Hunting Washington Forum

Equipment & Gear => Guns and Ammo => Topic started by: Shane54 on March 30, 2014, 12:41:51 PM


Advertise Here
Title: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: Shane54 on March 30, 2014, 12:41:51 PM
I was looking for a larger caliber long range rifle. Is the 300rum to much power for mule deer? Which one should I buy. I'm looking for it to be a 400-500 yard gun and no more.
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: slm9s on March 30, 2014, 12:46:45 PM
No need for RUM for that range.  A 30-06 would work.
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: Taco280AI on March 30, 2014, 12:57:39 PM
For deer <500 yards I'd look at 257wby, 270wsm, 7-08, 6.5-06, 280ai, 7rm/wsm/saum, 30-06. If you just have to have more recoil you can go with any of the 300 mags, but a non mag will kill cleanly at that range too. Proper bullets and bullet placement are what matter
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: ICEMAN on March 30, 2014, 01:04:15 PM
RUM... bear, deer, elk. You will be happy. Great caliber.
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: Bean Counter on March 30, 2014, 01:33:08 PM
For deer <500 yards I'd look at 257wby, 270wsm, 7-08, 6.5-06, 280ai, 7rm/wsm/saum, 30-06. If you just have to have more recoil you can go with any of the 300 mags, but a non mag will kill cleanly at that range too. Proper bullets and bullet placement are what matter

No need for RUM for that range.  A 30-06 would work.

 :yeah:

Save your money... And your shoulder.  ;)
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: Hooked On Chrome Guide Service on March 30, 2014, 02:02:48 PM
I shoot a 300 rum and sure it kicks like a mule but that's nothing a break can't help reduce and last time I checked there's no such thing as being to dead
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: bobcat on March 30, 2014, 02:10:10 PM
Either one will be fine. The only real difference is recoil. If you can handle the recoil and the higher cost of ammo doesn't bother you, get the RUM.

The 300 WSM is just slightly faster than the 30/06, so it should be easy on your shoulder compared to the RUM. The standard 300 Win Mag is another good option.
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: Bob33 on March 30, 2014, 02:18:46 PM
Unless you put a muzzle brake on it, the recoil from a RUM is stiff and will likely cause flinching in most shooters.

Put a brake on, and you need ear protection every time you shoot it  or you will almost certainly permanently damage your hearing.

RUM = lots more powder, lots more energy and velocity, and lots more recoil.

For most shooters a 300 WSM is a better choice between the two.
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: CAMPMEAT on March 30, 2014, 02:19:51 PM
My 300 RUM.........shoots like a 22 mag  :tup:
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: Biggerhammer on March 30, 2014, 02:46:01 PM
Killed Mulies at those ranges over the years with the .300 Win Mag, .300 WSM and the .300 Ultra. All of them died the same. I began years ago with the .300 Win Mag in sporter's and custom heavies. Went through the short mag, ultra mag and .338 Edge phase. Back to a good old 30" .300 Win Mag and the 230 OTM's for the long stuff, the combo will run with any Edge.

All Persenal preference.
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: Easy-E on March 30, 2014, 02:52:55 PM
I gave up using the RUM for deer after a couple of cases of extreme meat damage. I will say, however, that I was not using a premium bullet, so that could have contributed to the meat damage. It did do a dandy job of anchoring almost everything I shot with it (deer and elk).
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: Fowlweather25 on March 30, 2014, 03:04:11 PM
Killed Mulies at those ranges over the years with the .300 Win Mag, .300 WSM and the .300 Ultra. All of them died the same. I began years ago with the .300 Win Mag in sporter's and custom heavies. Went through the short mag, ultra mag and .338 Edge phase. Back to a good old 30" .300 Win Mag and the 230 OTM's for the long stuff, the combo will run with any Edge.

All Persenal preference.
Is the vld hybrid your otm of choice?
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: Shane54 on March 30, 2014, 03:09:03 PM
Thanks for all of the info guys! I already have 3 .270's just wanting to bulk up for elk bear, and long range shooting. Is there really a dif between 300wsm and 300 win mag? And I would be getting a muzzle brake if I opted for the 300rum.
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: Biggerhammer on March 30, 2014, 03:10:04 PM
Killed Mulies at those ranges over the years with the .300 Win Mag, .300 WSM and the .300 Ultra. All of them died the same. I began years ago with the .300 Win Mag in sporter's and custom heavies. Went through the short mag, ultra mag and .338 Edge phase. Back to a good old 30" .300 Win Mag and the 230 OTM's for the long stuff, the combo will run with any Edge.

All Persenal preference.
Is the vld hybrid your otm of choice?

Yes, Berger Hybrids for both the .338 Edge & .300 Win Mag. They stopped making them but the Berger 190 VLD was wicked accurate in a 11 twist Winnie.
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: Fowlweather25 on March 30, 2014, 03:11:34 PM
 :tup:
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: rb2506 on March 30, 2014, 03:14:06 PM
I shoot a rum with a brake and love it. Loud yes but you should always use hearing protection. The rum has yet to let me down.
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: BULLBLASTER on March 30, 2014, 03:17:55 PM
300 rum with 215 berger hybrid for me. Its been devastating on elk and bears for me.
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: Biggerhammer on March 30, 2014, 03:27:43 PM
300 rum with 215 berger hybrid for me. Its been devastating on elk and bears for me.

I have friends that swear by the 215's for flat outright killing stuff.👍
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: mountainman on March 30, 2014, 04:07:12 PM
The 300 Ultra beats all the other 30 cal's out there. I have never had an issue withe the recoil w/o the break, but I shoot alots of 'big' guns. The edge beats them all as a hunting round and hits hard out at loner then 500 yard ranges!
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: Easy-E on March 30, 2014, 04:21:31 PM
Just curious what distances you guys are shooting groups at when you start load development for the 300 RUM? Any issues with tight groups at 100 yards? Or are you shooting longer distances from the start?
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: mountainman on March 30, 2014, 04:25:40 PM
I usually start at 100 yards, then work the 300 yards backstop as a baseline for gauging accuracy for load development. Its a more accurate indicator of what a given load will do with longer bullets, due to them "falling to sleep", or in layman terms, smoothing out and stabilizing..
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: Bob33 on March 30, 2014, 04:49:39 PM
All of the modern .30 calibers have enough energy to cleanly kill deer at 500 yards. A 300 RUM will work; so will a .308.

The advantages of flatter trajectories were more valuable 20 years ago before the advent of laser rangefinders. If you weren't sure if the deer was 300 or 350 yards a flatter shooting caliber was a great advantage.

With a laser rangefinder today, you know the distance and can know the drop to within an inch or two. Whether the bullet drops 10 inches or 20 inches, you can aim accordingly.

If the 300 RUM gives you more confidence, then that's of some value but the deer will be just as dead with another .30 caliber.
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: Biggerhammer on March 30, 2014, 04:58:46 PM
Just curious what distances you guys are shooting groups at when you start load development for the 300 RUM? Any issues with tight groups at 100 yards? Or are you shooting longer distances from the start?

I start at 300 yards or further for the long range stuff, especially with the VLD bullets. 100 yards is a waste of time,  powder and bullets. One learns that fairly quickly. If your shooting 1/4 MOA at 300 yards with a load. You can be assured you have 100 & 200 yards covered for a long range varmint and big game rig.
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: Bofire on March 30, 2014, 05:03:29 PM
 :) 300 wm has 7-10% more powder capacity than 300wsm, has won numerous 1000 yard competitions. Proven cartridge. Go with the real 300, 300 WM :chuckle:
I been using one for 40 years, my 2.
Carl
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: mountainman on March 30, 2014, 05:04:06 PM
Bob, that statement is so true, if we are compering same bullet at the same angles (broadside shots) where the bigger magnums come into play, again with a slight trajectory advantage, is on those long range angle or raking shots. Whether the deer quartering away or quartering to you, the higher velecity, givin the same controlled expansion bullet, will always penetrate deeper. Sometime the difference between shoot or no shoot, or for those that dont know any better, a wounded animal and a long bloodtrail..
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: yorketransport on March 30, 2014, 05:16:36 PM
All of the modern .30 calibers have enough energy to cleanly kill deer at 500 yards. A 300 RUM will work; so will a .308.

The advantages of flatter trajectories were more valuable 20 years ago before the advent of laser rangefinders. If you weren't sure if the deer was 300 or 350 yards a flatter shooting caliber was a great advantage.

With a laser rangefinder today, you know the distance and can know the drop to within an inch or two. Whether the bullet drops 10 inches or 20 inches, you can aim accordingly.

If the 300 RUM gives you more confidence, then that's of some value but the deer will be just as dead with another .30 caliber.

 :yeah: I'm partial to the 300 WSM and I don't think that the RUM is really a significant improvement. All you really gain with the RUM is recoil, blast, and a velocity/time of flight advantage. With the use of rangefinders, BDC turrets and reticles, and better bullets, the added point blank range just isn't as important any more. It's the same bullet, same diameter, and the same performance at any given velocity. At the ranges you're considering the 300 WSM (or standard Win Mag) will still flatten any deer.

I've played a lot with the 300 WSM out of different guns ranging from handguns to rifles in both sporting and target configurations and I've never been disappointed. The I've played with the RUM less, but still a fair bit in both handguns and rifles. Honestly if I were you, I would bypass the 30 caliber mags all together. I don't think that they offer a significant advantage over your 270s on deer sized game. The next step up for me would be into the 338 class. :twocents:

Andrew
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: Bob33 on March 30, 2014, 05:21:12 PM
Chris Kyle, a former Navy sniper has the most confirmed kills of any sniper in American history.

His primary weapon was a 300 Win Mag. He had several kills in excess of 1200 yards.  It seemed to work pretty well for him. ;)

SI: You’re obviously known for your skill with a rifle. What was your primary rifle in the service?

CK: My favorite was a .300 Win. Mag. rifle with an Accuracy International stock. It was a Crane-designed rifle that handled real well and delivered superior accuracy over standard-issue rifles.

SI: How did you determine what rifle to take on a mission?

CK: We’d look at overhead imagery before mission and estimate what was the longest possible shot we might have to take. Beyond 1,000 yards, I’d take the .300 Win. Mag. 7.62 NATO just doesn’t have the range or punch at those really long distances. The .300 Win. Mag. also worked just fine on closer targets—it put them down faster than the 7.62 NATO could.
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: Biggerhammer on March 30, 2014, 05:36:29 PM
The .300 Winchesters a daisy.😘
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: rtspring on March 30, 2014, 05:44:17 PM
RUM! Hands down!!  I have had one for 9 years!  Out of the box it is deadly at ranges most shooters can't handle.   I shoot every big game animal with mine and not one has taken a step after being shot.

Get a RUM, then get a brake installed and shoot factory Level III Scirocco's.   has worked every time for me!  It is the best all around rifle I have ever owned!!!! By far!!!

Buy one and you wont ever need another rifle!!!!

Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: ICEMAN on March 30, 2014, 05:54:02 PM
Why do you guys keep recommending the brakes? They kick, but not that darned hard! :dunno:
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: CAMPMEAT on March 30, 2014, 06:09:09 PM
I'm changing your request. Why not get a 6.5 Creedmoor instead. Long distance, flat shooter and easy on your eyes ???
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: yorketransport on March 30, 2014, 06:11:54 PM
Why do you guys keep recommending the brakes? They kick, but not that darned hard! :dunno:

Maybe they own stock in a hearing protection company? :chuckle:
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: rb2506 on March 30, 2014, 06:19:16 PM

Why do you guys keep recommending the brakes? They kick, but not that darned hard! :dunno:

For me it's like shooting a 243 with a loud bang.
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: Bob33 on March 30, 2014, 06:34:27 PM
Why do you guys keep recommending the brakes? They kick, but not that darned hard! :dunno:

Maybe they own stock in a hearing protection company? :chuckle:
What did you say?
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: Shane54 on March 30, 2014, 06:56:46 PM
All good info guys! Really helpful!
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: bod on March 31, 2014, 09:09:12 AM
Shane54
 Do yourself a favor and take my advice.
 Buy a Tikka T3 stainless 300 wsm and go fill the arc.
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: MtnMuley on March 31, 2014, 11:07:43 AM
I sure love all these gun debates these days.  Chuckling through most of them, I find bod's last post spot on for "your" desires. :twocents:
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: BULLBLASTER on March 31, 2014, 11:51:50 AM
300 rum with 215 berger hybrid for me. Its been devastating on elk and bears for me.

I have friends that swear by the 215's for flat outright killing stuff.👍
they seem to do a great job. Animals dont seem to go far after being hit with them.


The 300 win does seem to really shine with the 215 or 230 and a longer barrel.
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: Easy-E on March 31, 2014, 12:09:31 PM
long barrels, long bullets, and slow powders!
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: Biggerhammer on March 31, 2014, 01:23:56 PM
long barrels, long bullets, and slow powders!

And there it is... :tup: H1000 & Retumbo. :)
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: yorketransport on March 31, 2014, 06:43:56 PM
long barrels, long bullets, and slow powders!

And there it is... :tup: H1000 & Retumbo. :)

That's great if you can find either of those powders. I'm down to 2# of H1000 and I'm starting to panic! :chuckle:

Andrew
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: Biggerhammer on March 31, 2014, 07:03:48 PM
long barrels, long bullets, and slow powders!

And there it is... :tup: H1000 & Retumbo. :)

That's great if you can find either of those powders. I'm down to 2# of H1000 and I'm starting to panic! :chuckle:

Andrew

Some of the cartridges you shoot eat that stuff quick!
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: jasnt on March 31, 2014, 07:05:00 PM
Another vote for 300 win mag!  Wsm close 2nd
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: yorketransport on March 31, 2014, 07:55:18 PM
long barrels, long bullets, and slow powders!

And there it is... :tup: H1000 & Retumbo. :)

That's great if you can find either of those powders. I'm down to 2# of H1000 and I'm starting to panic! :chuckle:

Andrew

Some of the cartridges you shoot eat that stuff quick!

I need to start buying that stuff by the 8# keg. I only get 60 loads per pound in the BME! Makes the 300 Win Mag seem pretty efficient by comparison! ;)
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: Easy-E on March 31, 2014, 07:56:00 PM
I'm trying to remember my pet load for my 300 RUM. Like 90 grains of H870 or something crazy like that. I just remember my powder charger visibly dropping with each charge! Cha-Ching. Cha-Ching. Cha-Ching!

Every time someone would ask me if they could shoot it I'd tell them the fee was a buck a round, and after about 3 they wouldn't want to shoot it any more! :chuckle:

And then a disclaimer about not being responsible for split eyebrows!
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: huntnnw on April 01, 2014, 10:20:52 PM
I would rather shoot a braked RUM over my 300WSM
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: Shane54 on April 12, 2014, 08:16:03 PM
Thank you everyone this has been really helpful. I am not sure exactly how hard 300rum ammo is to find, along with the cost. Thank you for your input everyone!
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: xXLojackXx on April 15, 2014, 05:44:16 PM
It's not hard to find at all and runs about $60 a box on average. I shot my RUM for a good while and then had Benchmark build it into a .338 Edge. Absolutely a 300gr VLD tack driver. In good conditions it's rings my 16" steel square consistently out to 1830 yards. The last picture is a .338 Edge round next to a 200 gr Accubond .300 RUM
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: yorketransport on April 15, 2014, 08:34:06 PM
It's not hard to find at all and runs about $60 a box on average. I shot my RUM for a good while and then had Benchmark build it into a .338 Edge. Absolutely a 300gr VLD tack driver. In good conditions it's rings my 16" steel square consistently out to 1830 yards. The last picture is a .338 Edge round next to a 200 gr Accubond .300 RUM

There's something special about Benchmark's 338 barrels!
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: xXLojackXx on April 16, 2014, 07:57:40 AM
It's not hard to find at all and runs about $60 a box on average. I shot my RUM for a good while and then had Benchmark build it into a .338 Edge. Absolutely a 300gr VLD tack driver. In good conditions it's rings my 16" steel square consistently out to 1830 yards. The last picture is a .338 Edge round next to a 200 gr Accubond .300 RUM

There's something special about Benchmark's 338 barrels!

There's something special about all of Benchmark's barrels. I've never seen a Benchmark rifle that didn't shoot bug holes
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: Shane54 on April 17, 2014, 02:09:53 PM
XxlojackXx that was really helpful! Thank you! I think I'm starting to lean towards the 300rum. If any one else has two cents please share!
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: Taco280AI on April 18, 2014, 11:39:32 AM
For the OP's desire for a caliber to shoot a MAX of 400-500 yards,  why are so many suggesting the RUM? I don't get it...  :dunno:

If you want to burn more powder,  have more recoil,  and more muzzle blast to kill your game just as dead I guess it makes sense. 
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: coachcw on April 19, 2014, 08:29:51 AM
Really you cant go wrong with the wsm or the wm.  we have both and the t3 in 300wsm is a pleasure to shoot, we have a wm accurized savage with a break that sends 180grain sst's with deadly results . if you want a fairly light mountain option I'd pick the wsm if that's not a concern you could go with wm and handloads. or you could just go with the 26 nosler
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: xXLojackXx on April 20, 2014, 06:21:42 PM
Really you cant go wrong with the wsm or the wm.  we have both and the t3 in 300wsm is a pleasure to shoot, we have a wm accurized savage with a break that sends 180grain sst's with deadly results . if you want a fairly light mountain option I'd pick the wsm if that's not a concern you could go with wm and handloads. or you could just go with the 26 nosler

When does the .26 Nosler hit the market to consumers? Or is it?
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: jasnt on April 21, 2014, 12:17:19 PM
For the OP's desire for a caliber to shoot a MAX of 400-500 yards,  why are so many suggesting the RUM? I don't get it...  :dunno:

If you want to burn more powder,  have more recoil,  and more muzzle blast to kill your game just as dead I guess it makes sense. 

Could be because once you start shooting at 400 yards + you just keep pushing it out there wanting to go farther. I like the 300wm my self but everyone has there own flavor
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: longrange7mm on April 25, 2014, 04:22:04 AM
My 300 RUM.........shoots like a 22 mag  :tup:

and throws dirt, gravel, and any other debri under your muzzle like a pissed off child  :chuckle: sweet gun campmeat I had a brake like that on a 338 RUM and still have dirt in my eyes  :chuckle:
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: CAMPMEAT on April 25, 2014, 10:19:02 AM
My 300 RUM.........shoots like a 22 mag  :tup:

and throws dirt, gravel, and any other debri under your muzzle like a pissed off child  :chuckle: sweet gun campmeat I had a brake like that on a 338 RUM and still have dirt in my eyes  :chuckle:
\


Thanks. I'm kinda lucky, I can't lay down and hardly get up. I can shoot out of my truck with my disabled placard..... :tup:

I didn't have a brake put on without holes, on the bottom, just for that reason.....dirt blast excavation  :tup:
Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: KFhunter on April 25, 2014, 08:18:58 PM
I was looking for a larger caliber long range rifle. Is the 300rum to much power for mule deer? Which one should I buy. I'm looking for it to be a 400-500 yard gun and no more.

You don't need a magnum, let alone a ultra mag for that. 

Just a waste of $ and meat  :twocents:



In internet slang "400-500 yards" usually means 150- 200 yards at best  :chuckle:

Title: Re: 300rum or 300wsm
Post by: Shane54 on April 29, 2014, 05:18:02 PM
I was looking for a larger caliber long range rifle. Is the 300rum to much power for mule deer? Which one should I buy. I'm looking for it to be a 400-500 yard gun and no more.

You don't need a magnum, let alone a ultra mag for that. 

Just a waste of $ and meat  :twocents:



In internet slang "400-500 yards" usually means 150- 200 yards at best  :chuckle:

If that's the case I meant to say 1400-1500 yards  :chuckle:
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal