Post by: bigtex on January 21, 2015, 10:50:53 AM
(1) The department of fish and wildlife must establish a pilot program to coordinate the statewide collection
and recycling of fishing line or monofilament. The program must consist of indoor and outdoor collection bins located at or near established fishing areas, boat ramps, and other interested locations. The department must provide signage to each collection point explaining the program and the benefits of monofilament recycling.
(2) The department of fish and wildlife may work cooperatively with other state agencies and interested parties to establish a system to check the collection bins regularly and remove monofilament for recycling and to encourage volunteer participation in the program.
(3) The department of fish and wildlife must submit a report to the legislature by December 1, 2017, on the following:
(a) A description of the level of coordination between the department and other state agencies and interested parties;
(b)Collection point locations;
(c) Data collected about the monofilament, including the amount collected by weight or by another reasonable measurement;
(d) A description of monofilament recycling-related community outreach or education efforts conducted by the department or its program partners;
(e) A plan to establish the monofilament recycling program on a permanent basis, including action items for the legislature to consider; and
(f) An estimate of costs and resources required to implement the plan identified in (e)of this subsection.
(4)This section expires December 31, 2017.
Post by: Special T on January 22, 2015, 06:33:32 AM
Post by: ghosthunter on January 22, 2015, 07:27:09 AM
Post by: jay.sharkbait on January 22, 2015, 07:37:16 AM
Post by: bobcat on January 22, 2015, 08:18:42 AM
I save mine up and burn it.....
:yike:
Post by: bigtex on January 22, 2015, 08:38:04 AM
While i think recycling line is important.... What the hell is wrong with these legislators with all their pet ideas and no$ to implement them? How bout you lay this at the department of ecology's feet? :bash:I thought ecology as well. I know at the end of last year's legislative session there was a proposal to institute a bottle recycling program similar to Oregon the agency that would run it....the Liquor Control Board. Because that makes sense? :dunno:
Post by: lokidog on January 22, 2015, 11:13:55 AM
While i think recycling line is important.... What the hell is wrong with these legislators with all their pet ideas and no$ to implement them? How bout you lay this at the department of ecology's feet? :bash:
:yeah:
With the huge variety of fishing lines, recycling is not practical, nor cost effective. Skyline Marina just installed some receptacles, on the dock, specifically for used fishing line. Good for them. I'd rather see it thrown away properly than cost the state a bunch for another "do nothing" program. The marina used a short length of PVC/ABS pipe, too small for people to throw garbage into. Why doesn't the Department of Ecology install something similar at boat ramps and fishing access areas? Really, fishermen should be more responsible, but if the state feels they need to "do" something, this would be better than a recycling program. :twocents:
Post by: dreamunelk on January 22, 2015, 07:08:18 PM
Post by: Ridgeratt on January 22, 2015, 09:10:57 PM
So what ever happened to the pack it in pack it out logic?
Isn't there a law against littering? If caught doesn't it also constitute some kind of fine?
I guess I want to thank those folks who come up with laws to protect me from myself!!! I have no idea where I would be with out them!! :chuckle:
Do you honestly think the folks who would throw it on the ground will really put it in a container at the launch?
Post by: CAMPMEAT on January 22, 2015, 09:29:40 PM
Post by: JimmyHoffa on January 22, 2015, 09:33:01 PM
Post by: bigtex on February 01, 2015, 12:10:53 PM
It is WDFW's plan that if this bill passes that WDFW will construct the collection bins but the rest of the program will be handled by volunteers.
Post by: Special T on February 01, 2015, 08:56:42 PM
Part of my Beef with the WDFW is that they COULD actively reach out to outdoor groups for help. Provide the materials and ask for the help in distributing, hanging Collecting...
I see the success that the Snoqualmie Valley manger Brian has had by reaching out to people with vested interest in the land. He got help and support and is improving things. Part of why I have a hard time viewing the WDFW as a partner is they dont view sportsmen as one. (The department not ground level employees)
Post by: bigtex on February 01, 2015, 09:01:06 PM
Is this really the kind of thing that NEEDS to be a Bill?Under state law such activity does need to be authorized by a bill/law. Everything that WDFW currently uses volunteers for is authorized under a law.
Part of my Beef with the WDFW is that they COULD actively reach out to outdoor groups for help. Provide the materials and ask for the help in distributing, hanging Collecting...
I see the success that the Snoqualmie Valley manger Brian has had by reaching out to people with vested interest in the land. He got help and support and is improving things. Part of why I have a hard time viewing the WDFW as a partner is they dont view sportsmen as one. (The department not ground level employees)
Post by: Ridgeratt on February 01, 2015, 09:03:25 PM
This bill has actually received a lot of support.
It is WDFW's plan that if this bill passes that WDFW will construct the collection bins but the rest of the program will be handled by volunteers.
Interesting that on the poll here it has a 80%+ failure. But you say folks are in favor. :dunno:
I would guess like most programs that rely on volunteers might start off well and then die on the vine.
Post by: Special T on February 01, 2015, 09:09:28 PM
Keeping used line out of the water is a worthy endeavor, Im just surprised a vote is needed to allow volunteer groups to hang collection tubes at launch/fishing sites thats all.
Post by: Cap.Silver on February 01, 2015, 09:19:58 PM
Post by: bigtex on February 01, 2015, 09:25:54 PM
So was a bill passed to accept the donation to have the canary grass mowed several times in Cherry valley?Ye there a bill passed at some time to authorize the use of volunteers. In fact RCW Chapter 77.100 authorizes many WDFW volunteer opportunities.
Keeping used line out of the water is a worthy endeavor, Im just surprised a vote is needed to allow volunteer groups to hang collection tubes at launch/fishing sites thats all.
Like I said in another thread about a month ago. Agencies can't just do something, even if it's a good idea, they need to get authorization from the state legislature.
Post by: bigtex on February 01, 2015, 09:27:09 PM
They can't manage paid campsites ,so what are they going to do with depositors for fishing lines .WDFW doesn't have paid campsites.....
Post by: PolarBear on February 02, 2015, 06:21:54 AM
Post by: floatinghat on February 02, 2015, 07:13:35 AM
I see the need yet the practicality ??? I am reversing the line on all my single actions (Islanders) this year. When I swap a line I leave it to the shop to recycle. I think most of the line "left" isn't from anglers throwing it over board. Its from some malfunction/error, at least I hope I'm wrong?