collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 300" rosey pics  (Read 25466 times)

Offline highside74

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 5401
  • Location: Eatonville wa
Re: 300" rosey pics
« Reply #45 on: October 13, 2016, 05:44:25 PM »
Can either of you break down your 175 number?  We are talking about the bull Forks posted?

I believe rereading birdblasters post him and I were referring to the 5 in his picture.

Yes, I was referring to the bull I posted.   I'm just trying to help with accurate numbers of bull that were actually scored.  I don't want people to think they shot a 300" bull, get it scored, and then find out its only 250".  That's all.

For quick reference, the 175" 5 point that I posted has 8 scorable tines that are roughtly 9" each (excluding the 1 point kicker), main beam length of 31", 6 scorable girth measurements at 5" each, and an inside main spread of 24".  Add all those up (9+8+8+7+9+8+8+7+5+5+4+5+5+4+31+31+24) = 178"

Ummm...you forgot tip to tip score and widest part outide spread. 178 + 60 or more inches you missed

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32939
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: 300" rosey pics
« Reply #46 on: October 13, 2016, 06:20:39 PM »
Can either of you break down your 175 number?  We are talking about the bull Forks posted?

I believe rereading birdblasters post him and I were referring to the 5 in his picture.

Yes, I was referring to the bull I posted.   I'm just trying to help with accurate numbers of bull that were actually scored.  I don't want people to think they shot a 300" bull, get it scored, and then find out its only 250".  That's all.

For quick reference, the 175" 5 point that I posted has 8 scorable tines that are roughtly 9" each (excluding the 1 point kicker), main beam length of 31", 6 scorable girth measurements at 5" each, and an inside main spread of 24".  Add all those up (9+8+8+7+9+8+8+7+5+5+4+5+5+4+31+31+24) = 178"

Ummm...you forgot tip to tip score and widest part outide spread. 178 + 60 or more inches you missed

 Only spread measurement included in score is inside. ;)

 I suspect the measurements you are referring to is why many mule deer hunters seem to always be claiming their 160 class bucks are 180" :dunno:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline MtnMuley

  • Site Sponsor
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 8700
  • Location: NCW
Re: 300" rosey pics
« Reply #47 on: October 13, 2016, 06:27:43 PM »
 :chuckle:

Offline highside74

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 5401
  • Location: Eatonville wa
Re: 300" rosey pics
« Reply #48 on: October 13, 2016, 06:28:04 PM »
Boone and crockett



Offline link

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 1214
Re: 300" rosey pics
« Reply #49 on: October 13, 2016, 06:33:19 PM »
And you get 4 mass measurements per side also. Even on a five point.

Offline highside74

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 5401
  • Location: Eatonville wa
Re: 300" rosey pics
« Reply #50 on: October 13, 2016, 06:34:13 PM »
And that goes for pope and young also. Sci drops one width but scores all totals.

So I guess that's why my wife thinks I know everything. 

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32939
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: 300" rosey pics
« Reply #51 on: October 13, 2016, 06:34:53 PM »
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline lewy

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 3986
  • Location: buckley
  • IBEW RMEF WSTA WCO NRA
Re: 300" rosey pics
« Reply #52 on: October 13, 2016, 06:35:21 PM »
This is  :chuckle:
Go hawks

Offline kentrek

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 3499
  • Location: west coast
Re: 300" rosey pics
« Reply #53 on: October 13, 2016, 06:35:49 PM »
That bull forks posted is a giant....5 inches of mass ?? No way....that bulls proportions make it pretty tough to judge....


5 obviously don't score well but who cares....I'll take that 5 over my pretty 346 bull any day

I have no 300 inch Rosie's to add  :'(

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32939
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: 300" rosey pics
« Reply #54 on: October 13, 2016, 06:39:35 PM »
And that goes for pope and young also. Sci drops one width but scores all totals.

So I guess that's why my wife thinks I know everything.

 Don't feel bad, a lot of hunters think those measurements are included in the score. ;)
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline highside74

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 5401
  • Location: Eatonville wa
Re: 300" rosey pics
« Reply #55 on: October 13, 2016, 06:44:53 PM »
And that goes for pope and young also. Sci drops one width but scores all totals.

So I guess that's why my wife thinks I know everything.

 Don't feel bad, a lot of hunters think those measurements are included in the score. ;)

I'm not following you.  Are you being serious or messing with me? The score sheet is right there.

Offline highside74

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 5401
  • Location: Eatonville wa
Re: 300" rosey pics
« Reply #56 on: October 13, 2016, 06:47:24 PM »
I do see that the spread credit can't equal greater than the longest main beam.

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32939
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: 300" rosey pics
« Reply #57 on: October 13, 2016, 06:49:59 PM »
And that goes for pope and young also. Sci drops one width but scores all totals.

So I guess that's why my wife thinks I know everything.

 Don't feel bad, a lot of hunters think those measurements are included in the score. ;)

I'm not following you.  Are you being serious or messing with me? The score sheet is right there.

  :chuckle: No I'm not messing with you. ;)
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32939
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: 300" rosey pics
« Reply #58 on: October 13, 2016, 06:51:14 PM »
Which column does tip to tip and greatest spread show up in? ;)
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10706
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: 300" rosey pics
« Reply #59 on: October 13, 2016, 07:02:05 PM »
And that goes for pope and young also. Sci drops one width but scores all totals.

So I guess that's why my wife thinks I know everything.

 Don't feel bad, a lot of hunters think those measurements are included in the score. ;)

I'm not following you.  Are you being serious or messing with me? The score sheet is right there.
follow the boxes.  Only space to add in spread down below is spread credit which is the greatest point between the inside of the main beams but cannot exceed the longest main beam.  Also, if you print the score sheet off their Web page it prints two sheets.  One is the score sheet itself and the second is a detailed list of instructions.  Those other spread measurements are for infomation only.  Record keeping so to speak.  It's a common mistake that many make when scoring.
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Quality tag by Romulus1297
[Today at 11:51:27 PM]


Japanese Kei truck? by Happy Gilmore
[Today at 10:16:44 PM]


Re gearing the hunting rig by Happy Gilmore
[Today at 10:14:32 PM]


GM 6.6l gas 6 speed vs. 10 speed? by Happy Gilmore
[Today at 10:13:44 PM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by Machias
[Today at 10:11:25 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by jrebel
[Today at 09:28:18 PM]


CCW/SA small Supreme Court win+breaking down the WWF "Not my WDFW" Campaign by JakeLand
[Today at 09:25:42 PM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by HillHound
[Today at 07:57:50 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by MADMAX
[Today at 07:33:08 PM]


Dehydrating Chantrelles by MR5x5
[Today at 03:46:57 PM]


Displaced Hunting Camps? by elkaholic123
[Today at 01:34:10 PM]


Blue Tongue and EHD outbreak in NE Washington by Shooter4
[Today at 01:23:15 PM]


2025 opener by EnglishSetter
[Today at 11:57:00 AM]


Talking About Barely Legal by lewy
[Today at 10:00:55 AM]


Douglas 108 Moose tag by TriggerMike
[Yesterday at 09:06:30 PM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by lovetogrouse
[Yesterday at 07:42:22 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal