Hunting Washington Forum

Other Hunting => Coyote, Small Game, Varmints => Topic started by: mfswallace on June 30, 2015, 11:46:28 AM


Advertise Here
Title: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: mfswallace on June 30, 2015, 11:46:28 AM
Caught these dogs in a hay field this morning. Knocked the 1st down with a shot to the noggin when he peaked out of a circle wheel line track. Moved to the next one that was looping away and as I was lined up in my scope and squeezing the trigger I caught movement with my off eye of a third running the opposite way. It was just enough of a momentary lapse in concentration that I hit the 2nd in the hips. Saw he wasn't going anywhere so tried to get on the 3rd but couldn't cast a shot before he made it to the sage brush. I picked up the 2 I did save a few deer and pheasant from and went about my rounds. 
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Curly on June 30, 2015, 11:51:03 AM
Good shooting.  Cute little buggers, but a good coyote is a dead coyote.  Good job!  :tup:
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Timberstalker on June 30, 2015, 12:55:47 PM
Good conservation!
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: MLBowhunting on June 30, 2015, 02:15:02 PM
 :tup: cute lil guys.
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Landowner on July 01, 2015, 05:47:35 PM
Some would argue that pics like these give hunting a bad name.    I would agree. 
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Miles on July 01, 2015, 05:57:42 PM
Some would argue that pics like these give hunting a bad name.    I would agree. 
who said he was hunting?  Maybe he was working a ranch or farm.  Ever seen the damage to equipment from coyotes digging holes?
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: grundy53 on July 01, 2015, 06:04:33 PM
Some would argue that pics like these give hunting a bad name.    I would agree.
It's management pure and simple.
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Landowner on July 01, 2015, 06:06:50 PM
Some would argue that pics like these give hunting a bad name.    I would agree.
It's management pure and simple.

Not the point  It's fuel for the non-hunters.  Plain and simple.   
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Landowner on July 01, 2015, 06:16:11 PM
Some would argue that pics like these give hunting a bad name.    I would agree. 
who said he was hunting?  Maybe he was working a ranch or farm.  Ever seen the damage to equipment from coyotes digging holes?

I own a large ranch and farm, and deal with coyotes every day.  I have never damaged a tractor or other equipment on a coyote den. 
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Miles on July 01, 2015, 06:19:00 PM
Some would argue that pics like these give hunting a bad name.    I would agree. 
who said he was hunting?  Maybe he was working a ranch or farm.  Ever seen the damage to equipment from coyotes digging holes?

I own a large ranch and farm, and deal with coyotes every day.  I have never damaged a tractor or other equipment on a coyote den. 

You're lucky.   Do you tip toe around the farm hoping not to offend anyone?
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: grundy53 on July 01, 2015, 06:21:04 PM
Some would argue that pics like these give hunting a bad name.    I would agree.
It's management pure and simple.

Not the point  It's fuel for the non-hunters.  Plain and simple.
It's exactly the point.
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Landowner on July 01, 2015, 06:22:54 PM
Some would argue that pics like these give hunting a bad name.    I would agree. 
who said he was hunting?  Maybe he was working a ranch or farm.  Ever seen the damage to equipment from coyotes digging holes?

I own a large ranch and farm, and deal with coyotes every day.  I have never damaged a tractor or other equipment on a coyote den. 

You're lucky.   Do you tip toe around the farm hoping not to offend anyone?

Luck has nothing to do with it.  We know what we are doing.  We respect wildlife on the farm.  Not sure what your point is.  Perhaps there is not one. 
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Landowner on July 01, 2015, 06:26:15 PM
Some would argue that pics like these give hunting a bad name.    I would agree.
It's management pure and simple.

Not the point  It's fuel for the non-hunters.  Plain and simple.
It's exactly the point.

No, it's not.   Posting pics like those have nothing to do with managing coyotes. 
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: 10thmountainarcher on July 01, 2015, 06:29:07 PM
Posting pics of a dead coyote has nothing to do with managing coyotes? You're kidding right? Yea they're young, but guess what! They grow up!p
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Blacktail Sniper on July 01, 2015, 06:31:00 PM
Getting ready, looks like this might get good!!
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: billythekidrock on July 01, 2015, 06:31:18 PM
What is funny is that both sides are right.

It is predator management and it is fuel for anti's. Even worse, it is fuel for those on the fence about hunting and predator control.

Personally I don't have a big problem with the predator control aspect but I don't like to see pics like this on the internet.
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: JODakota on July 01, 2015, 06:31:34 PM
Some would argue that pics like these give hunting a bad name.    I would agree. 
who said he was hunting?  Maybe he was working a ranch or farm.  Ever seen the damage to equipment from coyotes digging holes?

I own a large ranch and farm, and deal with coyotes every day.  I have never damaged a tractor or other equipment on a coyote den. 

You're lucky.   Do you tip toe around the farm hoping not to offend anyone?

Luck has nothing to do with it.  We know what we are doing.  We respect wildlife on the farm.  Not sure what your point is.  Perhaps there is not one.

I am in complete agreement with landowner. Damage to equipment??? Please. And yes I have run cattle and agriculture. And the ranches I have been a hand for have never really worried about coyotes. I'm not talking about a few hundred head. I'm talking about 800 being the smallest and average of 2000 plus. I'm an avid coyote hunter and trapper. So before you pull your liberal hippy bs, their pups. Why not wait until their worth something. And this is fuel for anti hunting. There isn't a lot out their I don't try and kill, but juvenile critters are off limits.
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: 10thmountainarcher on July 01, 2015, 06:34:36 PM
What is funny is that both sides are right.

It is predator management and it is fuel for anti's. Even worse, it is fuel for those on the fence about hunting and predator control.

Personally I don't have a big problem with the predator control aspect but I don't like to see pics like this on the internet.

This I can agree with.. Would I shoot them? Nope. Do I support someone who does? Yup.
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Scvette on July 01, 2015, 06:39:08 PM
I'm all for predator control too,would I shoot those,maybe. Post pics if I did. NO way. That'll be PETA next poster.  :dunno:
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: jackelope on July 01, 2015, 07:59:05 PM

Some would argue that pics like these give hunting a bad name.    I would agree.
It's management pure and simple.

Not the point  It's fuel for the non-hunters.  Plain and simple.
It's exactly the point.

No, it's not.   Posting pics like those have nothing to do with managing coyotes.

I agree. Some things are better left off the internet. I'm ok with shooting the pups but I don't see the point or need to post pictures of them.
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Turner89 on July 01, 2015, 08:17:16 PM
I hunt, and trap as much as I can. Ive done a few things that were  legal, but defiantly not going to post it on the net. To me its common sense......something we can control.  :twocents:
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: HHPro on July 01, 2015, 09:12:25 PM
All for shooting coyotes but I prefer they not have mommas milk on them...Atleast let them get bigger so they provide a challenge and definitely don't post pics of all the baby animals you killed.
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: JimmyHoffa on July 01, 2015, 09:20:04 PM
Could skin those out and have a matching pair of slippers.
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: jrebel on July 01, 2015, 09:28:46 PM
If an archery hunter shot a calf elk legally, would you guys complain about him posting pics of his kill on the internet??   :dunno: :dunno:

What's the difference?? 
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: HHPro on July 01, 2015, 10:21:23 PM
If an archery hunter shot a calf elk legally, would you guys complain about him posting pics of his kill on the internet??   :dunno: :dunno:

What's the difference??
I would that's poor ethics in my opinion  :dunno: shooting any baby animal should be illegal in my opinion.If you can feel good about that there isn't much lower you can go.
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: jrebel on July 01, 2015, 10:43:08 PM
If an archery hunter shot a calf elk legally, would you guys complain about him posting pics of his kill on the internet??   :dunno: :dunno:

What's the difference??
I would that's poor ethics in my opinion  :dunno: shooting any baby animal should be illegal in my opinion.If you can feel good about that there isn't much lower you can go.

Where do you draw the line.  You have condemned lots of hunter on this sight for shooting button nub spikes (blactails) and 150lb first year calf elk.  Do you feel the same about people who shoot does too because they are shooting some babies momma???

My point is simple......if it is legal it is legal.  You don't have to like it!!  Everyone does not have to share your opinion / ethics / morals / values ect...ect...ect...  Why should that person feel bad about posting a pic of there legally killed animal?  You big buck dead on a hillside with bloody tongue hanging out is just as offensive to antis as my cow / calf elk.  Who cares as long as it is legal.  People are always gonna complain about something and you will never make everyone happy.  So in closing.....do your thing and don't worry about others.   Also don't try and impose your ethics on others.  "About as low as you can go"...... Rapist theives and murderers are above a person that legally shoots a first year (5month old) button buck!!  Surely you don't believe that.
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: HardCorpsHuntr on July 01, 2015, 10:48:34 PM
Candidate :dunno:

http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,177468.msg2348656/topicseen.html#new
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Jellymon on July 01, 2015, 10:51:57 PM
 
Candidate :dunno:

http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,177468.msg2348656/topicseen.html#new

 :chuckle:
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Romulus1297 on July 01, 2015, 11:19:25 PM
Those pieces of crud coyotes killed a prime 600lbs steer this spring. Bit an ankle then infection. Of to WSU for a week and then killed :bash: Those coyotes all need some good old Ramik Brown  :bash:
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: HHPro on July 02, 2015, 05:53:24 AM
What's the point of shooting a "baby"animal? If you're after meat wouldn't you rather go for a bigger animal that will fill the freezer? I have my opinion you have yours don't post a pic on a forum and not expect to get good and bad opinion's....quote author=jrebel link=topic=177408.msg2348672#msg2348672 date=1435815788]
If an archery hunter shot a calf elk legally, would you guys complain about him posting pics of his kill on the internet??   :dunno: :dunno:

What's the difference??
I would that's poor ethics in my opinion  :dunno: shooting any baby animal should be illegal in my opinion.If you can feel good about that there isn't much lower you can go.

Where do you draw the line.  You have condemned lots of hunter on this sight for shooting button nub spikes (blactails) and 150lb first year calf elk.  Do you feel the same about people who shoot does too because they are shooting some babies momma???

My point is simple......if it is legal it is legal.  You don't have to like it!!  Everyone does not have to share your opinion / ethics / morals / values ect...ect...ect...  Why should that person feel bad about posting a pic of there legally killed animal?  You big buck dead on a hillside with bloody tongue hanging out is just as offensive to antis as my cow / calf elk.  Who cares as long as it is legal.  People are always gonna complain about something and you will never make everyone happy.  So in closing.....do your thing and don't worry about others.   Also don't try and impose your ethics on others.  "About as low as you can go"...... Rapist theives and murderers are above a person that legally shoots a first year (5month old) button buck!!  Surely you don't believe that.
[/quote]
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Miles on July 02, 2015, 06:15:34 AM
Bearpaw should see if Kotex will sponsor the forum.  There's obviously a bunch of members that could use some.
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: 257 Wby Mag on July 02, 2015, 06:26:36 AM
Boy that's a fact!! Ain too much that don't hurt people's feelers anymore it seems... Nice work on the pups bud I'll kill everyone I see as well.
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: jackelope on July 02, 2015, 07:44:28 AM
If an archery hunter shot a calf elk legally, would you guys complain about him posting pics of his kill on the internet??   :dunno: :dunno:

What's the difference??
I would that's poor ethics in my opinion  :dunno: shooting any baby animal should be illegal in my opinion.If you can feel good about that there isn't much lower you can go.

Where do you draw the line.  You have condemned lots of hunter on this sight for shooting button nub spikes (blactails) and 150lb first year calf elk.  Do you feel the same about people who shoot does too because they are shooting some babies momma???

My point is simple......if it is legal it is legal.  You don't have to like it!!  Everyone does not have to share your opinion / ethics / morals / values ect...ect...ect...  Why should that person feel bad about posting a pic of there legally killed animal?  You big buck dead on a hillside with bloody tongue hanging out is just as offensive to antis as my cow / calf elk.  Who cares as long as it is legal.  People are always gonna complain about something and you will never make everyone happy.  So in closing.....do your thing and don't worry about others.   Also don't try and impose your ethics on others.  "About as low as you can go"...... Rapist theives and murderers are above a person that legally shoots a first year (5month old) button buck!!  Surely you don't believe that.

I draw the line at feeling the need to post pictures of the pups on the internet. GO ahead and do it, just don't post pictures. I look at it as showing off. There's no need for that in our hunting community.
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Jonathan_S on July 02, 2015, 08:04:10 AM
I would shoot them too, 100%  I would not post pictures of it, 100%
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: CoryTDF on July 02, 2015, 08:35:28 AM
I have killed more coyote pups than I can count. A coyote is a coyote age is not important. That said the anti will literally use anything to try and smear hunters. As far as damage goes I know a guy that used to kill coyote pups like crazy in his orchard because they chew off the sprinkler tips and the pvc pipe. So I guess it just depends on what type of damage you are talking about.

In the end it's a coyote. %99 of the people on this forum and in general don't sell the hides I'm sure of that. Fur buyers are few and far between and in the end the juice is not worth the squeeze most of the time. Coyote hunting is mostly done for management purposes. So, in that regard young, old,  little, big, fat, skinny, mangy, and healthy they all end up being classified as the same thing... a coyote.

My only reason to wait is that I hate hot weather and prefer to chase them in the snow. I will however smoke any coyote at any time if given the opportunity. They are an important part of the eco system and some of them do need to survive. That's why god makes misfires, dead FoxPro batteries, frozen calls, and millions of other reasons why we will never kill them all nor should we.

Anyway, good on the OP for thinning the numbers and saving some other critters. The pictures are only 2 months away from being completely acceptable by everybody on this site.     
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Jonathan_S on July 02, 2015, 08:37:27 AM
Cory, that was almost a RadSav length post.
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: whitey on July 02, 2015, 08:55:59 AM
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD MAN!!! :bash:
HERE IT GOES AGAIN.. :yike:
Nice shooting. :tup:

Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: NRA4LIFE on July 02, 2015, 09:10:46 AM
I would have liked to see 3 of them.
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: pashok23 on July 02, 2015, 10:13:33 AM
Well done  :tup:
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: CoryTDF on July 02, 2015, 10:20:14 AM
Cory, that was almost a RadSav length post.

We all have to aspire to be something... :chuckle:
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Rainier10 on July 02, 2015, 10:32:54 AM
Legal yes.  Would I do the same probably not, would I post the pics no.

Everybody has their own idea of what is acceptable.  That is why they make the regulations, the regulations say you can shoot them.  There is no rule about posting and so it is up to each individual to decide and the line for what is acceptable varies from person to person.  They do teach in hunter safety that the majority of citizens in Washington don't hunt and to be mindful of their opinion.

Just my  :twocents:
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Scvette on July 02, 2015, 02:02:25 PM
:yike: Lots of Midol needed for most of you with your panties in a bunch. I don't give 2 chits who thinks this is wrong no matter your reason its not you dealing with over 25 active denning sites on this 1000 acre piece of ground -- the middle :tup:

No one said your wrong for shooting them! Just not right to post pics on a open forum,just makes us hunters look bad in the eyes of on hunters is all.
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Scvette on July 02, 2015, 02:27:10 PM
Oh since some have a opinion on posting those pics,you don't like it so we should leave. Here's one I like to use on my wife. Obviously your upset,calm down go get a midol and you'll feel better later. 
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: 257 Wby Mag on July 02, 2015, 02:32:10 PM
:yike: Lots of Midol needed for most of you with your panties in a bunch. I don't give 2 chits who thinks this is wrong no matter your reason its not you dealing with over 25 active denning sites on this 1000 acre piece of ground -- the middle :tup:

No one said your wrong for shooting them! Just not right to post pics on a open forum,just makes us hunters look bad in the eyes of on hunters is all.

I would pose this question to Dale, why was this site started if not to share stories and pictures?

I'm not wrong for sharing pictures, if I was, everyone on here would be wrong for posting pictures of any dead animal :twocents: get over yourselves or off this site.

I agree bud, shoot everyone ya see in the face!! Then wrap em in a confederate flag for the next pic!! That'll piss some folks off..
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: mburrows on July 02, 2015, 02:55:11 PM
I dont have a problem with predotar control in any legal form. Posting pics of any killed baby animal isnt in our best interest as a group though.  :twocents:
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: mfswallace on July 02, 2015, 02:58:05 PM
Does this make them look older...

What's the difference between this and the fifty pound bears that are routinely posted?

Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Scvette on July 02, 2015, 03:02:47 PM
.

Now you'd be really cool if you could go find some baby bobcats,maybe some baby geese,kill them and post those pics.  :chuckle:
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: face on July 02, 2015, 04:23:31 PM
Great job mfswallace . Love the post " shot him in the noggin" . if you dont like,then dont look. babies
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: jrebel on July 02, 2015, 04:52:21 PM
Does this make them look older...

What's the difference between this and the fifty pound bears that are routinely posted?

 :yeah:

Totally agree.  I love seeing any legally killed / hunted animal.  Even the 150 lb elk, 40lb blacktail button nubs, 50lb bear and coyote pups.  Cannot believe how naive some of you guys are to think this gives hunters a bad name any more than the 180 class mule deer buck that gets posted in the fall.  Anti hunters don't hate hunting because people kill certain animals........they don't like any animal being killed.  We actually give antis more firepower by arguing amongst ourselves over something stupid like this. 

Take emotion out of it and look at the facts.  Nothing wrong with the op's post if you do that.
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: JimmyHoffa on July 02, 2015, 04:59:36 PM
Does this make them look older...

What's the difference between this and the fifty pound bears that are routinely posted?

 :yeah:

Totally agree.  I love seeing any legally killed / hunted animal.  Even the 150 lb elk, 40lb blacktail button nubs, 50lb bear and coyote pups.  Cannot believe how naive some of you guys are to think this gives hunters a bad name any more than the 180 class mule deer buck that gets posted in the fall.  Anti hunters don't hate hunting because people kill certain animals........they don't like any animal being killed.  We actually give antis more firepower by arguing amongst ourselves over something stupid like this. 

Take emotion out of it and look at the facts.  Nothing wrong with the op's post if you do that.
Antis will never be happy.  A few are more upset about the big bulls and bucks because they say hunters target the healthiest and leave the weaker animals for procreating.
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: grundy53 on July 02, 2015, 05:57:49 PM
I have killed more coyote pups than I can count. A coyote is a coyote age is not important. That said the anti will literally use anything to try and smear hunters. As far as damage goes I know a guy that used to kill coyote pups like crazy in his orchard because they chew off the sprinkler tips and the pvc pipe. So I guess it just depends on what type of damage you are talking about.

In the end it's a coyote. %99 of the people on this forum and in general don't sell the hides I'm sure of that. Fur buyers are few and far between and in the end the juice is not worth the squeeze most of the time. Coyote hunting is mostly done for management purposes. So, in that regard young, old,  little, big, fat, skinny, mangy, and healthy they all end up being classified as the same thing... a coyote.

My only reason to wait is that I hate hot weather and prefer to chase them in the snow. I will however smoke any coyote at any time if given the opportunity. They are an important part of the eco system and some of them do need to survive. That's why god makes misfires, dead FoxPro batteries, frozen calls, and millions of other reasons why we will never kill them all nor should we.

Anyway, good on the OP for thinning the numbers and saving some other critters. The pictures are only 2 months away from being completely acceptable by everybody on this site.     
Exactly.
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: fullpipe77 on July 04, 2015, 03:05:09 PM
Yep coyote little or big is still just a coyote except now its dead!  I will admit I've shot a few little guys and it is more shooting the grown-ups.  Keep shooting!
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: mfswallace on July 04, 2015, 04:17:10 PM
Checking a trailcam and left the .22 40ft away over a fence in the truck, four GIANT pups come out of a den 20ft away :bash: I'll be back there soon   :bfg:
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: BGLEMIN on July 04, 2015, 04:42:50 PM
Wonder what Darwin would think of this? Shooting the pups will make the bitch go back in heat...food for thought. The objective of management has only hastened procreation. As far as the debate whether you've given antis more fuel, that's exactly what they want. They want for you to be so paranoid about what you do that you'll stop doing it. Would you feel the same when carrying your .45 on your hip like a proud 2A supporter? Or maybe you no longer carrying your .45 because your worried someone might not like it!
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: bearpaw on July 04, 2015, 05:05:59 PM
What is funny is that both sides are right.

It is predator management and it is fuel for anti's. Even worse, it is fuel for those on the fence about hunting and predator control.

Personally I don't have a big problem with the predator control aspect but I don't like to see pics like this on the internet.

My exact thoughts!
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: BGLEMIN on July 04, 2015, 06:47:41 PM
Way to go Scvette, calling out names against a fellow forume member!!! You just became an anti in my book. Hope the OP does post more, why not he's proud of what he does. Are you sir proud of what you do with your locker room banter?
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: BGLEMIN on July 04, 2015, 07:02:27 PM
Here's a calf that I did not hesitate to shoot. One weekend to hunt , bet your a$$ I'm not gonna pass!! I only post this now since there seems to be an overwhelming agreement that only mature animal pics are worthy of view. Still can't understand why a couple pups could create such dissent amongst a community structured around legal take? Or why one should be ashamed for posting there success. Perhaps the showcasing of Jakes should be chastised too, I mean come on shouldn't only birds with full fans be shot? What does grind my gears is why can't some be more tasteful in regards to the photos they take and submit? (https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F15%2F07%2F04%2Ffc4c8b4b01699c190f7d870f3ba31d91.jpg&hash=601dedc0e9931882a5ed7776df3c240c934971d1)
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Landowner on July 04, 2015, 07:06:23 PM
Way to go Scvette, calling out names against a fellow forume member!!! You just became an anti in my book. Hope the OP does post more, why not he's proud of what he does. Are you sir proud of what you do with your locker room banter?

I have no problem with Scvette's post.  Kill all the coyotes one wants to drop.  But consider leaving the dead pups off the web.  Can't see the connection to pride as a reason for posting 'em. 
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Landowner on July 04, 2015, 07:17:12 PM
.....What does grind my gears is why can't some be more tasteful in regards to the photos they take and submit?

Your post highlights the bone of contention here---what is tasteful.   I would not have posted that calf.  Then again, I don't see the sport in killing calves and fawns.   Each to their own.
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: stevemiller on July 04, 2015, 07:38:55 PM
The other side of this to me is,The antis are mostly for abortion so to look at this as baby animals should not be a prob. for them.Unless they are hypocrites that is  :chuckle: Seriously though,I would shoot them at any age just dont agree with pics as i have stated so many times in the past,Its just not worth it.if they didnt have our pics how could they get the followers that they have?  :twocents:
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: BGLEMIN on July 04, 2015, 07:59:37 PM
Guy I did not shoot the calf for "sport". I harvested that animal because if I didn't, I would not have had elk in my freezer. Boned out and processed I fed my family with 70 lbs. of truly natural meat, some of the best this world could offer. And I am proud that I could be blessed to take and showcase such an awesome animal!

Why are the OP's pics not tastefull? Nothing derogatory was seen. Oh but wait...they're pups,

The problem that I have with Scvette's post is that he chose to label a fellow hunter whom has not lam basted him with a name; but yet is slammed with a name as far as I can tell as Richard Head.

Is that necessary? Look at the dissension that is rising amongst us hunters.  And yet this discussion has escalated due to what the anti's could feed from.

If I hated hunting and I read through these comments, I would think "Oh yeah they're gonna destroy each other before we get a chance!"

I commend any and all for posting  ANY success photo, poor taste is when you choose to portray the animal with inappropriate props or to be inappropriate with how you choose to display yourself with the animal.

There is a lot to say about "pride" and conversely "humility" with our posts!!
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Bigshooter on July 04, 2015, 08:41:11 PM
Bearpaw should see if Kotex will sponsor the forum.  There's obviously a bunch of members that could use some.

 :yeah:
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Scvette on July 04, 2015, 08:51:34 PM
Guy I did not shoot the calf for "sport". I harvested that animal because if I didn't, I would not have had elk in my freezer. Boned out and processed I fed my family with 70 lbs. of truly natural meat, some of the best this world could offer. And I am proud that I could be blessed to take and showcase such an awesome animal!

Why are the OP's pics not tastefull? Nothing derogatory was seen. Oh but wait...they're pups,

The problem that I have with Scvette's post is that he chose to label a fellow hunter whom has not lam basted him with a name; but yet is slammed with a name as far as I can tell as Richard Head.

Is that necessary? Look at the dissension that is rising amongst us hunters.  And yet this discussion has escalated due to what the anti's could feed from.

If I hated hunting and I read through these comments, I would think "Oh yeah they're gonna destroy each other before we get a chance!"

I commend any and all for posting  ANY success photo, poor taste is when you choose to portray the animal with inappropriate props or to be inappropriate with how you choose to display yourself with the animal.

There is a lot to say about "pride" and conversely "humility" with our posts!!

It's not the issue about shooting them,get over it. The op removed his posts that he told me if I don't like it I should leave the forum. If you notice,pretty much everyone,except a few think the same about posting those pics.
Good for you harvesting that animal for your family,wonder how the young coyotes taste,see any difference. If you don't then you just don't get it.
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Landowner on July 04, 2015, 08:52:41 PM
Bearpaw should see if Kotex will sponsor the forum.  There's obviously a bunch of members that could use some.

 :yeah:

Start with some reputable hunting magazines.  Good sponsors there, and good examples of pics that work.   
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Scvette on July 04, 2015, 08:59:04 PM
Way to go Scvette, calling out names against a fellow forume member!!! You just became an anti in my book. Hope the OP does post more, why not he's proud of what he does. Are you sir proud of what you do with your locker room banter?

There you go,you feel better now,I don't know what you could possibly be talking about,I don't see any post where I called anyone a bad name.
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: mfswallace on July 04, 2015, 09:01:22 PM
What is funny is that both sides are right.

It is predator management and it is fuel for anti's. Even worse, it is fuel for those on the fence about hunting and predator control.

Personally I don't have a big problem with the predator control aspect but I don't like to see pics like this on the internet.

My exact thoughts!

U mean small bears, squirrels, rock chucks, Jake's and baby wallabies shouldn't be posted online :dunno:
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Bigshooter on July 04, 2015, 09:19:14 PM
Bearpaw should see if Kotex will sponsor the forum.  There's obviously a bunch of members that could use some.

 :yeah:

Start with some reputable hunting magazines.  Good sponsors there, and good examples of pics that work.

Kotex by Landowner........for when you have heavy flow.
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Bigshooter on July 04, 2015, 09:24:09 PM
If you are worried about 2 dead coyote pups being posted on a hunting forum then the anti's have already won. 
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: stevemiller on July 04, 2015, 09:24:39 PM
wow thats rich  :yeah:2  (reply 66)  where was this at bigshooter when there were so many whining about the draw odds in WA.?Same members pointing at others and doing saying whatever they want.I thought no one was supposed to call out a specific member when poking at them.I guess it DEPENDS on who the member is that is poking and who the member is being poked,is that it?
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Bigshooter on July 04, 2015, 09:30:21 PM
wow thats rich  :yeah:2  (reply 66)  where was this at bigshooter when there were so many whining about the draw odds in WA.?Same members pointing at others and doing saying whatever they want.I thought no one was supposed to call out a specific member when poking at them.I guess it DEPENDS on who the member is that is poking and who the member is being poked,is that it?

I guess people whining about draw odds doesn't bother me as much as someone one acting like they are better than someone else.   :tup:
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Bigshooter on July 04, 2015, 09:36:27 PM
The other side of this to me is,The antis are mostly for abortion so to look at this as baby animals should not be a prob. for them.Unless they are hypocrites that is  :chuckle: Seriously though,I would shoot them at any age just dont agree with pics as i have stated so many times in the past,Its just not worth it.if they didnt have our pics how could they get the followers that they have?  :twocents:

The anti's are nothing more than terrorists.  And unlike you and others on here I will not surrender to a group of terrorists.  Once you have surrendered they have won.  I see no problem posting dead animals of any age on a HUNTING FORUM as long as they were legally taken.
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: stevemiller on July 04, 2015, 09:39:01 PM
I said exactly that  :yeah:  about 2 years ago on here and all you old timer members ran me into the ground,Now because you are on the other side of the issue its diff. FlIP FLOP MUCH?
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Landowner on July 04, 2015, 09:44:00 PM
Bearpaw should see if Kotex will sponsor the forum.  There's obviously a bunch of members that could use some.

 :yeah:

Start with some reputable hunting magazines.  Good sponsors there, and good examples of pics that work.

Kotex by Landowner........for when you have heavy flow.

Lol.  Post some 6 inch perch here so we can question your manhood as well.   
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Bigshooter on July 04, 2015, 09:46:26 PM
I said exactly that  :yeah:  about 2 years ago on here and all you old timer members ran me into the ground,Now because you are on the other side of the issue its diff. FlIP FLOP MUCH?

I don't recall what your talking about but I will say I have gotten wiser with age. 

If I was a politician I might be insulted by the flip flop jab but let me remind you again this is a hunting site so I find it funny.   :chuckle:
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Bigshooter on July 04, 2015, 09:50:02 PM
Bearpaw should see if Kotex will sponsor the forum.  There's obviously a bunch of members that could use some.

 :yeah:

Start with some reputable hunting magazines.  Good sponsors there, and good examples of pics that work.

Kotex by Landowner........for when you have heavy flow.

Lol.  Post some 6 inch perch here so we can question your manhood as well.   

O great......so you cry about people keeping what they catch too?   :chuckle: :chuckle:

I smell a troll.
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: stevemiller on July 04, 2015, 09:52:08 PM
Me as well sir.Now back on topic,The only reason i have changed my stance on pics like these is because of what almost happened last year with the coyote derby and will prob. continue to come up every year.pics like these dont help.sure i agree 100% we should but until we can get some kind of a hold on whats going on in this country we should tone down the pics a little,just my 2 cents of course.When a large portion of the hunters agree that we should that should mean something to us all.Another big thing that this particular thread is doing that i think is even worse than the pic is the hunters against the hunters again,I have said it time and time again that this is what is defeating us and that my friend is what a lot of hunters on this forum are flip flopping about.  :twocents:
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: stevemiller on July 04, 2015, 09:54:26 PM
Bearpaw should see if Kotex will sponsor the forum.  There's obviously a bunch of members that could use some.

 :yeah:

Start with some reputable hunting magazines.  Good sponsors there, and good examples of pics that work.

Kotex by Landowner........for when you have heavy flow.

Lol.  Post some 6 inch perch here so we can question your manhood as well.   
if its legal and i can fry it or can it why not?might be about as big as they get.  :chuckle:
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Landowner on July 04, 2015, 09:56:26 PM
Bearpaw should see if Kotex will sponsor the forum.  There's obviously a bunch of members that could use some.

 :yeah:

Start with some reputable hunting magazines.  Good sponsors there, and good examples of pics that work.

Kotex by Landowner........for when you have heavy flow.

Lol.  Post some 6 inch perch here so we can question your manhood as well.   

O great......so you cry about people keeping what they catch too?   :chuckle: :chuckle:

I smell a troll.

Funny, I read your defense of the pup pics and smell something a whole lot worse.  Defenseless position, but keep up the good work.   
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: KopperBuck on July 04, 2015, 10:04:06 PM
Nice work mfswallace!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Bigshooter on July 04, 2015, 10:04:28 PM
Bearpaw should see if Kotex will sponsor the forum.  There's obviously a bunch of members that could use some.

 :yeah:

Start with some reputable hunting magazines.  Good sponsors there, and good examples of pics that work.

Kotex by Landowner........for when you have heavy flow.

Lol.  Post some 6 inch perch here so we can question your manhood as well.   

O great......so you cry about people keeping what they catch too?   :chuckle: :chuckle:

I smell a troll.

Funny, I read your defense of the pup pics and smell something a whole lot worse.  Defenseless position, but keep up the good work.   

Defenseless?  You're joking or ignorant.  If it's not breaking the law I have no need to defend it.  You are the one saying that it is wrong.  So you are the one that needs to defend your position.  Not I.
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Scvette on July 04, 2015, 10:10:03 PM
Nobody is saying anything about breaking the law,being your from Lewis county I make it simple for you.
Killing young animals in season= good
Posting pictures = bad

Ok now

Oh and you can save the part about must be a troll,cause I don't have 45 million posts like you do. I'll try to catch up,but I have more in my life.
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Bigshooter on July 04, 2015, 10:16:10 PM
Nobody is saying anything about breaking the law,being your from Lewis county I make it simple for you.
Killing young animals in season= good
Posting pictures = bad

Ok now

Being since your from Thurston county I think that it is a safe bet that you have fallen for the liberal anti BS.   And because of this I'm not surprised that you would think that posting pics would be bad.

OK now


Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Bigshooter on July 04, 2015, 10:21:20 PM
Nobody is saying anything about breaking the law,being your from Lewis county I make it simple for you.
Killing young animals in season= good
Posting pictures = bad

Ok now

Oh and you can save the part about must be a troll,cause I don't have 45 million posts like you do. I'll try to catch up,but I have more in my life.
:chuckle: :chuckle:  It must suck when there is nothing better in your life than to come on an open forum and try to insult people.  Go carry on with your busy life.  :chuckle: :chuckle:

Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Scvette on July 04, 2015, 10:32:02 PM
Nobody is saying anything about breaking the law,being your from Lewis county I make it simple for you.
Killing young animals in season= good
Posting pictures = bad

Ok now

Oh and you can save the part about must be a troll,cause I don't have 45 million posts like you do. I'll try to catch up,but I have more in my life.
:chuckle: :chuckle:  It must suck when there is nothing better in your life than to come on an open forum and try to insult people.  Go carry on with your busy life.  :chuckle: :chuckle:

And you don't insult people in any of your posts.  :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle: do you read what you write.  :chuckle: :chuckle:
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: Bigshooter on July 04, 2015, 10:41:13 PM
Nobody is saying anything about breaking the law,being your from Lewis county I make it simple for you.
Killing young animals in season= good
Posting pictures = bad

Ok now

Oh and you can save the part about must be a troll,cause I don't have 45 million posts like you do. I'll try to catch up,but I have more in my life.
:chuckle: :chuckle:  It must suck when there is nothing better in your life than to come on an open forum and try to insult people.  Go carry on with your busy life.  :chuckle: :chuckle:

And you don't insult people in any of your posts.  :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle: do you read what you write.  :chuckle: :chuckle:
I win.   :IBCOOL:  :IBCOOL:  :IBCOOL:
Title: Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad
Post by: jackelope on July 04, 2015, 10:48:00 PM
Locked. This thread has run its course and is now a meaningless pissing match.

Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk 2

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal