Post by: PA BEN on December 01, 2014, 12:28:09 PM
WILDLIFE — Many of the wolves in northeastern Washington moved in naturally from Idaho. But the Gem State is a dangerous place for the wolves to return.
A radio-collared wolf from the Diamond Pack in east-central Pend Oreille County was killed Dec. 20 by a trapper in North Idaho a few hundred yards east of the stateline.
Trappers have reported taking at least six wolves in the Idaho Panhandle during the state's first trapping season, which started Nov. 15 and runs through March 15. Hunters have reported taking 28 wolves so far this season in the Panhandle, counting the one checked in at Coeur d'Alene on Tuesday.
Statewide, hunters have tagged at least 173 wolves in Idaho so far this season and trappers have reported taking 24.
The wolf trapped Dec. 20 was one of four Washington wolves wearing radio collars to track the movements of the Diamond Pack, which wanders along the stateline, as well as the Salmo Pack that roams the boundary with Canada.
“We will get the radio collar back,” said Madonna Luers, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Spokeswoman in Spokane in an interview with Andy Walgamott of Northwest Sportsman Magazine.
Meantime, here's the latest Idaho Panhandle wolf report posted Tuesday evening by Jim Hayden, Fish and Game regional wildlife manager.
Wolf Harvest
Checked another wolf today, so we’re at 28 wolves taken in the Panhandle via hunting, and 6 via trapping. By this date two years ago, we had taken just 13 wolves. (In fact, the 14thwolf didn’t come until Feb. 2.) We ended up with 24 legal wolf kills two years ago (there were also 4 illegal kills added for a total of 28).
So, we’re taking more wolves than we did two years ago, even if just hunting is considered. Will we have more wolves at the end of the season than we did two years ago or less? There might be plenty of folks willing to say they know. I’m not one of them. There are just too many unknowns – did we take more wolves simply because there are more around? Are hunters more effective than they were two years ago? Both? Neither?
Post by: boneaddict on December 01, 2014, 12:32:12 PM
Post by: Sitka_Blacktail on December 01, 2014, 12:41:54 PM
more wolves, more interest.
Less hunters though. I'd guess hunters are learning more about wolves and how to hunt them.
Post by: HUNTINCOUPLE on December 01, 2014, 12:54:17 PM
Post by: AspenBud on December 01, 2014, 01:00:57 PM
Post by: boneaddict on December 01, 2014, 01:12:40 PM
more wolves, more interest.
Less hunters though. I'd guess hunters are learning more about wolves and how to hunt them.
That's included in the interest. Such as queries on here, buying calls, learning tactics etc. How cheap is it now to throw a wolf tag in the wallet if you are already hunting out of state? I bet I have had 50 minimium serious pms asking me where to hunt wolves in Idaho just this year.
Post by: lamrith on December 01, 2014, 01:32:51 PM
Post by: DOUBLELUNG on December 01, 2014, 01:36:46 PM
Post by: jackelope on December 01, 2014, 01:38:55 PM
Post by: 6x6in6 on December 01, 2014, 01:39:19 PM
Um is that an article from last year? Last time I looked it is only Dec 1st..?:chuckle:
At least that. It was 2011 wolf kill published in January of 2012.
Post by: jackelope on December 01, 2014, 01:44:47 PM
Post by: PlateauNDN on December 03, 2014, 09:06:52 PM
more wolves, more interest.
Less hunters though. I'd guess hunters are learning more about wolves and how to hunt them.
That's included in the interest. Such as queries on here, buying calls, learning tactics etc. How cheap is it now to throw a wolf tag in the wallet if you are already hunting out of state? I bet I have had 50 minimium serious pms asking me where to hunt wolves in Idaho just this year.
I'm not looking for your honey hole but can you point me to some general areas for wolves.
Post by: WAcoyotehunter on December 11, 2014, 01:53:54 PM
Post by: trophyhunt on December 11, 2014, 02:07:46 PM