Post by: wolfbait on October 04, 2014, 09:18:12 PM
Columbia Riverkeeper Study Analyzes Toxin Levels In Five Columbia River Fish Species
Posted on Friday, October 03, 2014 (PST)
Findings from tests of five Columbia River fish species “intended for the dinner table” show alarming levels of heavy metals, toxic flame retardants, cancer-causing PCBs, and endocrine disrupting chemicals, according to results of a Phase 2 study, “Is Your Fish Toxic?”
“Fish advisories are not enough. We need immediate reduction and prevention of toxic pollution entering our river to protect the health of our communities,” said Lorri Epstein, Water Quality director with Columbia Riverkeeper, which conducted the study.
Through interviews with participants, Riverkeeper found that ethnic, immigrant, and low income populations are eating fish with unsafe levels of toxic pollution.
Contributing factors for increased risk include higher fish consumption rates, and fish-preparation styles. For example, the Cambodian American fisherman who provided shad for the study fishes for his parents who cook the whole fish in soups and stews. Not removing internal organs, skin, head and tail increase exposure to toxic contaminants.
Another fisherman from Kyrgyzstan eats carp twice a week, while the EPA would recommend limiting consumption to less than one fish meal per month based on the PCB levels found in his fish.
The study results this year include analysis of steelhead caught in the Columbia near Cascade Locks, Ore., both small and large walleye caught in the Multnomah channel at Portland, shad caught in the area below Bonneville Dam, carp caught in Vancouver Lake, and catfish caught in the Columbia Slough at Portland.
Phase I of the study looked at bass from the Bonneville Pool, sturgeon from the Columbia estuary and suckers from the Columbia Slough.
(See CBB, Oct. 26, 2012, “As Ongoing Project, Columbia Riverkeeper Collects Toxin Data In Sample Fish Caught By Anglers” http://www.cbbulletin.com/423520.aspx (http://www.cbbulletin.com/423520.aspx) < http://www.cbbulletin.com/423520.aspx (http://www.cbbulletin.com/423520.aspx) > )
Analysis of fish samples in 2012 to showed “shocking” levels of toxics, Riverkeeper said. A sturgeon sampled near Astoria showed PCB levels at 7,000 percent of what the Environmental Protection Agency considers safe for unlimited consumption, according to the conservation group. PCBs increase cancer risks and harm immune, reproductive, and development systems in humans and aquatic life.
“The fact that some Columbia River fish are unsafe to feed your family presents a real environmental justice issue,” said Epstein. “Posting warning signs is not the answer. Many people are unaware of the warnings or will continue to eat fish due to cultural and economic reasons.
“The top priority must be cleaning up our rivers. Our data show extremely high levels of toxic contaminants in these fish, and we need to consider the individual stories and families interwoven with the results of this scientific data.”
Riverkeeper’s testing this year revealed that sampled Columbia River fish contain unsafe levels of heavy metals like mercury and arsenic, PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls), and toxic flame retardants known as PBDEs (polybrominated diphenyl ethers). These contaminants are known endocrine disruptors that can increase cancer risk and wreak havoc on hormone, reproductive and development systems in both human and animals.
Key findings:
-- Walleye from the Multnomah Channel contained PCBs 175 times the EPA limit for unrestricted consumption.
-- Shad caught near Bonneville Dam contained endocrine disrupting flame retardants and heavy metals.
-- Carp near Vancouver, Wash., contained PCBs 30 times the EPA limit for unrestricted consumption, mercury 3.5 times the EPA limit, as well as flame retardants and other heavy metals.
Steelhead and shad, which spend part of their lives in the ocean, did not contain detectable PCBs, but did have high levels of mercury as well as flame retardants, according to the study.
Riverkeeper says its data is consistent with previous scientific findings. The U.S. Geological Survey ( http://or.water.usgs.gov/proj/Conhab/&l (http://or.water.usgs.gov/proj/Conhab/&l) … oj/Conhab/ > ) found comparable high levels of toxic contaminants in the Columbia River in everything from sediments to resident fish to osprey eggs. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency released a report ( http://www2.epa.gov/columbiariver/colum (http://www2.epa.gov/columbiariver/colum) … nuary-2009 < http://www2.epa.gov/columbiariver/colum (http://www2.epa.gov/columbiariver/colum) … nuary-2009 > concluding that the Columbia River exceeds the safe level for PCBs, DDT, mercury, and flame retardants, according to Riverkeeper.
To read more information about the Columbia Riverkeeper study visit www.bit.ly/isyourfishtoxic (http://www.bit.ly/isyourfishtoxic) < http://www.bit.ly/isyourfishtoxic (http://www.bit.ly/isyourfishtoxic) >
< http://www.bit.ly/isyourfishtoxic (http://www.bit.ly/isyourfishtoxic) >
Columbia Riverkeeper’s mission is to protect and restore the water quality of the Columbia River and all life connected to it, from the headwaters to the Pacific Ocean. The organization is a member of Waterkeeper Alliance, which unites more than 200 Waterkeeper organizations worldwide and focusing citizen action on issues that affect our waterways, from pollution to climate change.
For more information go to www.columbiariverkeeper.org (http://www.columbiariverkeeper.org)<http://www.columbiariverkeeper.org/ >
Post by: lokidog on October 04, 2014, 09:41:46 PM
Post by: Lucky1 on October 04, 2014, 09:47:49 PM
We could be selling and shipping out low sulfur coal to China. This would result in less pollution and acid rain because they will get higher sulfur coal from other sources if we don't sell them our low sulfur coal. These people are "save the earth the sky is falling" alarmists.
Post by: Bullkllr on October 04, 2014, 10:15:22 PM
Walleye from the Multnomah Channel contained PCBs 175 times the EPA limit for unrestricted consumption.
That may be cause for alarm.
Post by: Maverick on October 05, 2014, 07:02:25 AM
Post by: Bullkllr on October 05, 2014, 08:21:38 AM
http://www.epa.gov/wastes/hazard/tsd/pcbs/pubs/effects.htm (http://www.epa.gov/wastes/hazard/tsd/pcbs/pubs/effects.htm)