collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: WATV court decision.  (Read 2063 times)

Offline Naches Sportsman

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 2783
  • Location: Idaho
WATV court decision.
« on: March 20, 2016, 05:51:02 PM »
Frustrating to all the guys and gals that are responsible atv'ers. I know I will continue to wave and act like I didn't see you. :bash:

Friggen tree hugging liberals. Just imagine everything the f.s. could get done without those tree hugging groups.

http://www.spokesman.com/blogs/outdoors/2016/mar/18/forest-service-ok-watvs-blocked-must-be-revisited-court-says/

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4515
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
Re: WATV court decision.
« Reply #1 on: March 20, 2016, 06:20:06 PM »
Potential potential potential...........thats all thats required to make something bad. 

Offline CAMPMEAT

  • CAMPMEAT
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 13347
  • Location: ARIZONA, A PLACE WHERE I DON'T WANT YOU LIVING !!
  • I love my gun rights in Arizona..
Re: WATV court decision.
« Reply #2 on: March 20, 2016, 06:33:21 PM »
I still can't figure why ATV/ORV vehicles are the scapegoat for ALL greenies to use ? I see more damage from jeeps/4x4 trucks, motorcycles, bulldozers, logging equipment, neglected FOREST SERVICE lands etc. I see LESS to no damage from ATV/ORV vehicles where I live than any other mobile units. It's total and 110% bullcrap why these courts rule in favor of the, enviro terrorist groups....

We have around 5-10 people in this county who denies 7200 people access to OUR LANDS....
I couldn't care less about what anybody says..............

Offline timberfaller

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2014
  • Posts: 4354
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: WATV court decision.
« Reply #3 on: March 20, 2016, 09:06:14 PM »
"Prior to the lawsuit, the Forest Service said it could not commit any additional funding or personnel for monitoring, enforcement, or restoration of damaged areas if riders travel off-road.  “We’re concerned about agency capacity to deal with illegal and harmful off-road riding.  We need law enforcement’s presence out on the land, but the Forest Service is already stretched thin,” said ALPS president Karl Forsgaard."

The very first meeting I went to some 10 years ago, the above "excuse" was given!!

Don't forget, the USFS employee's Union is stacked with eco-freaks and politicians love getting paid for their vote!

The USFS wouldn't be "stretched" thin if they would FIRE most of upper management(plus get back to logging)!  Its called "Redundancy"  Portland would rather hire 10 paper pushers over ONE hard working, physical labor person out where NEEDED!  :yike:
The only good tree, is a stump!

Offline CAMPMEAT

  • CAMPMEAT
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 13347
  • Location: ARIZONA, A PLACE WHERE I DON'T WANT YOU LIVING !!
  • I love my gun rights in Arizona..
Re: WATV court decision.
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2016, 07:40:45 AM »
"Prior to the lawsuit, the Forest Service said it could not commit any additional funding or personnel for monitoring, enforcement, or restoration of damaged areas if riders travel off-road.  “We’re concerned about agency capacity to deal with illegal and harmful off-road riding.  We need law enforcement’s presence out on the land, but the Forest Service is already stretched thin,” said ALPS president Karl Forsgaard."

The very first meeting I went to some 10 years ago, the above "excuse" was given!!

Don't forget, the USFS employee's Union is stacked with eco-freaks and politicians love getting paid for their vote!

The USFS wouldn't be "stretched" thin if they would FIRE most of upper management(plus get back to logging)!  Its called "Redundancy"  Portland would rather hire 10 paper pushers over ONE hard working, physical labor person out where NEEDED!  :yike:





So very damned true.....
I couldn't care less about what anybody says..............

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

New hunter looking for some help by Transam2340
[Today at 01:14:51 AM]


CB Radio Hints and Tips, Installing guidance. by spin05
[Yesterday at 11:23:55 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by Broomd
[Yesterday at 10:27:45 PM]


Hunting with a suppressor - dumb idea? by GWP
[Yesterday at 10:08:58 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by jamesjett
[Yesterday at 10:07:15 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by fowl smacker
[Yesterday at 09:42:13 PM]


Buck to Doe Ratio by fowl smacker
[Yesterday at 09:38:36 PM]


2024 Ford Edge Opinion by mountainman
[Yesterday at 09:28:11 PM]


GL Late Tag holders by Ridgerunner
[Yesterday at 09:09:16 PM]


Pheasant Release Program by McCRIZZLEY
[Yesterday at 08:59:10 PM]


328/329 reports by Meathunter06
[Yesterday at 07:54:00 PM]


Kettle Range Moose by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 07:15:18 PM]


2025 Montana alternate list by CJ1962
[Yesterday at 07:12:50 PM]


Youth Idaho Brownlee Cow Tag by CJ1962
[Yesterday at 07:08:52 PM]


AMMO 6.5 PRC 143 Gr ELD-X Hornady by scottfrick
[Yesterday at 03:57:18 PM]


North Idaho 2025 Rifle Bull by ganghis
[Yesterday at 03:18:11 PM]


I bought this beater Win 06 as a scrapper outer, it turned into a fixer upper by bearhunter99
[Yesterday at 02:14:34 PM]


Any Luck With Used Dies ? by HereDuckyDucky
[Yesterday at 01:49:07 PM]


Getting the hang of hanging on to mallards! by Goshawk
[Yesterday at 12:51:19 PM]


It was a great year by WAcoueshunter
[Yesterday at 11:03:58 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal