collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: WATV court decision.  (Read 2073 times)

Offline Naches Sportsman

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 2789
  • Location: Idaho
WATV court decision.
« on: March 20, 2016, 05:51:02 PM »
Frustrating to all the guys and gals that are responsible atv'ers. I know I will continue to wave and act like I didn't see you. :bash:

Friggen tree hugging liberals. Just imagine everything the f.s. could get done without those tree hugging groups.

http://www.spokesman.com/blogs/outdoors/2016/mar/18/forest-service-ok-watvs-blocked-must-be-revisited-court-says/

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4515
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
Re: WATV court decision.
« Reply #1 on: March 20, 2016, 06:20:06 PM »
Potential potential potential...........thats all thats required to make something bad. 

Offline CAMPMEAT

  • CAMPMEAT
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 13347
  • Location: ARIZONA, A PLACE WHERE I DON'T WANT YOU LIVING !!
  • I love my gun rights in Arizona..
Re: WATV court decision.
« Reply #2 on: March 20, 2016, 06:33:21 PM »
I still can't figure why ATV/ORV vehicles are the scapegoat for ALL greenies to use ? I see more damage from jeeps/4x4 trucks, motorcycles, bulldozers, logging equipment, neglected FOREST SERVICE lands etc. I see LESS to no damage from ATV/ORV vehicles where I live than any other mobile units. It's total and 110% bullcrap why these courts rule in favor of the, enviro terrorist groups....

We have around 5-10 people in this county who denies 7200 people access to OUR LANDS....
I couldn't care less about what anybody says..............

Offline timberfaller

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2014
  • Posts: 4418
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: WATV court decision.
« Reply #3 on: March 20, 2016, 09:06:14 PM »
"Prior to the lawsuit, the Forest Service said it could not commit any additional funding or personnel for monitoring, enforcement, or restoration of damaged areas if riders travel off-road.  “We’re concerned about agency capacity to deal with illegal and harmful off-road riding.  We need law enforcement’s presence out on the land, but the Forest Service is already stretched thin,” said ALPS president Karl Forsgaard."

The very first meeting I went to some 10 years ago, the above "excuse" was given!!

Don't forget, the USFS employee's Union is stacked with eco-freaks and politicians love getting paid for their vote!

The USFS wouldn't be "stretched" thin if they would FIRE most of upper management(plus get back to logging)!  Its called "Redundancy"  Portland would rather hire 10 paper pushers over ONE hard working, physical labor person out where NEEDED!  :yike:
The only good tree, is a stump!

Offline CAMPMEAT

  • CAMPMEAT
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 13347
  • Location: ARIZONA, A PLACE WHERE I DON'T WANT YOU LIVING !!
  • I love my gun rights in Arizona..
Re: WATV court decision.
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2016, 07:40:45 AM »
"Prior to the lawsuit, the Forest Service said it could not commit any additional funding or personnel for monitoring, enforcement, or restoration of damaged areas if riders travel off-road.  “We’re concerned about agency capacity to deal with illegal and harmful off-road riding.  We need law enforcement’s presence out on the land, but the Forest Service is already stretched thin,” said ALPS president Karl Forsgaard."

The very first meeting I went to some 10 years ago, the above "excuse" was given!!

Don't forget, the USFS employee's Union is stacked with eco-freaks and politicians love getting paid for their vote!

The USFS wouldn't be "stretched" thin if they would FIRE most of upper management(plus get back to logging)!  Its called "Redundancy"  Portland would rather hire 10 paper pushers over ONE hard working, physical labor person out where NEEDED!  :yike:





So very damned true.....
I couldn't care less about what anybody says..............

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Selkirk bull moose. by mountainman
[Today at 12:21:30 AM]


Got a great deal on a jet sled by huntnphool
[Yesterday at 11:28:48 PM]


Idaho's new Deer/Elk License System by andrew_in_idaho
[Yesterday at 11:08:30 PM]


From Behind by hunt6226
[Yesterday at 09:46:58 PM]


What are some good 12 ga factory loads for predators? by Goshawk
[Yesterday at 08:51:55 PM]


White River late archery by Crunchy
[Yesterday at 08:41:20 PM]


2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by wadu1
[Yesterday at 08:36:19 PM]


Slick 4 by deer_hnter
[Yesterday at 08:08:53 PM]


Cowichie muzzy bull this year by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 07:37:37 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by redi
[Yesterday at 07:18:41 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 06:05:24 PM]


Perfect evening hunt by Stein
[Yesterday at 05:50:14 PM]


Late season in gods Country My big buck by hunt6226
[Yesterday at 04:53:53 PM]


Any beaver trappers in the Nile area? by ASHQUACK
[Yesterday at 04:37:30 PM]


Best service for estimating draw odds by Antlershed
[Yesterday at 03:44:40 PM]


Long distance love affair by Pathfinder101
[Yesterday at 02:59:41 PM]


Old recessed buck by Pathfinder101
[Yesterday at 02:57:52 PM]


My wife found her first shed by boneaddict
[Yesterday at 02:33:59 PM]


Real world feedback needed: Rangefinder Binos by CarbonHunter
[Yesterday at 02:07:30 PM]


Older SxS shotgun by salish
[Yesterday at 12:20:12 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal