Hunting Washington Forum
Big Game Hunting => Out Of State Hunting => Topic started by: Halo on June 16, 2014, 10:23:14 AM
-
Montana sheep & moose results are up, nothing for me, Goat should be up shortly.
Good Luck.
-
Goat is up now also, nothing.
-
Another state draw, another rejection! Nine states down, two to go! Come on OR or Arizona!
-
Nothing for me either!
-
nothing for me
-
0 for 3 on moose, sheep & goat!
-
No mountain goat for me. bailed out of sheep and moose.
-
None of the big 3 for me in Montana. Just struck out in Oregon. That's 0 for 5 states so far. Come on AZ desert bighorn!
-
Don't forget to comment on the proposed license increase for nonresident moose, sheep, bison, and goat from $750 to $1,250!
-
$1250 doesn't seem bad for moose. I think Idaho is around $1,000 higher. :o
-
I pulled out this year so it doesnt matter what they raise their prices too. I am starting to think its foolish for the future of hunting to have a smaller base of paying customers (aka hunters that also vote) than a larger base but that's "just my opinion."
-
I pulled out this year so it doesnt matter what they raise their prices too. I am starting to think its foolish for the future of hunting to have a smaller base of paying customers (aka hunters that also vote) than a larger base but that's "just my opinion."
For elk, MT nonresidents pay 96% of the cost.
A tag going up $500 in a single swoop doesn't bode well for the future of hunting in my opinion. Good news for those that can afford it I guess.
We seem to be in a period where the states are racing to figure out what price results in the maximum revenue without regarding the heritage or affordability. The end game is some guy paying $5 million to buy one tag and hunt by himself.
-
A buddy of mine got lucky with a sheep tag. :tup:
-
I pulled out this year so it doesnt matter what they raise their prices too. I am starting to think its foolish for the future of hunting to have a smaller base of paying customers (aka hunters that also vote) than a larger base but that's "just my opinion."
For elk, MT nonresidents pay 96% of the cost.
A tag going up $500 in a single swoop doesn't bode well for the future of hunting in my opinion. Good news for those that can afford it I guess.
We seem to be in a period where the states are racing to figure out what price results in the maximum revenue without regarding the heritage or affordability. The end game is some guy paying $5 million to buy one tag and hunt by himself.
I agree with all of what is being said here. It seems most wildlife managers would auction/raffle their mother off if they figured it would bring another nickel into the department. Its a very sad and frankly terrifying future...when only millionaires can afford to hunt.