Hunting Washington Forum

Community => Advocacy, Agencies, Access => Topic started by: Naches Sportsman on March 20, 2016, 05:51:02 PM

Title: WATV court decision.
Post by: Naches Sportsman on March 20, 2016, 05:51:02 PM: Frustrating to all the guys and gals that are responsible atv'ers. I know I will continue to wave and act like I didn't see you. :bash:

Friggen tree hugging liberals. Just imagine everything the f.s. could get done without those tree hugging groups.

http://www.spokesman.com/blogs/outdoors/2016/mar/18/forest-service-ok-watvs-blocked-must-be-revisited-court-says/
Title: Re: WATV court decision.
Post by: buckfvr on March 20, 2016, 06:20:06 PM: Potential potential potential...........thats all thats required to make something bad.
Title: Re: WATV court decision.
Post by: CAMPMEAT on March 20, 2016, 06:33:21 PM: I still can't figure why ATV/ORV vehicles are the scapegoat for ALL greenies to use ? I see more damage from jeeps/4x4 trucks, motorcycles, bulldozers, logging equipment, neglected FOREST SERVICE lands etc. I see LESS to no damage from ATV/ORV vehicles where I live than any other mobile units. It's total and 110% bullcrap why these courts rule in favor of the, enviro terrorist groups....

We have around 5-10 people in this county who denies 7200 people access to OUR LANDS....
Title: Re: WATV court decision.
Post by: timberfaller on March 20, 2016, 09:06:14 PM: "Prior to the lawsuit, the Forest Service said it could not commit any additional funding or personnel for monitoring, enforcement, or restoration of damaged areas if riders travel off-road. “We’re concerned about agency capacity to deal with illegal and harmful off-road riding. We need law enforcement’s presence out on the land, but the Forest Service is already stretched thin,” said ALPS president Karl Forsgaard."

The very first meeting I went to some 10 years ago, the above "excuse" was given!!

Don't forget, the USFS employee's Union is stacked with eco-freaks and politicians love getting paid for their vote!

The USFS wouldn't be "stretched" thin if they would FIRE most of upper management(plus get back to logging)! Its called "Redundancy" Portland would rather hire 10 paper pushers over ONE hard working, physical labor person out where NEEDED! :yike:
Title: Re: WATV court decision.
Post by: CAMPMEAT on March 21, 2016, 07:40:45 AM: Quote from: timberfaller on March 20, 2016, 09:06:14 PM
"Prior to the lawsuit, the Forest Service said it could not commit any additional funding or personnel for monitoring, enforcement, or restoration of damaged areas if riders travel off-road. “We’re concerned about agency capacity to deal with illegal and harmful off-road riding. We need law enforcement’s presence out on the land, but the Forest Service is already stretched thin,” said ALPS president Karl Forsgaard."

The very first meeting I went to some 10 years ago, the above "excuse" was given!!

Don't forget, the USFS employee's Union is stacked with eco-freaks and politicians love getting paid for their vote!

The USFS wouldn't be "stretched" thin if they would FIRE most of upper management(plus get back to logging)! Its called "Redundancy" Portland would rather hire 10 paper pushers over ONE hard working, physical labor person out where NEEDED! :yike:

So very damned true.....