Post by: idahohuntr on February 11, 2014, 09:04:00 AM
"a wolf lover is anyone who does not believe the barstool rumors that wolves run in packs of 100, eat children from playgrounds, and are the demise of civilization as we know it.
Even if you admit wolves have some impact and you hunt/trap them, failure to subscribe to the SFW/BGF Little Red Riding Hood fairy tales will put you in the wolf lover crowd.
You could fill all your wolf tags, every year, but if you go so far as to even imply that there are more dynamics to elk populations than just wovles, you are definitely a wolf lover..."
I thought this pretty well summed it up :chuckle: :chuckle: And I also thought of those of us labeled wolf-lovers on this site and if we are in the company of guys like Randy Newberg, then we are on the right team :tup:
Post by: Jonathan_S on February 11, 2014, 09:07:51 AM
Go ahead and victimize yourself though.
Post by: WAcoyotehunter on February 11, 2014, 09:21:21 AM
Whatever. Run for your houses, the wolves are coming. I will be in the woods hunting for them while the serious anti wolfers are maniacally typing away on outdoor forums about how bad the situation is getting.
Post by: Special T on February 11, 2014, 10:23:31 AM
The issue is that normal hunting of wolves does very little in the way of harvest, the numbers prove it out. Hunting trapping, aerial gunning, year round seasons, and likely poisen are the only real ways to "manage" wolves. When you take a state like WA that pays no attention the the lessons learned from Canadians, and the states of ID, Mt, And WY its :bash: We have fewer tools, smaller herds, and less action on the part of our State "Managers". Every time i hear some one cautious about killing too many wolves I'm beside myself. Killing wolves is not that different than killing coyotes. If there is a prey base you can shoot them up all day year round and you would still have them.
So many of you that telegraph your "concern" for moving too aggressively toward wolves just frustrate the hell out of many hunters. You may not be the source of the problem but are definitely the lightning rod. :twocents:
Post by: KFhunter on February 11, 2014, 10:28:05 AM
Post by: AspenBud on February 11, 2014, 10:32:43 AM
Post by: KFhunter on February 11, 2014, 10:35:43 AM
People go to internet forums for affirmation, not to have their minds changed. This topic (wolves) is proof enough of that.
Boy ain't that the truth, no amount of logic, truth or common sense will ever change your mind.
Post by: AspenBud on February 11, 2014, 10:37:04 AM
People go to internet forums for affirmation, not to have their minds changed. This topic (wolves) is proof enough of that.
Boy ain't that the truth, no amount of logic or common sense will ever change your mind.
Or yours. :chuckle:
Ah well, you hunt with a bird dog occasionally so I have to give you a little cred.
Post by: finnman on February 11, 2014, 04:54:46 PM
That is actually a pretty accurate decription of it. I have been called a wolf lover a hundred times on here :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle:
Whatever. Run for your houses, the wolves are coming. I will be in the woods hunting for them while the serious anti wolfers are maniacally typing away on outdoor forums about how bad the situation is getting.
They may be home typing away, but does that mean they are wrong?
Post by: jon.brown509 on February 11, 2014, 05:12:28 PM
Post by: idahohuntr on February 11, 2014, 09:35:02 PM
I don't consider you a wolf lover. I strongly disagree with your management thoughts but I don't think you fall into the wolf lover category.I am not a victim and I seriously doubt you have a clue about my thoughts on "management". :tup:
Go ahead and victimize yourself though.
Post by: Jonathan_S on February 12, 2014, 10:14:17 AM
I don't consider you a wolf lover. I strongly disagree with your management thoughts but I don't think you fall into the wolf lover category.I am not a victim and I seriously doubt you have a clue about my thoughts on "management". :tup:
Go ahead and victimize yourself though.
I mean I've read your posts on here, does that not count enough to give me an initial opinion?
One thing I agree with you on is that most people (both sides) seem to think there are only two camps to fall into but I don't see it that way at all.
I imagine that we'd get along in person so I'm not going to get crazy online.
Post by: Machias on February 12, 2014, 11:05:35 AM
not wrong I would say some are uninformed with blind eyes and deaf ears,some learn and are like ahh ok thats what a wolf does alight others think its the end of the world having predators back in the eco system where they belong
It's not the end of the world UNLESS your management is to do nothing at all, which is what got us into this mess we are in. If they would have allowed the states to manage the grey wolf, LIKE they promised in the beginning when they reached 300 in all three states, you'd have very little hard feelings by hunters and ranchers. They had a golden opportunity for both sides of this issue to be happy. Wolves back in the eco system and being properly managed by hunters and trappers. Didn't happen and won't happen in WA. It will end up being 10 times worse in WA, just because a large faction of the political machine in WA will never allow proper management. Everyone will suffer.
Post by: bearpaw on February 12, 2014, 11:47:25 AM
not wrong I would say some are uninformed with blind eyes and deaf ears,some learn and are like ahh ok thats what a wolf does alight others think its the end of the world having predators back in the eco system where they belong
It's not the end of the world UNLESS your management is to do nothing at all, which is what got us into this mess we are in. If they would have allowed the states to manage the grey wolf, LIKE they promised in the beginning when they reached 300 in all three states, you'd have very little hard feelings by hunters and ranchers. They had a golden opportunity for both sides of this issue to be happy. Wolves back in the eco system and being properly managed by hunters and trappers. Didn't happen and won't happen in WA. It will end up being 10 times worse in WA, just because a large faction of the political machine in WA will never allow proper management. Everyone will suffer.
:yeah: That's where I am at, if the wolf lovers would have kept their end of the deal wolves would mostly be a non-issue. As I've said many times, there's room for a small managed population of wolves in wilderness and parks where they do not cause problems. Wyoming did it right, in the 80% of the state where most of the population and ranching occurs, wolves are shot on site. :tup:
Post by: idahohuntr on February 12, 2014, 11:59:51 AM
Based on your response, I was wrong...you probably do have a pretty good handle on where I would stand...and I'm sure we would get along even if we disagree on aspects of wolf management :chuckle: :chuckle: How dare you inject resaonableness into an internet forum!I don't consider you a wolf lover. I strongly disagree with your management thoughts but I don't think you fall into the wolf lover category.I am not a victim and I seriously doubt you have a clue about my thoughts on "management". :tup:
Go ahead and victimize yourself though.
I mean I've read your posts on here, does that not count enough to give me an initial opinion?
One thing I agree with you on is that most people (both sides) seem to think there are only two camps to fall into but I don't see it that way at all.
I imagine that we'd get along in person so I'm not going to get crazy online.
I was just expecting you to pigeon-hole me into some generic "leave the wolves alone" philosophy...a lot of folks (including me) tend to oversimplify other peoples management view points, particularly in controversial issues.
Post by: bearpaw on February 12, 2014, 12:16:30 PM
Post by: elkboy on February 12, 2014, 12:21:31 PM
Post by: Special T on February 12, 2014, 12:23:42 PM
Do any of you know of an area that lacks coyotes for very long, even under intensive hunting pressure? I know of only 1 and its a dryland farmer that LOVES to shoot coyotes... :twocents:
Post by: turkeyfeather on February 12, 2014, 12:40:17 PM
As far as this topic goes, I think the author and some others tend to lump many of us hunters into one category of "all wolves should be dead" just because they don't agree with our thoughts that something needs done about the lack of wolf management, so this road goes both ways, it sounds like this topic may be a bit hypocritical? :dunno:I was thinking the exact same thing.
Post by: idahohuntr on February 12, 2014, 01:08:07 PM
As far as this topic goes, I think the author and some others tend to lump many of us hunters into one category of "all wolves should be dead" just because they don't agree with our thoughts that something needs done about the lack of wolf management, so this road goes both ways, it sounds like this topic may be a bit hypocritical? :dunno:"Both sides" probably oversimplify the views others have on controversial management issues. I posted Randy Newbergs tounge-in-cheek definition because I thought it was pretty darn accurate and funny (or sad). People call him a wolf lover at the same time the enviro crazies send him death threats for shooting a wolf on his hunting show..more importantly he stands up for public land DIY hunters more than anyone I am aware of...I posted this so folks that get called "wolf lovers" can realize they are in good company...and that if someone calls you a "wolf lover"...that often just means you don't subscribe to severe paranoia about secret government conspiracies or that wolves will end all hunting as we know it.
Post by: AspenBud on February 12, 2014, 01:39:44 PM
Do any of you know of an area that lacks coyotes for very long, even under intensive hunting pressure?
Anywhere wolves occur in abundance.
Post by: Special T on February 12, 2014, 01:41:23 PM
Post by: jon.brown509 on February 12, 2014, 06:52:40 PM
As far as this topic goes, I think the author and some others tend to lump many of us hunters into one category of "all wolves should be dead" just because they don't agree with our thoughts that something needs done about the lack of wolf management, so this road goes both ways, it sounds like this topic may be a bit hypocritical? :dunno:"Both sides" probably oversimplify the views others have on controversial management issues. I posted Randy Newbergs tounge-in-cheek definition because I thought it was pretty darn accurate and funny (or sad). People call him a wolf lover at the same time the enviro crazies send him death threats for shooting a wolf on his hunting show..more importantly he stands up for public land DIY hunters more than anyone I am aware of...I posted this so folks that get called "wolf lovers" can realize they are in good company...and that if someone calls you a "wolf lover"...that often just means you don't subscribe to severe paranoia about secret government conspiracies or that wolves will end all hunting as we know it.
[/quote
Good to know lol My name is Jon brown I'm going to school for wildlife biology/ecologist due too the fact that I like wolves in the eco system I have been look upon as a wolf lover glad we got this "wolf lover" anonymous lol due we get chips for posting lol :chuckle:
Post by: Fowlweather25 on February 12, 2014, 07:09:43 PM
Post by: jon.brown509 on February 12, 2014, 08:34:39 PM