Hunting Washington Forum
Big Game Hunting => Other Big Game => Topic started by: WAcoyotehunter on October 20, 2015, 02:50:15 PM
-
I wonder how much Inslee is going to get in campaign contributions from these groups during the next election??? What a crock. My thoughts are pretty clear :)
http://www.spokesman.com/blogs/outdoors/2015/oct/20/gov-inslee-nixes-cougar-hunting-quota-increases-overrules-wildlife-panel
Gov. Inslee nixes cougar hunting quota increases; overrules wildlife panel
HUNTING -- Answering an appeal filed by eight wildlife-protection groups, Gov. Jay Inslee has struck down increases in cougar hunting quotas approved for this year by the Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission.
Inslee said an amendment proposed at the April commission meeting to increase cougar hunting quotas by one-to-three animals in some designated areas was done without proper advance notice to the public. The citizen panel approved the increase by a 7-1 vote.
This may be the first time a Washington governor has forced the reversal of an action taken by the Fish and Wildlife Commission, said Bruce Botka, state Fish and Wildlife Department spokesman in Olympia.
"We will be reviewing the governor’s action with our assistant attorneys general and the commission and will identify management options moving forward," Botka said. "We had already planned to work with the commission next spring to review cougar hunting rules for the 2016-17 and 2017-18 seasons."
Inslee announced his action Monday in a letter to the Humane Society of the United States as well as other parties involved in the administrative appeal -- the Center for Biological Diversity, Mountain Lion Foundation, Wolf Haven International, The Cougar Fund, The Lands Council (based in Spokane), Predator Defense, Kettle Range Conservation Group and Gary Koehler, a former Fish and Wildlife Department research scientist.
The groups pointed out that in the published proposal going into the April meeting, state wildlife managers had proposed quotas estimated to be 12-16 percent of the cougar population in designated game management areas.
Biologists wrote that this was a "sustainable harvest rate" for mountain lions. They also pointed out in the proposal that "harvest rates in excess of 16 percent can result in declines in core populations of breeding females, and excessive male harvest rates result in the loss of adult male territorial (behavior), which acts as a regulatory mechanism for local male cougar members."
Based on those statements in the published proposal, the groups appealed saying that the public had no reason to suspect Commissioner Miranda Wecker of Naselle would offer a last-minute amendment to slightly increase the quotas.
After the groups' June 30 rulemaking appeal to the commission was denied by the panel in August, the groups stepped up the appeal to the governor.
In proposing her cougar quota increase at the April 9-10 meeting, Wecker said, "The logic is that we have tremendous social conflict under way. I don’t believe that in any of these GMUs the small changes that I’ve proposed will make a difference in the health of cougar populations. I’ve been assured by staff that is the case.…
"It will have a beneficial effect, I believe, of giving some consideration to that communities that live in these GMUs in which wolf packs are now operating."
The commission then voted to increase the restrictive cougar harvest guideline to 17-21 percent in several Eastern Washington game management areas.
Inslee's decision is based on a procedural rule and does not address the wildlife biology involved.
But the appealing groups are quick to fill that gap.
"The Fish and Wildlife Commission decided to kill more cougars after ignoring the public and its own scientists," said Collette Adkins, an attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity. "Its knee-jerk decision needed to be reversed, and we’re overjoyed that the governor agreed with us.”
"The commission’s decision also ignored a 13-year, Washington-based scientific study that cost taxpayers approximately $5 million," she said. "The study showed that killing cougars at such high levels might exacerbate conflicts with people and livestock and would do nothing to prevent future cougar attacks or make people safer."
But hunters, who tend to be seeing a remarkable number of cougars this year, say the animal groups are making the cougar quota situation a bigger deal than it is.
"I am 100 percent in support of the quota system and protecting cat populations," said Bart George, a wildlife biologist with the Kalispel Tribe and a houndsman often called by state wildlife officials to help them deal with problem cougars and bears.
However, George says, a "12-14 percent harvest rate is a worthless measure (for indicating sustainable cougar numbers) when we have no idea what the population is. It's an estimate at best. The whole thing is a bad joke."
-
Can't you change it to black type. The red is a killer to try to read.
-
sorry- it's done. Read away :)
-
I guess making the switch to predator huntin on the west side is the best move I can make!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I547 using Tapatalk
-
Inslee's decision is based on a procedural rule and does not address the wildlife biology involved.
Wow. Never has the phrase "nothing more needs to be said" ever been applied more appropriately.
-
What a bunch of b.s.
-
Would like to be able to say I'm shocked....but that would make me a liar
-
Stupid...... Atleast your thoughts were quoted in the article
-
I looked over the WA State Constitution and I do not see where the Governor has authority to Veto Commission rules.
Can anybody point me to a section that gives him this power?
It looks to me like he has unconstitutionally exceeded his authority.
Maybe I'm wrong but I would like to have this explained.
-
I Thought that is why the Commission was set up to begin with To supposedly be non partisan in decisions and use the Biology
-
Seems like all of these eco-antihunting groups control OUR, WDFW and our DEMOCRAT GOVERNOR.
-
Bad joke is right. Inslee proves he is an idiot in case there was any doubt. :bash:
-
Disgusting :bash:
Sent from my E6782 using Tapatalk
-
Inslee announced his action Monday in a letter to the Humane Society of the United States as well as other parties involved in the administrative appeal -- the Center for Biological Diversity, Mountain Lion Foundation, Wolf Haven International, The Cougar Fund, The Lands Council (based in Spokane), Predator Defense, Kettle Range Conservation Group and Gary Koehler, a former Fish and Wildlife Department research scientist.
Yet we are supposed to believe these very same groups won't do the exact same thing with wolves....
Sent from my E6782 using Tapatalk
-
We'll see how this affects the animal population in this part of the state, that most likely gets hit the hardest from cougar kills....idiots. These groups don't even live here except the, Kettle Range Conservancy. That group is our local enemy that we fight with all the time about ATV riding.. :bash:
-
Pretty much speechless ..Inslee is a quack , just the the idiots he supports ... This state is the worst when it comes to managing wildlife ..Some day it will all come to head and it will be bad !!! The wildlife should be managed by the WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT ...Not by anti groups and all the anti public ! Bear and cougar are plentiful in our state and no reason why they should not be controlled ..Well, I guess they let us harvest 2 bears so I guess I should leave the bear out of this ...lmao !
-
Bummer, So what can we do to support proper predator management? I would support couger tags being rafle tags and those tags can be hunted with hounds. I,D,K. that way the tags would actually be filled without having to increase the tags in a gmu. higher sucess with same amount of tags. Then I think about my neighbors on the east side of the state. Wolf population is increasing, there are lots of cougars, and coyotes then when deer season comes they get a flood of us coasties putting tons of pressure on the deer. Whats gonna happen to our white tail and Mullie populations? Somehow we as hunters have got to get involved and find a way to support groups that are fighting for common sense game management, I dont know of any groups so if somone does can they post them please.In the mean time maybe we can share resources and intel on effective ways of hunting cougars without hounds so we can give our favorite GMU'S and chance for good deer populations.Lets do our dilligence to fill that cougar tag.
-
Why doesn't Inslee start saving some $$ on some of these state programs if he is just going to decide what he wants anyway? Why even hire biologists, have wildlife commission, hold all these wolf meetings, have mule deer management meetings, etc.? Sounds like he could save the state a lot of money by just making all the decisions himself..........
-
Just to be clear, the quota was killed by the governor, not the anti-hunting groups. He could've chosen to listen to science instead of whining. He chose to listen to the whining. I'd like to move to another state. If my wife would have it, I'd put the house up today. I'm sick of this state and the lack of substance over emotion.
-
I heard on the news - yeah, I know - that the justification for the quota increase being killed was that it was not subject to a public comment period. Anyone know whether the implementation of the quota system was subject to a public comment period?
-
Well, we're screwed if wildlife has to be managed based on public comment. The majority are going to say no to shooting any cougars or any wolves.......they probably also don't want coyotes shot or a season for bears. :twocents:
-
Everytime I hear that stuttering fool speak, this is what I visualize :chuckle:
-
I don't like the way this is going, reminds me of how the public was able to take away our hounds :yike:
-
I heard on the news - yeah, I know - that the justification for the quota increase being killed was that it was not subject to a public comment period. Anyone know whether the implementation of the quota system was subject to a public comment period?
Well, there was a thread about it on here when it was in the works, myself and some others wrote letters supporting the quota increase. It was public knowledge, there was time to comment for anybody who cared to do so.
http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,178474.msg2363329.html#msg2363329
-
I don't like the way this is going, reminds me of how the public was able to take away our hounds :yike:
Yeah the kitties are thriving with no natural predators. Find the deer, you'll find the cats. Imagine if the never increased quota or decreased it. Could get bad for all the other critters.
-
"The commission’s decision also ignored a 13-year, Washington-based scientific study that cost taxpayers approximately $5 million," she said. "The study showed that killing cougars at such high levels might exacerbate conflicts with people and livestock and would do nothing to prevent future cougar attacks or make people safer."
1) where was the publics input on whether or not we should spend $5 million on that study?
2) "MIGHT exacerbate conflicts? So they base the entire change on cat hunting on a $5 million guess?
Sounds a awful lot like last years bad "guess" that resulted in handing out 1000 extra doe tags in the Methow.
-
Check this out. "Lets be clear, nobody eats cougar" they say. And theyre implying that the reason for the increased quota was to prevent attacks on people. Ridiculous. http://blog.humanesociety.org/wayne/2015/10/washington-gov-nixes-cougar-killing-plan.html#comment-6498
-
I pointed both of these inaccuracies out in the replies and they deleted my post in less than 5 minutes. Imagine that.
-
I pointed both of these inaccuracies out in the replies and they deleted my post in less than 5 minutes. Imagine that.
It's not about truth...
-
I pointed both of these inaccuracies out in the replies and they deleted my post in less than 5 minutes. Imagine that.
It's not about truth...
Oh im well aware. Doesnt it mean anything to them that they have to lie to support the agenda?? If the truth about something doesnt support your argument, then your cause is wrong.
-
"Estimates put Washington's cougar population at over 3,000 animals, with more than 200 a year killed by hunters." That adds up to 6.67%
"The recommended quota, based on in-state university research, has been 12 to 16 percent of the cougar population – but the commission increased the number to 17 to 21 percent in some hunting management units."
So we could kill over 400 a year and still be in the recommended quota :bash:
http://www.publicnewsservice.org/2015-07-06/animal-welfare/animal-rights-groups-challenge-washington-cougar-hunt-quota/a46988-1
We don't even come close to filling recommended cougar harvest according to the research. This state is going to unmanage it's self to total chaos! Before we know it we will be public commented right out of beloved passions to the anti common sence folks
-
I pointed both of these inaccuracies out in the replies and they deleted my post in less than 5 minutes. Imagine that.
It's not about truth...
Doesnt it mean anything to them that they have to lie to support the agenda??
Um no.......as with most libs, the actual truth or facts are of no concern.
-
I just posted a comment, we'll see if the delete mine too..Yep, they didn't post mine either...
I just checked, mine is in the comment section.....I guess they can't read.
-
I heard on the news - yeah, I know - that the justification for the quota increase being killed was that it was not subject to a public comment period. Anyone know whether the implementation of the quota system was subject to a public comment period?
Well, there was a thread about it on here when it was in the works, myself and some others wrote letters supporting the quota increase. It was public knowledge, there was time to comment for anybody who cared to do so.
http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,178474.msg2363329.html#msg2363329
They won't be happy with comment periods either, they'll want town hall meetings, visits by politicians, long drawn out impact studies, etc. The Navy is going through the greenie stall tactics over here. They want to do some training, but the greenies are all over the FS trying to prevent the permit. Long comment period that only got maybe 100 comments. But the greenies ran to lawyers, Reps/Sens, now have change.org petitions, weekly newsletters have to be put out. Guess they needed enough time to get all their support from California, New York, UK, France, etc to inflate their numbers. They are even trying to find ways to get the guy from the FS fired because he isn't 'representing their interest'.
-
This whole thing makes me sick to my stomach...
-
I pointed both of these inaccuracies out in the replies and they deleted my post in less than 5 minutes. Imagine that.
I don't know what you expected. HSUS makes their living by telling lies. They would have to go out of business if they told the truth.
-
I just posted a comment, we'll see if the delete mine too..Yep, they didn't post mine either...
I just checked, mine is in the comment section.....I guess they can't read.
Actually, your comment somehow made it past the moderators, but mine didnt so i reposted it. I think its pretty civilized, not insulting. We will see if it makes it this time.
The article says “lets be clear, nobody eats cougars” This is incorrect, cougar meat is highly prized, people eat cougar all the time. In fact, in WA you are legally required to salvage the meat from a cougar you kill. The article also is implying that the reason for the quota increase is to prevent cougar attacks on people. It was actually proposed as a way to help adjust for the increased predation on our deer elk and moose from the growing wolf population. The quota increase is only for areas with the highest wolf densities.
-
Let's all go comment over there! Try to make good sensible points that they won't delete... Because I'm sure they are fair and balanced.... 8)
-
It says this right down by the comment section. The HSUS encourages open discussion, and we invite you to share your opinion on our issues. Apparently that doesnt apply to me though.
-
It says this right down by the comment section. The HSUS encourages open discussion, and we invite you to share your opinion on our issues. Apparently that doesnt apply to me though.
I've tried posting 3 times now. Each comment was abiding by their rules. They deleted them all. Freakin commie liberals.
-
Yup, so much for their "open discussion" huh?
-
Yup, so much for their "open discussion" huh?
Yeah, I directly called them out in my last post. I'm sure they just chuckle while they hit delete. It's all about controlling information. If they control the information that the majority sees, they can sway people based on emotions.
-
I comment to the director weekly, they used to be curtious and pleasant!
Hey aren't they public servants?
-
Theyre not public servants, theyre a for profit litigation club
-
W.D.F.W.?
-
Let's see if this one gets printed. I doubt it. They only want their views to be read.
Cougars are at or above full carrying capacity – the total number of animals that can be sustained throughout the year without harm to the wildlife or the habitat – all over the state of WA. With the introduction of the grey wolf, there has been increased pressure on the ungulate herds (elk, deer, sheep), and increased human/wildlife conflict, statewide. As you may or may not be aware, when cougar populations exceed carrying capacity, the adolescent males are pushed further and further into human populations. This causes conflict and is a danger to both the wildlife and to human, pets, livestock, etc. Hunters are the tool of all wildlife agencies nationwide, to cull surplus animals, keeping wildlife populations healthy and abundant. Contrary to propaganda and myth, without hunters, many of our wildlife species wouldn’t exist today. The governor’s decision to pander to animal rights groups instead of relying on his hired experts in the field shows ignorance to proper wildlife management practices and stands in opposition to scientific study, contrary to claims by this organization. Wildlife management by popular opinion is mind-numbingly stupid. When the state wildlife biologists say that it’s time to thin the herd, they do so only after intensive research. You people claim to love animals, as do I. If you’re telling the truth about that, you’d support the experts in the field. I suggest that when you don’t your goals are other than those which are in keeping with wildlife’s best interests.
-
Let's see if this one gets printed. I doubt it. They only want their views to be read.
Cougars are at or above full carrying capacity – the total number of animals that can be sustained throughout the year without harm to the wildlife or the habitat – all over the state of WA. With the introduction of the grey wolf, there has been increased pressure on the ungulate herds (elk, deer, sheep), and increased human/wildlife conflict, statewide. As you may or may not be aware, when cougar populations exceed carrying capacity, the adolescent males are pushed further and further into human populations. This causes conflict and is a danger to both the wildlife and to human, pets, livestock, etc. Hunters are the tool of all wildlife agencies nationwide, to cull surplus animals, keeping wildlife populations healthy and abundant. Contrary to propaganda and myth, without hunters, many of our wildlife species wouldn’t exist today. The governor’s decision to pander to animal rights groups instead of relying on his hired experts in the field shows ignorance to proper wildlife management practices and stands in opposition to scientific study, contrary to claims by this organization. Wildlife management by popular opinion is mind-numbingly stupid. When the state wildlife biologists say that it’s time to thin the herd, they do so only after intensive research. You people claim to love animals, as do I. If you’re telling the truth about that, you’d support the experts in the field. I suggest that when you don’t your goals are other than those which are in keeping with wildlife’s best interests.
My comment was very similar to yours, but your a lot better with words :tup: I'll bet it gets deleted.
-
W.D.F.W.?
Thouggt he was talkinh about hsus
-
Deleting everybodys posts except campmeats. He must be a hsus spy!
-
Well pianoman yours made it. I guess mine didnt because i pointed out the fact that the entire article is deliberate misinformation.
-
Let's see if this one gets printed. I doubt it. They only want their views to be read.
Cougars are at or above full carrying capacity – the total number of animals that can be sustained throughout the year without harm to the wildlife or the habitat – all over the state of WA. With the introduction of the grey wolf, there has been increased pressure on the ungulate herds (elk, deer, sheep), and increased human/wildlife conflict, statewide. As you may or may not be aware, when cougar populations exceed carrying capacity, the adolescent males are pushed further and further into human populations. This causes conflict and is a danger to both the wildlife and to human, pets, livestock, etc. Hunters are the tool of all wildlife agencies nationwide, to cull surplus animals, keeping wildlife populations healthy and abundant. Contrary to propaganda and myth, without hunters, many of our wildlife species wouldn’t exist today. The governor’s decision to pander to animal rights groups instead of relying on his hired experts in the field shows ignorance to proper wildlife management practices and stands in opposition to scientific study, contrary to claims by this organization. Wildlife management by popular opinion is mind-numbingly stupid. When the state wildlife biologists say that it’s time to thin the herd, they do so only after intensive research. You people claim to love animals, as do I. If you’re telling the truth about that, you’d support the experts in the field. I suggest that when you don’t your goals are other than those which are in keeping with wildlife’s best interests.
Well said!! :tup: :tup:
-
Deleting everybodys posts except campmeats. He must be a hsus spy!
They saw the name and decided I was a liberal plant to get a rise out of the liberals themselves..... :tup:
-
I just posted a couple more comments....
-
They actually posted my comments and the expected response about trophy hunting and that man is the top killer of our beautiful wild animals. I have to acknowledge them for posting, at least. I'm not sure what i expected more than what I got. I can't believe these fanatics are on the WAG. :bash:
-
I highly doubt theyll let this one in either.
Everything you are saying is operating under the assumption that mature males are the ones primarily being hunted. While this may be true in states like idaho that allow hound hunting, here in washington an opportunity at any cat is a rare event, and likely a once in a lifetime opportunity for most hunters. One does not pass up a subadult or female in washington. The harvest statistics show 3 of the last 5 years having a higher female harvest than male, and average age of 2 years, so the whole thing about social structure being ruined is pretty irrelevant here since a ban on hound hunting effectively eliminates selective harvest.
-
Yeah, they're not great with logic. It'll probably be tanked or someone will start crying about mommies getting killed.
-
Bango. That's a great point you bring up. Hound hunting is the ultimate management tool. Selective harvest or no harvest. Still a sport, you treed the animal your dogs did there job. That really jerked my chain when they banned hound hunting. Had a couple buddies that did it and its a very cool sport that doesn't have to be about a kill.
Good luck convincing a lib of that! Like talking too three a year old.
-
I see a t shirt in the making. Running hounds, the only form of catch and release hunting!
Certified bunny hugger (insert pic of begal)
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I547 using Tapatalk
-
I just posted a couple more comments....
Campmeat, I saw the stupid comment on there from someone named Diana where she called you a tool because she didn't believe you about cougars being a problem for kids waiting for the school bus.
I remember the story being on the national news about the 11 year old girl in Twisp that shot a cougar.
http://www.chron.com/hunting-fishing/article/11-year-old-Twisp-girl-kills-cougar-5270222.php
The link above is from a Houston newspaper.
-
I wonder if HSUS would rather have malnourished cougars running around starving to death with no hunting or a healthy population of cougars and some hunting?
Oh wait, no need to answer that question.......it is an easy answer. :bash:
-
I wonder if HSUS would rather have malnourished cougars running around starving to death with no hunting or a healthy population of cougars and some hunting?
Oh wait, no need to answer that question.......it is an easy answer. :bash:
They don't care about animals. They care about control.
-
I just posted a couple more comments....
Campmeat, I saw the stupid comment on there from someone named Diana where she called you a tool because she didn't believe you about cougars being a problem for kids waiting for the school bus.
I remember the story being on the national news about the 11 year old girl in Twisp that shot a cougar.
http://www.chron.com/hunting-fishing/article/11-year-old-Twisp-girl-kills-cougar-5270222.php
The link above is from a Houston newspaper.
Spouting off without facts, huh Curly...
-
Yes, that is what is so frustrating about those hsus and Peta type people.
-
Inslee stated it wasn't about the biology, and he was right. He killed it because of what so many of you complain about on issues like this: the decision was made outside of allowable admin. procedures. You all want "transparency" and the ability to comment on any changes WDFW makes, so you say. But when that same issue comes up and you don't like the result, now you want it another way? The change in quota isn't a dead issue, they just would have to go back and do it "the right way", which so many of you scream for here. So let's push the commission to revisit this issue and do it by proper procedure. Send notes to the commissioners to go back over this, that you all support the increase...don't let them drop the issue.
I got a phone call from HSUS the other day, asking my opinion about cougar mgmt., this issue, and other ideas on best ways to ensure healthy cat populations. I referred him to the two-episode series of Western Extreme that went into great depth on solid mgmt. methods, and expressed a lot of other things that have been proven through studies that work. I'm sending him a digital version of the episodes, and will also have them with me at the December WAG meeting, and talk about some of those mgmt. practices during that meeting. His assumption was that all cougars seen were shot, which I told him is more true when it's a chance sighting, like most are now. But when hunting with hounds, most outfitters only recommend their hunters shooting toms.
Talk to your local commissioner and tell them we still want the quota issue passed through, and make sure proper procedure is followed, so it can't be cut down again. If the commission follows procedure and pass it again, it will stick.
-
Spoke with one of the commissioners last night at dinner about this issue. It is coming back up, with the correct procedural actions, and will be handled at the March Commissioner's meeting. He told me that when the Gov. killed this, he also said to get it back on track within the right channels so we could get it done. Go to the meeting in March if you get a chance and voice your opinion on this...and contact local commissioners to voice your support for the increase.
-
Yeah I'd seen this too. I get emails from WDFW and this is what I got.
November 4, 2015
Contact: Wildlife Program, 360-902-2515
WDFW reduces cougar harvest level
in response to Governor Inslee decision
OLYMPIA – The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) today enacted an emergency rule to restore cougar harvest rates to 12-16 percent throughout the state for the remainder of the 2015-16 hunting season.
WDFW took the action in response to direction from Gov. Jay Inslee. Last month the governor said the state Fish and Wildlife Commission erred in April when it amended the proposed state hunting rules by increasing the harvest rate to 17-21 percent of the estimated cougar population within portions of eastern Washington where wolves are present.
Responding to a petition from animal rights and environmental groups, Inslee said the commission, which sets policy for WDFW, improperly applied the state Administrative Procedure Act in amending the harvest rate. He directed the commission to restore the lower rate and to conduct a full public rulemaking process to consider changes for future hunting seasons.
Nate Pamplin, head of the WDFW Wildlife Program, said the emergency rule will take effect Jan. 1, 2016, and will remain in place until April 30, which marks the end of the 2015-16 cougar season.
While the emergency rule is in place, Pamplin said WDFW will initiate a full public rulemaking process to set cougar harvest rates for the 2016-17 and 2017-18 seasons. That process will include a review of cougar biology and statewide population trends, and analysis of research into cougar populations in areas of eastern and western Washington, he said.
Pamplin said the public will have an opportunity to comment on the proposed rule at the commission’s March 2016 meeting in Moses Lake. Adoption of the rule is tentatively scheduled for April, Pamplin said.
In its 2014 Game Management Plan, WDFW estimated the total statewide cougar population at about 3,600.
Cougar hunting is open statewide during an early general season from Sept. 1 through Dec. 31. Hunting remains open during a late season from Jan 1 through April 30, although WDFW closes cougar hunting in individual units if the harvest limit is reached before then.
Pamplin said hunters must check the WDFW website (http://wdfw.wa.gov/hunting/cougar/) or call the toll-free cougar hotline (866-364-4868) to determine whether specific areas remain open. Licenses for the 2015 season expire March 31, 2016, so hunters will need a valid 2016 cougar license to hunt in April.
:bdid:
POS INSLEE has no idea what he's doing.
-
I just posted a couple more comments....
Campmeat, I saw the stupid comment on there from someone named Diana where she called you a tool because she didn't believe you about cougars being a problem for kids waiting for the school bus.
I remember the story being on the national news about the 11 year old girl in Twisp that shot a cougar.
http://www.chron.com/hunting-fishing/article/11-year-old-Twisp-girl-kills-cougar-5270222.php
The link above is from a Houston newspaper.
When I was driving truck I seen a huge cougar putting the stalk on some kids waiting for the school bus, it was 50 yards across the highway from them kids had no idea it was there, I blew on the air horn it took off