collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: WATV court decision.  (Read 2022 times)

Offline Naches Sportsman

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 2772
  • Location: Idaho
WATV court decision.
« on: March 20, 2016, 05:51:02 PM »
Frustrating to all the guys and gals that are responsible atv'ers. I know I will continue to wave and act like I didn't see you. :bash:

Friggen tree hugging liberals. Just imagine everything the f.s. could get done without those tree hugging groups.

http://www.spokesman.com/blogs/outdoors/2016/mar/18/forest-service-ok-watvs-blocked-must-be-revisited-court-says/

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4515
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
Re: WATV court decision.
« Reply #1 on: March 20, 2016, 06:20:06 PM »
Potential potential potential...........thats all thats required to make something bad. 

Offline CAMPMEAT

  • CAMPMEAT
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 13347
  • Location: ARIZONA, A PLACE WHERE I DON'T WANT YOU LIVING !!
  • I love my gun rights in Arizona..
Re: WATV court decision.
« Reply #2 on: March 20, 2016, 06:33:21 PM »
I still can't figure why ATV/ORV vehicles are the scapegoat for ALL greenies to use ? I see more damage from jeeps/4x4 trucks, motorcycles, bulldozers, logging equipment, neglected FOREST SERVICE lands etc. I see LESS to no damage from ATV/ORV vehicles where I live than any other mobile units. It's total and 110% bullcrap why these courts rule in favor of the, enviro terrorist groups....

We have around 5-10 people in this county who denies 7200 people access to OUR LANDS....
I couldn't care less about what anybody says..............

Offline timberfaller

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2014
  • Posts: 4195
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: WATV court decision.
« Reply #3 on: March 20, 2016, 09:06:14 PM »
"Prior to the lawsuit, the Forest Service said it could not commit any additional funding or personnel for monitoring, enforcement, or restoration of damaged areas if riders travel off-road.  “We’re concerned about agency capacity to deal with illegal and harmful off-road riding.  We need law enforcement’s presence out on the land, but the Forest Service is already stretched thin,” said ALPS president Karl Forsgaard."

The very first meeting I went to some 10 years ago, the above "excuse" was given!!

Don't forget, the USFS employee's Union is stacked with eco-freaks and politicians love getting paid for their vote!

The USFS wouldn't be "stretched" thin if they would FIRE most of upper management(plus get back to logging)!  Its called "Redundancy"  Portland would rather hire 10 paper pushers over ONE hard working, physical labor person out where NEEDED!  :yike:
The only good tree, is a stump!

Offline CAMPMEAT

  • CAMPMEAT
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 13347
  • Location: ARIZONA, A PLACE WHERE I DON'T WANT YOU LIVING !!
  • I love my gun rights in Arizona..
Re: WATV court decision.
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2016, 07:40:45 AM »
"Prior to the lawsuit, the Forest Service said it could not commit any additional funding or personnel for monitoring, enforcement, or restoration of damaged areas if riders travel off-road.  “We’re concerned about agency capacity to deal with illegal and harmful off-road riding.  We need law enforcement’s presence out on the land, but the Forest Service is already stretched thin,” said ALPS president Karl Forsgaard."

The very first meeting I went to some 10 years ago, the above "excuse" was given!!

Don't forget, the USFS employee's Union is stacked with eco-freaks and politicians love getting paid for their vote!

The USFS wouldn't be "stretched" thin if they would FIRE most of upper management(plus get back to logging)!  Its called "Redundancy"  Portland would rather hire 10 paper pushers over ONE hard working, physical labor person out where NEEDED!  :yike:





So very damned true.....
I couldn't care less about what anybody says..............

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Ten Years, and still plugging along by EnglishSetter
[Yesterday at 11:28:32 PM]


Looking for a hunting partner by vincepnw
[Yesterday at 10:51:51 PM]


AUCTION: Custom knife by Alden Cole by b0bbyg
[Yesterday at 10:12:34 PM]


Koro Traps 4 Sale by Humptulips
[Yesterday at 10:03:34 PM]


Stone Glacier packs by greenhead_killer
[Yesterday at 09:06:17 PM]


Cougar Tips by hunter399
[Yesterday at 09:00:44 PM]


Still no bears by Jellymon
[Yesterday at 08:46:50 PM]


Lund Fisherman 1800 info/advice by lewy
[Yesterday at 08:43:58 PM]


Anti-Snagging Rule ? by Stein
[Yesterday at 08:21:48 PM]


Bass Pro Strikes Again by EnglishSetter
[Yesterday at 08:05:43 PM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by Dave Workman
[Yesterday at 07:08:46 PM]


High buck hunt by bmc02
[Yesterday at 06:07:22 PM]


Scope/mount options Ruger Ranch 5.56 by Westside88
[Yesterday at 03:31:01 PM]


Bear Meat Care after the shot by jrebel
[Yesterday at 03:24:19 PM]


More Kings! by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 01:35:26 PM]


Montana Antelope Draw by bustedoldman
[Yesterday at 11:11:02 AM]


WSTA 2025 Summer Rendezvous Agenda by Humptulips
[Yesterday at 10:54:35 AM]


HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 10:34:16 AM]


Looking for River Bank Salmon Fishing Help, Tips, etc: Lewis Co Area by AROTTY
[Yesterday at 07:39:42 AM]


2025 Montana alternate list by tdot24
[Yesterday at 07:34:07 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal