collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: WATV court decision.  (Read 2072 times)

Offline Naches Sportsman

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 2788
  • Location: Idaho
WATV court decision.
« on: March 20, 2016, 05:51:02 PM »
Frustrating to all the guys and gals that are responsible atv'ers. I know I will continue to wave and act like I didn't see you. :bash:

Friggen tree hugging liberals. Just imagine everything the f.s. could get done without those tree hugging groups.

http://www.spokesman.com/blogs/outdoors/2016/mar/18/forest-service-ok-watvs-blocked-must-be-revisited-court-says/

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4515
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
Re: WATV court decision.
« Reply #1 on: March 20, 2016, 06:20:06 PM »
Potential potential potential...........thats all thats required to make something bad. 

Offline CAMPMEAT

  • CAMPMEAT
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 13347
  • Location: ARIZONA, A PLACE WHERE I DON'T WANT YOU LIVING !!
  • I love my gun rights in Arizona..
Re: WATV court decision.
« Reply #2 on: March 20, 2016, 06:33:21 PM »
I still can't figure why ATV/ORV vehicles are the scapegoat for ALL greenies to use ? I see more damage from jeeps/4x4 trucks, motorcycles, bulldozers, logging equipment, neglected FOREST SERVICE lands etc. I see LESS to no damage from ATV/ORV vehicles where I live than any other mobile units. It's total and 110% bullcrap why these courts rule in favor of the, enviro terrorist groups....

We have around 5-10 people in this county who denies 7200 people access to OUR LANDS....
I couldn't care less about what anybody says..............

Offline timberfaller

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2014
  • Posts: 4414
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: WATV court decision.
« Reply #3 on: March 20, 2016, 09:06:14 PM »
"Prior to the lawsuit, the Forest Service said it could not commit any additional funding or personnel for monitoring, enforcement, or restoration of damaged areas if riders travel off-road.  “We’re concerned about agency capacity to deal with illegal and harmful off-road riding.  We need law enforcement’s presence out on the land, but the Forest Service is already stretched thin,” said ALPS president Karl Forsgaard."

The very first meeting I went to some 10 years ago, the above "excuse" was given!!

Don't forget, the USFS employee's Union is stacked with eco-freaks and politicians love getting paid for their vote!

The USFS wouldn't be "stretched" thin if they would FIRE most of upper management(plus get back to logging)!  Its called "Redundancy"  Portland would rather hire 10 paper pushers over ONE hard working, physical labor person out where NEEDED!  :yike:
The only good tree, is a stump!

Offline CAMPMEAT

  • CAMPMEAT
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 13347
  • Location: ARIZONA, A PLACE WHERE I DON'T WANT YOU LIVING !!
  • I love my gun rights in Arizona..
Re: WATV court decision.
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2016, 07:40:45 AM »
"Prior to the lawsuit, the Forest Service said it could not commit any additional funding or personnel for monitoring, enforcement, or restoration of damaged areas if riders travel off-road.  “We’re concerned about agency capacity to deal with illegal and harmful off-road riding.  We need law enforcement’s presence out on the land, but the Forest Service is already stretched thin,” said ALPS president Karl Forsgaard."

The very first meeting I went to some 10 years ago, the above "excuse" was given!!

Don't forget, the USFS employee's Union is stacked with eco-freaks and politicians love getting paid for their vote!

The USFS wouldn't be "stretched" thin if they would FIRE most of upper management(plus get back to logging)!  Its called "Redundancy"  Portland would rather hire 10 paper pushers over ONE hard working, physical labor person out where NEEDED!  :yike:





So very damned true.....
I couldn't care less about what anybody says..............

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Idaho Non-res hunt draw by huntnnw
[Today at 12:52:57 AM]


Nevada bull hunt 2025 by huntnnw
[Today at 12:48:37 AM]


Long distance love affair by WapitiTalk1
[Yesterday at 10:54:11 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by andrew_in_idaho
[Yesterday at 10:49:21 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by Turner89
[Yesterday at 10:00:28 PM]


CVA Accura LR-X by Rigby416
[Yesterday at 09:23:10 PM]


Perfect evening hunt by boneaddict
[Yesterday at 08:34:20 PM]


Last Minute Light by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 07:57:25 PM]


Older SxS shotgun by ChesapeakeMan
[Yesterday at 07:38:03 PM]


Diarrhea ? by Knocker of rocks
[Yesterday at 07:21:34 PM]


Winchester SX3 problem by Quackaddict
[Yesterday at 06:31:59 PM]


Old recessed buck by JakeLand
[Yesterday at 05:48:50 PM]


Last day! Don’t leave us hanging by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 05:14:16 PM]


5 Points......(mule deer or blacktails) by boneaddict
[Yesterday at 04:59:15 PM]


Eastern Washington Late Archery by jstone
[Yesterday at 04:29:34 PM]


2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by swordtine
[Yesterday at 03:05:15 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 01:40:09 PM]


My wife found her first shed by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 11:35:18 AM]


Fishing the East Cape in Baja? by jeffro
[Yesterday at 09:27:36 AM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by hunter399
[Yesterday at 08:50:09 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal