collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: WATV court decision.  (Read 2068 times)

Offline Naches Sportsman

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 2787
  • Location: Idaho
WATV court decision.
« on: March 20, 2016, 05:51:02 PM »
Frustrating to all the guys and gals that are responsible atv'ers. I know I will continue to wave and act like I didn't see you. :bash:

Friggen tree hugging liberals. Just imagine everything the f.s. could get done without those tree hugging groups.

http://www.spokesman.com/blogs/outdoors/2016/mar/18/forest-service-ok-watvs-blocked-must-be-revisited-court-says/

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4515
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
Re: WATV court decision.
« Reply #1 on: March 20, 2016, 06:20:06 PM »
Potential potential potential...........thats all thats required to make something bad. 

Offline CAMPMEAT

  • CAMPMEAT
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 13347
  • Location: ARIZONA, A PLACE WHERE I DON'T WANT YOU LIVING !!
  • I love my gun rights in Arizona..
Re: WATV court decision.
« Reply #2 on: March 20, 2016, 06:33:21 PM »
I still can't figure why ATV/ORV vehicles are the scapegoat for ALL greenies to use ? I see more damage from jeeps/4x4 trucks, motorcycles, bulldozers, logging equipment, neglected FOREST SERVICE lands etc. I see LESS to no damage from ATV/ORV vehicles where I live than any other mobile units. It's total and 110% bullcrap why these courts rule in favor of the, enviro terrorist groups....

We have around 5-10 people in this county who denies 7200 people access to OUR LANDS....
I couldn't care less about what anybody says..............

Offline timberfaller

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2014
  • Posts: 4400
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: WATV court decision.
« Reply #3 on: March 20, 2016, 09:06:14 PM »
"Prior to the lawsuit, the Forest Service said it could not commit any additional funding or personnel for monitoring, enforcement, or restoration of damaged areas if riders travel off-road.  “We’re concerned about agency capacity to deal with illegal and harmful off-road riding.  We need law enforcement’s presence out on the land, but the Forest Service is already stretched thin,” said ALPS president Karl Forsgaard."

The very first meeting I went to some 10 years ago, the above "excuse" was given!!

Don't forget, the USFS employee's Union is stacked with eco-freaks and politicians love getting paid for their vote!

The USFS wouldn't be "stretched" thin if they would FIRE most of upper management(plus get back to logging)!  Its called "Redundancy"  Portland would rather hire 10 paper pushers over ONE hard working, physical labor person out where NEEDED!  :yike:
The only good tree, is a stump!

Offline CAMPMEAT

  • CAMPMEAT
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 13347
  • Location: ARIZONA, A PLACE WHERE I DON'T WANT YOU LIVING !!
  • I love my gun rights in Arizona..
Re: WATV court decision.
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2016, 07:40:45 AM »
"Prior to the lawsuit, the Forest Service said it could not commit any additional funding or personnel for monitoring, enforcement, or restoration of damaged areas if riders travel off-road.  “We’re concerned about agency capacity to deal with illegal and harmful off-road riding.  We need law enforcement’s presence out on the land, but the Forest Service is already stretched thin,” said ALPS president Karl Forsgaard."

The very first meeting I went to some 10 years ago, the above "excuse" was given!!

Don't forget, the USFS employee's Union is stacked with eco-freaks and politicians love getting paid for their vote!

The USFS wouldn't be "stretched" thin if they would FIRE most of upper management(plus get back to logging)!  Its called "Redundancy"  Portland would rather hire 10 paper pushers over ONE hard working, physical labor person out where NEEDED!  :yike:





So very damned true.....
I couldn't care less about what anybody says..............

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

"Any Deer" GMU's - Proof of Sex? by DaNewb
[Today at 08:42:03 AM]


What are you cooking? by cjjcb
[Today at 08:23:22 AM]


2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by wadu1
[Today at 08:13:36 AM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by Ridgerunner
[Today at 07:58:46 AM]


Pearygin Quality by Ridgerunner
[Today at 07:56:01 AM]


New scope or not? by outdooraddict
[Today at 06:31:27 AM]


More than one shotgun? by jdb
[Today at 05:08:07 AM]


Fishin' with First-Timers by Martinhunter
[Today at 02:00:43 AM]


What gmu's in sw Washington hold elk? by Cylvertip
[Yesterday at 10:54:05 PM]


Making memories by h2ofowlr
[Yesterday at 10:29:43 PM]


My 2025 Wyoming trip by hollymaster
[Yesterday at 07:26:47 PM]


The Mysterious $200,000 by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 07:06:09 PM]


Late Muzzy WT by Jimmy33
[Yesterday at 04:35:34 PM]


East Oak smokers? by treefarmer
[Yesterday at 03:52:44 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by IdeehoT
[Yesterday at 02:20:40 PM]


211 Mile Ambler Road Through The Brooks Range Approved by Houndhunter
[Yesterday at 02:13:34 PM]


Newbie quail hunter by Bob33
[Yesterday at 10:02:21 AM]


My Wenaha bull by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 09:30:24 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal