Post by: hoof rot on October 11, 2016, 07:03:14 AM
Post by: Forks on October 11, 2016, 04:42:51 PM
Post by: hoof rot on October 11, 2016, 04:47:38 PM
Post by: carpsniperg2 on October 11, 2016, 05:10:56 PM
Thats heavy! My crew got 2 mashers up on the peninsula this year and im pretty sure they will go 300", i can't load pics for some reason, a 7x7 and a 6x7 in muzzy season
The file is probably to large. Open it in a program like paint and then resize to about 30%, save it. Then it should post up for ya.
Post by: TVHunts on October 11, 2016, 05:25:43 PM
Post by: highside74 on October 11, 2016, 05:29:15 PM
Post by: highside74 on October 11, 2016, 05:31:30 PM
Post by: hoof rot on October 11, 2016, 06:08:43 PM
Post by: highside74 on October 11, 2016, 06:23:35 PM
Don't know john, but lets have a look ;)
Sorry can't do it.
Post by: sagerat on October 11, 2016, 06:50:27 PM
Post by: highside74 on October 11, 2016, 07:10:32 PM
Well that's bs, block the guys face out!!!
Lol I don't know the hunter and I got the picture from a 3rd hand source so I'm not posting it.
Post by: sagerat on October 11, 2016, 07:14:09 PM
Post by: hoof rot on October 11, 2016, 09:06:57 PM
Post by: blackveltbowhunter on October 11, 2016, 09:10:27 PM
Post by: hoof rot on October 11, 2016, 09:13:21 PM
Post by: highside74 on October 11, 2016, 09:17:32 PM
If its way bigger then 300 west of i5 muzzy then thats awesome, whats the record? 340?
For sure west of i5 over on the Peninsula. I was hoping it would be on here at some point so we could talk about it but I haven't seen it yet.
Post by: JimmyHoffa on October 11, 2016, 09:19:22 PM
If its way bigger then 300 west of i5 muzzy then thats awesome, whats the record? 340?Think it is in the 420s
Post by: highside74 on October 11, 2016, 09:22:09 PM
Post by: hoof rot on October 11, 2016, 09:34:24 PM
Post by: highside74 on October 11, 2016, 09:52:58 PM
Post by: hoof rot on October 11, 2016, 09:54:32 PM
Post by: Brown Rob on October 11, 2016, 09:55:32 PM
Post by: hoof rot on October 11, 2016, 09:56:08 PM
Post by: highside74 on October 11, 2016, 09:58:33 PM
Post by: highside74 on October 11, 2016, 10:00:47 PM
Post by: hoof rot on October 11, 2016, 10:03:17 PM
Post by: hoof rot on October 11, 2016, 10:09:17 PM
Post by: highside74 on October 11, 2016, 10:11:18 PM
Post by: highside74 on October 11, 2016, 10:13:27 PM
Post by: hoof rot on October 11, 2016, 10:14:27 PM
Post by: Karl Blanchard on October 11, 2016, 10:16:45 PM
Post by: huntnphool on October 11, 2016, 10:31:06 PM
Any 300" true roosevelt pics, im curious what they look like
Post by: hoof rot on October 12, 2016, 01:04:08 PM
Post by: WAPatriot on October 12, 2016, 01:55:58 PM
Post by: huntnphool on October 12, 2016, 02:16:18 PM
Whats the story on this guy
No story yet, he's still out there.
Pretty sure I've seen that guy near lake sawyer
Must be a different bull.
Post by: deerhunter_98520 on October 12, 2016, 07:28:17 PM
(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi799.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fyy275%2Fdeerhunter_98520%2FIMG_20130924_155410_721_zps1ca74900.jpg&hash=02b6d04b47017abdc1fe80a68b0276217454cc84) (http://s799.photobucket.com/user/deerhunter_98520/media/IMG_20130924_155410_721_zps1ca74900.jpg.html)
(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi799.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fyy275%2Fdeerhunter_98520%2FIMG_20130924_155356_097_zps22669d8e.jpg&hash=068f186bd196e2206875cad7e11d3edf89eb765f) (http://s799.photobucket.com/user/deerhunter_98520/media/IMG_20130924_155356_097_zps22669d8e.jpg.html)
Think this one would also
Post by: Mark251 on October 12, 2016, 09:15:07 PM
Post by: elkslare on October 13, 2016, 07:55:50 AM
:tup:
Post by: birdblaster on October 13, 2016, 09:08:55 AM
Post by: Tbar on October 13, 2016, 09:31:03 AM
Not trying to put down anyone's bulls, but a 300" bull is larger than most people think. A 300" 5 point would have to be a total freak. I have killed two solid 5 point rosey elk and neither one of them broke 200". The 5 point pictured is 175". The side by side 6 points are both right at 300".
Guys like you are why I'll never post a picture on this site. Oh and by the way you are way off on that bull, way off. :twocents:
Post by: 180-GRAIN on October 13, 2016, 09:47:35 AM
Not trying to put down anyone's bulls, but a 300" bull is larger than most people think. A 300" 5 point would have to be a total freak. I have killed two solid 5 point rosey elk and neither one of them broke 200". The 5 point pictured is 175". The side by side 6 points are both right at 300".
Guys like you are why I'll never post a picture on this site. Oh and by the way you are way off on that bull, way off. :twocents:
Not trying to start a debate on his bull scores but I would agree his 5 point picture is close to the 175 area give or take 5 or 10 points. I bet if he put another picture on of a different angle you would agree. Just my :twocents:
Post by: Tbar on October 13, 2016, 09:53:03 AM
Post by: Spuddieselwwu on October 13, 2016, 10:13:58 AM
Pretty sure I've seen that guy near lake sawyer
I was going to say the same thing - I saw a bull like that last year running the powerlines between MV and Black Diamond.
Post by: 180-GRAIN on October 13, 2016, 10:22:39 AM
Can either of you break down your 175 number? We are talking about the bull Forks posted?
I believe rereading birdblasters post him and I were referring to the 5 in his picture.
Post by: birdblaster on October 13, 2016, 05:15:24 PM
Can either of you break down your 175 number? We are talking about the bull Forks posted?
I believe rereading birdblasters post him and I were referring to the 5 in his picture.
Yes, I was referring to the bull I posted. I'm just trying to help with accurate numbers of bull that were actually scored. I don't want people to think they shot a 300" bull, get it scored, and then find out its only 250". That's all.
For quick reference, the 175" 5 point that I posted has 8 scorable tines that are roughtly 9" each (excluding the 1 point kicker), main beam length of 31", 6 scorable girth measurements at 5" each, and an inside main spread of 24". Add all those up (9+8+8+7+9+8+8+7+5+5+4+5+5+4+31+31+24) = 178"
Post by: highside74 on October 13, 2016, 05:44:25 PM
Can either of you break down your 175 number? We are talking about the bull Forks posted?
I believe rereading birdblasters post him and I were referring to the 5 in his picture.
Yes, I was referring to the bull I posted. I'm just trying to help with accurate numbers of bull that were actually scored. I don't want people to think they shot a 300" bull, get it scored, and then find out its only 250". That's all.
For quick reference, the 175" 5 point that I posted has 8 scorable tines that are roughtly 9" each (excluding the 1 point kicker), main beam length of 31", 6 scorable girth measurements at 5" each, and an inside main spread of 24". Add all those up (9+8+8+7+9+8+8+7+5+5+4+5+5+4+31+31+24) = 178"
Ummm...you forgot tip to tip score and widest part outide spread. 178 + 60 or more inches you missed
Post by: huntnphool on October 13, 2016, 06:20:39 PM
Can either of you break down your 175 number? We are talking about the bull Forks posted?
I believe rereading birdblasters post him and I were referring to the 5 in his picture.
Yes, I was referring to the bull I posted. I'm just trying to help with accurate numbers of bull that were actually scored. I don't want people to think they shot a 300" bull, get it scored, and then find out its only 250". That's all.
For quick reference, the 175" 5 point that I posted has 8 scorable tines that are roughtly 9" each (excluding the 1 point kicker), main beam length of 31", 6 scorable girth measurements at 5" each, and an inside main spread of 24". Add all those up (9+8+8+7+9+8+8+7+5+5+4+5+5+4+31+31+24) = 178"
Ummm...you forgot tip to tip score and widest part outide spread. 178 + 60 or more inches you missed
Only spread measurement included in score is inside. ;)
I suspect the measurements you are referring to is why many mule deer hunters seem to always be claiming their 160 class bucks are 180" :dunno:
Post by: MtnMuley on October 13, 2016, 06:27:43 PM
Post by: highside74 on October 13, 2016, 06:28:04 PM
Post by: link on October 13, 2016, 06:33:19 PM
Post by: highside74 on October 13, 2016, 06:34:13 PM
So I guess that's why my wife thinks I know everything.
Post by: huntnphool on October 13, 2016, 06:34:53 PM
Boone and crockett
Here you go.
Post by: lewy on October 13, 2016, 06:35:21 PM
Post by: kentrek on October 13, 2016, 06:35:49 PM
5 obviously don't score well but who cares....I'll take that 5 over my pretty 346 bull any day
I have no 300 inch Rosie's to add :'(
Post by: huntnphool on October 13, 2016, 06:39:35 PM
And that goes for pope and young also. Sci drops one width but scores all totals.
So I guess that's why my wife thinks I know everything.
Don't feel bad, a lot of hunters think those measurements are included in the score. ;)
Post by: highside74 on October 13, 2016, 06:44:53 PM
And that goes for pope and young also. Sci drops one width but scores all totals.
So I guess that's why my wife thinks I know everything.
Don't feel bad, a lot of hunters think those measurements are included in the score. ;)
I'm not following you. Are you being serious or messing with me? The score sheet is right there.
Post by: highside74 on October 13, 2016, 06:47:24 PM
Post by: huntnphool on October 13, 2016, 06:49:59 PM
And that goes for pope and young also. Sci drops one width but scores all totals.
So I guess that's why my wife thinks I know everything.
Don't feel bad, a lot of hunters think those measurements are included in the score. ;)
I'm not following you. Are you being serious or messing with me? The score sheet is right there.
:chuckle: No I'm not messing with you. ;)
Post by: huntnphool on October 13, 2016, 06:51:14 PM
Post by: Karl Blanchard on October 13, 2016, 07:02:05 PM
follow the boxes. Only space to add in spread down below is spread credit which is the greatest point between the inside of the main beams but cannot exceed the longest main beam. Also, if you print the score sheet off their Web page it prints two sheets. One is the score sheet itself and the second is a detailed list of instructions. Those other spread measurements are for infomation only. Record keeping so to speak. It's a common mistake that many make when scoring.And that goes for pope and young also. Sci drops one width but scores all totals.
So I guess that's why my wife thinks I know everything.
Don't feel bad, a lot of hunters think those measurements are included in the score. ;)
I'm not following you. Are you being serious or messing with me? The score sheet is right there.
Post by: blacktailcody on October 13, 2016, 07:07:26 PM
I shot a 5 pt this year that is around 275...300 is for sure possible!
Post by: highside74 on October 13, 2016, 07:09:37 PM
follow the boxes. Only space to add in spread down below is spread credit which is the greatest point between the inside of the main beams but cannot exceed the longest main beam. Also, if you print the score sheet off their Web page it prints two sheets. One is the score sheet itself and the second is a detailed list of instructions. Those other spread measurements are for infomation only. Record keeping so to speak. It's a common mistake that many make when scoring.And that goes for pope and young also. Sci drops one width but scores all totals.
So I guess that's why my wife thinks I know everything.
Don't feel bad, a lot of hunters think those measurements are included in the score. ;)
I'm not following you. Are you being serious or messing with me? The score sheet is right there.
I got it. Don't tell my wife. :o :DOH:
Post by: MtnMuley on October 13, 2016, 07:20:03 PM
Post by: hoof rot on October 13, 2016, 07:22:36 PM
Post by: ELKHUNTER495 on October 14, 2016, 07:44:27 AM
Post by: birdblaster on October 14, 2016, 08:07:18 AM
follow the boxes. Only space to add in spread down below is spread credit which is the greatest point between the inside of the main beams but cannot exceed the longest main beam. Also, if you print the score sheet off their Web page it prints two sheets. One is the score sheet itself and the second is a detailed list of instructions. Those other spread measurements are for infomation only. Record keeping so to speak. It's a common mistake that many make when scoring.And that goes for pope and young also. Sci drops one width but scores all totals.
So I guess that's why my wife thinks I know everything.
Don't feel bad, a lot of hunters think those measurements are included in the score. ;)
I'm not following you. Are you being serious or messing with me? The score sheet is right there.
I got it. Don't tell my wife. :o :DOH:
You don't get to add the length of the last point as that is factored in the main beam length. B&C ask for 3 width measurements, but the formula is very complicated and it basically just takes the inside spread of the main beam. Also, you only get 3 girth measurements on a 5 point, 4 on a 6+. You never get more that 4 girth measurements even if it is a 10x10.
Post by: sirmissalot on October 14, 2016, 08:09:31 AM
I'd much rather kill a massive 5 point bull like that over a spindly horned six point any day
Post by: BULLBLASTER on October 14, 2016, 08:18:07 AM
An elk always gets 4 mass measurements regardless of number of points in the rack.follow the boxes. Only space to add in spread down below is spread credit which is the greatest point between the inside of the main beams but cannot exceed the longest main beam. Also, if you print the score sheet off their Web page it prints two sheets. One is the score sheet itself and the second is a detailed list of instructions. Those other spread measurements are for infomation only. Record keeping so to speak. It's a common mistake that many make when scoring.And that goes for pope and young also. Sci drops one width but scores all totals.
So I guess that's why my wife thinks I know everything.
Don't feel bad, a lot of hunters think those measurements are included in the score. ;)
I'm not following you. Are you being serious or messing with me? The score sheet is right there.
I got it. Don't tell my wife. :o :DOH:
You don't get to add the length of the last point as that is factored in the main beam length. B&C ask for 3 width measurements, but the formula is very complicated and it basically just takes the inside spread of the main beam. Also, you only get 3 girth measurements on a 5 point, 4 on a 6+. You never get more that 4 girth measurements even if it is a 10x10.
Same goes for deer
Post by: Coastal_native on October 14, 2016, 09:06:29 AM
Post by: Cylvertip on October 14, 2016, 09:15:58 AM
Post by: Karl Blanchard on October 14, 2016, 09:45:31 AM
The 175 bull Bird Blaster is referring to is the second pic on his post. He is not saying that about Forks' bull. Forks' Bull is probably right around the 300".beat me to it. Definitely think there was some confusion there. The mass on Forks bull is nasty!
Post by: grundy53 on October 14, 2016, 10:46:53 AM
Not trying to put down anyone's bulls, but a 300" bull is larger than most people think. A 300" 5 point would have to be a total freak. I have killed two solid 5 point rosey elk and neither one of them broke 200". The 5 point pictured is 175". The side by side 6 points are both right at 300".Agreed. It's also very hard to tell from a photo. You can have a photo of huge bull that doesn't do it justice. On the flip side you can use camera angles to make a average bull look huge. These photos are a good example they are the same bull and it only scores about 245".
(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fuploads.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F20161014%2F01e0ad04437a02aac0fbb4fff3793d43.jpg&hash=d6d5ef9eb2883fd15efee1b48f38dcc2d6678058)(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fuploads.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F20161014%2F804d4aca3d219a3fe28fcac3b6a1e813.jpg&hash=b51ade5aea1c41c429f03ea19bc05d956f0e210f)(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fuploads.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F20161014%2F7a76d75d53ca7c335ca339e46e596df4.jpg&hash=64742860789a6de7364c6740856b79d9cbe86eeb)(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fuploads.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F20161014%2Fde2bb6a8c6146ff15dfea59bdfcb283a.jpg&hash=c9b9215c1e52bbb0dbae9ed5723cd0fb99f13ffc)
Sent from my E6782 using Tapatalk
Post by: Falcon on October 14, 2016, 06:33:30 PM
My 2016 archery bull...not a 300" bull, not even close. Haven't scored it yet, but if anyone can squeeze a pope and young qualifier out of it, I'd be surprised.
That's a cool looking bull👍
Post by: deerhunter_98520 on October 14, 2016, 07:17:31 PM
Not trying to put down anyone's bulls, but a 300" bull is larger than most people think. A 300" 5 point would have to be a total freak. I have killed two solid 5 point rosey elk and neither one of them broke 200". The 5 point pictured is 175". The side by side 6 points are both right at 300".Agreed. It's also very hard to tell from a photo. You can have a photo of huge bull that doesn't do it justice. On the flip side you can use camera angles to make a average bull look huge. These photos are a good example they are the same bull and it only scores about 245".
(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fuploads.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F20161014%2F01e0ad04437a02aac0fbb4fff3793d43.jpg&hash=d6d5ef9eb2883fd15efee1b48f38dcc2d6678058)(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fuploads.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F20161014%2F804d4aca3d219a3fe28fcac3b6a1e813.jpg&hash=b51ade5aea1c41c429f03ea19bc05d956f0e210f)(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fuploads.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F20161014%2F7a76d75d53ca7c335ca339e46e596df4.jpg&hash=64742860789a6de7364c6740856b79d9cbe86eeb)(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fuploads.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F20161014%2Fde2bb6a8c6146ff15dfea59bdfcb283a.jpg&hash=c9b9215c1e52bbb0dbae9ed5723cd0fb99f13ffc)
Sent from my E6782 using Tapatalk
That's a great bull....I see we celebrate the same way :tup:
Post by: grundy53 on October 14, 2016, 07:35:38 PM
Thank you. I was very happy with it but it's nowhere near the 300 club. Just pointing out how photos can be very deceiving. Different angles can make the same bull look totally different. Better or worse. And yes, crown tastes mighty good after killing a bull. :chuckle:Not trying to put down anyone's bulls, but a 300" bull is larger than most people think. A 300" 5 point would have to be a total freak. I have killed two solid 5 point rosey elk and neither one of them broke 200". The 5 point pictured is 175". The side by side 6 points are both right at 300".Agreed. It's also very hard to tell from a photo. You can have a photo of huge bull that doesn't do it justice. On the flip side you can use camera angles to make a average bull look huge. These photos are a good example they are the same bull and it only scores about 245".
(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fuploads.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F20161014%2F01e0ad04437a02aac0fbb4fff3793d43.jpg&hash=d6d5ef9eb2883fd15efee1b48f38dcc2d6678058)(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fuploads.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F20161014%2F804d4aca3d219a3fe28fcac3b6a1e813.jpg&hash=b51ade5aea1c41c429f03ea19bc05d956f0e210f)(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fuploads.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F20161014%2F7a76d75d53ca7c335ca339e46e596df4.jpg&hash=64742860789a6de7364c6740856b79d9cbe86eeb)(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fuploads.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F20161014%2Fde2bb6a8c6146ff15dfea59bdfcb283a.jpg&hash=c9b9215c1e52bbb0dbae9ed5723cd0fb99f13ffc)
Sent from my E6782 using Tapatalk
That's a great bull....I see we celebrate the same way :tup:
Sent from my E6782 using Tapatalk
Post by: hoof rot on October 18, 2016, 02:05:59 PM
Post by: tritt007 on October 22, 2016, 03:25:24 AM
Post by: deerhunter_98520 on October 22, 2016, 09:34:57 PM
Sounds like some people here are the kind of guys that tell girls its 10" and its really 4" lol . :yike: :twocents:Maybe they say it's 4" and its really 10" :chuckle: