Hunting Washington Forum

Big Game Hunting => Wolves => Topic started by: wolfbait on March 24, 2016, 02:19:47 PM


Advertise Here
Title: A Conspiracy of Lies
Post by: wolfbait on March 24, 2016, 02:19:47 PM
A Conspiracy of Lies



THEY tell us that wolves are unique and different than coyotes or dogs.

They tell us wolves are necessary.

They tell us that wolves are good in settled landscapes.

They tell us that wolves do not attack and kill people.

They tell us that livestock and dogs can be protected from wolves.

They tell us that wolves do not spread more than 30 deadly diseases and
infections.

They tell us that grizzly bears must be protected in settled landscapes.

They tell us bureaucrats can take away our property and rights.

They quote nonsense to justify endless government land acquisition.

They acquire land for public use and then close it for "environmental"
voodoo.

They indoctrinate children to accept economy-wrecking energy policies.

They whine for more taxes for everything with no mention of the meaning of
"TRILLIONS" in National Debt.

They tell us we have no right to criticize a "black" President lest we be
called "Racist".

They tell us we have no right to question Moslem's intentions and behavior.

They pass Draconian "Terrorist" Laws and then ignore Moslem Terrorism and
immediately prosecute and identify ranchers with legitimate complaints as
"Terrorists".

They say that healthcare protects Constitutional Rights while coercing the
Little Sisters of the Poor to disband their programs aimed at helping the
aged and infirm among us.

They establish federal preferences for anyone "black" or in designated
ethnic groups for government and business preferences thus discriminating
against any "white" citizen and identify those laws as "Equal".

They legitimize preferences for any female for any government or private
employment to the exclusion of any "white" male citizen and call it "Equal
Employment".

They under-report and under-expose black and Moslem crimes by discouraging
pictures or names in most reporting accounts in order to suppress public
opinion.



I could add more to this List but to what end?  If this List does not open
your mind to what follows, more truths certainly won't matter.

I point out these things neither because I am having an acid reflux attack
nor because I am just a mean old man.  I point these things out because I
have just watched a very, very disturbing video on a news program.  It was a
six-year-old little girl being ripped from the arms of the foster mother and
father that have parented her for years and who she obviously, deeply loves.
Her fault?

She evidently has 1% (??) Indian (feather not dot)/"Native" American
"blood". ( At this point think here about all the "DNA" nonsense about
wolf/coyote/dog/"coywolf"/coydog/wolfdog etc., etc. legal crapola about what
is a ticket to prison or about to kill your livestock or is in your yard
with your children or killing your dog, etc.  Just like a DNA test after you
act can send you to prison, justify seizing your family's savings and
property, deny your right to ever bear arms or vote: so too is government
abuse and injustice responsible for that explosive, life-changing
transformation of that little girl and her foster parents that I just
watched on TV.

You see; just like the Endangered Species Act is the spawn of Environmental
Communism, and government land control is the child of Nazi property
policies, and all the "Equal" this and that Laws are copies of George
Orwell's writing in 1984 where a Big Brother slogan was "War is Peace" or in
Animal Farm where two young pigs teach the farm animals that "All Animals
Are Equal"; the Native Americans also have "special" preferences to "anyone
eligible for membership in some tribe" (??) based on ANY tribes "blood"
percentage requirements (currently higher in rich tribes and lower in poor
tribes).  Thus some bureaucrat or some Indian has utilized an unjust, unfair
and UNEQUAL "Law" to enact an action that joins in a growing chorus of such
callous acts of disregard of citizen's rights and the dwindling expectations
of US justice in a nation once boasting "One Nation under God, with Liberty
and Justice FOR ALL!"

Am I the only one that sees how this unequal treatment of all citizens is
corroding our society, our government, our communities and our very
existence?  All that "let's just get along" BS cannot mask what the real
problem is: it is not that we don't "get along"; it is that we CANNOT GET
ALONG when we are unequal before the law and within our everyday lives.

The Declaration of Independence says, "We hold these truths to be
self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their
Creator with certain unalienable Rights". Really? 

-        "Created equal"? 

-       "Endowed by their Creator"? 

-       "Unalienable Rights"?

The Constitution says, "We the People of the United States, in order to form
a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility,
provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the
blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish
this Constitution".  Really?

-       "Establish Justice"?

-       "Insure domestic Tranquility"?

-       "Promote the general Welfare"?

-       "Secure the blessings of Liberty"?

Can any fair assessment of the current uncontrolled bureaucracy and amoral
lawmaking based on Lies still allow any fair-minded person to still support:

-       Environmental lawlessness by government?

-       Government preferences that while titled "Equal" are the antithesis
of Equality?

-       Suppression of Rights like free speech and religious protections?

-       Growing government thuggery on the citizenry while ignoring
international religious terrorism here and abroad?

-       Propagandizing faux science as an inarguable basis for all manner of
government abuse?

I still hear the cries of that little girl and the German pre-WWII newsreel
similarities of the guy blocking the camera as the girl is abducted (the
correct word).  But then, I saw it in Nevada when the BLM thugs posed like
Storm Troopers by the Bundy ranch; and I heard it when USFWS managers
promised (once again) to do all they could to "Delist" wolves wreaking havoc
while knowing that it won't happen and even if it does the federal
government now has an eternal (they think) authority over any and all wolves
anywhere, anytime and anyway they want no matter what happens.

We are self-delusional just like European Jews in the 1930's that couldn't
see what was coming but knew that it might be bad but somehow hoping it
would all work out.  This is just like women whose "husbands" or boyfriends
beat them but they keep going back and telling others to "but out" because
somehow it won't be too bad and will eventually get better.  These two
self-delusions are and were based on believing lies and despite the
evidence, going about our daily business and refusing to mention the
unmentionable until one day it is all gone and we ask each other, "What
happened?"



Jim Beers

24 March 2016
Title: Re: A Conspiracy of Lies
Post by: Henrydog on March 24, 2016, 02:25:03 PM
Amen :tup:
Title: Re: A Conspiracy of Lies
Post by: idahohuntr on March 24, 2016, 04:36:53 PM
Whats sick and delusional is comparing wolf management and federal land policies to the Holocaust and Domestic Violence. 
Title: Re: A Conspiracy of Lies
Post by: nwwanderer on March 25, 2016, 07:31:11 AM
I think Mr. Beers understands history and what he has lived while idahohuntr has drank the koolaid.  Federal land policy, using wildlife management as a tool, continues in a downward spiral with an end result that has been repeated many times in humans short time on this rock.  Evidence?  Spend a minute and look at what ultimate land policy folks, Ukraine as an example, are doing, coming apart and scratching out new boundaries.  Of course, the koolaid drinkers report that is not possible here.  Mr. Beers boat will float, a boat full of koolaid will not.  Thanks Wolfbait
Title: Re: A Conspiracy of Lies
Post by: mfswallace on March 25, 2016, 08:02:14 AM
I think Mr. Beers understands history and what he has lived while idahohuntr has drank the koolaid.  Federal land policy, using wildlife management as a tool, continues in a downward spiral with an end result that has been repeated many times in humans short time on this rock.  Evidence?  Spend a minute and look at what ultimate land policy folks, Ukraine as an example, are doing, coming apart and scratching out new boundaries.  Of course, the koolaid drinkers report that is not possible here.  Mr. Beers boat will float, a boat full of koolaid will not.  Thanks Wolfbait

 :yeah:  Idhntr being only recently indoctrinated sure doesn't understand what his signature line means...
Title: Re: A Conspiracy of Lies
Post by: JDHasty on March 25, 2016, 09:46:35 AM
I think Mr. Beers understands history and what he has lived while idahohuntr has drank the koolaid.  Federal land policy, using wildlife management as a tool, continues in a downward spiral with an end result that has been repeated many times in humans short time on this rock.  Evidence?  Spend a minute and look at what ultimate land policy folks, Ukraine as an example, are doing, coming apart and scratching out new boundaries.  Of course, the koolaid drinkers report that is not possible here.  Mr. Beers boat will float, a boat full of koolaid will not.  Thanks Wolfbait

 :yeah:  Idhntr being only recently indoctrinated sure doesn't understand what his signature line means...

There is a connection.  He would do well to read and understand Thomas Sowell's 1987 classic A Conflict of Visions http://www.amazon.com/Conflict-Visions-Ideological-Political-Struggles/dp/0465002056

In this classic work, Thomas Sowell analyzes the two competing visions that shape our debates about the nature of reason, justice, equality, and power: the “constrained” vision, which sees human nature as unchanging and selfish, and the “unconstrained” vision, in which human nature is malleable and perfectible. He describes how these two radically opposed views have manifested themselves in the political controversies of the past two centuries, including such contemporary issues as welfare reform, social justice, and crime. Updated to include sweeping political changes since its first publication in 1987, this revised edition of A Conflict of Visions offers a convincing case that ethical and policy disputes circle around the disparity between both outlooks.
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal