silly an selfish.....I appreciate longer opportunities ... I was just thinking about myself...
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: Jonathan_S on August 22, 2013, 03:43:55 PM
Hey Matty is that a blacktail in your avatar?  archery kill?
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: MattySuto on August 22, 2013, 03:59:22 PM
Hey Matty is that a blacktail in your avatar?  archery kill?

Yea I shot him in 2011...here on Whidbey
Title: Re: Clarification
Post by: dreamingbig on August 30, 2013, 01:32:58 AM
Catching up with this thread...  Lori is flat out wrong.  You can't interpret that WAC as a stand alone.  That said, I am also not  surprised that they don't know the rules.  The adopt out of influence rather than sound logic.

More technology will lead to shorten seasons.  You can bet on that!
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal