collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 300" rosey pics  (Read 25489 times)

Online highside74

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 5402
  • Location: Eatonville wa
Re: 300" rosey pics
« Reply #45 on: October 13, 2016, 05:44:25 PM »
Can either of you break down your 175 number?  We are talking about the bull Forks posted?

I believe rereading birdblasters post him and I were referring to the 5 in his picture.

Yes, I was referring to the bull I posted.   I'm just trying to help with accurate numbers of bull that were actually scored.  I don't want people to think they shot a 300" bull, get it scored, and then find out its only 250".  That's all.

For quick reference, the 175" 5 point that I posted has 8 scorable tines that are roughtly 9" each (excluding the 1 point kicker), main beam length of 31", 6 scorable girth measurements at 5" each, and an inside main spread of 24".  Add all those up (9+8+8+7+9+8+8+7+5+5+4+5+5+4+31+31+24) = 178"

Ummm...you forgot tip to tip score and widest part outide spread. 178 + 60 or more inches you missed

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32939
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: 300" rosey pics
« Reply #46 on: October 13, 2016, 06:20:39 PM »
Can either of you break down your 175 number?  We are talking about the bull Forks posted?

I believe rereading birdblasters post him and I were referring to the 5 in his picture.

Yes, I was referring to the bull I posted.   I'm just trying to help with accurate numbers of bull that were actually scored.  I don't want people to think they shot a 300" bull, get it scored, and then find out its only 250".  That's all.

For quick reference, the 175" 5 point that I posted has 8 scorable tines that are roughtly 9" each (excluding the 1 point kicker), main beam length of 31", 6 scorable girth measurements at 5" each, and an inside main spread of 24".  Add all those up (9+8+8+7+9+8+8+7+5+5+4+5+5+4+31+31+24) = 178"

Ummm...you forgot tip to tip score and widest part outide spread. 178 + 60 or more inches you missed

 Only spread measurement included in score is inside. ;)

 I suspect the measurements you are referring to is why many mule deer hunters seem to always be claiming their 160 class bucks are 180" :dunno:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline MtnMuley

  • Site Sponsor
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 8701
  • Location: NCW
Re: 300" rosey pics
« Reply #47 on: October 13, 2016, 06:27:43 PM »
 :chuckle:

Online highside74

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 5402
  • Location: Eatonville wa
Re: 300" rosey pics
« Reply #48 on: October 13, 2016, 06:28:04 PM »
Boone and crockett



Offline link

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 1214
Re: 300" rosey pics
« Reply #49 on: October 13, 2016, 06:33:19 PM »
And you get 4 mass measurements per side also. Even on a five point.

Online highside74

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 5402
  • Location: Eatonville wa
Re: 300" rosey pics
« Reply #50 on: October 13, 2016, 06:34:13 PM »
And that goes for pope and young also. Sci drops one width but scores all totals.

So I guess that's why my wife thinks I know everything. 

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32939
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: 300" rosey pics
« Reply #51 on: October 13, 2016, 06:34:53 PM »
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline lewy

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 3987
  • Location: buckley
  • IBEW RMEF WSTA WCO NRA
Re: 300" rosey pics
« Reply #52 on: October 13, 2016, 06:35:21 PM »
This is  :chuckle:
Go hawks

Offline kentrek

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 3499
  • Location: west coast
Re: 300" rosey pics
« Reply #53 on: October 13, 2016, 06:35:49 PM »
That bull forks posted is a giant....5 inches of mass ?? No way....that bulls proportions make it pretty tough to judge....


5 obviously don't score well but who cares....I'll take that 5 over my pretty 346 bull any day

I have no 300 inch Rosie's to add  :'(

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32939
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: 300" rosey pics
« Reply #54 on: October 13, 2016, 06:39:35 PM »
And that goes for pope and young also. Sci drops one width but scores all totals.

So I guess that's why my wife thinks I know everything.

 Don't feel bad, a lot of hunters think those measurements are included in the score. ;)
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Online highside74

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 5402
  • Location: Eatonville wa
Re: 300" rosey pics
« Reply #55 on: October 13, 2016, 06:44:53 PM »
And that goes for pope and young also. Sci drops one width but scores all totals.

So I guess that's why my wife thinks I know everything.

 Don't feel bad, a lot of hunters think those measurements are included in the score. ;)

I'm not following you.  Are you being serious or messing with me? The score sheet is right there.

Online highside74

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 5402
  • Location: Eatonville wa
Re: 300" rosey pics
« Reply #56 on: October 13, 2016, 06:47:24 PM »
I do see that the spread credit can't equal greater than the longest main beam.

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32939
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: 300" rosey pics
« Reply #57 on: October 13, 2016, 06:49:59 PM »
And that goes for pope and young also. Sci drops one width but scores all totals.

So I guess that's why my wife thinks I know everything.

 Don't feel bad, a lot of hunters think those measurements are included in the score. ;)

I'm not following you.  Are you being serious or messing with me? The score sheet is right there.

  :chuckle: No I'm not messing with you. ;)
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32939
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: 300" rosey pics
« Reply #58 on: October 13, 2016, 06:51:14 PM »
Which column does tip to tip and greatest spread show up in? ;)
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10706
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: 300" rosey pics
« Reply #59 on: October 13, 2016, 07:02:05 PM »
And that goes for pope and young also. Sci drops one width but scores all totals.

So I guess that's why my wife thinks I know everything.

 Don't feel bad, a lot of hunters think those measurements are included in the score. ;)

I'm not following you.  Are you being serious or messing with me? The score sheet is right there.
follow the boxes.  Only space to add in spread down below is spread credit which is the greatest point between the inside of the main beams but cannot exceed the longest main beam.  Also, if you print the score sheet off their Web page it prints two sheets.  One is the score sheet itself and the second is a detailed list of instructions.  Those other spread measurements are for infomation only.  Record keeping so to speak.  It's a common mistake that many make when scoring.
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Idaho on the verge of outlawing by hughjorgan
[Today at 09:41:43 AM]


MANDATORY REPORTING AND SUBMISSION FOR 100 GMU's!!! by Ridgeratt
[Today at 09:37:20 AM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by Big6bull
[Today at 09:23:16 AM]


As He Lay by kellama2001
[Today at 09:16:57 AM]


49 DN Moose Success by pianoman9701
[Today at 09:15:53 AM]


Color phase fox by Loup Loup
[Today at 08:14:09 AM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 08:10:07 AM]


Deer in the snow by jstone
[Today at 07:34:15 AM]


Chasing wild chickens. by Shannon
[Today at 07:25:44 AM]


Boring & relining .22 barrel, any recommendations? by Blacktail Sniper
[Today at 07:19:07 AM]


Pheasant Release Program by Threewolves
[Today at 06:27:30 AM]


Moose's 2025 Upland Season by Threewolves
[Today at 06:21:20 AM]


A few grouse by Threewolves
[Today at 06:12:35 AM]


Japanese Kei truck? by trophyhunt
[Today at 06:05:20 AM]


No tracking dogs in Weyerhaeuser by Goshawk
[Yesterday at 09:29:14 PM]


Yukon wolf by HUNTINCOUPLE
[Yesterday at 09:28:43 PM]


Daughters doubled up before 8am by Widgeondeke
[Yesterday at 08:37:02 PM]


SPIKE??? by carpsniperg2
[Yesterday at 08:08:17 PM]


2025 sheds….let's see em by PastorJoel
[Yesterday at 05:20:00 PM]


Rimrock Bull: Modern by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 04:03:17 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal